Mega Edition:  Is The Epstein Investigation Genuine Or Another Attempt To Bury The Truth? (2/9/26)

Mega Edition: Is The Epstein Investigation Genuine Or Another Attempt To Bury The Truth? (2/9/26)

The controversy surrounding the Epstein files has intensified following President Trump’s public directive calling on Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice to launch a new investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s associations—specifically targeting political opponents and several high-profile figures in finance and technology. The timing of this announcement is drawing significant scrutiny, arriving just months after the DOJ and FBI publicly stated that they had already conducted a comprehensive review of all Epstein-related materials, including more than 300 gigabytes of digital evidence, and concluded there was no basis to open any further criminal inquiries. That review asserted that the majority of evidence remained sealed primarily to protect victims and that there was no credible evidence of an Epstein “client list” or coordinated blackmail operation. Critics argue that the sudden reversal raises red flags about political motivations rather than new facts, particularly as Congress moves forward with a discharge petition intended to force the release of unredacted Epstein records to the public.

Legal scholars and government accountability watchdogs warn that labeling this sudden initiative an “ongoing investigation” could be used to halt congressional access to Epstein-related records and effectively freeze public disclosure for months or even years. Under DOJ policy, active investigations allow the government to withhold documents that would otherwise be subject to subpoenas or release mandates, raising concerns that the move could function as a procedural shield rather than a legitimate inquiry. Critics argue that invoking investigative privilege at this moment—after years of limited transparency and repeated failures to hold institutions accountable—risks undermining public trust in the justice system and may set a dangerous precedent in which politically motivated probes are used to obstruct oversight. With bipartisan pressure continuing to build around the discharge petition seeking full release of the Epstein files, the coming weeks will test whether Congress can assert its authority or whether the executive branch can successfully deploy legal mechanisms to re-seal evidence and control the narrative around one of the most consequential criminal scandals in modern American history.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jaksot(1000)

Minimization as Complicity: How Epstein Is Still Being Enabled (2/9/26)

Minimization as Complicity: How Epstein Is Still Being Enabled (2/9/26)

There is nothing unclear about Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes, and anyone pretending otherwise is not confused, they are cowardly. The files are explicit and repetitive, documenting a system of abuse built ...

9 Helmi 11min

Someone Went Up the Stairs the Night Epstein Died—So Why Were We Told No One Did?  (2/9/26)

Someone Went Up the Stairs the Night Epstein Died—So Why Were We Told No One Did? (2/9/26)

Newly released Department of Justice documents from the ongoing Epstein Files review include surveillance logs that appear to contradict parts of the official narrative of Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2...

9 Helmi 21min

Caught in Black and White: How Epstein Emails Expose Howard Lutnick’s Lies (2/9/26)

Caught in Black and White: How Epstein Emails Expose Howard Lutnick’s Lies (2/9/26)

In the newly released tranche of the Epstein files—millions of internal emails and documents made public by the U.S. Department of Justice—correspondence involving Howard Lutnick has revealed details ...

9 Helmi 11min

Mark Epstein Says His Brother Was Murdered And He Thinks Trump Is Responsible (2/9/26)

Mark Epstein Says His Brother Was Murdered And He Thinks Trump Is Responsible (2/9/26)

Mark Epstein has consistently stated that he does not believe his brother, Jeffrey Epstein, died by suicide and has instead argued that he was murdered while in federal custody. From the beginning, Ma...

9 Helmi 12min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 10-11) 2/8/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 10-11) 2/8/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

9 Helmi 23min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 7-9) 2/8/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 7-9) 2/8/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

9 Helmi 33min

Judge Hippler's Order On Bryan Kohberger's Capital Punishment Motions  (Part 8)

Judge Hippler's Order On Bryan Kohberger's Capital Punishment Motions (Part 8)

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentenc...

9 Helmi 14min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
tervo-halme
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
viisupodi
rss-podme-livebox
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
rss-asiastudio
otetaan-yhdet
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
the-ulkopolitist
linda-maria
rikosmyytit
rss-mina-ukkola
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
rss-merja-mahkan-rahat
radio-antro
rss-polikulaari-humanisti-vastaa-ja-muut-ts-podcastit
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka