Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jaksot(1000)

Ghislaine Maxwell  And The  Alleged  Picture While Pregnant

Ghislaine Maxwell And The Alleged Picture While Pregnant

During Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, a curious and controversial detail surfaced when testimony referenced an alleged photograph showing Maxwell appearing pregnant during the period when she was accused ...

23 Tammi 20min

How  Prince Andrew Caused A Huge Rift Between The Queen And Prince Charles

How Prince Andrew Caused A Huge Rift Between The Queen And Prince Charles

Prince Andrew's association with Jeffrey Epstein led to significant tensions within the British royal family, particularly between Queen Elizabeth II and her eldest son, now King Charles III. The Quee...

23 Tammi 16min

Ghislaine Maxwell Alleges  Guard Misconduct

Ghislaine Maxwell Alleges Guard Misconduct

Ghislaine Maxwell complained of guard misconduct by portraying herself as a victim of mistreatment inside federal custody, repeatedly alleging that guards were improperly watching her, disrupting her ...

22 Tammi 20min

Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 2) (1/22/26)

Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 2) (1/22/26)

In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal ...

22 Tammi 15min

Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 1) (1/22/26)

Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 1) (1/22/26)

In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal ...

22 Tammi 12min

Millions of Documents, Zero Urgency: The DOJ’s Epstein Excuse Tour (1/22/26)

Millions of Documents, Zero Urgency: The DOJ’s Epstein Excuse Tour (1/22/26)

The Department of Justice has repeatedly argued that it cannot meet the congressionally mandated deadline to release all Jeffrey Epstein–related documents because of the massive volume of material and...

22 Tammi 18min

The House Oversight Committee Votes In Favor Of Holding The Clinton's In Contempt (1/22/26)

The House Oversight Committee Votes In Favor Of Holding The Clinton's In Contempt (1/22/26)

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has voted to hold former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress after both refused to appear f...

22 Tammi 14min

Contempt and Consequence: The Oversight Committee And The Clinton Contempt Hearing  (1/22/26)

Contempt and Consequence: The Oversight Committee And The Clinton Contempt Hearing (1/22/26)

Congress’s contempt hearing for Bill and Hillary Clinton marked a rare and explosive moment in the Epstein investigation, as lawmakers openly accused two of the most powerful figures in modern America...

22 Tammi 17min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
tervo-halme
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
viisupodi
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
otetaan-yhdet
rss-asiastudio
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
rss-podme-livebox
linda-maria
the-ulkopolitist
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
rss-tekkipodi
rikosmyytit
rss-mina-ukkola
rss-kuka-mina-olen
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka
rss-kyselytunti