Episode 127 - Nic Koziolek discusses self-knowledge
Elucidations15 Heinä 2020

Episode 127 - Nic Koziolek discusses self-knowledge

In this episode, Nic Koziolek (Washington University in St. Louis) returns to talk to me and Nora Bradford about self-consciousness.


Self-consciousness, as philosophers use the term, is a word for when you know something about one of your own mental states. Like when I really enjoy some pizza and note that I'm enjoying it. Someone else might ask me: ‘Hey Matt, do you like that pizza?’ And I'm typically the best person to ask about that, which is a sign that I typically know whether I like the pizza. Or when I have an itch, and I notice the itch before going to scratch it. If I noticed it, then I know that I have an itch. Self-consciousness, in the philosophical setting, is a name for me being able to tell what's happening in my own mind, when it happens.


Now, you might wonder how I know about my own mind, when something new happens with it. Our guest argues that there has to be an answer to that question, because whenever you know something, there's an answer to the question how you know it. And so, he argues that the way you know you're in a mental state is by being in that mental state. So to apply the idea to the two examples we started with, you know you having an itch by having an itch. And you know you like the pizza by liking the pizza. Being in the state is what allows you to know that you're in it.


If you think that idea sounds wacky, you're not alone. But our guest provides some pretty interesting arguments in favor of it. And he also makes the case that understanding what's going on when you fail to know something about your own mind can lead us to a clearer understanding of what's going on when you fail to know that you know something—which is an age-old puzzle in philosophy.


It's a fun discussion. I hope you enjoy it.


Matt Teichman

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jaksot(153)

Episode 97: Meghan Sullivan discusses time biases

Episode 97: Meghan Sullivan discusses time biases

In this episode, Meghan Sullivan argues that if it's irrational to sacrifice long-term benefits for short-term gain, then it's also irrational to prefer for bad experiences to have already happened. H...

11 Kesä 201755min

Episode 96: Nic Koziolek discusses the role of belief in reasoning

Episode 96: Nic Koziolek discusses the role of belief in reasoning

In this episode, Nic Koziolek offers an account of what thought, belief, and reasoning are in terms of what knowledge is. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

8 Touko 201741min

Episode 95: Zed Adams discusses the genealogy of color

Episode 95: Zed Adams discusses the genealogy of color

In this episode, Zed Adams argues that philosophers are in an irresolvable debate about whether colors are real because they inherited multiple conflicting conceptions of what color is from previous g...

10 Huhti 201732min

Episode 94: Zsofia Zvolenszky discusses fictional names

Episode 94: Zsofia Zvolenszky discusses fictional names

In this episode, Zsofia Zvolenszky argues that names like 'Harry Potter' or 'Princess Leia' stand for non-concrete human-made artifacts. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

23 Maalis 201736min

Episode 93: Barry Lam discusses obligations after death

Episode 93: Barry Lam discusses obligations after death

In this episode, Barry Lam examines our common assumption that we should prioritize honoring the wishes of dead people. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

30 Tammi 201741min

Episode 92: Kristie Dotson discusses epistemic oppression

Episode 92: Kristie Dotson discusses epistemic oppression

In this episode, Kristie Dotson discusses how imbalances in the way we share information with each other reflect broader power imbalances between social groups. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy ...

14 Tammi 201743min

Episode 91: Paolo Santorio discusses counterfactuals

Episode 91: Paolo Santorio discusses counterfactuals

In this episode, Paolo Santorio argues that to explain what statements like 'If A were, then B would be' mean, we need to understand them as statements about causal networks. Hosted on Acast. See acas...

23 Joulu 201635min

Episode 90: Ásta Sveinsdóttir discusses social construction

Episode 90: Ásta Sveinsdóttir discusses social construction

In this episode, our guest argues that we confer social statuses on each other by treating each other has having different obligations and entitlements. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more...

20 Marras 201629min

Suosittua kategoriassa Yhteiskunta

olipa-kerran-otsikko
siita-on-vaikea-puhua
kaksi-aitia
gogin-ja-janin-maailmanhistoria
i-dont-like-mondays
poks
antin-palautepalvelu
kolme-kaannekohtaa
sita
mamma-mia
aikalisa
yopuolen-tarinoita-2
lahko
rss-murhan-anatomia
loukussa
rss-palmujen-varjoissa
rss-nikotellen
meidan-pitais-puhua
terapeuttiville-qa
mystista