Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jaksot(1000)

Mega Edition:  The Legal Sledgehammer That Should Be Waiting for Ghislaine Maxwell If Pardoned (11/30/25)

Mega Edition: The Legal Sledgehammer That Should Be Waiting for Ghislaine Maxwell If Pardoned (11/30/25)

If Donald Trump were to issue a presidential pardon to Ghislaine Maxwell for her federal crimes, the doctrine of dual sovereignty could allow the state of New York to pursue separate charges against h...

30 Marras 202522min

Mega Edition:  How The Financial Sector Funded And Fortified  Jeffrey Epstein  (11/30/25)

Mega Edition: How The Financial Sector Funded And Fortified Jeffrey Epstein (11/30/25)

The financial sector didn’t just enable Jeffrey Epstein—they fortified him. For decades, elite institutions like JPMorgan Chase continued to do business with Epstein long after his 2008 conviction for...

30 Marras 202525min

Mega Edition:  Jane Doe's 1-6 And Their Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein's  Estate (11/30/25)

Mega Edition: Jane Doe's 1-6 And Their Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein's Estate (11/30/25)

The third amended complaint filed in the Southern District of New York involves six plaintiffs—Jane Does 1 through 6—who have brought claims against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, acting as co-...

30 Marras 202535min

Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell, The Public Corruption Unit And The "Hacked" Emails (11/29/25)

Mega Edition: Ghislaine Maxwell, The Public Corruption Unit And The "Hacked" Emails (11/29/25)

Ghislaine Maxwell’s claims that her emails were hacked and manipulated to fabricate evidence against her appear to be a last-ditch attempt to rewrite history and cast doubt on overwhelming evidence of...

30 Marras 202536min

Former U.S. Intelligence Officer Allan Starkie Backs Up Andrew's No Sweat Claim

Former U.S. Intelligence Officer Allan Starkie Backs Up Andrew's No Sweat Claim

A former U.S. intelligence officer, Allan Starkie, publicly said he was willing to swear under oath that Prince Andrew really didn’t sweat — or at least appeared not to — on a night they spent togethe...

30 Marras 202529min

Andrew Gets A Reprieve In York Due To The Pandemic But It Only Delays The Inevitable

Andrew Gets A Reprieve In York Due To The Pandemic But It Only Delays The Inevitable

In March 2022, the council had planned a vote to remove Prince Andrew’s “Freedom of the City of York” honour — a symbolic title granted in 1987. However, just before the meeting, a coronavirus outbrea...

30 Marras 202515min

Even The Queen Couldn't Protect Andrew Forever

Even The Queen Couldn't Protect Andrew Forever

When Queen Elizabeth II removed Prince Andrew’s military titles, royal patronages, and the style of “His Royal Highness” in an official capacity, the atmosphere in the United Kingdom and across the Co...

30 Marras 202520min

Inside the Confidential Agreement Between Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Roberts

Inside the Confidential Agreement Between Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Roberts

The 2009 settlement between Virginia Roberts (now Virginia Giuffre) and Jeffrey Epstein was a confidential agreement reached in the aftermath of her filing a civil lawsuit in federal court in Florida,...

29 Marras 202521min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
tervo-halme
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
viisupodi
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
otetaan-yhdet
rss-asiastudio
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
rss-podme-livebox
linda-maria
the-ulkopolitist
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
rss-tekkipodi
rikosmyytit
rss-mina-ukkola
rss-kuka-mina-olen
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka
rss-kyselytunti