How Epstein’s Operation Required a Network the DOJ Won’t Confront  (1/29/26)

How Epstein’s Operation Required a Network the DOJ Won’t Confront (1/29/26)

The Department of Justice’s long-standing claim that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell acted alone is contradicted by the government’s own records. Federal prosecutors explicitly acknowledged the existence of multiple co-conspirators as early as the 2007–2008 Florida investigation, including in the Non-Prosecution Agreement that granted immunity to Epstein and unnamed others. Sworn testimony, sealed filings, and investigative activity confirm that Epstein’s crimes required an organized network of recruiters, schedulers, transporters, financial managers, and legal fixers operating across jurisdictions for years. Despite this, the DOJ has consistently narrowed its framing to portray the case as a two-person operation, avoiding any comprehensive conspiracy prosecution. That decision was not driven by a lack of evidence, but by institutional restraint, selective inquiry, and an unwillingness to confront the broader implications of its own past decisions.


The DOJ continues to justify secrecy by invoking victim privacy, even though survivors themselves were excluded from key prosecutorial decisions and have repeatedly called for transparency. Redactions, sealed documents, and the refusal to name co-conspirators function less as victim protection and more as insulation for the government and its prior conduct. A full accounting would expose prosecutorial failures, political interference, and decades of discretionary choices that allowed Epstein to operate with impunity. The continuity of this behavior across administrations—including during the Trump DOJ—demonstrates that the issue is structural, not partisan. At bottom, the DOJ is not merely protecting Epstein’s associates; it is protecting itself and the institutional role it played in creating, enabling, and shielding one of the most consequential criminal enterprises in modern history.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jaksot(1000)

How Barclays Could  See The  Epstein Storm  Building

How Barclays Could See The Epstein Storm Building

Jes Staley is under the microscope due to the lawsuit that is making its way through the courts that alleges he enabled Jeffrey Epstein while he was working at JP Morgan and even, according to one all...

29 Tammi 10min

Jeffrey Epstein, Harvey Weinstein And The Attempt To Buy New York Magazine

Jeffrey Epstein, Harvey Weinstein And The Attempt To Buy New York Magazine

In 2003, Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein joined forces with a small group of high-powered figures, including Michael Wolff and Mortimer Zuckerman, in a bid to purchase New York Magazine. The grou...

28 Tammi 13min

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 7) (1/28/26)

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 7) (1/28/26)

The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and ...

28 Tammi 12min

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 6) (1/28/26)

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 6) (1/28/26)

The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and ...

28 Tammi 14min

The DOJ's Letter To The Court Explaining Their Failure To Comply With The Law (1/28/26)

The DOJ's Letter To The Court Explaining Their Failure To Comply With The Law (1/28/26)

In its latest joint letter to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer, the Department of Justice frames its update as a status report on compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, emp...

28 Tammi 8min

Substantial Progress, No Timeline”: DOJ Explains Epstein Files Delay to Federal Judges  (1/28/26)

Substantial Progress, No Timeline”: DOJ Explains Epstein Files Delay to Federal Judges (1/28/26)

In a recent joint update to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer and Judge Richard M. Berman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, top Department of Justice officials — including Attor...

28 Tammi 13min

Named 80 Times, Charged Zero Times: How Sarah Kellen Haunted the Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (1/28/26)

Named 80 Times, Charged Zero Times: How Sarah Kellen Haunted the Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (1/28/26)

During the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, the name Sarah Kellen surfaced again and again—more than 80 separate times—underscoring just how central she was to the machinery surrounding Jeffrey Ep...

28 Tammi 15min

Mega Edition:  The Inspector Generals Report On Epstein's NPA (Part 53-55) (1/28/26)

Mega Edition: The Inspector Generals Report On Epstein's NPA (Part 53-55) (1/28/26)

In this segment we’re going back to the Office of Inspector General’s report on Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn’t exist when most people ...

28 Tammi 41min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
tervo-halme
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
rss-podme-livebox
viisupodi
otetaan-yhdet
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
rss-tasta-on-kyse-ivan-puopolo-verkkouutiset
io-techin-tekniikkapodcast
linda-maria
rikosmyytit
rss-polikulaari-humanisti-vastaa-ja-muut-ts-podcastit
rss-merja-mahkan-rahat
mtv-uutiset-polloraati
rss-aika-ankkuri
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka