No condom = no consent, when lawyers can't quit, and unjust enrichment

This week on Legally Speaking with Michael Mulligan: Section 273.1(1) of the Criminal Code specifies that a person’s voluntary agreement to “engage in the sexual activity in question” is required. Even where there is consent to sexual activity, it can be legally ineffective in various circumstances, including where the consent is obtained by force, the exercise of authority or fraud. In 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada decided on a case where an accused secretly sabotaged condoms by pok...