Mark Levin Audio Rewind - 11/21/18

On Monday’s Mark Levin show, the New York Times piece on John Bolton’s new book changes nothing. There was no quid pro quo. There was no impeachable offense, all we have is a leaked manuscript of a book. No leak changes the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong!  Also, Senate Republicans, Susan Collins and Mitt Romney are calling for Bolton to testify. Now, it looks like Sen Pat Toomey wants to cut a deal with democrats for witnesses. These RINO Republicans are doing the bidding of the democrats. Then, MRC’s Brent Bozell calls in to discuss left wing NPR, where their money comes from and why they still exist? Later, like all of you, Mark was stunned when he found out Kobe Bryant and his daughter died. Our sympathy goes out to the families affected by this crash. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

28 Tammi 20201h 59min

On Friday's Mark Levin Show, it's funny how the Democrat Party that allowed Russia to annex Crimea and voted to reduce military and defense spending while Russia was ramping up their military, is now talking tough on Russia despite their record of weakness. There is no new information in this latest scam to attack the president, it's more of Adam Schiff's Castro-like soliloquy of lies. Regardless of what they say, President Trump's phone call with newly-elected President Zelensky was legitimate. Then, similar to the spying scandal started by the FBI's operation Crossfire Hurricane, which has turned out to be largely coordinated by rogue elements within the FBI's leadership, the impeachment sham also lacks legitimacy. Let us not forget that it is Trump that is the victim in all of this, not the aggressor. Later, President Trump is the first President to speak at the March for Life rally in Washington, DC. After, on the 70th anniversary of Auschwitz, we reflect on a report that 60% of millennials don't know what the Holocaust and 40 percent of adults don't know either. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

25 Tammi 20201h 58min

On Thursday's Mark Levin Show, this impeachment debate is over objective standard versus subjective conclusion when it comes to the definition of a high-crime or misdemeanor. Will we use the Constitution as our standard or the opinions of politicians. Moreover, can we in good faith remove a President from office based on these unconstitutional phrases? Where is their eye-witness? There isn't one. Speaking with passion and drama doesn't make it anymore impeachable. The irony of suggesting that a crime is not necessary despite the precedent of President Johnson’s acquittal is in effect rewriting the impeachment clause. Given the basis established in our constitution and the precedent of other impeachments (derived from British common law) the task at hand is to define and make the case for these platitudes. So clearly, "Abuse of Power" and "Obstruction of Congress" don't match the gravity of "Treason" and "Bribery" and with no crime, this case becomes weaker and weaker. Later, Sen Ted Cruz calls the show for his first interview since the Senate Impeachment trial began. Cruz agrees that the standard of an impeachable offense has not been met. He added that calling Hunter Biden as a witness is becoming increasingly more important, should new additional witnesses be added. Afterward, Congressman Jim Jordan joins the program to discuss exactly what happened leading up to the impeachment hearings. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

24 Tammi 20201h 59min

On Wednesdays Mark Levin Show, a firm grasp of history and the schools of intellectual thought that influenced our founders reveals that this impeachment is not just tyrannical it’s a pseudo-impeachment and a quasi-trial. With respect to precedent, no person ever has been slighted of their due process rights. This quasi trial is bogus because it's based on a pseudo-impeachment that doesn't meet the legal standard of high crimes and misdemeanors. Lamentably, the 'progressive' leftwing no longer cares for legal tradition when it doesn't fit their pre-determined outcome. Then, Chief Justice Roberts is giving this sham process legitimacy. We are witnessing the deconstitutionalization of America. The case that these corrupt political prosecutors made wasn't enough in the House but they turned a blind eye to the Constitution and voted on it anyway, and it won't be enough in the Senate. Later, the attempted soft coup of the President likely hatched with Adam Schiff and his staff colluding with the "whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella. However, the facts, remain that the Trump Administration has given lethal military aid to Ukraine every single year of his presidency, unlike his predecessor who failed to provide military aid even while Russian aggressors were attacking Ukraine to annex it. Afterward, WABC Radio Host Curtis Sliwa, founder of the Guardian Angels safety patrol group in New York, joins the program to discuss the increased patrols in Jewish neighborhoods due to an upswing in Anti-Semitic violence perpetrated by Black Hebrew Israelites that have been emboldened by the state's lax new cashless bail reforms. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

