Will Anti-Obesity Drugs Disrupt the MedTech Industry?

Will Anti-Obesity Drugs Disrupt the MedTech Industry?

Investors worry that anti-obesity drugs could dent demand for medical procedures and devices. Here’s what they could be missing.


----- Transcript -----

Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Patrick Wood, Morgan Stanley's MedTech analyst. And today, I'll be talking about the potential impact of anti-obesity medications on the MedTech industry. It's Monday, January 8th at 10 a.m. in New York.

Anti-obesity drugs have made significant gains in popularity over the past year, and by and large, the market expects them to disrupt numerous MedTech markets as widespread adoption leads to population-level weight reduction and co-morbidity improvement.


To a certain extent, we agree with the premise that obesity is linked to high health care spend and therefore anti-obesity drugs could represent a risk to device sales. Our research suggests that moderate obesity is associated with about $1,500 a year higher spend on healthcare per capita, with an even greater impact in severe obesity at about $3000 bucks a year. But we think it would be a mistake to assume reduced rates of obesity are intrinsically negative for medtech makers overall.


In fact, we think anti-obesity drugs may ultimately prove to be a net positive for MedTech companies as the drugs increased life expectancy and increased demand for procedures or therapies that would not have been a good option for patients who are obese. In some cases, severe obesity can actually be contraindication for ortho or spine surgery, with many patients denied procedures until they shed a certain amount of weight for fear of complications, infection, and other issues. In this context, anti-obesity drugs could actually boost procedure volumes for certain patients.


Another factor to consider, we believe the importance of life expectancy shifts as a result of potentially lower obesity rates cannot be ignored. In fact, our analysis suggests that obesity reduces life expectancy by about ten years in younger adults and five years in middle age adults.


Think of it this way, from the standpoint of total healthcare consumption, one incremental year of life expectancy in old age could equate to as much as ten years of obesity in terms of overall healthcare spending. Adults 65 plus spend 2 to 3 times more per year on average, than adults 45 to 64, with a significant $10 to $25,000 step up in dollar terms.


Furthermore, rates of sudden cardiac death increased dramatically in high body mass index patients, eliminating the possibility of medical intervention to address the underlying obesity issue or the associated co-morbidities.


Given all this, we think anti-obesity drugs will ultimately prove to be a net benefit for cardiovascular device makers overall, even in certain categories where body mass index is correlated with higher procedure rates. In markets such as structural heart, where we're replacing things like heart valves, we believe the number of patients reaching old age, that is 70 plus, is most important in regards to volumes. Though rates of obesity are contributing factors as well, orthopedics is more of a mixed bag. The strongest evidence we've seen here is on lower BMI's leading to reduced procedure volumes though pertaining to osteoarthritis in the knees and degenerative disc disease in spine. But we think the argument that fewer people with obesity means fewer knee replacements or fewer incidences of spine disease is actually only half the picture. Clearly, age may be a factor here, and our sense is that hip volumes in particular are not dependent on high BMI's as much as on an aging population.


To sum up, we believe that anti-obesity drugs won't dismantle core MedTech markets. There are more layers to the story here.


Thanks for listening. If you enjoyed the show, please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts and share Thoughts on the Market with a friend or colleague today.

Jaksot(1507)

Michael Zezas: Three Possible Trade Paths from the G20

Michael Zezas: Three Possible Trade Paths from the G20

On today’s podcast, Head of U.S. Public Policy strategy Michael Zezas says three likely U.S.-China trade scenarios will come out of the G20. But a tariff pause might be the trickiest for investors.

19 Kesä 20192min

Mike Wilson: How Confident Are U.S. Businesses in the Economy?

Mike Wilson: How Confident Are U.S. Businesses in the Economy?

On today’s episode, Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson shares a readout on the firm’s proprietary Business Conditions Index. Are the data softening more than investors realize?

17 Kesä 20193min

Andrew Sheets: The Dangers of Cheering for Weaker Data

Andrew Sheets: The Dangers of Cheering for Weaker Data

On today’s podcast, Chief Cross-asset Strategist Andrew Sheets provides a bit of historical perspective on the logic of rooting for weaker data and lower interest rates.

14 Kesä 20193min

Michael Zezas: Why ‘Slowbalization’ May Be Feeding Trade Tensions

Michael Zezas: Why ‘Slowbalization’ May Be Feeding Trade Tensions

Head of U.S. Public Policy Michael Zezas says that independent of current trade concerns, the trend toward globalized supply chains is fading, as companies respond both to political and market incentives.

12 Kesä 20193min

Mike Wilson: Why Trade Tensions Are Only Part of the Story

Mike Wilson: Why Trade Tensions Are Only Part of the Story

Investors and media have been hyper-focused on trade and Fed policymaking. But according to Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson, some key economic data points are the real story to watch.

10 Kesä 20193min

Andrew Sheets: For Markets, Signs, Signs, Everywhere Signs

Andrew Sheets: For Markets, Signs, Signs, Everywhere Signs

On today’s podcast, Chief Cross-asset Strategist Andrew Sheets says that while discussion of a Fed rate cut may have helped markets rebound, several longer-term signals are troubling.

7 Kesä 20193min

Michael Zezas: U.S.-Mexico Trade Adds to Recession Risks

Michael Zezas: U.S.-Mexico Trade Adds to Recession Risks

On today’s episode, Head of U.S. Public Policy Michael Zezas says further escalation of trade tensions could come with a cost. Are the risks of a global recession increasing?

5 Kesä 20192min

Mike Wilson: U.S. Equities: How Much Correction is Ahead?

Mike Wilson: U.S. Equities: How Much Correction is Ahead?

On today’s TOTM, Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson says trade tensions may be rattling markets, but the fundamentals are the real culprit behind the correction. So where are equities headed next?

3 Kesä 20193min

Suosittua kategoriassa Liike-elämä ja talous

sijotuskasti
mimmit-sijoittaa
rss-rahapodi
psykopodiaa-podcast
rss-lahtijat
ostan-asuntoja-podcast
hyva-paha-johtaminen
rss-rahamania
leadcast
inderespodi
oppimisen-psykologia
lakicast
rss-uppoava-vn-laiva
rss-bisnesta-bebeja
rss-seuraava-potilas
kasvun-kipuja
rss-strategian-seurassa
rss-karon-grilli
rss-merja-mahkan-rahat
rss-inderes