Epstein Files Unsealed:  Paul Cassell's Deposition In  Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 5) (2/9/26)

Epstein Files Unsealed: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 5) (2/9/26)

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge. Cassell’s deposition focuses on his role in challenging the 2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein, and on statements he made publicly about Alan Dershowitz that later became the basis for Dershowitz’s defamation claims. Cassell explains the factual foundation for his remarks, emphasizing that they were rooted in court filings, sworn victim testimony, investigative reporting, and contemporaneous evidence. He details how survivors’ allegations against Dershowitz emerged, how they were evaluated by legal teams, and why he believed it was appropriate and accurate to reference them in public advocacy surrounding Epstein’s secret plea deal. Cassell consistently frames his conduct as part of his duty to represent victims and expose prosecutorial misconduct, not as a personal attack.


The deposition also addresses Dershowitz’s accusation that Cassell acted recklessly or with malice, which Cassell firmly rejects. He testifies that he never fabricated claims, never coached witnesses to lie, and never acted outside ethical or professional boundaries. Cassell underscores that his statements reflected allegations already made under oath by victims and contained in legal records, and that suppressing discussion of those allegations would further harm survivors. Throughout the testimony, Cassell situates the dispute within the larger Epstein cover-up, arguing that the real issue is not reputational discomfort among the powerful but the systemic failure to protect exploited minors. The deposition ultimately functions as a defense of victim-centered advocacy and transparency, directly countering Dershowitz’s narrative that survivor allegations were invented, coerced, or irresponsibly amplified.




to contact me:

EFTA00594390.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jaksot(1000)

The Man Who Made Introductions: Epstein’s Currency of Connection

The Man Who Made Introductions: Epstein’s Currency of Connection

Jeffrey Epstein’s entire operation, once you strip away the tabloid sleaze and the lurid headlines, always comes back to one thing: he was a broker. A fixer. A middleman who existed in the gray zones ...

18 Huhti 13min

Andrew Lownie, Prince Andrew, and the Epstein Evidence That Went Nowhere (4/18/26)

Andrew Lownie, Prince Andrew, and the Epstein Evidence That Went Nowhere (4/18/26)

Andrew Lownie has been blunt and deeply critical about his interactions with British authorities regarding Prince Andrew and the Epstein affair, stating that he provided detailed information and evide...

18 Huhti 15min

Adriana Ross FBI 302 Raises Questions on Epstein’s Role in Trump–Melania Introduction (Day 4)(4/18/26)

Adriana Ross FBI 302 Raises Questions on Epstein’s Role in Trump–Melania Introduction (Day 4)(4/18/26)

Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection exi...

18 Huhti 11min

Adriana Ross FBI 302 Raises Questions on Epstein’s Role in Trump–Melania Introduction (Day 3)(4/18/26)

Adriana Ross FBI 302 Raises Questions on Epstein’s Role in Trump–Melania Introduction (Day 3)(4/18/26)

Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection exi...

18 Huhti 18min

Mega Edition:  Did Scotland Yard Protect Prince Andrew From The Epstein/Maxwell Storm? (4/18/26)

Mega Edition: Did Scotland Yard Protect Prince Andrew From The Epstein/Maxwell Storm? (4/18/26)

Metropolitan Police—commonly known as Scotland Yard—announced in 2019 that it would not reopen its investigation into Virginia Giuffre’s claims that she had been trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and coer...

18 Huhti 1h 3min

Mega Edition:  Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI  (Part 5-7) (4/18/26)

Mega Edition: Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI (Part 5-7) (4/18/26)

Judge Jed Rakoff approved a $290 million settlement between JPMorgan Chase and Jeffrey Epstein's victims, emphasizing that the case sent a strong message to the financial industry about the responsibi...

18 Huhti 32min

Mega Edition:  Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI  (Part 3-4) (4/18/26)

Mega Edition: Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI (Part 3-4) (4/18/26)

Judge Jed Rakoff approved a $290 million settlement between JPMorgan Chase and Jeffrey Epstein's victims, emphasizing that the case sent a strong message to the financial industry about the responsibi...

18 Huhti 24min

Mega Edition:  Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI  (Part 1-2) (4/18/26)

Mega Edition: Judge Rakoff Makes A Ruling In The Survivors Suit Against USVI (Part 1-2) (4/18/26)

Judge Jed Rakoff approved a $290 million settlement between JPMorgan Chase and Jeffrey Epstein's victims, emphasizing that the case sent a strong message to the financial industry about the responsibi...

18 Huhti 24min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

uutiscast
aikalisa
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
politiikan-puskaradio
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
tervo-halme
rss-pinnalla
rss-podme-livebox
otetaan-yhdet
rss-asiastudio
aihe
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
the-ulkopolitist
radio-antro
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
rss-ulkopoditiikkaa
rss-mina-ukkola
rss-girls-finish-f1rst
linda-maria
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka