Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority vs. Dr. Kamala Selvaraj 2025 INSC 1200
Nyay Samachar30 Loka 2025

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority vs. Dr. Kamala Selvaraj 2025 INSC 1200

Imagine undertaking the project of a lifetime—building a state-of-the-art hospital—only to be blindsided by an unexpected, multi-crore fee from a government authority.


This is the exact scenario that confronted Dr. Kamala Selvaraj, a medical professional who was handed a staggering demand for ₹1.64 crore by the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA).


This decision strengthens protections for landowners against improper levies and clarifies the limits of planning authorities.


Key Takeaways:

✅ Historical sub-division validated

✅ OSR charges not applicable below 3,000 sq. meters

✅ Strengthens checks on arbitrary planning fees


Statutes:

✅ Constitution of India (Art. 136)

✅ Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971

✅ Chennai Metropolitan Development Regulations (Annexure XX) #LandLaw #PropertyRights #SupremeCourt #UrbanPlanning

Tämä jakso on lisätty Podme-palveluun avoimen RSS-syötteen kautta eikä se ole Podmen omaa tuotantoa. Siksi jakso saattaa sisältää mainontaa.

Jaksot(149)

Zainul vs. State of Bihar 2025 INSC 1192

Zainul vs. State of Bihar 2025 INSC 1192

What happens when the conviction of a large group is based on vague and inconsistent evidence in a land dispute turned violent? The Supreme Court revisits constructive liability under Section 149 IPC,...

30 Loka 20255min

Dharmrao Sharanappa Shabadi & ors. vs. Syeda Arifa Parveen 2025 INSC 1187

Dharmrao Sharanappa Shabadi & ors. vs. Syeda Arifa Parveen 2025 INSC 1187

Can an oral gift (Hiba) of immovable property, claimed decades later, stand its ground against consistent documentary evidence of possession and the bar of limitation?Key Takeaways:✅ Supreme Court cla...

30 Loka 20256min

Nilesh Baburao Gitte. vs. State of Maharashtra 2025 INSC 1191

Nilesh Baburao Gitte. vs. State of Maharashtra 2025 INSC 1191

In this judgement, the Apex Court revisits the crucial principles of circumstantial evidence in criminal law. This verdict underscores the necessity of a complete and unquestionable chain of evidence ...

30 Loka 20255min

Rajendra Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttaranchal Etc. 2025 INSC 1193

Rajendra Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttaranchal Etc. 2025 INSC 1193

In this case, the Supreme Court overturned the High Court’s conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder, reinstating the Trial Court’s acquittal. Central to the judgment was the assessment of eyewitne...

30 Loka 20256min

K.S. Shivappa vs. Smt. K. Neelamma 2025 INSC 1195

K.S. Shivappa vs. Smt. K. Neelamma 2025 INSC 1195

MINORS CAN REPUDIATE GUARDIAN CONDUCTED PROPERTY SALES, EVEN WITHOUT FILING A SUIT. If a minor, upon attaining majority, resells or otherwise demonstrates repudiation within the time limit, the prior ...

30 Loka 20255min

S . Santhana Lakshmi & Ors. vs. D. Rajammal 2025 INSC 1197 -

S . Santhana Lakshmi & Ors. vs. D. Rajammal 2025 INSC 1197 -

What happens when a suit seeks only an injunction without asking for a declaration of title—especially amidst disputed ownership and admitted lack of possession? The Court holds that when possession a...

30 Loka 20256min

Swacch Association, Nagpur vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2025 INSC 1199

Swacch Association, Nagpur vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2025 INSC 1199

The Supreme Court has delivered a significant ruling regarding the status of Nagpur's iconic Futala Lake. The Court concluded that Futala Lake is a man-made waterbody, not a statutory wetland under re...

30 Loka 20255min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

uutiscast
aikalisa
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
rss-podme-livebox
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
tervo-halme
otetaan-yhdet
politiikan-puskaradio
rss-asiastudio
aihe
the-ulkopolitist
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka
rss-girls-finish-f1rst
rikosmyytit
rss-360-podi
rss-fingo-podcast
rss-kuka-mina-olen
rss-ulkopoditiikkaa