Seeking Better Value in Emerging Market Debt

Seeking Better Value in Emerging Market Debt

Our Head of Corporate Credit Research explains why the debt of high-rated EM countries is a viable alternative for investors looking for high yields with longer duration.


----- Transcript -----


Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Andrew Sheets, head of Corporate Credit Research at Morgan Stanley. Along with my colleagues bringing you a variety of perspectives, today I'll be talking about why – for buyers of investment grade bonds – we see better value in Emerging Markets.

It's Friday May 17th at 2pm in London.

This is a good backdrop for corporate credit. The asset class loves moderation and our forecasts at Morgan Stanley see a US soft landing with growth about 2 percent comfortably above recession, but also not so strong that we think we need further rate increases from the Federal Reserve. Corporate balance sheets are in good shape, especially in the financial sector and the demand for investment grade corporate bonds remains high – thanks to yields, which hover around five and a half percent.

For all these reasons, even though the additional yield that you currently get on corporate bonds, relative to say government bonds is low, we think that spread can remain around current levels, given this unusually favorable backdrop. But we're less confident about longer maturity bonds. Here, credit spreads are much more extreme, near their lowest levels than 20 years. So, what can investors do if they're looking to get some of the advantages of this macro backdrop but still access higher risk premiums.

For investors who are looking for high rated yield with longer duration, we see a better alternative: the debt of high rated countries in the Emerging Markets, or EM. Adjusting for rating, high grade Emerging Market debt currently trades at a discount to corporate bonds. That is for bonds of similar ratings, the spreads on EM debt are generally higher. And this is even more pronounced when we're looking at those longer dated borrowings; the bonds with the maturity over 10 years. In investment grade credit, you get paid relatively little incremental risk premium to lend to a company over 30 years, relative to lending it to 10. But that's not the case in Emerging Market sovereigns. There, these curves are steep. The incremental premium you get for lending at a longer maturity is much higher.

So, what's driving this difference? Well one has been relatively different flows between these different but related asset classes. Corporate bonds have been very popular with investors, enjoying strong inflows year to date. But Emerging Market bond funds have not, and have seen money come out. Relatively weaker flows may help explain why risk premiums in the EM debt market are higher.

Another reason is that the same EM investors who are often seeing outflows have been asked to buy an unusually large amount of EM bonds. Issuance from Emerging Market sovereigns has been unusually high year to date and unusually focused on longer dated debt. We think this may help explain why Emerging Market risk premiums are even higher for longer dated bonds.

The good news? Our EM strategy team thinks some of this issuance surge will moderate in the second half of the year. It's a good backdrop for high rated credit and this week's CPI number, which showed continued moderation. And inflation is further reinforcing the idea that the US can see a soft landing. The challenge is that – that good news has tightened spreads in the corporate market.

While we think those risk premiums can stay low, we currently see better relative value for investors, looking for yield and risk premium in high-rated EM sovereigns – especially for those looking at longer maturities.

Thanks for listening. Subscribe to Thoughts on the Market wherever you get your podcasts and leave us a review. We'd love to hear from you.

Jaksot(1506)

Andrew Sheets: A Narrow Path

Andrew Sheets: A Narrow Path

On today’s podcast, Chief Cross-Asset Strategist Andrew Sheets says that while conditions could line up for market success, the variables that need to align are many and diverse.

5 Heinä 20193min

Michael Zezas: How Markets View the Pause on Trade Tariffs

Michael Zezas: How Markets View the Pause on Trade Tariffs

On today’s podcast, Head of U.S. Public Policy Michael Zezas says a pause on trade tariffs should be good news for markets and growth, but is the path forward any clearer?

3 Heinä 20192min

Mike Wilson: A G20 Trade Truce?

Mike Wilson: A G20 Trade Truce?

On today’s podcast, markets are cheering this weekend’s pause on U.S.-China trade tensions. But is the potential progress enough to extend the longest business cycle in history?

1 Heinä 20193min

Andrew Sheets: What to Watch from the G20

Andrew Sheets: What to Watch from the G20

On today’s podcast, Chief Cross-Asset Strategist Andrew Sheets shares three possible trade outcomes from the G20—and how markets may react to a pause on new tariffs.

28 Kesä 20193min

Michael Zezas: Indirect Impacts

Michael Zezas: Indirect Impacts

In today’s podcast, Head of U.S. Public Policy strategy Michael Zezas discusses how the great debate playing out in markets around trade is about more than direct impacts.

26 Kesä 20193min

Mike Wilson: Are Markets Putting Stock in Trade?

Mike Wilson: Are Markets Putting Stock in Trade?

With corporate confidence softening, could movement on U.S.-China trade at the G20 be the catalyst for growth in the second half of the year? Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson has analysis.

24 Kesä 20193min

Andrew Sheets: Let’s Say the Fed Cuts Rates in July…

Andrew Sheets: Let’s Say the Fed Cuts Rates in July…

Morgan Stanley's economics team now expects the Fed to cut interest rates by half a percent possibly as soon as July. On today’s podcast, Chief Cross-Asset Strategist Andrew Sheets examines how markets could react.

21 Kesä 20193min

Michael Zezas: Three Possible Trade Paths from the G20

Michael Zezas: Three Possible Trade Paths from the G20

On today’s podcast, Head of U.S. Public Policy strategy Michael Zezas says three likely U.S.-China trade scenarios will come out of the G20. But a tariff pause might be the trickiest for investors.

19 Kesä 20192min

Suosittua kategoriassa Liike-elämä ja talous

sijotuskasti
mimmit-sijoittaa
psykopodiaa-podcast
rss-rahapodi
rss-lahtijat
ostan-asuntoja-podcast
hyva-paha-johtaminen
rss-rahamania
leadcast
lakicast
rss-yritys-ja-erehdys
oppimisen-psykologia
rss-karon-grilli
rss-seuraava-potilas
kasvun-kipuja
pomojen-suusta
rss-uppoava-vn-laiva
rss-puhutaan-rahasta
rss-myynnin-myllerryksessa
rss-markkinointiradio