Prince Andrew Asks Judge Kaplan To Dismiss Virginia Robert's Lawsuit

Prince Andrew Asks Judge Kaplan To Dismiss Virginia Robert's Lawsuit

Prince Andrew asked U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan to dismiss the civil lawsuit filed against him by Virginia Giuffre, arguing that the case was legally flawed and barred by prior agreements. His legal team contended that a 2009 settlement Giuffre reached with Jeffrey Epstein included broad release language that shielded other potential defendants — including Andrew — from future claims. They also argued that the complaint failed to state a viable claim under federal sex-trafficking laws, asserting that Andrew had no knowledge of Epstein’s alleged trafficking operation and that Giuffre’s allegations lacked sufficient specificity. Additionally, they challenged the court’s jurisdiction, claiming Andrew’s limited contacts with New York were insufficient to justify the case being heard there.

Judge Kaplan ultimately rejected Andrew’s motion, ruling that the language in the Epstein settlement agreement did not automatically immunize the prince at the dismissal stage and that Giuffre’s complaint plausibly alleged claims under the relevant statutes. Kaplan emphasized that factual disputes — including the meaning and scope of the 2009 release — could not be resolved on a motion to dismiss and would require further proceedings. The ruling allowed the lawsuit to move forward into discovery, increasing pressure on Andrew and leading to intense public scrutiny. Shortly thereafter, the case was resolved through an out-of-court settlement, with Andrew denying wrongdoing but agreeing to a financial settlement and a statement expressing regret for his association with Epstein.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jaksot(1000)

Mega Edition:   Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal"  According To  The DOJ (2/16/26)

Mega Edition: Why Epstein’s Deal Was “Technically Legal" According To The DOJ (2/16/26)

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims’ Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA’s prot...

16 Helmi 38min

Mega Edition:   Inside the Roles of Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn

Mega Edition: Inside the Roles of Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures in Jeffrey Epstein’s world but central operators who helped build, maintain, and financially sustain his criminal enterprise. As Epstein’s lo...

16 Helmi 30min

Spencer Kuvin Calls  On Bill Gates To Speak With Authorities About Jeffrey Epstein

Spencer Kuvin Calls On Bill Gates To Speak With Authorities About Jeffrey Epstein

Spencer Kuvin, an attorney representing multiple survivors of Jeffrey Epstein, publicly criticized Bill Gates for continuing to meet with Epstein even after the financier’s conviction. Speaking to The...

16 Helmi 19min

Jeffrey Epstein And His Great Pal Charlie Rose

Jeffrey Epstein And His Great Pal Charlie Rose

Charlie Rose’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein surfaced through reports that Epstein actively referred young women to Rose’s office, pitching them as “perfect assistants.” Phone logs reportedly showed Epstein...

16 Helmi 13min

Eileen Guggenheim And The Allegations She Was A Conduit To Epstein

Eileen Guggenheim And The Allegations She Was A Conduit To Epstein

The article reports that Eileen Guggenheim, a former aide to then-Prince Charles and now president of the New York Academy of Art, has been accused i of introducing a studen, Maria  Farmer, to Jeffrey...

16 Helmi 10min

How The State Of New York Failed To Stop Jeffrey Epstein's Predatory Behavior

How The State Of New York Failed To Stop Jeffrey Epstein's Predatory Behavior

Manhattan prosecutors in New York played a troubling role in allowing Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse to continue largely uninterrupted. As journalist Jane Coaston detailed, a Manhattan assistant distr...

15 Helmi 18min

The Operational Spine: How the DOJ’s Final Epstein “List” Avoids the Infrastructure (2/15/26)

The Operational Spine: How the DOJ’s Final Epstein “List” Avoids the Infrastructure (2/15/26)

The DOJ’s so-called “list” is being framed as transparency, but it reads like controlled optics rather than a serious accounting of Jeffrey Epstein’s network. A genuine disclosure would distinguish be...

15 Helmi 15min

The Legal Basis for Redactions: DOJ Explains Its Epstein File Edits In A Letter To Congress (2/16/26)

The Legal Basis for Redactions: DOJ Explains Its Epstein File Edits In A Letter To Congress (2/16/26)

The letter outlines the Department of Justice’s obligations under Section 3 of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandates that within 15 days of completing its required document release, the D...

15 Helmi 15min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
tervo-halme
politiikan-puskaradio
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
rss-podme-livebox
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
viisupodi
rss-asiastudio
otetaan-yhdet
radio-antro
linda-maria
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
rss-tasta-on-kyse-ivan-puopolo-verkkouutiset
rss-kalevi-sorsa-saation-podcast
rss-hyvaa-huomenta-bryssel
rss-merja-mahkan-rahat