How the DOJ Defended the Indefensible: Inside Marie Villafaña’s Epstein CVRA Claim (Part 1) (12/11/25)

How the DOJ Defended the Indefensible: Inside Marie Villafaña’s Epstein CVRA Claim (Part 1) (12/11/25)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jaksot(1000)

The Role Streaming Services  Played In The Epstein  Aftermath

The Role Streaming Services Played In The Epstein Aftermath

Streaming services played an outsized role in rekindling public interest and scrutiny in the Jeffrey Epstein case by making documentaries about his life, network, and crimes widely accessible. Project...

28 Tammi 24min

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Massage Therapist She Introduced To Prince Andrew

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Massage Therapist She Introduced To Prince Andrew

Monique Giannelloni said her interaction with Prince Andrew was the direct result of Ghislaine Maxwell deliberately setting the stage and controlling the circumstances. She explained that Maxwell fram...

28 Tammi 18min

Ghislaine Maxwell Looks To Collect A Bag With Her Rumored Tell All Autobiography

Ghislaine Maxwell Looks To Collect A Bag With Her Rumored Tell All Autobiography

Speculation has swirled that Ghislaine Maxwell is writing a tell‑all memoir from prison, purportedly aimed at “correcting misinformation” about her involvement with Jeffrey Epstein and the broader sca...

28 Tammi 11min

Jeffrey Epstein, Prince  Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell And The Gypsy

Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell And The Gypsy

Jeffrey Epstein had a professional relationship with Gypsy Gita, a spiritual wellness guru who reportedly provided massage services to high-profile individuals including Prince Andrew. Gita worked for...

27 Tammi 20min

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 3) (1/27/26)

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 3) (1/27/26)

The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and ...

27 Tammi 13min

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 2) (1/27/26)

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 2) (1/27/26)

The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and ...

27 Tammi 12min

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 1) (1/27/26)

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 1) (1/27/26)

The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and ...

27 Tammi 14min

The Justice Department Won’t Release the Epstein Files — So What Now?   (1/27/26)

The Justice Department Won’t Release the Epstein Files — So What Now? (1/27/26)

Despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA) requiring the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release all unclassified investigative files on Jeffrey Epstein by the legal deadline of 19 December 2025...

27 Tammi 14min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
tervo-halme
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
viisupodi
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
otetaan-yhdet
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
rss-podme-livebox
io-techin-tekniikkapodcast
linda-maria
rikosmyytit
rss-tasta-on-kyse-ivan-puopolo-verkkouutiset
rss-asiastudio
the-ulkopolitist
rss-uusi-juttu
rss-fi-lainsaadanto-paremmaksi
rss-hyvaa-huomenta-bryssel
rss-50100-podcast