Racing the Clock: Inside DOJ’s Scramble to Release the Epstein Files  (12/19/25)

Racing the Clock: Inside DOJ’s Scramble to Release the Epstein Files (12/19/25)

Inside the Justice Department, the push to release the Epstein files has turned into a race against the clock, driven less by transparency than by damage control. Career prosecutors, records officers, and senior DOJ officials are scrambling to inventory decades’ worth of investigative material spanning multiple districts, agencies, and administrations. The problem is not simply volume, but exposure: the Epstein case intersects with sealed grand jury records, civil settlements, prior non-prosecution agreements, and internal deliberations that were never meant to see daylight. As deadlines loom, the department is attempting to thread an almost impossible needle—producing something that satisfies public demands for disclosure without detonating legal landmines that could reopen cases, trigger appeals, or expose institutional misconduct.

Overlaying that scramble is the intense involvement of national security and intelligence components, which has slowed the process even further. Intelligence agencies and DOJ’s National Security Division are reportedly combing through materials for anything that touches classified sources, foreign intelligence relationships, or sensitive international cooperation—particularly Epstein’s global movements, foreign contacts, and financial pathways. That review process is methodical by design and deeply incompatible with political timelines, creating friction between officials pushing for release and those whose mandate is to prevent exposure at all costs. The result is a high-stakes internal tug-of-war: every day that passes increases public suspicion, while every document released risks revealing not just Epstein’s crimes, but how deeply federal institutions failed—or refused—to stop them.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jaksot(1000)

The Mega Edition: Sara Rivers And Her Allegations Against Diddy (Parts 5-6) (10/12/25)

The Mega Edition: Sara Rivers And Her Allegations Against Diddy (Parts 5-6) (10/12/25)

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

13 Loka 22min

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 4)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 4)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

13 Loka 12min

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 3)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 3)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

13 Loka 12min

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 2)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 2)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Loka 10min

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 1)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 1)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Loka 10min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 3) (10/12/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 3) (10/12/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Loka 16min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 2) (10/12/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 2) (10/12/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Loka 14min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 1) (10/12/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 1) (10/12/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Loka 14min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
tervo-halme
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
otetaan-yhdet
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
rss-kuka-mina-olen
aihe
the-ulkopolitist
rss-podme-livebox
rss-tasta-on-kyse-ivan-puopolo-verkkouutiset
radio-antro
rikosmyytit
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka
eevan-politiikkapodi-totuuksia-suomesta
rss-mina-ukkola
rss-pykalien-takaa
rss-kaikki-uusiksi