#110 – Holden Karnofsky on building aptitudes and kicking ass

#110 – Holden Karnofsky on building aptitudes and kicking ass

Holden Karnofsky helped create two of the most influential organisations in the effective philanthropy world. So when he outlines a different perspective on career advice than the one we present at 80,000 Hours — we take it seriously.

Holden disagrees with us on a few specifics, but it's more than that: he prefers a different vibe when making career choices, especially early in one's career.

Links to learn more, summary and full transcript.

While he might ultimately recommend similar jobs to those we recommend at 80,000 Hours, the reasons are often different.

At 80,000 Hours we often talk about ‘paths’ to working on what we currently think of as the most pressing problems in the world. That’s partially because people seem to prefer the most concrete advice possible.

But Holden thinks a problem with that kind of advice is that it’s hard to take actions based on it if your job options don’t match well with your plan, and it’s hard to get a reliable signal about whether you're making the right choices.

How can you know you’ve chosen the right cause? How can you know the job you’re aiming for will be helpful to that cause? And what if you can’t get a job in this area at all?

Holden prefers to focus on ‘aptitudes’ that you can build in all sorts of different roles and cause areas, which can later be applied more directly.

Even if the current role doesn’t work out, or your career goes in wacky directions you’d never anticipated (like so many successful careers do), or you change your whole worldview — you’ll still have access to this aptitude.

So instead of trying to become a project manager at an effective altruism organisation, maybe you should just become great at project management. Instead of trying to become a researcher at a top AI lab, maybe you should just become great at digesting hard problems.

Who knows where these skills will end up being useful down the road?

Holden doesn’t think you should spend much time worrying about whether you’re having an impact in the first few years of your career — instead you should just focus on learning to kick ass at something, knowing that most of your impact is going to come decades into your career.

He thinks as long as you’ve gotten good at something, there will usually be a lot of ways that you can contribute to solving the biggest problems.

But Holden’s most important point, perhaps, is this: Be very careful about following career advice at all.

He points out that a career is such a personal thing that it’s very easy for the advice-giver to be oblivious to important factors having to do with your personality and unique situation.

He thinks it’s pretty hard for anyone to really have justified empirical beliefs about career choice, and that you should be very hesitant to make a radically different decision than you would have otherwise based on what some person (or website!) tells you to do.

Instead, he hopes conversations like these serve as a way of prompting discussion and raising points that you can apply your own personal judgment to.

That's why in the end he thinks people should look at their career decisions through his aptitude lens, the '80,000 Hours lens', and ideally several other frameworks as well. Because any one perspective risks missing something important.

Holden and Rob also cover:

• Ways to be helpful to longtermism outside of careers
• Why finding a new cause area might be overrated
• Historical events that deserve more attention
• And much more

Chapters:

  • Rob’s intro (00:00:00)
  • Holden’s current impressions on career choice for longtermists (00:02:34)
  • Aptitude-first vs. career path-first approaches (00:08:46)
  • How to tell if you’re on track (00:16:24)
  • Just try to kick ass in whatever (00:26:00)
  • When not to take the thing you're excited about (00:36:54)
  • Ways to be helpful to longtermism outside of careers (00:41:36)
  • Things 80,000 Hours might be doing wrong (00:44:31)
  • The state of longtermism (00:51:50)
  • Money pits (01:02:10)
  • Broad longtermism (01:06:56)
  • Cause X (01:21:33)
  • Open Philanthropy (01:24:23)
  • COVID and the biorisk portfolio (01:35:09)
  • Has the world gotten better? (01:51:16)
  • Historical events that deserve more attention (01:55:11)
  • Applied epistemology (02:10:55)
  • What Holden has learned from COVID (02:20:55)
  • What Holden has gotten wrong recently (02:32:59)
  • Having a kid (02:39:50)

Producer: Keiran Harris
Audio mastering: Ben Cordell
Transcriptions: Sofia Davis-Fogel

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(358)

OpenAI Security: Controlling Models is Now ‘Hell’ (AI Explained cross-post)

OpenAI Security: Controlling Models is Now ‘Hell’ (AI Explained cross-post)

This is an (unpaid) cross-post of a video from the podcast 'AI Explained', which Rob Wiblin thought you might be interested in.You can find the original on YouTube here. If you like it and want more s...

9 Okt 40min

In 2023 Ajeya Cotra already knew what was coming (classic episode)

In 2023 Ajeya Cotra already knew what was coming (classic episode)

We're rereleasing some of older episodes that seem more relevant than ever with new rogue AI incidents now seemingly announced every day. Ajeya was one of three independent investigators into the Hugg...

8 Okt 2h 46min

19 Astra and 'Hugging Face' details that reveal what's coming next | Rob Wiblin

19 Astra and 'Hugging Face' details that reveal what's coming next | Rob Wiblin

OpenAI’s rogue agent swarm was eventually caught hacking Hugging Face for a simple reason: it wasn’t trying to hide from us at all. What could a swarm that wants to stay hidden get away with?Host Rob ...

2 Okt 20min

The case for giving AI (some) legal rights | Simon Goldstein

The case for giving AI (some) legal rights | Simon Goldstein

It sounds like the worst idea in the world: pay AIs, let them own property, give them rights. But AI ethics and safety researcher Simon Goldstein thinks it might actually be the best way to keep human...

1 Okt 1h 53min

Will AI take power — or will humans use it to take power first? With Katja Grace and Tom Davidson

Will AI take power — or will humans use it to take power first? With Katja Grace and Tom Davidson

In our first-ever debate, we asked two leading AI risk researchers which catastrophe we should fear most: misaligned AI seizing control from humans, or a small group of humans using AI to seize power....

29 Sep 1h 28min

How we get from AI cyberattacks to human extinction

How we get from AI cyberattacks to human extinction

You’ve seen the headlines: AI could kill us all. Think it sounds ridiculous? So did host Luisa Rodriguez, until she tried to pick apart the arguments. She starts with the motive: why would AI ‘want’ t...

24 Sep 27min

#254 – Max Nadeau on why ambitious people should start AI safety nonprofits

#254 – Max Nadeau on why ambitious people should start AI safety nonprofits

There are millions available for anyone who can launch a successful nonprofit AI safety startup. The hard part, it turns out, is finding people to take the money. Coefficient Giving has drawn up a lis...

17 Sep 1h 3min

Why the intelligence explosion can't happen inside a data centre | Tom Reed

Why the intelligence explosion can't happen inside a data centre | Tom Reed

AI systems are starting to build themselves. Because each generation of model will be better at building its successor than the last, it seems plausible that the full automation of AI R&D could rapidl...

10 Sep 22min

Populært innen Fakta

fastlegen
dine-penger-pengeradet
rss-kunsten-a-leve
relasjonspodden-med-dora-thorhallsdottir-kjersti-idem
rss-strid
rss-bisarr-historie
foreldreradet
treningspodden
rss-orjasater
jakt-og-fiskepodden
fryktlos
mikkels-paskenotter
sinnsyn
gravid-uke-for-uke
hr-podden-2
hverdagspsyken
takk-og-lov-med-anine-kierulf
rss-impressions-2
level-up-med-anniken-binz
dopet