Mega Edition:  Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

Mega Edition: Marie Villafana And Her Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA (2/3/26)

In a sworn affidavit filed in 2017, Marie Villafaña, a Department of Justice official, laid out the government’s formal defense of how federal prosecutors handled the Crime Victims’ Rights Act during the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. Her core argument was that the CVRA’s notice and participation requirements did not apply because Epstein had not been federally charged at the time the deal was negotiated, framing the agreement as a pre-charge exercise of prosecutorial discretion rather than a criminal proceeding triggering victims’ rights. Villafaña asserted that prosecutors were operating within long-standing DOJ interpretations of the law, emphasizing that the CVRA was never intended to require victim notification during confidential plea negotiations or before formal charges were filed. She presented the government’s position as legally cautious rather than deceptive, insisting that secrecy was necessary to preserve the integrity of negotiations and avoid jeopardizing a potential federal case.


Villafaña also used the affidavit to push back against allegations that prosecutors intentionally misled Epstein’s victims or acted in bad faith, repeatedly stressing that DOJ personnel believed they were complying with the law as it was understood at the time. She argued that internal DOJ guidance supported limiting disclosure to victims before charges, and that there was no clear judicial precedent then requiring broader notification under the CVRA in pre-indictment settings. Framed this way, the affidavit portrayed the Epstein deal not as a calculated effort to sidestep victims’ rights, but as a legally defensible—if controversial—exercise of prosecutorial judgment. That position would later come under severe criticism from courts and victims’ advocates, but in 2017 Villafaña’s filing stood as the DOJ’s most explicit attempt to justify its handling of the Epstein case under the CVRA.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.19.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jaksot(1000)

From Courtroom to Chalet: The Secret Bond Between Epstein and His Prosecutor Matt Menchel

From Courtroom to Chalet: The Secret Bond Between Epstein and His Prosecutor Matt Menchel

Matthew I. Menchel, once the Chief of the Criminal Division at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, played a pivotal role in shaping the 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement...

16 Tammi 27min

Michael Wolff Sues Melania Trump For A Billion Dollars As Part Of Their Ongoing Epstein Feud

Michael Wolff Sues Melania Trump For A Billion Dollars As Part Of Their Ongoing Epstein Feud

Journalist and political author Michael Wolff has filed a lawsuit in the New York Supreme Court against Melania Trump, alleging that she threatened him with a $1 billion lawsuit over remarks he made a...

16 Tammi 12min

Jeffrey Epstein Survivors Slam The DOJ In Letters Sent To Judge Berman

Jeffrey Epstein Survivors Slam The DOJ In Letters Sent To Judge Berman

Two anonymous survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse filed letters on August 4, 2025, expressing deep frustration with the Justice Department’s request to unseal grand jury transcripts, which they say h...

15 Tammi 12min

Epstein Files Unsealed: Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 14) (1/15/26)

Epstein Files Unsealed: Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 14) (1/15/26)

In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure ra...

15 Tammi 13min

Epstein Files Unsealed: Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 13) (1/15/26)

Epstein Files Unsealed: Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 13) (1/15/26)

In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure ra...

15 Tammi 11min

Congress Puts Columbia University On Notice Over Their Epstein Ties  (1/15/26)

Congress Puts Columbia University On Notice Over Their Epstein Ties (1/15/26)

Jamie Raskin sent a pointed letter to Columbia University demanding answers about the institution’s historical ties to Jeffrey Epstein and whether the university had fully disclosed the extent of his ...

15 Tammi 10min

Sean Hannity Gaslights Millions on Epstein While James Comer Looks the Other Way (1/15/26)

Sean Hannity Gaslights Millions on Epstein While James Comer Looks the Other Way (1/15/26)

During his interview with House Oversight Chair James Comer, Sean Hannity floated the bogus claim that Donald Trump was never on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane, presenting it as settled fact rather than a di...

15 Tammi 13min

Rules for Thee, Not for Me: Hillary Clinton’s Epstein Subpoena Defiance (1/15/26)

Rules for Thee, Not for Me: Hillary Clinton’s Epstein Subpoena Defiance (1/15/26)

Hillary Clinton drew sharp criticism after declining to comply with an Epstein-related congressional subpoena that sought testimony and records tied to the broader investigation into Epstein’s network...

15 Tammi 11min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
tervo-halme
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
viisupodi
rss-podme-livebox
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
rss-asiastudio
otetaan-yhdet
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
the-ulkopolitist
linda-maria
rikosmyytit
rss-mina-ukkola
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
rss-merja-mahkan-rahat
radio-antro
rss-polikulaari-humanisti-vastaa-ja-muut-ts-podcastit
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka