Mega Edition:  How Andrew's Own Behavior Left Him With No Off Ramp (11/14/25)

Mega Edition: How Andrew's Own Behavior Left Him With No Off Ramp (11/14/25)

Prince Andrew’s entanglement with Jeffrey Epstein reached a point where there was no off-ramp, no graceful escape route left for him to take. From the moment photos surfaced of him walking with Epstein in Central Park after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, his public credibility began to erode. Every attempt to distance himself only made things worse—his disastrous 2019 BBC interview cemented his reputation as arrogant, evasive, and tone-deaf. Instead of expressing remorse or empathy for Epstein’s victims, he portrayed himself as the victim, insisting he’d done nothing wrong while offering implausible excuses about medical conditions and faulty memories. The public and the press weren’t buying it. With Epstein’s death reigniting global outrage, Andrew found himself cornered by mounting evidence of his closeness to the financier—flight logs, photos, and testimony from Virginia Giuffre made denial untenable.

By the time Andrew settled Giuffre’s civil lawsuit in 2022, reportedly for millions, his royal career was finished. The Queen stripped him of his military titles and public duties, while King Charles quietly ensured his permanent exile from frontline royal life. Every possible exit strategy—silence, denial, legal settlements, staged contrition—had failed. Epstein’s shadow had consumed Andrew’s reputation, leaving him radioactive even within his own family. What began as an elite friendship turned into a life sentence of disgrace; there was no PR fix, no royal favor, no public forgiveness that could undo the damage. Epstein’s name became an anchor Andrew could never cut loose from—dragging him deeper every time he tried to escape.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Episoder(1000)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 4)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 4)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

13 Okt 12min

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 3)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 3)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

13 Okt 12min

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 2)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 2)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Okt 10min

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 1)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 1)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Okt 10min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 3) (10/12/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 3) (10/12/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Okt 16min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 2) (10/12/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 2) (10/12/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Okt 14min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 1) (10/12/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 1) (10/12/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Okt 14min

The Mega Edition: Sara Rivers And Her Allegations Against Diddy (Parts 3-4) (10/12/25)

The Mega Edition: Sara Rivers And Her Allegations Against Diddy (Parts 3-4) (10/12/25)

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Okt 22min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
aftenpodden-usa
forklart
popradet
stopp-verden
dine-penger-pengeradet
det-store-bildet
fotballpodden-2
nokon-ma-ga
e24-podden
bt-dokumentar-2
aftenbla-bla
frokostshowet-pa-p5
rss-gukild-johaug
rss-ness
rss-dannet-uten-piano
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk
kommentarer-fra-aftenposten
ukrainapodden