Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jaksot(1000)

Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 6) (1/24/26)

Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 6) (1/24/26)

In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal ...

24 Tammi 12min

Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 5) (1/24/26)

Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 5) (1/24/26)

In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal ...

24 Tammi 12min

Mega Edition:  The Prince Andrew  Movie "Scoop"  And The Palace's Reaction To It (1/24/26)

Mega Edition: The Prince Andrew Movie "Scoop" And The Palace's Reaction To It (1/24/26)

Netflix’s Scoop, a high-profile dramatic film about Prince Andrew’s disastrous BBC Newsnight interview — the 2019 broadcast in which he attempted to explain his ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey ...

24 Tammi 32min

Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein, Leon Black, Larry Summers And The IPI (1/24/26)

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein, Leon Black, Larry Summers And The IPI (1/24/26)

Jeffrey Epstein’s entanglement with Leon Black and Larry Summers runs through the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation and its flagship project, the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET), born out of th...

24 Tammi 38min

Mega Edition:  Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI  (Part 5-7) (1/24/26)

Mega Edition: Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI (Part 5-7) (1/24/26)

Judge Jed Rakoff approved a $290 million settlement between JPMorgan Chase and Jeffrey Epstein's victims, emphasizing that the case sent a strong message to the financial industry about the responsibi...

24 Tammi 32min

Mega Edition:  Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI  (Part 3-4) (1/23/26)

Mega Edition: Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI (Part 3-4) (1/23/26)

Judge Jed Rakoff approved a $290 million settlement between JPMorgan Chase and Jeffrey Epstein's victims, emphasizing that the case sent a strong message to the financial industry about the responsibi...

24 Tammi 24min

Mega Edition:  Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI  (Part 1-2) (1/23/26)

Mega Edition: Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI (Part 1-2) (1/23/26)

Judge Jed Rakoff approved a $290 million settlement between JPMorgan Chase and Jeffrey Epstein's victims, emphasizing that the case sent a strong message to the financial industry about the responsibi...

24 Tammi 24min

Why Did Jeffrey Epstein Hire Ken Starr As His Lawyer?

Why Did Jeffrey Epstein Hire Ken Starr As His Lawyer?

Ken Starr’s involvement on Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team marked a decisive turning point in how Epstein was treated by the justice system. As a former U.S. Solicitor General and a figure deeply embedde...

24 Tammi 17min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
tervo-halme
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
viisupodi
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
otetaan-yhdet
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
rss-asiastudio
rss-podme-livebox
the-ulkopolitist
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
rss-tekkipodi
io-techin-tekniikkapodcast
rikosmyytit
rss-mina-ukkola
rss-fingo-podcast
rss-hyvaa-huomenta-bryssel
rss-kuka-mina-olen