47: Truth bombs from a methodological freedom fighter (with Anne Scheel)

In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Anne Scheel (LMU Munich) to discuss open science advocacy. Highlights: - How Anne became an open science advocate - Open science is better science - Methodological terrorists/freedom fighters - The time Anne stood up after a conference keynote and asked a question - Asking poor PhD students to pay for conference costs upfront and then reimbursing them 6 months later - Is it worth if for early career researchers to push open science practices? - How to begin with implementing open science practices - Power analysis should be normal practice, it shouldn’t be controversial - Anne’s going to start a podcast - The 100%CI: A long copy blog with 4 writers - The benefits of preprints and blogging - Science communication in English for non-native English speakers - Doing stuff that interests you vs. stuff that’s meant to advance your career Twitter accounts of people/things we mentioned: @dalejbarr - 2:10 @siminevazire - 2:45 @lakens - 2:45 @nicebread303 (Felix Schönbrodt)- 3:50 @annaveer - 21:40 @methodpodcast - 29:20 @the100ci - 30:40 @realscientists - 31:40 @upulie - 31:55 @fMRIguy (Jens Foell) - 32:20 @realsciDE (Real scientists Germany) - 32:30 @maltoesermalte, @rca, @dingdingpeng (100% CI team) - 33:55 @stuartJRitchie - 65:05 Links - Early Career Researchers and publishing practices: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1102/full (paywalled) - Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template” Paywalled link: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103116301925, Preprint link: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4frms/ - The CI 100%: http://www.the100.ci Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/ Special Guest: Anne Scheel.