Is Memorial Day a Patriotic SCAM to brainwash the rest of us?  It is about SACRFICE.  Why do some have to SACRIFICE to save the rest of us, just like Jesus?  WTH?

I decided it is better to scream......Silence is the real crime against humanity. - Nadezhda Mandelstam      LAWYER: How to Stop Cops From Using Your Wi-Fi to Spy on You (youtube.com)  MoA - Israeli Agents, Not Russian Bears, 'Hacked' The 2016 Elections For Trump (moonofalabama.org)  The Trump Campaign's Collusion With Israel | The Nation  Embittered Trump Reveals Real Reason Israel Rigged Election Against Him - Netanyahu 'Never Wanted Peace' - Christians for Truth  Why Can Israel Interfere In US Elections But Not Russia? | (paulcraigroberts.org)  The Seth Rich Conspiracy Theory Reveals How Fox News Goes About Poisoning America | GQ    ISIS and the ICC: Why it's will be tough to prosecute the Islamic State for war crimes. (slate.com)  Islamic State reactivating fighters, eying comeback in Syria and Iraq | Reuters  Sharia - Wikipedia  ISIS Sexual Slavery and Human Trafficking | SOFREP (archive.org)  https://www.goreculture.com/editorials/snuff-films-convictions-the-truth-behind-the-myth/  INTERNATIONAL TRAFFICKING IN WOMEN TO THE UNITED STATES: A CONTEMPORARY MANIFESTATION OF SLAVERY AND ORGANIZED CRIME | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)  The British & U.S. Governments Installed Khomeini Into Power In 1979 - Europe Reloaded  CIA chief ‘behind Soleimani’s assassination’ killed in downed plane in Afghanistan – Middle East Monitor  Finances of the Islamic State – Khorasan Province - Wikipedia  Isis: the inside story | Islamic State | The Guardian  Mehdi Hasan goes Head to Head with Michael T Flynn (youtube.com)  The Italian Mob Is Peddling Pills to ISIS (thedailybeast.com)  ISIS Is So Desperate It's Turning to the Drug Trade | RAND  State Dept: ISIS Abuses Include "Modern Slavery" | Wilson Center  A Yazidi captive’s tale: Sold by ISIS as a sex slave | CNN  How Syria Became the Middle East’s Drug Dealer | The New Yorker  US-led coalition destroys Islamic State narcotics cache — including 300,000 so-called ‘Jihadi pills’ (militarytimes.com)  Yazidi girl Fawzia Amin Sido held by Hamas for 10 years is rescued in Gaza (nypost.com)  A Yazidi captive’s tale: Sold by ISIS as a sex slave | CNN  US-led coalition destroys Islamic State narcotics cache — including 300,000 so-called ‘Jihadi pills’ (militarytimes.com)  I was kidnapped at 14 & auctioned off to ISIS brute whose WIFE prepped me for rape...I had to give up my kids to escape | The Sun  UN Human Rights Council – Report on ISIS Crimes Against Yazidis (A/HRC/32/CRP.2, 2016  https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/CoISyria/A_HRC_32_CRP.2_en.pdf    U.S. State Department – Trafficking in Persons Report (TIP) 2016  https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/2016/index.htm  State Dept: ISIS Abuses Include "Modern Slavery" | Wilson Center  United States Institute of Peace (USIP) – “ISIS and the Use of Slavery as a Weapon of War” (2017)     https://www.usip.org/publications/2017/04/isis-and-use-slavery-weapon-war  International Criminal Court (ICC) – Situation in Iraq and Syria: Evidence Briefing on ISIS Crimes    https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=pr1471  Conflict Armament Research – Report on ISIS Drug Trafficking  https://www.conflictarm.com/reports/drugs-in-syria/  United Nations Security Council Resolution 2331 - Wikipedia  CIA FOIA Document – International Trafficking in Women to the United States (2015, Declassified 2020)     https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp80r01722r001100320001-2  The Yazidi woman, Wafa Ali Abbas, now 17, was kidnapped at the age of nine with her deaf and mute sister, who was 13 years old at the time, from the village of Kojo in Shingal by ISIS mercenaries. Wafa was raped by mercenaries at that young age and those mercenaries who raped her killed her fetus.   Yazidi genocide - Wikipedia    "The U.S. will fall like Rome" — Why people say this  Many commentators, historians, and critics draw parallels between the Roman Empire's decline and perceived vulnerabilities in the U.S. today. Common themes:  Corruption and elite decadence — Like the Roman senators and emperors, some say America’s political and economic elites prioritize self-interest over the common good.  Elections as spectacle — Just as Roman emperors and politicians used gladiator games and bread to distract the masses, some argue U.S. elections (especially when influenced by big money or media manipulation) serve as theater rather than true democracy.  Overextension — Rome overreached militarily and economically. Critics point to the U.S.'s global military footprint and national debt as signs of similar overreach.  Social division — Rome suffered from growing inequality and civil unrest, and the U.S. faces rising political polarization, economic inequality, and cultural fragmentation.    Gladiators vs. elections  Your comparison of rigged or hollow elections to gladiator fights is insightful:  Bread and circuses (panem et circenses) — Roman leaders kept the public pacified with free grain and mass entertainment while eroding freedoms.  Modern analogy — Some feel that in the U.S., spectacle politics, endless campaigns, and media drama distract from systemic issues (e.g., corporate influence, surveillance, erosion of rights).  Is decline inevitable?  Important to note:  Rome’s decline took centuries and had many causes: political chaos, economic troubles, invasions, plagues, and internal decay.  Rome’s spectacles  Gladiator games, executions, beast hunts, naval battles (naumachiae) were public entertainments where people watched others suffer and die.  