23 Tammi 20201h 59min

On Tuesday's Mark Levin Show, the Democrats have impeached the President of the United States and as such, they cast their votes for impeachment based on the case that they themselves made in the House. They must now defend their impeachment. The Senate is not voting on articles of impeachment, the Senate is voting on the evidence already provided by the house. Their vote to impeach was based on their investigation and evidence; this is not a trial in civil or criminal court. Republicans in the Senate have a duty to uphold the Constitution and have a trial based on the evidence already presented by the House in their articles of impeachment. Despite their majority in the House the Democrats could not convince a single republican to join them in voting for their unconstitutional articles of impeachment. Afterward, Mark delivers an opening statement to the Senate defending President Trump and responding to Adam Schiff during the opening of the impeachment trial. Finally, author Peter Schweizer callss in to discuss his new book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America's Progressive Elite. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

22 Tammi 20202h

On Monday's Mark Levin Show, the problem with those commenting on impeachment is that they don't know much about the subject and keep comparing the Bill Clinton impeachment with the Donald Trump impeachment. For those who've actually read or watched the Clinton impeachment trial know that there were 11 felonies that President Clinton was charged with. Clinton was also held in contempt of court, he was disbarred by the state court and was going to be disbarred by the US Supreme Court by he resigned instead. The Trump impeachment is purely about separation of powers. A sitting President must have the ability to have privileged conversations with his cabinet and advisors in order to execute the duties of his office. The brief submitted by the Managers from the House of Representatives does not include a single violation of the Constitution. Just as Andrew Johnson was wronged, Trump is being wronged. Then, the Senate has issued the rules of the impeachment trial. This marks the first time the President's council will be included and make remarks. Afterward, leftwing publications keep getting the facts wrong; this time they are misconstruing this program's commentary on due process and likened it to enemy combatants. Later, thankfully there were patriots who braved the cold to attend today's 2nd amendment rally in Virginia. Despite the media's best effort to sell their propaganda that there would be white supremacist violence, but there wasn't. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

21 Tammi 20201h 59min

On Friday's Mark Levin Show, when red states turn blue, it’s a big deal. In the commonwealth of Virginia, just one vote in the State Senate and five votes in the lower house have tipped the scales away from liberty. New laws include new taxes such as a "highway use fee." The proposed changes would produce massive revenue by way of taking money from the people. This is in addition to the already announced restrictions on the second amendment. This is the way we lost California, making it into a perpetual blue state once they're done with redistricting and legislative overhauls that benefit leftists. Then, why do we care what the Democrats in the House have to say? Did they care when the Republicans spoke up in defense of President Trump getting railroaded by the House? Of course not. Chuck Schumer has flip-flopped yet again now asking for witnesses but declined them back in 1999 during the Clinton impeachment. Later, progressivism subjugates individuals under the power of the state. When the state has all the power it becomes dangerous to the people. One such person under attack by rogue officials in the government is General Michael Flynn. Attorney Sidney Powell, explains that these charges must be dropped and has withdrawn Flynn's guilty plea. Afterward, Nancy Pelosi's fascistic tactics mirror that of Putin's and they seem to be celebrated by the left instead of being called out for strong-arming our constitutional system for her political benefit. Finally, Sen. Martha McSally joins the program to discuss her recent comments on a liberal hack media. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

18 Tammi 20201h 59min

On Thursday's Mark Levin Show, Vice President Mike Pence joins the program and explains that this impeachment trial is about obstruction President Trump and trying to take away his accomplishments. The House has to let the Senate decide the outcome of this trial. Also, this spectacle is not a somber moment, it’s a disgrace, an attack on our Constitution. From the media to the politicians it seems they know less and less about this Constitutional process. Then they claim that there is new "evidence" from an indicted Ukrainian national. They claimed that Robert Mueller would prove that the president obstructed, now they broadcast that the President broke the law, according to the Government Accountability Office; the problem with this is that the regulation they cite "the impoundment control act" cannot supersede the Constitution. This "breaking of the law" was not adjudicated, nor are they law enforcement, they are simply a government agency issuing their opinion of their policy.  Innocent until proven guilty is still the legal standard in America. Plus, a single senator's desire to hear from a witness does not change the facts of historical precedent; this is a political process from the politicians to police themselves. As such, the responsibility of the Senate is not to provide the Democrats with their wish list, it is to provide the process for the trial.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

17 Tammi 20201h 59min