Diddy Defendants Move To Dismiss The Shareka Sherrod Allegations With Prejudice (7/6/25)

Bill Barr’s deposition before Congress on Jeffrey Epstein was a masterclass in calculated deflection. While Barr insisted that Epstein’s death was “absolutely” suicide, he conceded that the prison surveillance system had “blind spots”—a detail that conveniently leaves just enough room for speculation without providing definitive answers. His reliance on flawed or incomplete camera footage, combined with his dismissal of alternative forensic perspectives, came off less like transparency and more like institutional damage control. Instead of holding the Bureau of Prisons accountable, Barr’s narrative positioned the failures as unfortunate but inconsequential, a stance that fails to satisfy the public demand for clarity.Just as troubling was Barr’s evasiveness when pressed about Donald Trump’s knowledge of Epstein. He admitted to having spoken with Trump about Epstein’s death but couldn’t recall when one of those conversations occurred—an astonishing lapse considering the gravity of the matter. His reasoning that “if there were more to it, it would have leaked” was not only flippant but dismissive of the very real history of suppression, obstruction, and selective disclosure that has defined the Epstein saga. By leaning on institutional trust in a case defined by betrayal of that very trust, Barr’s testimony did little more than reinforce suspicions that the Department of Justice has long been more concerned with containment than accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Barr-Transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Syys 11min

The Epstein cover-up isn’t just corruption—it’s an insult to everyone’s intelligence. The powerful trot out the same tired lines—“we’re investigating,” “we didn’t know,” “our hands are tied”—while survivors are still screaming and files remain sealed. Politicians pound tables for the cameras, the FBI pretends to be helpless, and institutions hide behind PR spin, charity donations, and crocodile tears. The arrogance is breathtaking: they think if they stall long enough, the public will forget. But the public isn’t forgetting, because everyone knows this wasn’t ignorance—it was complicity.At its core, this isn’t just about Epstein—it’s about a system rotted through with people who knew, who benefited, and who chose to protect themselves instead of the victims. Every sealed file, every redacted name, every “move on” excuse is proof that power protects power at all costs. The outrage won’t fade, because truth doesn’t expire. The longer they bury it, the hotter the rage burns. And when the dam breaks, every enabler—from politicians to royals to institutions that took the money—will drown in the flood of accountability they thought they could dodge.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Syys 11min

The Thomas Massie/Ro Khana discharge petition to bring Jeffrey Epstein’s sealed files to the House floor has surged forward, closing in on the 218 votes required. With all 212 Democrats unified in support, the math is simple: just a handful of Republicans breaking ranks will guarantee the petition’s success. The momentum has been further fueled by the Arizona special election, where the victor pledged to add their name as soon as they’re sworn in, potentially becoming the tipping point.Republican leadership, however, is digging in its heels. Reports have surfaced of threats and pressure campaigns aimed at peeling away GOP support, a reflection of the desperation to keep the vote from hitting the magic number. But if Massie secures the final signatures, leadership will lose control, and the House will be compelled to go on record in full public view. At that moment, lawmakers will have to choose between protecting secrets or siding with transparency—an unavoidable reckoning that could fracture party lines and ignite a political firestorm.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:House nears vote to compel release of Jeffrey Epstein filesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Syys 16min

This morning’s Epstein-related headlines captured a mix of political, legal, and royal fallout. In Washington, a provocative bronze statue of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein holding hands was installed overnight on the National Mall and swiftly removed by U.S. Park Police for lacking proper authorization. The work, titled “Best Friends Forever,” was claimed by an anonymous art collective as political satire, provoking crowds and online debate before authorities dismantled it. The episode highlighted ongoing tensions around Trump’s past ties to Epstein and the broader fight over transparency in the case.At the same time, James O’Keefe released hidden-camera footage of former DOJ official Glenn Prager alleging that Trump is blocking the release of Epstein-related files, even claiming Epstein had been a CIA asset—remarks that DOJ dismissed as misleading. Meanwhile, Princess Eugenie launched an anti-trafficking campaign in New York to address exploitation in counterfeit fashion supply chains. Her initiative, though welcomed by some human rights groups, was quickly overshadowed by renewed scrutiny of her parents’ ties to Epstein, underscoring how the scandal continues to reverberate across politics and royalty alike.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Syys 11min

