Bryan Kohberger Responds To The States Continuance Objection (Part 1)

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State’s opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger’s legal team argues that the prosecution’s objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger’s constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.


Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State’s assertion that further delay is unwarranted.













to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.