Trusting Machine Learning Models with LIME
Data Skeptic19 Elo 2016

Trusting Machine Learning Models with LIME

Machine learning models are often criticized for being black boxes. If a human cannot determine why the model arrives at the decision it made, there's good cause for skepticism. Classic inspection approaches to model interpretability are only useful for simple models, which are likely to only cover simple problems.

The LIME project seeks to help us trust machine learning models. At a high level, it takes advantage of local fidelity. For a given example, a separate model trained on neighbors of the example are likely to reveal the relevant features in the local input space to reveal details about why the model arrives at it's conclusion.

In this episode, Marco Tulio Ribeiro joins us to discuss how LIME (Locally Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations) can help users trust machine learning models. The accompanying paper is titled "Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier.

Tämä jakso on lisätty Podme-palveluun avoimen RSS-syötteen kautta eikä se ole Podmen omaa tuotantoa. Siksi jakso saattaa sisältää mainontaa.

Jaksot(601)

Skeptical Survey Interpretation

Skeptical Survey Interpretation

Kyle shares his own perspectives on challenges getting insight from surveys. The discussion ranges from commentary on the market research industry to specific advice for detecting disingenuous or frau...

10 Touko 202321min

The Gallup Poll

The Gallup Poll

Jeff Jones, a Senior Editor at Gallup, joins us today. His conversation with Kyle spanned a range of topics on Gallup's poll creation process. He discussed how Gallup generates unbiased questionnaires...

1 Touko 202340min

Inclusive Study Group Formation at Scale

Inclusive Study Group Formation at Scale

Gireeja Ranade, a University of California at Berkeley professor, speaks with us today. She presented her study on implementing inclusive study groups at scale and shared the observed student performa...

25 Huhti 202332min

The PhilPapers Survey

The PhilPapers Survey

Today, we are joined by David Bourget. David is an Associate Professor in Philosophy at Western University in London, Ontario. David is also the co-director of the PhilPapers Foundation and Director o...

21 Huhti 202331min

Non-Response Bias

Non-Response Bias

Today's show focused on an essential part of surveys — missing values. This is typically caused by a low response rate or non-response from respondents. Yajuan Si is a Research Associate Professor at ...

10 Huhti 202335min

Measuring Trust in Robots with Likert Scales

Measuring Trust in Robots with Likert Scales

We are joined by two guests today, Mariah, a Ph.D. student in the CORE Robotics Lab at Georgia Tech, and Matthew Gombolay, the Director of the CORE Robotics Lab. They both discuss practices for measur...

3 Huhti 202347min

CAREER Prediction

CAREER Prediction

Ever wondered what your next career would be? Today, Keyon Vafa, a computer science Ph.D. student at Columbia University, joins us to discuss his latest research on developing a machine-learning model...

27 Maalis 202340min

The Panel Study of Income Dynamics

The Panel Study of Income Dynamics

Noura Insolera, a Research Investigator with the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), joins us to share how PSID conducts longitudinal household surveys. She also shared some interesting findings fr...

21 Maalis 202334min

Suosittua kategoriassa Tiede

rss-poliisin-mieli
tiedekulma-podcast
rss-mita-tulisi-tietaa
docemilia
filocast-filosofian-perusteet
menologeja-tutkimusmatka-vaihdevuosiin
rss-duodecim-lehti
sotataidon-ytimessa
rss-tiedetta-vai-tarinaa
utelias-mieli
radio-antro
rss-bios-podcast
rss-ranskaa-raakana
rss-kasvatuspsykologiaa-kaikille
rss-luontopodi-samuel-glassar-tutkii-luonnon-ihmeita
rss-lapsuuden-rakentajat-podcast
rss-sosiopodi