Bank of America Settles Epstein Victim Lawsuit for $72.5 Million (3/30/26)

Bank of America Settles Epstein Victim Lawsuit for $72.5 Million (3/30/26)

Bank of America agreed to pay approximately $72.5 million to settle a civil lawsuit brought by women who accused the bank of playing a role in enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation. The case alleged that the bank failed to flag suspicious financial activity tied to Epstein and his associates, despite what plaintiffs described as clear warning signs, and that it financially benefited from maintaining relationships within Epstein’s network. The lawsuit was filed as a proposed class action and covered a period after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, focusing on whether the bank ignored red flags in order to continue doing business. A federal judge had previously allowed key portions of the case to proceed, including claims that the bank may have knowingly benefited from Epstein’s activities.


As part of the settlement, Bank of America denied any wrongdoing and maintained that it did not facilitate Epstein’s crimes, framing the agreement as a way to resolve the matter and provide compensation to victims rather than an admission of liability. The deal still requires court approval, but it follows a broader pattern of major financial institutions paying large sums to settle similar allegations tied to Epstein, including earlier payouts by JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank. The case also highlighted financial ties between Epstein and powerful figures moving money through the banking system, reinforcing ongoing concerns about how elite financial networks may have intersected with—and potentially enabled—his operation even after his criminal history was widely known.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:


Epstein victims get $72.5M from Bank of America settlement









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jaksot(1000)

Private Hands, Public Questions: Epstein Evidence Removal Sparks Congressional Probe (3/30/26)

Private Hands, Public Questions: Epstein Evidence Removal Sparks Congressional Probe (3/30/26)

House Democrats on the Oversight Committee are seeking testimony from three private investigators—Paul Lavery, Stephen Kiraly, and William Riley—who allegedly removed a significant amount of material ...

30 Maalis 16min

Inside the Epstein Files: Modeling Agent’s Disturbing Outreach to Jeffrey Epstein (3/30/26)

Inside the Epstein Files: Modeling Agent’s Disturbing Outreach to Jeffrey Epstein (3/30/26)

The communications in question center on a modeling agent who maintained a long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, during which he repeatedly attempted to introduce young women to him under th...

30 Maalis 11min

Mega Edition: Virginia Roberts Responds To Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Part 1-2) (3/30/26)

Mega Edition: Virginia Roberts Responds To Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Part 1-2) (3/30/26)

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's a...

30 Maalis 25min

Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Parts 4-5) (3/30/26)

Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Parts 4-5) (3/30/26)

In the defamation lawsuit Giuffre v. Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell submitted a Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts as part of her motion for summary judgment. This statement aimed to establi...

30 Maalis 31min

Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Parts 1-3) (3/29/26)

Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Rule 56.1 Statement Of Facts (Parts 1-3) (3/29/26)

In the defamation lawsuit Giuffre v. Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell submitted a Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts as part of her motion for summary judgment. This statement aimed to establi...

30 Maalis 40min

Tea, Titles, and Trafficking: Prince Andrew’s Cozy Correspondence With Jeffrey Epstein

Tea, Titles, and Trafficking: Prince Andrew’s Cozy Correspondence With Jeffrey Epstein

Prince Andrew has become the walking definition of hypocrisy — a royal parasite sitting comfortably in Royal Lodge while pretending “no one is above the law.” The newly unearthed emails to Jeffrey Eps...

30 Maalis 13min

No Title, No Honor, No Dignity:   Andrew Is Stripped Of All Remaining Titles And Honors (Part 3)

No Title, No Honor, No Dignity: Andrew Is Stripped Of All Remaining Titles And Honors (Part 3)

Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prer...

30 Maalis 13min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

uutiscast
aikalisa
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
tervo-halme
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
rss-podme-livebox
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
rss-asiastudio
otetaan-yhdet
the-ulkopolitist
rss-hyvaa-huomenta-bryssel
rss-merja-mahkan-rahat
aihe
rikosmyytit
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka
rss-aijat-hopottaa-podcast
rss-polikulaari-pitka-kiekko-ja-muut-ts-podcastit