Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence
Elucidations13 Kesä 2022

Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence

This time around, Matt sits down with Rob Goodman to talk about political eloquence. Goodman is the author of a new book on this topic called Words on Fire, which you can pick up a copy of wherever you like to get books.


Can you think of the last time you saw someone give a rousing speech? They step up to the podium with throngs of onlookers staring at them. Somehow, rather than nervously scampering offstage or melting into a puddle, they speak off the cuff in a way that transfixes everyone listening. Their words feel fresh, sincere, and yet somehow also perfect, like a movie star nailing their big scene on the first take. You’d think that someone speaking from the heart would falter or stumble the way the rest of us do, but against all odds, this feels both maximally authentic and maximally polished.


What is it that makes a speaker compelling to listen to? Rob Goodman thinks that in order to understand what eloquence is, we need to look not just at the person up on stage and how they’re talking, but how the people in the audience are responding, and how the speaker is responding to their responses, and how they’re responding to the responses to their responses, and so on, ad infinitum. What makes eloquence happen isn’t really individual speakers talking in vacuum, so much as it is groups of people conversing together. Or at least that’s his idea. Eloquence isn’t just one person speaking skillfully; it’s several people conversing skillfully.


In this episode, our distinguished guest also argues that when a public speech goes well, it goes well because both the person speaking and the people listening are taking some risks. The person speaking is sort of on the spot, risking embarrassment, and the people listening might have to rethink their prior beliefs, which takes a lot of work, at least assuming they make an effort to live by their beliefs. When a speech does what it’s supposed to, these risks are shared between all parties, rather than farmed off onto just one. But when the speaker tries to give the appearance of taking risks without actually doing so, you end up with the audience shouldering 100% of the burden, and the exchange ends up somewhat dysfunctional. This, argues our guest, is what happens when politicians go to great lengths to control or sanitize the environment in which they speak, so that no matter what, they don’t embarrass themselves. Sort of like riding a roller coaster with a safety bar.


Tune in to hear more about what makes for a great speech!


Matt Teichman

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jaksot(153)

Episode 105: R. A. Briggs discusses epistemic decision theory

Episode 105: R. A. Briggs discusses epistemic decision theory

How do we tell what the best strategies for changing our beliefs on the basis of new evidence might be? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

20 Huhti 201837min

Episode 104: Seth Yalcin discusses the question-sensitivity of belief

Episode 104: Seth Yalcin discusses the question-sensitivity of belief

In this episode, Seth Yalcin argues that every belief we have is implicitly framed as the answer to a question, and that at different times we're considering different questions. Hosted on Acast. See ...

4 Maalis 201838min

Episode 103: Brian Leiter explains why we should think about Marx

Episode 103: Brian Leiter explains why we should think about Marx

In this episode, we talk to Brian Leiter about why the writings of Karl Marx are helpful for understanding the current situation of the working and middle class in America, the 2016 Presidential elect...

9 Tammi 201850min

Episode 102: Josh Knobe discusses the true self

Episode 102: Josh Knobe discusses the true self

In this episode, Josh Knobe discusses a series of experiments that try to tease out what we implicitly assume about who a person really is, deep down. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more i...

1 Joulu 201733min

Episode 101: Miranda Fricker discusses blame and forgiveness

Episode 101: Miranda Fricker discusses blame and forgiveness

In this episode, Miranda Fricker argues that the purpose of blaming someone is to communicate to them your sense of why what they did was wrong. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more informa...

21 Loka 201749min

Episode 100: Agnes Callard discusses aspiration

Episode 100: Agnes Callard discusses aspiration

In this episode, Agnes Callard explains why she thinks aspiration is the process of moving from one set of values to a new set of values in the way you live your life. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/p...

22 Syys 201749min

Episode 99: Steven Nadler discusses Spinoza on freedom

Episode 99: Steven Nadler discusses Spinoza on freedom

In this episode, Steven Nadler discusses Benedict de Spinoza's unique reason-centric conception of what it is to live a good life and be free. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more informati...

13 Elo 201739min

Episode 98: Jennifer Lackey discusses credibility

Episode 98: Jennifer Lackey discusses credibility

In this episode, Jennifer Lackey discusses both how you can get things factually wrong and do something morally wrong by trusting people more than they deserve to be trusted. Hosted on Acast. See acas...

17 Heinä 201732min

Suosittua kategoriassa Yhteiskunta

olipa-kerran-otsikko
siita-on-vaikea-puhua
kaksi-aitia
gogin-ja-janin-maailmanhistoria
i-dont-like-mondays
poks
antin-palautepalvelu
kolme-kaannekohtaa
sita
mamma-mia
aikalisa
yopuolen-tarinoita-2
lahko
rss-murhan-anatomia
loukussa
rss-palmujen-varjoissa
rss-nikotellen
meidan-pitais-puhua
terapeuttiville-qa
mystista