Who’s Gerry and Why Is He So Bad at Drawing Maps?
More Perfect3 Loka 2017

Who’s Gerry and Why Is He So Bad at Drawing Maps?

“It is an invidious, undemocratic, and unconstitutional practice,” Justice John Paul Stevens said of gerrymandering in Vieth v. Jubelirer (2004). Politicians have been manipulating district lines to favor one party over another since the founding of our nation. But with a case starting today, Gill v. Whitford, the Supreme Court may be in a position to crack this historical nut once and for all.

Up until this point, the court didn’t have a standard measure or test of how much one side had unfairly drawn district lines. But “the efficiency gap” could be it. The mathematical formula measures how many votes Democrats and Republicans waste in elections; if either side is way outside the norm, there may be some foul play at hand. According to Loyola law professor Justin Levitt, both the case and the formula arrive at a critical time. “After the census in 2020, all sorts of different bodies will redraw all sorts of different lines and this case will help decide how and where.”

Tämä jakso on lisätty Podme-palveluun avoimen RSS-syötteen kautta eikä se ole Podmen omaa tuotantoa. Siksi jakso saattaa sisältää mainontaa.

Jaksot(49)

Part 2: If Not Viability, Then What?

Part 2: If Not Viability, Then What?

Now that the “viability line” in pregnancy — as defined by Roe v. Wade — is no longer federal law, lawmakers and lawyers are coming up with new frameworks for abortion access at a dizzying rate. In th...

15 Kesä 202335min

Part 1: The Viability Line

Part 1: The Viability Line

When the justices heard oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the landmark abortion case, one word came up more than any other: viability. The viability line was at the core ...

8 Kesä 202344min

The Political Thicket Reprise

The Political Thicket Reprise

This week, we revisit one of the most important Supreme Court cases you’ve probably never heard of: Baker v. Carr, a redistricting case from the 1960s, which challenged the justices to consider what m...

1 Kesä 202345min

The Court’s Reporters

The Court’s Reporters

Unlike other branches of government, the Supreme Court operates with almost no oversight. No cameras are allowed in the courtroom, no binding code of ethics, and records of their activities are incred...

25 Touko 202335min

Clarence X

Clarence X

To many Americans, Clarence Thomas makes no sense. For more than 30 years on the Court, he seems to have been on a mission — to take away rights that benefit Black people. As a young man, though, Thom...

18 Touko 202357min

The Supreme Court v. Peyote

The Supreme Court v. Peyote

More than 30 years ago, a Native American man named Al Smith was fired for ingesting peyote at a religious ceremony. When his battle made it to the Supreme Court, the decision set off a thorny debate ...

11 Touko 202357min

The Preamble: Introducing More Perfect Season 4

The Preamble: Introducing More Perfect Season 4

To kick off the new season, host Julia Longoria returns to high school, where she first fell in love with the Supreme Court. She was a star on her high school’s nationally-ranked “Constitution team” (...

4 Touko 20237min

More Perfect Is Coming Back

More Perfect Is Coming Back

More Perfect has been dark for four years now. But next year, hosted by Julia Longoria, we're coming back! The past few weeks have been historic, to say the least, in Supreme Court history. So in the ...

14 Heinä 20222min

Suosittua kategoriassa Koulutus

rss-murhan-anatomia
psykopodiaa-podcast
voi-hyvin-meditaatiot-2
kesken
rss-niinku-asia-on
psykologia
rss-valo-minussa-2
rss-narsisti
rss-vapaudu-voimaasi
adhd-podi
rss-rahamania
rss-liian-kuuma-peruna
rss-laadukasta-ensihoitoa
rss-arkea-ja-aurinkoa-podcast-espanjasta
rss-hereilla
rahapuhetta
aamukahvilla
dreamtalk
ihminen-tavattavissa-tommy-hellsten-instituutti
rss-mentalrace