Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jaksot(1000)

How Barclays Could  See The  Epstein Storm  Building

How Barclays Could See The Epstein Storm Building

Jes Staley is under the microscope due to the lawsuit that is making its way through the courts that alleges he enabled Jeffrey Epstein while he was working at JP Morgan and even, according to one all...

29 Tammi 10min

Jeffrey Epstein, Harvey Weinstein And The Attempt To Buy New York Magazine

Jeffrey Epstein, Harvey Weinstein And The Attempt To Buy New York Magazine

In 2003, Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein joined forces with a small group of high-powered figures, including Michael Wolff and Mortimer Zuckerman, in a bid to purchase New York Magazine. The grou...

28 Tammi 13min

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 7) (1/28/26)

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 7) (1/28/26)

The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and ...

28 Tammi 12min

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 6) (1/28/26)

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 6) (1/28/26)

The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and ...

28 Tammi 14min

The DOJ's Letter To The Court Explaining Their Failure To Comply With The Law (1/28/26)

The DOJ's Letter To The Court Explaining Their Failure To Comply With The Law (1/28/26)

In its latest joint letter to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer, the Department of Justice frames its update as a status report on compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, emp...

28 Tammi 8min

Substantial Progress, No Timeline”: DOJ Explains Epstein Files Delay to Federal Judges  (1/28/26)

Substantial Progress, No Timeline”: DOJ Explains Epstein Files Delay to Federal Judges (1/28/26)

In a recent joint update to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer and Judge Richard M. Berman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, top Department of Justice officials — including Attor...

28 Tammi 13min

Named 80 Times, Charged Zero Times: How Sarah Kellen Haunted the Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (1/28/26)

Named 80 Times, Charged Zero Times: How Sarah Kellen Haunted the Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (1/28/26)

During the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, the name Sarah Kellen surfaced again and again—more than 80 separate times—underscoring just how central she was to the machinery surrounding Jeffrey Ep...

28 Tammi 15min

Mega Edition:  The Inspector Generals Report On Epstein's NPA (Part 53-55) (1/28/26)

Mega Edition: The Inspector Generals Report On Epstein's NPA (Part 53-55) (1/28/26)

In this segment we’re going back to the Office of Inspector General’s report on Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn’t exist when most people ...

28 Tammi 41min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
tervo-halme
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
viisupodi
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
otetaan-yhdet
rss-podme-livebox
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
rss-asiastudio
the-ulkopolitist
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
rss-tekkipodi
io-techin-tekniikkapodcast
rikosmyytit
rss-mina-ukkola
rss-fingo-podcast
rss-hyvaa-huomenta-bryssel
rss-merja-mahkan-rahat