Nuclear Submarines and the Limits of the 123 Agreement | Eye on Korea Ep. 41

Nuclear Submarines and the Limits of the 123 Agreement | Eye on Korea Ep. 41

President Donald Trump said South Korea’s nuclear-powered submarines would be built at the Hanwha Philly Shipyard. Joyce Connery explains why they may not be built there, and what the actual construction path means for a U.S.-South Korea nuclear agenda that has grown beyond the agreement governing it.

Connery is Principal Owner of Connery Strategies and a Distinguished Fellow at the Atlantic Council. She served as Chair of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board and was the first Director of Nuclear Energy Policy at the National Security Council (NSC), one of three NSC tours in a federal career of more than two decades that also included roles at the Department of Energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration.

Connery discusses why a commercial shipyard is not a facility qualified for naval nuclear work, implications of the AUKUS precedent for South Korea, and why naval propulsion falls outside the 2015 Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, also known as the 123 Agreement.

They also cover the June 2026 working-group consultations in Seoul, Korea’s near-term fuel assurance arrangements, the restructuring of South Korean reactor export governance, what allied deterrence consultation can deliver as North Korea’s arsenal expands, and more.

The conversation follows Connery's July 2026 ROK-U.S. Policy Brief, “Operationalizing U.S.-ROK Nuclear Cooperation,” published jointly by the Seoul National University Institute for Peace and Unification Studies and the George Washington University Institute for Korean Studies. Click here to read the full brief:

[This material is distributed by KEI on behalf of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.]

Tämä jakso on lisätty Podme-palveluun avoimen RSS-syötteen kautta eikä se ole Podmen omaa tuotantoa. Siksi jakso saattaa sisältää mainontaa.

Jaksot(41)

What Replaced the Tariffs the Supreme Court Struck Down | Eye on Korea Ep. 42

What Replaced the Tariffs the Supreme Court Struck Down | Eye on Korea Ep. 42

The Supreme Court struck down the IEEPA tariffs on February 20, 2026, holding that the statute never authorized the President to impose them. The tariff era did not end there. It moved to other statut...

3 Syys 29min

Can a Middle Power Run Its Own Grand Strategy? | Eye on Korea Ep. 40

Can a Middle Power Run Its Own Grand Strategy? | Eye on Korea Ep. 40

South Korea is running a deliberate grand strategy, pursuing autonomy and freedom of action while keeping the U.S.-South Korea alliance intact and turning the trade power and influence it has built in...

30 Heinä 34min

Why Democracy Is Still Winning in Korea | Eye on Korea Ep. 39

Why Democracy Is Still Winning in Korea | Eye on Korea Ep. 39

South Korea’s democracy has weathered stress tests few others have—moving from a night of martial law to a presidential impeachment and a snap election—causing the V-Dem’s 2025 report to downgrade the...

16 Heinä 32min

K-Defense Goes Global | Eye on Korea Ep. 38

K-Defense Goes Global | Eye on Korea Ep. 38

South Korea’s defense industry has gone from supplying its own military to arming others, and “K-defense” is now one of Seoul’s fastest-growing exports. Rob Rapson, a career U.S. diplomat who spent de...

29 Kesä 35min

Why China-North Korea Military Cooperation Should Alarm Washington | Eye on Korea Ep. 37

Why China-North Korea Military Cooperation Should Alarm Washington | Eye on Korea Ep. 37

Xi Jinping just spent two days in Pyongyang, his first trip to North Korea in nearly seven years, and the message was hard to miss. China is reinvesting in a relationship it had let cool, and the mili...

18 Kesä 36min

South Korea Wants a Bigger Seat at the Table | Ep. 36

South Korea Wants a Bigger Seat at the Table | Ep. 36

Former U.S. Ambassador to South Korea Philip Goldberg returns to Eye on Korea, making the case that South Korea has become a legitimate middle power with one of the fastest-growing defense-industrial ...

9 Kesä 32min

OPCON Transfer Should Have Happened a “Long Time Ago” | Ep. 35

OPCON Transfer Should Have Happened a “Long Time Ago” | Ep. 35

Wartime operational control, or OPCON, should have been transferred from U.S. to South Korean forces. That is the case Ambassador Joseph Yun makes on Eye on Korea—South Korea must take primary respons...

13 Touko 36min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

uutiscast
vallattomat
aikalisa
politiikan-puskaradio
rss-viihde-media
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
tervo-halme
rss-voi-venaja
otetaan-yhdet
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
rss-ulkopoditiikkaa
rss-podme-livebox
rss-asiastudio
rikosmyytit
the-ulkopolitist
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
aihe