The Billionaire's Playboy Club: A Memoir By Virginia Roberts (Chapter 1-Part 2) (10/7/25)

In June 2023, JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay $290 million to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by victims of Jeffrey Epstein, who accused the bank of enabling and profiting from his sex trafficking network. The lawsuit alleged that JPMorgan knowingly ignored numerous red flags — including large cash withdrawals, suspicious payments, and Epstein’s prior criminal conviction — in order to retain his lucrative business. Victims claimed the bank’s failure to act made it complicit in sustaining Epstein’s operation. The settlement, which did not include an admission of wrongdoing, was approved by U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff, marking one of the largest payouts ever by a financial institution tied to a human trafficking case.However, the deal faced backlash from 17 state attorneys general, including those from New Mexico, California, and the District of Columbia, who objected to the language of the settlement. They argued that its release terms were overly broad and could prevent state governments from pursuing future legal claims related to Epstein or other trafficking cases involving JPMorgan. The attorneys general warned that the agreement could unintentionally shield the bank from government enforcement actions under state or federal anti-trafficking laws. Despite their objections, Judge Rakoff ultimately approved the settlement, ruling that the release language did not infringe on the sovereign enforcement rights of states and that the agreement was fair, reasonable, and in the best interest of the victims.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

8 Loka 32min

Guzel Ganieva, a former Russian model, accused billionaire Leon Black of sexual abuse, coercion, and defamation stemming from a relationship that began in 2008. She alleged that Black raped her in 2014, engaged in “sadistic sexual acts,” and forced her into signing a nondisclosure agreement under duress to keep her silent. Ganieva claimed that Black used his wealth and power to control her and made payments to maintain her silence. Black denied all wrongdoing, describing the relationship as consensual and accusing Ganieva of extortion. The lawsuit gained national attention due to Black’s high-profile status as co-founder of Apollo Global Management and his financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein.In March 2023, Ganieva fired her legal team, Wigdor LLP, citing an “irrevocable breakdown” in their attorney-client relationship and moved to represent herself. A New York State Supreme Court judge later granted Wigdor’s request to withdraw. In May 2023, a judge dismissed Ganieva’s defamation claims, ruling that the nondisclosure agreement she signed — and accepted $9.5 million from — barred her case and that she had ratified the deal by taking its benefits. Ganieva appealed, but courts have continued to uphold the dismissal. Black later sued both Ganieva and her former law firm for malicious prosecution, alleging reputational damage, and while parts of that countersuit were dismissed, other claims were allowed to proceed.to contact me:bobbyapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

8 Loka 42min

Before his 2008 sentencing in Palm Beach County, Jeffrey Epstein submitted a letter to the court that was equal parts self-pitying and self-justifying. In it, he portrayed himself not as a predator but as a man who had made “a mistake,” downplaying the gravity of his crimes by framing them as poor decisions rather than deliberate exploitation. Epstein tried to convince the judge that he had “suffered enough” through public humiliation, financial loss, and the strain on his reputation. He emphasized his supposed philanthropy and cooperation with law enforcement, arguing that he had contributed to society through charitable donations and educational initiatives—an attempt to rebrand himself as a misunderstood benefactor instead of an orchestrator of abuse.The letter also carried an unmistakable undertone of arrogance. Epstein implied that his wealth, connections, and community standing should earn him leniency, reminding the court of his long list of “accomplishments” and insisting he posed no threat of reoffending. There was no genuine remorse, no acknowledgment of the pain inflicted on the dozens of girls he victimized—only concern for himself and his legacy. The tone was carefully crafted to sound reflective but landed as manipulative and hollow. In retrospect, the letter encapsulated Epstein’s entire strategy: weaponizing privilege, charm, and influence to elude true accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

8 Loka 16min

The U.S. Virgin Islands formally ended its civil racketeering (CICO) lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein’s estate in late 2022 after reaching a $105 million settlement, marking the close of one of the most aggressive legal efforts to hold his operation accountable. The lawsuit had accused Epstein’s estate of operating a criminal enterprise under the federal RICO framework—alleging that his private island, Little St. James, was used as a hub for sex trafficking, coercion, and the movement of victims across international lines. The territory’s Attorney General’s Office argued that Epstein’s vast web of shell companies and real estate holdings were tools to facilitate and conceal illegal activity, effectively turning the U.S. Virgin Islands into the epicenter of his trafficking operation. By ending the case, the territory secured both financial restitution and the right to pursue claims against co-conspirators and associated entities.While the settlement concluded the direct case against the Epstein estate, it left open the possibility of continued investigations into those who helped enable his crimes within the islands’ jurisdiction. The deal required the estate to sell Epstein’s island properties and distribute funds to survivors, with part of the proceeds going to local anti-trafficking initiatives. In public statements, the U.S. Virgin Islands government characterized the resolution as a “victory for justice,” though critics noted that it avoided full discovery and depositions that might have exposed more about Epstein’s powerful network. The case’s conclusion symbolized a pragmatic end to litigation—but also reinforced a lingering frustration: even in death, Epstein managed to settle before the full truth ever reached open court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

