Podme logo
HemUpptäckKategorierSökStudent
#191 (Part 2) – Carl Shulman on government and society after AGI

#191 (Part 2) – Carl Shulman on government and society after AGI

02:20:322024-07-05

Om avsnittet

This is the second part of our marathon interview with Carl Shulman. The first episode is on the economy and national security after AGI. You can listen to them in either order!If we develop artificial general intelligence that's reasonably aligned with human goals, it could put a fast and near-free superhuman advisor in everyone's pocket. How would that affect culture, government, and our ability to act sensibly and coordinate together?It's common to worry that AI advances will lead to a proliferation of misinformation and further disconnect us from reality. But in today's conversation, AI expert Carl Shulman argues that this underrates the powerful positive applications the technology could have in the public sphere.Links to learn more, highlights, and full transcript.As Carl explains, today the most important questions we face as a society remain in the "realm of subjective judgement" -- without any "robust, well-founded scientific consensus on how to answer them." But if AI 'evals' and interpretability advance to the point that it's possible to demonstrate which AI models have truly superhuman judgement and give consistently trustworthy advice, society could converge on firm or 'best-guess' answers to far more cases.If the answers are publicly visible and confirmable by all, the pressure on officials to act on that advice could be great. That's because when it's hard to assess if a line has been crossed or not, we usually give people much more discretion. For instance, a journalist inventing an interview that never happened will get fired because it's an unambiguous violation of honesty norms — but so long as there's no universally agreed-upon standard for selective reporting, that same journalist will have substantial discretion to report information that favours their preferred view more often than that which contradicts it.Similarly, today we have no generally agreed-upon way to tell when a decision-maker has behaved irresponsibly. But if experience clearly shows that following AI advice is the wise move, not seeking or ignoring such advice could become more like crossing a red line — less like making an understandable mistake and more like fabricating your balance sheet.To illustrate the possible impact, Carl imagines how the COVID pandemic could have played out in the presence of AI advisors that everyone agrees are exceedingly insightful and reliable. But in practice, a significantly superhuman AI might suggest novel approaches better than any we can suggest.In the past we've usually found it easier to predict how hard technologies like planes or factories will change than to imagine the social shifts that those technologies will create — and the same is likely happening for AI.Carl Shulman and host Rob Wiblin discuss the above, as well as:The risk of society using AI to lock in its values.The difficulty of preventing coups once AI is key to the military and police.What international treaties we need to make this go well.How to make AI superhuman at forecasting the future.Whether AI will be able to help us with intractable philosophical questions.Whether we need dedicated projects to make wise AI advisors, or if it will happen automatically as models scale.Why Carl doesn't support AI companies voluntarily pausing AI research, but sees a stronger case for binding international controls once we're closer to 'crunch time.'Opportunities for listeners to contribute to making the future go well.Chapters:Cold open (00:00:00)Rob’s intro (00:01:16)The interview begins (00:03:24)COVID-19 concrete example (00:11:18)Sceptical arguments against the effect of AI advisors (00:24:16)Value lock-in (00:33:59)How democracies avoid coups (00:48:08)Where AI could most easily help (01:00:25)AI forecasting (01:04:30)Application to the most challenging topics (01:24:03)How to make it happen (01:37:50)International negotiations and coordination and auditing (01:43:54)Opportunities for listeners (02:00:09)Why Carl doesn't support enforced pauses on AI research (02:03:58)How Carl is feeling about the future (02:15:47)Rob’s outro (02:17:37)Producer and editor: Keiran HarrisAudio engineering team: Ben Cordell, Simon Monsour, Milo McGuire, and Dominic ArmstrongTranscriptions: Katy Moore

Senaste avsnitten

80,000 Hours Podcast
80,000 Hours Podcast

#202 – Venki Ramakrishnan on the cutting edge of anti-ageing science

2024-09-192h 20min
80,000 Hours Podcast
80,000 Hours Podcast

#201 – Ken Goldberg on why your robot butler isn’t here yet

2024-09-132h 1min
80,000 Hours Podcast
80,000 Hours Podcast

#200 – Ezra Karger on what superforecasters and experts think about existential risks

2024-09-042h 49min
80,000 Hours Podcast
80,000 Hours Podcast

#199 – Nathan Calvin on California’s AI bill SB 1047 and its potential to shape US AI policy

2024-08-291h 12min
80,000 Hours Podcast
80,000 Hours Podcast

#198 – Meghan Barrett on challenging our assumptions about insects

2024-08-263h 48min
80,000 Hours Podcast
80,000 Hours Podcast

#197 – Nick Joseph on whether Anthropic's AI safety policy is up to the task

2024-08-222h 29min
80,000 Hours Podcast
80,000 Hours Podcast

#196 – Jonathan Birch on the edge cases of sentience and why they matter

2024-08-152h 1min
80,000 Hours Podcast
80,000 Hours Podcast

#195 – Sella Nevo on who's trying to steal frontier AI models, and what they could do with them

2024-08-012h 8min
80,000 Hours Podcast
80,000 Hours Podcast

#194 – Vitalik Buterin on defensive acceleration and how to regulate AI when you fear government

2024-07-263h 4min
80,000 Hours Podcast
80,000 Hours Podcast

#193 – Sihao Huang on the risk that US–China AI competition leads to war

2024-07-182h 23min
logo

PODME

INFORMATION

  • Om kakor
  • Allmänna villkor
  • Integritetspolicy
  • Press

LADDA NED APPEN

app storegoogle play store

REGION

flag
  • sweden_flag
  • norway_flag
  • finland_flag

© Podme AB 2024