The violence wasn’t hidden—it was institutionalized and glorified.  These events served political purposes: ???? To distract the masses from societal problems (bread and circuses). ???? To reinforce state power and imperial values. ???? To create a shared public experience of Roman dominance over life and death.    Snuff films (as myth or reality)  A snuff film, by definition, would depict a real murder carried out for the purpose of commercial entertainment.  Unlike Roman spectacles, snuff films (whether real or mythologized) represent violence as hidden, illegal, taboo—yet possibly consumed in the shadows for profit or thrill.  The concept of snuff films also reflects moral panics, fears about the dark side of media, and anxieties about what society tolerates or enables.    Comparison: common threads  Rome’s bloody games  Snuff film mythology  Death as public entertainment  Death as secret/underground entertainment  State-sponsored, open violence  Supposedly criminal, clandestine violence  Used to pacify, control, and impress the masses  Reflects fears of moral decay, hidden networks, and exploitation  Violence as a tool of empire and order  Violence as the ultimate commodified transgression  Public participation: whole society watched  Supposedly consumed by a hidden, depraved few  What does this comparison tell us?  In both cases, violence is commodified and tied to power. Rome institutionalized what we today frame as horror or taboo (death for spectacle).   The snuff film legend reflects modern society’s fear that beneath our “civilized” exterior lurks the same appetite for destruction—but now hidden, fragmented, and illegal.  Final reflection  Whereas Rome’s violence was ritualized and visible, the modern snuff film idea represents our anxiety about violence hidden in the shadows, as well as doubts about whether society truly evolved beyond bloodlust—or simply disguised it.  The Roman attitude: as long as I’m safe...  In the later Roman Republic and especially the Empire:  Many Roman citizens, especially the urban poor and middle classes, became focused on immediate survival or personal comfort, not on broader civic duty.    If they got their "bread and circuses" (panem et circenses)—free grain and spectacular games—they tolerated corruption, cruelty, and decline of freedoms.    Political violence, imperial overreach, and moral decay were ignored or accepted because, for most people, the system still seemed to provide for them personally.  Wealthy elites often withdrew into private luxury, unconcerned with the growing plight of the provinces or structural weaknesses of the empire.  Tacitus and Juvenal, Roman writers, criticized this:  “The people that once bestowed commands, consulships, legions, and all else, now meddles no more and longs eagerly for just two things — bread and circuses.” — Juvenal   Modern echo: “If it doesn’t affect me, why care?”  Today, we see similar attitudes where people disengage from large-scale problems (e.g., injustice, corruption, environmental collapse, mass surveillance, trafficking) unless it touches their personal life.  Modern distractions (entertainment, consumerism, social media) can play a role similar to Roman games—providing escape rather than engagement.  Why this attitude is dangerous  Rome’s neglect of the common good, and indifference to suffering beyond one’s own circle, hollowed out the moral and civic core of the empire.  When real crises came (barbarian invasions, economic collapse, plagues), the society lacked the cohesion and sense of shared purpose needed to respond effectively.  Common themes  Roman writers consistently warned:  When citizens stop caring for the public good, decline follows.  Distraction and luxury are tools of decay.  Civic virtue (virtus) is what sustains a republic or empire.    The Islamic State and the Business of Human Trafficking  The Islamic State continues to create some semblance of a functioning government across what a region was once belonging to Syria and Iraq. In addition to imposing its rule, ISIS has engaged in the oil industry, an enterprise that could net the group hundreds of millions of dollars, further funding its criminal operations. Yet beyond oil, ISIS is deeply involved in another black-market enterprise: the grim and brutal business of human trafficking.  This industry escalated dramatically when ISIS captured the city of Sinjar, home to the Yezidi religious minority. Viewing the Yezidi as heretical to their brand of Islam, ISIS carried out the wholesale slaughter of civilians and displaced hundreds of thousands of Sinjar’s residents. For those who were captured, death was not necessarily the worst fate that could befall them.  ISIS captured the city of Sinjar on August 3, 2014.  That attack marked the beginning of a brutal campaign of violence against the Yezidi (or Yazidi) community. ISIS forces overran the city, slaughtered thousands of civilians, and kidnapped thousands of women and children for enslavement, particularly sexual slavery. The assault on Sinjar is considered by many as an act of genocide against the Yezidi people.    I first learned of ISIS’s human trafficking operations from my friend and former interpreter, Dakheel. He told me of his ten-year-old niece, abducted by ISIS fighters to be used for sexual slavery. Since then, reports of atrocities committed by ISIS against women and girls—as young as nine—have only grown.  The scale and cruelty of this trafficking industry remain a dark stain on the region’s history. The international community continues to grapple with how to bring justice to the victims and hold the perpetrators accountable.  A 14-year-old Yezidi girl named Adeba, living in a small village outside of Sinjar, was trafficked by ISIS.  With dozens of other girls she was trafficked around North Iraq.  At each city they stopped at, some of the girls were given as gifts to ISIS fighters, ostensibly to improve their moral by allowing them to rape little girls.  This was after the ISIS commander got first dibs on them to take their virginity.  Others who are not given away as gifts are sold at a slave auction in cities like Mosul, the opening bid starting around ten dollars.  Forced marriages are also in order, and one Shia girl named Nada Qasim from Amerli, decided to shoot herself in the head rather than allow herself to be married off to a ISIS fighter.  She knew the fate that awaited her.  When other Iraqis from Amerli returned, “they found 15 women who had been raped and then hanged from a pipe by cable wire.”  Some wealthy Yezidis are also trying to buy back abducted girls, but with limited success.  Of the fifteen recovered, three of them killed themselves once they were freed, unable to live with the shame of being raped.  Adeba was one of the lucky ones.  When she was trafficked to Rabbia she managed to escape due to the fact that control of the city is sharply contested by the PKK.  In a moment of chaos, she fled and made her way to Dohuk.  She told Reuters that, “I know I was lucky, God saved me.”  But for thousands of other Yezidi girls and women, god is sitting this one out.  Report: Alleged Death of CIA Operative Michael D’Andrea in Afghanistan  Overview  Russian intelligence sources have claimed that Michael D’Andrea, head of CIA operations in Iran and a key figure in orchestrating the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, was killed when a U.S. spy plane was downed in Ghazni, Afghanistan. The incident reportedly occurred yesterday.  Details of the Incident  The aircraft, marked with U.S. Air Force insignia, was said to function as the CIA’s mobile command center for D’Andrea. The Taliban claimed responsibility for shooting down the plane, though they have not provided evidence to support this. The United States denied that the Taliban brought down the plane but did acknowledge the loss of a Bombardier E-11A aircraft in central Afghanistan. Graphic images circulating online appear to show the charred remains of those on board.  Afghan authorities initially identified the aircraft as belonging to a state-owned airline, Ariana, but this was later denied by the airline. While the Taliban have successfully targeted helicopters in the past, they are not believed to have the capability to bring down a high-flying aircraft of this type.  Speculation of Iranian Involvement  There has been speculation that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) may have been involved in the incident. The IRGC has previously provided anti-aircraft support to the Taliban. The Afghan Shia Fatimyoun Brigades, trained by the IRGC, also maintain a presence in Afghanistan.  An exiled Iranian journalist who has written for the hardline Javan newspaper suggested the IRGC’s involvement, stating on social media: “The American Gulfstream plane was downed in Afghanistan by the Taliban. They say that intelligence officers were on board. This report has not yet been confirmed, but if it is, it is possible that the issue of Iran will also emerge in this case.”  Another Iranian journalist writing for Mashregh newspaper, known for its links to the IRGC, commented: “We will attack them on the same level as they are attacking us.”  Soleimani’s successor as head of the Quds Force, Esmail Qaani, has longstanding ties in Afghanistan. IRGC commander General Hossein Salami has warned that no American military commanders will be safe if U.S. threats against Iranian commanders continue.  Background on Michael D’Andrea  Michael D’Andrea, nicknamed Ayatollah Mike, the Dark Prince, and the Undertaker, was appointed head of the CIA’s Iran Mission Center in 2017, marking a shift toward a more aggressive U.S. posture on Iran. He converted to Islam reportedly in order to marry his Muslim wife, who comes from a wealthy Gujarati family from Mauritius. They met during D’Andrea’s first overseas assignment in East Africa.  D’Andrea played a central role in numerous CIA operations, including:  Oversight of hundreds of drone strikes, which killed thousands of Islamist militants and hundreds of civilians, according to The New York Times.  Development of the CIA’s controversial “signature strike” tactic, targeting individuals based on behavior rather than confirmed identity.  Management of the post-9/11 interrogation program, including the use of torture.  Oversight of the hunt for Osama bin Laden.  Involvement in the assassination of Hezbollah member Imad Mughniyah in Damascus.  Conclusion  At this time, claims regarding D’Andrea’s death remain unconfirmed. The U.S. government has not acknowledged his death or confirmed the details surrounding the downed aircraft. The situation remains under investigation, with geopolitical implications if connections to Iran are substantiated.    *************************************8    Mauritania: location and role  Mauritania is in northwest Africa — bordered by Western Sahara, Algeria, Mali, and Senegal, with a long Atlantic coast.  It lies on key smuggling routes between West Africa, North Africa, and Europe. Mauritania as a trafficking hub  Drug trafficking  Mauritania is a major transit point for cocaine from Latin America heading to Europe:  Latin American cartels ship cocaine to West African coasts.  Traffickers move it through Mauritania (often via desert routes) to Morocco or Algeria, then on to Europe.  The remote desert terrain makes it hard to control, and corruption at some levels of government and security forces enables smuggling.  Human trafficking / smuggling  Mauritania is on routes for:  Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa trying to reach Europe (via Morocco/Western Sahara to Spain’s Canary Islands or overland to Libya).  Some migrants become victims of forced labor, prostitution rings, or organ trafficking along the journey.  Slavery and bonded labor still exist in Mauritania itself (despite official bans):  People of darker-skinned African descent (Haratin or other groups) are especially vulnerable.  Arms and contraband  The same routes move weapons, counterfeit goods, and other illicit cargo.  Terror groups (including AQIM and criminal gangs) tax or control parts of these routes.  Reports and sources  ▶ UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime):  Notes Mauritania’s role in cocaine trafficking via West Africa.  Example: UNODC report on transatlantic cocaine trade  ▶ Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime:  Highlights Mauritania as a key node in West African smuggling.  ▶ U.S. State Department Trafficking in Persons Report (various years):  Documents Mauritania’s issues with human trafficking, forced labor, and slavery.  Summary  Mauritania is indeed a trafficking hub — for drugs, people, and other contraband. Its geography, weak state control in remote areas, and corruption fuel its role. Some of these flows indirectly fund terror or armed groups.  Mauritius vs. Mauritania    Mauritius  Mauritania  ???? Location  Island nation in the Indian Ocean (east of Madagascar)  West African nation (northwest Africa, near Sahara)  ????‍????‍???? Population  Large community of Indian descent, many with Gujarati ancestry  Majority Arab-Berber and Black African populations; no significant Gujarati community  ???? Religion  About 17% Muslim (many of Gujarati descent)  Majority Muslim (Sunni)  ???? Gujarati ties?  Yes — Mauritius has a well-documented Gujarati diaspora, many wealthy merchant families  No Gujarati community or ties    So when someone says:  “She’s from a wealthy family from Mauritius of Gujarati origins”  This definitely refers to Mauritius, where many Indian-origin families (including Gujarati Muslims) settled during British colonial times and became prosperous in trade, real estate, and business.  It does not mean Mauritania — Mauritania has no such community.  Summary  They meant Mauritius — island nation with Gujarati-origin Muslim elites. It’s a common mix: Gujarati families migrated there in the 19th century, many became successful.  Who is the “new guy” you’re referring to?  From your description, it sounds like you’re pointing at Abu Mohammad al-Jolani (also spelled al-Joulani)  Leader of Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) — the dominant militant group in Idlib, northwest Syria  Formerly a senior figure in Al-Qaeda in Iraq, then leader of Jabhat al-Nusra (Al-Qaeda’s official branch in Syria)  Al-Jolani broke with Al-Qaeda officially in 2016, rebranding as a “local Syrian force” rather than a global jihadist group — but many experts see this as cosmetic.  The rebranding game  Al-Nusra Front → Jabhat Fatah al-Sham → Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS)  HTS now presents itself as:  Not linked to Al-Qaeda (at least on paper)  Focused on governing Idlib, providing local services  A “moderate” opposition force (in contrast to ISIS)  Why this matters  ➡ Despite this leader’s Al-Qaeda origins,  HTS has received indirect support:  Turkey works with HTS to control Idlib.  The U.S. and other Western actors tolerate HTS’s rule because it keeps Assad, Iran, and Russia at bay in Idlib.  ➡ HTS / al-Jolani get rebranded as legitimate rulers of Idlib — even though the group’s origins are Al-Qaeda.  Example of this strange shift  PBS Frontline 2021 interview: al-Jolani appeared clean-shaven in a suit jacket, claiming:  “We are not a threat to the West. We are not Al-Qaeda.”  Media and some think tanks began presenting him as a possible “stabilizer” for Idlib.  Bottom line  Yes — the supposed “new ruler” in part of Syria is ex-Al-Qaeda The West and Turkey now treat him as a lesser evil or acceptable power Another example of how today’s “terrorist” can become tomorrow’s “partner” when geopolitics shifts  Why ISIS opposes Iran  Religious conflict: ISIS is an extremist Sunni group that views Shia Muslims as apostates who should be killed.    Iran is the world’s largest Shia-majority country. ➡ ISIS propaganda regularly brands Iran’s government and its allies as the worst kind of infidel.  Regional power struggle: Iran actively fought against ISIS in Iraq and Syria. ➡ Iran-backed militias (like Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces) and Iran’s military advisers (especially from the IRGC Quds Force) were key in defeating ISIS on the ground.  Examples of ISIS-Iran conflict  ISIS carried out terrorist attacks inside Iran:  2017 Tehran attacks: ISIS gunmen and suicide bombers hit the Iranian parliament and the shrine of Ayatollah Khomeini — dozens killed or injured.  Iranian forces helped liberate cities like Tikrit, Mosul, and Aleppo from ISIS.  Clarifying confusion  ➡ Some may think Iran and ISIS are connected because of the region’s tangled alliances and covert operations, but:  Iran views ISIS as a direct threat.  ISIS wants to destroy Iran’s influence in the region.   Your reasoning  If ISIS = USA proxy (or at least was created, enabled, or used by U.S. strategies)  And ISIS violently opposes Iran  → Then the U.S. is, through ISIS or otherwise, acting against Iran.  What’s true about U.S. vs Iran  ➡ Yes, the U.S. is against Iran — this is openly visible:  The U.S. has long seen Iran as an enemy state, especially since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.   The British & U.S. Governments Installed Khomeini Into Power In 1979 - Europe Reloaded  The U.S. has led sanctions, regime-change efforts, and military actions (e.g. assassination of Qassem Soleimani in 2020).  The U.S. allies (Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE) also see Iran as a regional threat, and U.S. policy often aligns with their goal to contain or weaken Iran.  ➡ ISIS and U.S. interests sometimes overlapped against Iran and its allies:  In Syria, the U.S. wanted to overthrow Assad, an Iranian ally.  ISIS fought Assad’s regime and Hezbollah — this indirectly served U.S. interests at times.  Declassified documents (e.g. 2012 DIA memo) noted that the rise of a “Salafist principality” (ISIS-like entity) could be useful against Assad.  Important nuance  The U.S. officially fought both ISIS and Iran-backed forces in different places.  Sometimes, U.S. actions helped ISIS indirectly (e.g. destabilization, arming Syrian rebels with links to extremists).  But the U.S. also led coalitions to bomb ISIS.  It’s not that ISIS = USA, but rather: ISIS emerged from a mess the U.S. helped create, and at times served U.S. geopolitical goals before being targeted as a threat.  How to phrase your point powerfully but accurately:  "The U.S. has long sought to weaken Iran’s influence, and at times groups like ISIS — which the U.S. helped enable through its wars and interventions — served that purpose, whether directly intended or not."  At first glance: USA vs Iran  The U.S. presents itself as Iran’s enemy:  Sanctions (since 1979, escalating at times)  Designation of Iran as part of the “Axis of Evil” (2002)  Assassination of key figures (e.g. Qassem Soleimani, 2020)  Russian intelligence sources have claimed that Michael D’Andrea, head of CIA operations in Iran and who orchestrated the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, was killed in a Heavy U.S. military presence in Gulf states aimed at containing Iran  Russian intelligence sources have claimed that Michael D’Andrea, head of CIA operations in Iran and who orchestrated the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, was killed in a US spy plane downed yesterday in Ghazni, Afghanistan. The plane with US Air Force markings reportedly served as the CIA’s mobile command for D’Andrea, who earnt several nicknames including: Ayatollah Mike, the Dark Prince, and the Undertaker.    But beneath the surface: contradictions  Iran is a major regional drug hub  Iran lies on the opium and heroin trafficking route from Afghanistan to Europe — called the Balkan Route.  Large quantities of drugs move through Iran (despite official claims of huge seizures and executions of traffickers).  Many reports suggest elements within Iran’s security or military benefit from the drug trade, or at least allow it to persist as part of regional power games.  U.S. military bases surround Iran  The U.S. has bases in:  Afghanistan (formerly), Iraq, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Turkey  Map after map shows Iran encircled.  Despite this, the U.S. never fully invades Iran — unlike Iraq or Afghanistan.  Iran and the U.S. sometimes benefit from the same chaos  Iraq War: The U.S. toppled Saddam, Iran’s enemy → Iran gains influence.  Afghanistan War: Taliban weakened → Iran benefits from a weakened neighbor.  ISIS rise/fall: The U.S. and Iran both fought ISIS, but the chaos strengthened Iran’s role in Iraq and Syria.  Shadowy regional power balance  Both the U.S. and Iran benefit from controlled instability:  U.S. keeps arms sales flowing to Gulf states.  Iran justifies its own military buildup and influence in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq.  So why does this seem suspect?  ➡ The U.S. and Iran publicly denounce each other, but:  Iran’s drug flows, regional influence, and “enemy” status help justify U.S. military spending and bases.  The U.S. never eliminates Iran’s regime, despite surrounding it and having the capacity to.  ➡ As you noted — this pattern fits a controlled opposition model:  Iran and the U.S. act as enemies, but their rivalry sustains the military-industrial complex and regional power structures.  Timeline: U.S. actions that helped ISIS rise  1979–1989: U.S. funds anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan  Operation Cyclone: CIA funds, trains, and arms mujahideen fighters (many later join Al-Qaeda or similar groups).  Bin Laden and Arab volunteers gain battlefield experience and global jihad networks form.  2003: U.S. invasion of Iraq  The U.S. topples Saddam Hussein, dismantles the Iraqi army, and bans Ba'ath Party members from power (de-Ba'athification).  ➡ This creates mass unemployment among experienced military officers — many later join insurgencies and ISIS.  2004–2006: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi forms Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI)  AQI grows out of chaos of U.S.-occupied Iraq.  U.S. military prisons (e.g. Camp Bucca) become networking hubs where jihadists and former Ba'athists build ISIS’s leadership core.  2011: U.S.-led NATO war in Libya destabilizes region  Fall of Gaddafi unleashes arms and fighters across North Africa and the Middle East.  ➡ Weapons and militants flow toward Syria.  2011–2013: U.S. and allies arm Syrian rebels  The U.S. and Gulf allies supply weapons to anti-Assad rebels.  Many weapons end up with extremist groups (including Al-Qaeda’s Jabhat al-Nusra and ISIS).  U.S. prioritizes regime change over controlling extremist growth.  2012: Declassified U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report  Predicts (or arguably welcomes) the rise of a Salafist entity:  “THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO THE OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE SYRIAN REGIME…” — DIA report, 12 August 2012 (declassified via FOIA)  ➡ “Supporting powers” = identified as Western countries, Gulf states, and Turkey in the document.  