Rex Heuermann Wasn’t The Lone Gilgo Beach Killer — How Many Are Still “Active”?
Long Island wants to believe it caught the “one monster.” The lone predator. The man who stalked in silence until the handcuffs finally closed. But the truth is far more disturbing: Rex Heuermann didn’t operate in a vacuum. He operated in an ecosystem — one built on silence, vulnerability, and decades of ignored danger. And when you step back far enough, you start to see something bigger than one suspect. You see a pattern. A landscape. A coastline that became a dumping ground for the unnoticed and the unclaimed. In this episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski breaks down why the myth of the “lone wolf” is not just false — it’s dangerous. Because Long Island doesn’t have one predator in its past. Authorities know this. Forensic analysts know this. Anyone who’s looked at the remains found along Ocean Parkway knows this. Different signatures. Different timelines. Different patterns. More than one offender. So how did so many cases slip through the cracks? How did so many victims disappear without triggering urgency? And how many killers learned they could hide in the same shadows Rex allegedly used? Tony dives into the long, uncomfortable history of missing women, unidentified remains, and the decades of law-enforcement fragmentation that made Long Island fertile ground for serial predators. This isn’t about sensationalism — it’s about confronting the reality of a system that allowed multiple offenders to thrive in plain sight. If you think the arrest of Rex Heuermann solved the problem, think again. The arrest solved one case. It didn’t close the chapter on the dozens of unsolved homicides that still haunt the island. Tonight, we pull back the curtain on the bigger truth — the truth officials don’t say out loud: If one predator operated this long without detection, how many others walked the same shoreline? #HiddenKillers #RexHeuermann #LongIsland #TrueCrime #LISK #Investigation #ColdCases #CrimeAnalysis #Podcast #TonyBrueski Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
21 Marras 202517min
Brian Walshe’s Surprise Plea Flip — Will Murder Trial Go Forward?
Right before jury selection — right before the moment everything becomes real — Brian Walshe walked into court and detonated a grenade in his own case. He pled guilty to two critically important charges: misleading investigators and disposing of Ana Walshe’s remains. But he refused to plead guilty to murder. It’s a strange split. A risky split. And a split that reshapes the entire murder trial. In this episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski and Stacy Cole sit down with former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis to break down exactly what this means — legally, strategically, and psychologically — as the trial begins. Tony and Eric dissect the questions the public is asking: • Why would a defendant admit to moving a body but deny killing the person? • Is this a sign of desperation? A strategy? A narrative play? • Does this strengthen the prosecution’s story of intent and consciousness of guilt? • Is the defense about to pivot into an “accident + panic” explanation? • What happens now that jurors will hear Walshe admit he concealed and destroyed evidence? • Does this force the defense to abandon earlier theories — like Ana leaving on her own? • And what does this mean for sentencing exposure and credibility? Eric breaks down how prosecutors will weaponize these admissions — and how a defense attorney must now scramble to build a narrative around a client who has put himself directly at the scene after death. This isn’t a small procedural detour. This is the trial tipping on its axis. If you want the legal truth — not spin, not rumor — this conversation lays out exactly what this plea tells us, what the prosecution now knows, and what options Walshe has left. #HiddenKillers #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #TrueCrime Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
21 Marras 202527min
The Epstein Files Are About to Drop — What Happens Next?!
The Epstein Files are finally coming — not rumors, not fragments, not those half-redacted pages we’ve been fighting over for years, but the full trove of documents that investigators, survivors, journalists, and the public have been demanding. What’s about to be released isn’t just a snapshot of Jeffrey Epstein’s life — it’s the operating manual for how he stayed protected, connected, and strangely influential long after he should’ve been radioactive. In this episode of Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski, we dive into what the public can actually expect when the files hit daylight. These aren’t neat little lists or dramatic reveal reels. They’re tens of thousands of pages from multiple eras, multiple agencies, and multiple investigations that never told the same story out loud. They include travel logs, correspondence, email chains, financial statements, investigative notes, victim interviews, and records from years when Epstein was already a registered offender — yet still moving through the world like a man who had everything to offer and nothing to fear. We’re looking at what will likely be revealed, what absolutely will not be released due to legal protections and redactions, and the much bigger picture of who enabled Epstein to operate for so long. This isn’t just about names on a page. It’s about the systems that bent around him. The institutions that ignored warnings. The high-profile figures who kept showing up in his world. The gaps that investigators noticed and the public never got to see. This isn’t closure. It’s exposure. And once these documents are out, the old explanations won’t work anymore. The world is finally going to see the scaffolding of the Epstein machine — and the uncomfortable truth about who helped keep it standing. Subscribe for ongoing updates as the files roll out and the fallout begins. #HiddenKillers #EpsteinFiles #JeffreyEpstein #TrueCrime #Investigations #Accountability #TonyBrueski #BreakingNews #UnsealedDocuments #JusticeSystem Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
21 Marras 202518min
Two Cases Just Shifted — Brian Walshe’s Plea Flip & WSU Under Kohberger Fallout Fire
Two major true-crime cases just took sharp, unexpected turns — one in the courtroom, one in the civil arena. First, Brian Walshe blindsided the court by pleading guilty to disposing of Ana Walshe’s remains and misleading investigators — but still maintaining he didn’t kill her. It’s a move that redefines the entire murder trial and forces huge strategic shifts for both sides. Then, across the country, Washington State University is facing legal heat. The Goncalves family has filed a civil claim arguing WSU ignored repeated warnings about Brian Kohberger before the Moscow murders. More than a dozen complaints. A professor calling him a future predator. Students saying they felt trapped and unsafe. The question now is simple: Does the law say the university should have done more? On today’s episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski sits down with legal analyst Eric Faddis to break down both cases: • Why did Walshe plead guilty to these charges but not murder? • Does this strengthen the prosecution’s theory — or hand the defense a new angle? • What does the jury hear now, and how will it shape perception? • And in the WSU civil case — what duty does a university owe? • What evidence matters most? • Does foreseeability apply when the crime occurred off-campus at another school? • And is the real goal here discovery — forcing WSU’s internal files out into the light? Two cases. Two seismic shifts. One conversation that lays out the stakes, the law, and the fallout. #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BrianWalshe #BryanKohberger #WSU Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
21 Marras 202554min