8 Loka 11min

Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein once attempted to form a partnership to buy a controlling stake in New York Magazine in the early 2000s—a deal that collapsed as fast as it began. The arrangement was supposed to merge Epstein’s financial clout with Weinstein’s media ambitions, creating a powerhouse that would fuse money, influence, and cultural reach under one brand. Epstein, who wanted credibility among Manhattan’s elite, viewed the magazine as a gateway into legitimate high society, while Weinstein saw it as a prestige acquisition that would amplify his already considerable sway in entertainment and politics. Together, they envisioned transforming New York Magazine into a hybrid platform of culture, power, and celebrity access. But almost immediately, the partnership unraveled. Epstein found Weinstein volatile and self-serving, while Weinstein reportedly grew wary of Epstein’s secretive, predatory reputation and shady financial dealings.By most accounts, their attempted collaboration was doomed from the start—a combustible mix of two men whose egos and appetites far exceeded their judgment. Negotiations deteriorated amid mutual suspicion, personality clashes, and concern that their respective scandals-in-the-making could taint the brand before any deal was finalized. Ultimately, the New York Magazine acquisition never materialized, leaving behind only rumors and recriminations within Manhattan’s power circles. Ironically, both men’s downfalls years later mirrored each other’s: two predators brought low by their own excess, arrogance, and exploitation of women. The failed New York Magazine venture stands as a darkly poetic moment in modern media history—an aborted alliance between two of the most disgraced figures of their generation, united briefly by greed and the hunger for legitimacy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

7 Loka 13min

After Jeffrey Epstein’s 2019 arrest, billionaire financier Leon Black scrambled to distance himself from the disgraced sex offender, despite years of documented financial and personal ties. Black initially portrayed his connection to Epstein as limited to “tax and estate planning advice,” claiming he was unaware of Epstein’s criminal activities and had ended all contact after learning of them. But that narrative began to crumble when reports revealed Black had paid Epstein roughly $158 million between 2012 and 2017—years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from a minor. Under growing scrutiny, Black stepped down as CEO and chairman of Apollo Global Management in 2021 following an internal investigation that, while stopping short of criminal findings, confirmed that his payments to Epstein were far larger and more frequent than previously disclosed.Publicly, Black sought to frame himself as a victim of Epstein’s manipulative charm, describing their relationship as a “terrible mistake” born of misplaced trust in a man who “betrayed” him. Privately, however, former associates and leaked correspondence suggested the two had shared a closer dynamic, with Epstein advising on personal matters, charitable giving, and even meeting members of Black’s family. The fallout tarnished Black’s reputation permanently, forcing him into partial exile from the financial elite he once dominated. His attempts to rebrand the connection as a naïve business misjudgment only deepened public skepticism—cementing his image as another powerful man who enabled, empowered, and profited from Jeffrey Epstein long after the rest of the world knew who and what he was.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

7 Loka 28min

In September 2021, the New York Times filed a lawsuit against Wayne Biggs Jr., CEO of the U.S. Virgin Islands’ Economic Development Authority (EDA), and the Virgin Islands government, seeking access to financial and business records tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s activities in the territory. The Times claimed these records were public under local statutes and that transparency was necessary to understand Epstein’s financial footprint in the Virgin Islands and the EDA’s dealings. They argued that Biggs and the government had improperly withheld documents relevant to Epstein’s investments, property dealings, and possible influence in local economic affairs.The suit represented a broader effort by the press and public interest groups to pierce the veil of secrecy around Epstein’s financial network—especially in jurisdictions where public records laws often clash with powerful private interests. The legal action underscored tensions between government withholding and demands for accountability in investigations related to Epstein’s legacy of abuse, trafficking, and financial mystery.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

7 Loka 23min

Diddy is asking the court to let him serve his federal sentence at Fort Dix, a correctional facility in New Jersey. It’s a bold move — of all the prisons he could’ve picked (or been assigned), he’s aiming for the one whose name is, well, hard to ignore. He’s framing it as a legal decision — closer to family, better conditions, whatever the rationale given — but the very choice of “Dix” adds a layer of unmissable irony.However, the final placement decision rests not with the court but with the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), which considers multiple factors including security classification, institutional capacity, medical and programming needs, and disciplinary history before assigning a facility. While a judge’s recommendation may be noted, it is not binding. The BOP ultimately has full discretion to determine where Combs will serve his time once his designation process is completed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs requests to serve sentence in low-security NJ prison FCI Fort DixBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

7 Loka 11min