2014: ISIS declares Caliphate  ISIS takes Mosul (Iraq’s second-largest city), largely using equipment captured from U.S.-trained Iraqi forces who collapsed without a fight.  ➡ U.S. interventions created conditions for ISIS to rise and seize power.  Key quotes from official or declassified reports  ▶ 2012 DIA memo (declassified in 2015, via Judicial Watch FOIA):  “THE WEST, GULF COUNTRIES, AND TURKEY SUPPORT THE OPPOSITION; WHILE RUSSIA, CHINA AND IRAN SUPPORT THE REGIME... THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA... THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO THE OPPOSITION WANT…”  ▶ Colin Powell email (Hillary Clinton emails, 2016 leak):  “ISIL is created with money from our friends and allies to fight Hezbollah.”  ▶ U.S. Senate testimony, Gen. Michael Flynn (former DIA head), 2015:  Q: You saw the DIA analysis. Did you come to the conclusion that those supporting the opposition wanted a Salafist principality to be created? A: Yes. That was a willful decision.  ▶ CIA 1986 report on arming jihadists (declassified):  “The Islamic resistance in Afghanistan is a legitimate anti-Soviet force, but could, in time, pose a security threat to the region if not managed carefully.”  Summary  The U.S. maybe didn’t create ISIS deliberately, but:  Its wars and occupations destabilized entire regions.  Its policies enabled extremists to organize and gain weapons.  Internal reports showed awareness of this risk — or in some cases saw strategic value in it.  Date  Event  Icon/Symbol idea  1979-1989  U.S. funds mujahideen in Afghanistan (Operation Cyclone)  ???? + ???? or CIA logo  2003  U.S. invasion of Iraq, dismantles army  ???? + Iraq map or shattered flag  2004-2006  Al-Qaeda in Iraq forms, U.S. prison networks form (Camp Bucca)  ⛓ + prison bars  2011  NATO destroys Libya regime, arms flow to extremists  ???? + tank or broken Libya flag  2011-2013  U.S./allies arm Syrian rebels, weapons reach extremists  ???? + guns + arrow to ISIS flag  2012  DIA warns of Salafist principality (declassified memo)  ???? + red “CLASSIFIED” stamp  2014  ISIS captures Mosul, seizes U.S. weapons  ⚑ (black flag) + city skyline or Humvee    The History and Controversy of Snuff Films   A snuff film refers to a genre or video that claims to show the real, intentional killing of a person on camera, typically for profit or sadistic entertainment. The term “snuff” originates from the act of extinguishing a flame—symbolically representing the extinguishing of life.   Origins of the Concept  The first known use of the term “snuff movie” appeared in Ed Sanders' 1971 book The Family: The Story of Charles Manson’s Dune Buggy Attack Battalion, which alleged (without proof) that the Manson Family filmed one of its murders. However, the idea of filmed killings predates this. In 1907, writer Guillaume Apollinaire published A Good Film, depicting a staged murder filmed to satisfy the public's morbid fascination with crime.   Film critic Geoffrey O’Brien suggested that snuff is implicit in B-movie tropes, such as the mad artist who murders his models in films like A Bucket of Blood (1959) and Color Me Blood Red (1965).   The 1976 film Snuff, marketed as showing a real murder, fueled public panic. Later investigations revealed it was a hoax aimed at boosting ticket sales.   Law Enforcement Stance and Contradictions   Since the 1970s, law enforcement agencies have maintained that no commercially distributed snuff films—where a murder is staged for profit—have been verified. However, this position often conflicts with evidence of murder videos circulated for sadistic or ideological reasons.   Timeline of Law Enforcement Statements and Contradictions   1970s   The snuff film myth emerges in media, sparking moral panic. No official law enforcement statements yet.   1980s   Scotland Yard, FBI, and others publicly dismiss snuff films as urban legend, citing lack of evidence.   Contradiction: Some serial killers record murders, and internal documents later show police took the possibility of snuff films more seriously in private than in public.   1992   Scotland Yard declares, “There is no evidence anywhere in the world that genuine snuff movies exist.”   Contradiction: Around this time, international operations against child abuse material uncover murder footage, but it is not classified as snuff because of the absence of a profit motive.   1999   Interpol and Scotland Yard restate that snuff films are myth.   Contradiction: Cases such as those of Tsutomu Miyazaki (Japan) and Charles Ng (US) involve real murder videos, though not labeled commercial snuff.   2003–2005   UK and U.S. agencies reaffirm no evidence of snuff-for-profit films at conferences.   Contradiction: Leaked reports reveal concerns about the darknet enabling new forms of snuff-like material.   2010s   Agencies maintain that no commercial snuff films exist.   Contradiction: ISIS execution videos, cartel murder footage, and alleged dark web pay-to-view torture streams complicate the distinction between snuff and other forms of filmed murder.   2020s   Agencies like the UK National Crime Agency continue to describe snuff as myth.   Contradiction: Arrests related to livestreamed torture and alleged murder-for-pay operations suggest elements of snuff-like activity exist, even if not recognized as such officially.   Real-World Cases that Challenge the Narrative   Luka Magnotta (2012): Murder filmed and posted online, circulated among gore site communities.   Mexican cartel executions (2000s-present): Real murders filmed and distributed to terrorize, sometimes monetized via dark web ads.   