Jeffrey Epstein's Core 4 And The DOJ's Refusal To Prosecute Them

Jeffrey Epstein's Core 4 And The DOJ's Refusal To Prosecute Them

The Department of Justice’s decision to let Jeffrey Epstein’s inner circle of enablers—Nadia Marcinkova, Leslie Groff, Adriana Ross, and Sarah Kellen Vickers—walk away without a single criminal charge is an unforgivable stain on the agency’s credibility. These four women weren’t passive bystanders; they were active facilitators, named repeatedly in sworn testimony, lawsuits, and official documents as key players who helped recruit, schedule, and silence victims. Some even participated directly in the abuse or destroyed potential evidence. The idea that there was insufficient cause to prosecute them is a disgraceful lie. The DOJ had mountains of testimony and documentation, yet still chose to shield these women behind a veil of bureaucratic apathy. This wasn’t a case of legal nuance or lack of evidence—it was institutional cowardice dressed up as prosecutorial discretion.


Now, with the DOJ formally closing its investigation, the last vestige of accountability has been buried. The victims, many of whom spoke out courageously in the face of retaliation, are left to watch as the women who helped orchestrate their suffering go on with their lives, untouched and unrepentant. The message this sends is chilling: if you're powerful enough—or close enough to someone who is—the American justice system will find a way to let you off the hook. This wasn’t justice.

The DOJ didn’t just fail to pursue charges—they cemented a legacy of betrayal. The door is closed, the case is buried, and the “core four” walk free, their roles whitewashed by the very institution that claimed it was working on behalf of the victims.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein's women 'recruiters' granted immunity by 2008 sweetheart deal could now be investigated | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jaksot(1000)

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 7-9) (2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 7-9) (2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Helmi 33min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 4-6) 2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 4-6) 2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Helmi 33min

Mega Edition:  Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 1-3) 2/6/26)

Mega Edition: Multiple Epstein Survivors Sue Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 1-3) 2/6/26)

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, fac...

7 Helmi 33min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 4)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 4)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Helmi 18min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 3)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 3)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Helmi 13min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 2)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 2)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

7 Helmi 13min

In Their Own Words:  "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 1)

In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 1)

The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” agai...

6 Helmi 12min

Epstein Files Unsealed:  Paul Cassell's Deposition In  Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 2) (2/6/26)

Epstein Files Unsealed: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 2) (2/6/26)

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge...

6 Helmi 17min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
tervo-halme
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
viisupodi
rss-podme-livebox
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
otetaan-yhdet
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
rss-asiastudio
the-ulkopolitist
linda-maria
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
rss-merja-mahkan-rahat
io-techin-tekniikkapodcast
rikosmyytit
rss-mina-ukkola
rss-pykalien-takaa
rss-kuka-mina-olen