James O’Keefe (via his O’Keefe Media / Project Veritas apparatus) recently released a covert recording of Glenn Prager, a former DOJ official, during a flight from Phoenix to Washington. In the video, Prager asserts that Epstein was a CIA asset, alleges that President Trump is not personally implicated in Epstein-related sexual crimes, and claims Trump’s reluctance to release files stems from a desire to “protect a lot of people.” He further argues that his interviews with Epstein victims and review of itineraries found no evidence of Trump being present during assaults, while drawing a sharp contrast to Bill Clinton, whom he said was present during alleged rapes.The Department of Justice swiftly pushed back, stating that Prager’s role was limited to a program analyst position more than fifteen years ago and that he lacks direct knowledge of the Epstein investigations. The DOJ called his statements unreliable and criticized the release as exploitative of sexual abuse victims. Meanwhile, the recording has ignited renewed calls among critics and some Republicans for more transparency in the Epstein case and fresh scrutiny of withheld DOJ files.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein Investigator Taped Admitting Donald Trump ‘Covered Up’ FilesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Syys 16min

Sarah Kellen (also known as Sarah Vickers), once a trusted aide in Jeffrey Epstein’s inner circle, has long avoided criminal charges despite repeated allegations that place her at the heart of his sex-trafficking operations. Witnesses during Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial testified that Kellen helped schedule and facilitate sexualized “massages” — some involving minors — and a federal judge during Maxwell’s sentencing explicitly called Kellen “a knowing participant in the criminal conspiracy” and “criminally responsible,” yet she remains unindicted. In addition, Kellen’s name was listed as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in Epstein’s 2007 non-prosecution deal, a legal safeguard that has repeatedly shielded key associates of Epstein from prosecution.The reasons she has so far escaped prison are systemic and deeply troubling: prosecutorial discretion, insufficient willingness to pursue powerful enablers, and the invocation of legal immunities and procedural barriers. Though courts have acknowledged her culpability in written rulings, no one has yet brought charges, and she has been able to evade serving subpoenas or depositions, further blocking accountability. In effect, Kellen benefits from both the same structural protection that helped shield Epstein and his inner circle, and the impossibility of prosecuting a deceased ringleader — leaving her lurking in the shadows, unpunished despite having been publicly named as central to the conspiratorial enterprise.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Syys 46min

Neighbors have complained that Sarah Kellen Vickers and her husband are unpleasant and disruptive to live near. Reports describe late-night disturbances, loud behavior, and an apparent disregard for community standards, with neighbors calling them “horrible neighbors.” Accounts point to neglected property upkeep, tensions over shared spaces, and a general atmosphere of hostility that makes her unwelcome in her own neighborhood. These stories add another layer of negativity to her public image, showing that the toxicity surrounding her extends beyond her Epstein ties and into her day-to-day life.Even acknowledging the tabloid nature of some of these reports, the portrait that emerges is one of consistent friction with those living nearby. Neighbors have alleged a pattern of inconsiderate conduct, from blocking driveways to failing to keep their home in order, creating a lingering sense of resentment in the community. While she may have avoided prison, she has not avoided the ire of those forced to share their block with her, who see her not just as a disgraced Epstein associate but also as a blight on their neighborhood.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Syys 36min

Lilly Ann Sanchez played a legally significant but deeply controversial role in the Epstein saga: she was one of Jeffrey Epstein’s attorneys and signed key documents related to his immunity deal. In particular, she is listed as attorney for Epstein in the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that granted him sweeping protections from federal prosecution, enabling him to plead to lesser state charges while shielding many potential co-conspirators. Her involvement continues to elicit scrutiny because the NPA was criticized for its secrecy, for failing to notify many victims, and for using procedural maneuvers that effectively gutted accountability.Michael Reiter served as the Palm Beach, Florida, police chief from 2001 to 2009, and he spearheaded the earliest law enforcement efforts to investigate Epstein’s sexual misconduct. In 2005–2006, Reiter directed surveillance on Epstein’s Palm Beach properties, gathered evidence (including notepads recovered from trash) implicating underage victims, and pressed prosecutors for more serious charges than they ultimately pursued. He later publicly denounced the lenient handling of the case (especially the 2007 non-prosecution agreement), calling the Florida prosecutorial outcome a monumental failure of justice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

25 Syys 42min