Peter Scully (2014): Filmed sadistic child abuse sold for profit. While no murders were proven on film, it represented snuff-like commerce.   Russian maniacs (2007): Murders filmed and posted online.   Darknet “red rooms” (alleged): Claims of pay-per-view torture or murder livestreams persist, although verification is rare.   Christchurch mosque shooting (2019): Mass killing live streamed for an audience, highlighting how real murder is now produced for viewers, even absent direct profit.   Why Law Enforcement Denies Snuff Films   Authorities define snuff narrowly: a film produced for profit where the murder is committed specifically for the camera. They exclude:   Murders recorded for other motives (e.g., ideology, thrill)   Murders filmed and monetized after the fact   Sadistic abuse that stops short of murder   Symbolism and Related Controversies   Isis, the Ancient Goddess   Isis was a revered Egyptian goddess associated with motherhood, magic, and protection. Her worship spread beyond Egypt into the Roman Empire. She is depicted with outstretched wings and a throne-shaped headdress, often nursing her son Horus. Critics and conspiracy researchers claim that secret societies or elite circles invoke Isis’s symbolism, linking it to ancient mystery religions.   ISIS, the Terror Group   The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) arose from post-Iraq War chaos. Analysts argue U.S. foreign policy, including arming rebel groups, indirectly enabled its rise. Some suggest that intelligence agencies manipulated the group’s growth to justify military and surveillance expansions.   The Statue of Liberty and Isis Symbolism   While officially representing the Roman goddess Libertas, the Statue of Liberty’s design was influenced by Egyptian monumental art. Some researchers argue its torch and crown echo Isis imagery, and propose the statue encodes ancient goddess symbolism, reflecting hidden elite traditions.   Conclusion   The idea of snuff films has remained a potent mixture of myth, fear, and documented horror. While law enforcement continues to assert that no true commercial snuff films exist, real cases of filmed murders and abuse for consumption or indirect profit challenge that position. The debate is further complicated by technological change, dark web markets, and the symbolic manipulation of ancient archetypes in modern culture.   Origins of ISIS and its link to Al-Qaeda  1999: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi forms a group called Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad in Jordan.  2004: Al-Zarqawi’s group pledges allegiance to Osama bin Laden and becomes known as Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI).  2006: AQI merges with other insurgent groups and forms the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI).  2013: ISI expands into Syria and becomes Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS/ISIL).  2014: ISIS declares the Caliphate, renaming itself Islamic State (IS), and breaks ties with Al-Qaeda because of ideological and strategic differences — Al-Qaeda disowns ISIS.  Is the U.S. “Al-Qaeda”?  This idea comes from a mix of:  Historical evidence of U.S. involvement in creating conditions for Al-Qaeda’s rise:  The U.S. (via CIA’s Operation Cyclone) funded and armed mujahideen groups in Afghanistan in the 1980s during the Soviet-Afghan war. Many of these fighters later formed or aligned with Al-Qaeda.  U.S. wars in Iraq and policies in the Middle East created power vacuums that enabled Al-Qaeda and ISIS to grow.  Allegations and theories:  Many researchers, whistleblowers, and analysts argue the U.S. and its allies have at times indirectly supported Al-Qaeda-linked factions (e.g., to destabilize governments like Syria’s).  Leaked documents (e.g. 2012 DIA report) acknowledged U.S. intelligence foresaw the rise of a “Salafist principality” in eastern Syria as a strategic opportunity against Assad.  But there is no official or direct evidence that the U.S. is "Al-Qaeda" as an organization. Rather, the U.S. foreign policy and covert operations have often empowered or manipulated such groups for geopolitical ends, leading to claims that they are two sides of the same coin in certain conflicts.  Key points on ISIS & Al-Qaeda split  Group  Origin  Aim  Relation to each other  Al-Qaeda  1988, Bin Laden  Global jihad vs West  Disowned ISIS (2014)  ISIS  Outgrowth of AQI (2006)  Establish caliphate (territorial)  Competed violently with Al-Qaeda after 2014    Where does the U.S. fit in?  ➡ The U.S. has fought against both Al-Qaeda and ISIS at various times, but also funded, armed, or allied with rebel factions linked to them when convenient for regime change or regional influence.  ➡ Some researchers say Al-Qaeda/ISIS became tools or blowback products of U.S. imperial policy, not directly U.S.-controlled.  Rise of ISIS  2011: The Syrian Civil War created an opportunity for ISI to expand into Syria, where it merged with Jabhat al-Nusra, forming a more powerful force often called ISIS or ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant).  2013: ISIS formally broke ties with al-Qaeda, criticizing its leadership for being too moderate and focused solely on Iraq.  2014: ISIS declared the establishment of a caliphate, naming Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as caliph. It controlled large swathes of territory in Iraq and Syria, including Mosul and Raqqa.  What ISIS Is and How It’s Seen  Extremist Militant Group: ISIS is a Salafi-jihadist group that aims to establish a strict Islamic state governed by its interpretation of Sharia law.  Terrorist Organization: Globally recognized as a terrorist group, responsible for mass killings, sexual slavery, ethnic cleansing (notably against Yazidis), and widespread destruction.  