Elucidations Episode 124: Graham Priest discusses Buddhist political philosophy
Elucidations21 Maalis 2020

Elucidations Episode 124: Graham Priest discusses Buddhist political philosophy

Episode link here:

https://elucidations.now.sh/posts/episode-124/


In this episode, Graham Priest returns to discuss Buddhist political philosophy with me and Henry Curtis. (Last month, we talked with him about Buddhist metaphysics.)


Last month, we discussed the Four Noble Truths of Buddhism: that suffering happens, that this suffering is (partially) caused by emotional attachment, that you can deal with it by changing your headspace, and that you can change your headspace by understanding the world, understanding your mind and body, and treating other people well. In this episode, our guest adds something to that list, which he calls the '0-th noble truth'. This is the idea that suffering is bad. That idea appears as a foundational premise across many different Buddhist philosophical traditions, and he suspects that it can be used as the basis for political philosophy.


You might remember last month's episode when we talked about 'anatman', which is the Sanskrit word for the Buddhist principle that there is no self. Priest makes the interesting proposal that the 0-th Noble Truth plus 'anatman' gives us the view that we should care about suffering equally no matter who is suffering. We should just try to reduce the global amount of suffering anywhere in the world.


Graham Priest then argues that industrial capitalism is the cause of a lot of the suffering in today's world. Countless numbers of people are compelled by circumstance to work in exploitative jobs that overwork and underpay them, while others reap the profit from their work. If that further claim is correct, then it would seem to lead to the conclusion that a political philosophy based on Buddhist ethics would have to propose some alternative to industrial capitalism.


Would a political system based Buddhist principles then have to look like socialism, or communism, or anarchism? Maybe, but the question turns out to be a bit complicated. Tune in to find out!


Would a political system based Buddhist principles then have to look like socialism, or communism, or anarchism? Maybe, but it's a bit complicated. Tune in to find out!

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jaksot(154)

Episode 82: Robert May discusses Frege and the problem of identity

Episode 82: Robert May discusses Frege and the problem of identity

In this episode, Robert May discusses the problems that arise when we try to explain what simple statements of arithmetic are saying. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

13 Huhti 201641min

Episode 81: Cathy Legg discusses what Peirce's categories can do for you

Episode 81: Cathy Legg discusses what Peirce's categories can do for you

In this episode, Cathy Legg talks about why Charles Sanders Peirce thought that existing was only one of three ways of being. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

15 Maalis 201637min

Episode 80: Mark Hopwood discusses love and moral value

Episode 80: Mark Hopwood discusses love and moral value

In this episode, Mark Hopwood discusses the moral relation that results when one person values another as a particular individual. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

10 Helmi 201631min

Episode 79: Anthony S. Gillies discusses conditionals

Episode 79: Anthony S. Gillies discusses conditionals

In this episode, Anthony S. Gillies shows us how difficult it is to figure out what if/then statements mean! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

6 Tammi 201632min

Episode 78: Stephen Engstrom discusses the categorical imperative

Episode 78: Stephen Engstrom discusses the categorical imperative

In this episode, Stephen Engstrom discusses the principle that Immanuel Kant thought to underlie all of ethics. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

9 Joulu 201532min

Episode 77: Mark Schroeder discusses reasons for action and belief

Episode 77: Mark Schroeder discusses reasons for action and belief

In this episode, Mark Schroeder discusses an example of how something other than evidence against a claim can give you a reason not to believe that it's true. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy fo...

13 Marras 201538min

Episode 76: Barbara Herman discusses gratitude

Episode 76: Barbara Herman discusses gratitude

In this episode, Barbara Herman describes the intricacies of the relationship between two people that is created when one does a favor for the other. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more in...

13 Loka 201542min

Episode 75: Malte Willer discusses non-monotonic logic

Episode 75: Malte Willer discusses non-monotonic logic

In this episode, Malte Willer discusses attempts to give a formal theory of commonsense reasoning, and how it differs from the kind of reasoning that has traditionally been studied. Hosted on Acast. S...

8 Syys 201531min

Suosittua kategoriassa Yhteiskunta

olipa-kerran-otsikko
siita-on-vaikea-puhua
gogin-ja-janin-maailmanhistoria
kaksi-aitia
i-dont-like-mondays
uutiscast
poks
antin-palautepalvelu
joku-tietaa-jotain-2
kolme-kaannekohtaa
mamma-mia
sita
aikalisa
yopuolen-tarinoita-2
rss-murhan-anatomia
meidan-pitais-puhua
rss-nikotellen
lahko
rss-palmujen-varjoissa
rss-haudattu