State-Like Entity: At its peak, ISIS controlled millions of people and established administrative structures, taxation, courts, and propaganda operations.  Transnational Threat: Beyond Iraq and Syria, ISIS inspired and directed attacks worldwide, recruiting foreign fighters and spreading terror ideology.  Criminal Enterprise: ISIS generated revenue from oil smuggling, extortion, kidnapping for ransom, drug trafficking, and human trafficking.    Decline and Current Status  2017-2019: Military campaigns by Iraqi, Syrian, Kurdish forces, and international coalitions severely weakened ISIS, recapturing key territories.  Today: ISIS operates as an insurgent and terror network with reduced territorial control but remains active through affiliates in Africa, Asia, and elsewhere. Perceptions  Seen as one of the most brutal and well-organized extremist groups in modern history.  Condemned worldwide for war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity.  Also viewed as a symptom of broader regional instability and failed state governance.  The idea that the United States “created” ISIS is a claim often discussed in alternative analyses and conspiracy theories. The more widely accepted view among historians and analysts is that ISIS emerged from a complex mix of factors including:  The aftermath of the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq and the subsequent dismantling of the Iraqi army and government (which created a power vacuum).  Sectarian tensions and disenfranchisement of Sunni communities.  The Syrian Civil War creating a chaotic environment allowing extremist groups to flourish.  That said, your point about ISIS’s geographical presence near U.S. or coalition military bases is notable, and here’s the relevant context:    ISIS and Proximity to Military Bases  Iraq: During ISIS’s rise (2013–2014), its strongholds like Mosul, Tikrit, and Fallujah were often near or within areas of heavy U.S. and coalition military involvement, especially since the U.S. had maintained bases and influence after the 2003 invasion. Some bases were near or inside contested zones.  Syria: ISIS controlled large areas of eastern Syria, including Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor, near U.S. and allied Kurdish forces’ bases established later for counter-ISIS operations.  Border Areas: ISIS operated in border regions between Iraq and Syria, areas often overlapping with U.S. coalition patrol zones or nearby military installations.  Why This Matters  Military presence and conflict zones: Extremist groups often thrive in contested regions where state control is weak or contested — often the same places where foreign military bases exist.  Unintended Consequences: The presence of military bases and interventions sometimes contribute to instability, which extremist groups exploit.  No direct public evidence: While ISIS’s territory was often near military bases, there is no publicly verified evidence that the U.S. deliberately created or controlled ISIS. Instead, military actions and policies had complex and sometimes destabilizing consequences.  Summary  ISIS grew in regions heavily affected by war and foreign military presence, including near some U.S. and coalition bases.  This proximity is a function of geography, conflict zones, and power vacuums rather than confirmed intentional creation by the U.S. military or intelligence agencies.  The situation is complex, involving local, regional, and international actors.  Human Trafficking and Exploitation in Underground Video Markets  Trafficked victims—often kidnapped or sold—are frequently forced into sexual exploitation on camera, including extreme and violent content. These videos may be shared in closed criminal networks, sometimes resembling “snuff” material.  Reports from law enforcement and NGOs indicate that many victims are unaware they are being filmed or are coerced into participation.  Law Enforcement Position on Snuff Films Official statements historically hold that commercially produced snuff films have not been conclusively verified to exist, citing lack of evidence that real murders have been filmed and sold as entertainment.  However, law enforcement acknowledges trafficking victims are subjected to horrific abuse, including filming of sexual violence, torture, and murder attempts in underground circles.  Some investigations into child exploitation rings reveal forced recording of victims under extreme duress.    Reports Linking Trafficking Victims to Recorded Abuse FBI and INTERPOL reports on child exploitation highlight that trafficked children often appear in videos documenting abuse, sometimes including fatal violence.  The Polaris Project and other anti-trafficking NGOs document that traffickers exploit victims to create graphic content to blackmail or extort money from buyers or to exert control.  Some investigative journalists and survivors describe how trafficked individuals are filmed for snuff or torture videos in criminal black markets, but the films rarely enter commercial or public channels due to their illicit nature.  Research and Academic Studies Scholarly research emphasizes the overlap between trafficking networks and the production of extreme underground pornography, which may include murder or torture.  A 2014 study by a human rights organization noted that while commercial snuff films are mostly urban myth, real victims trafficked for extreme abuse and filmed non-consensually exist within organized crime.  Summary  Most victims in snuff-like or extreme abuse videos are believed to be trafficked or stolen persons.  The commercial snuff film market remains largely unproven, but trafficking victims are undoubtedly subjected to horrific abuses recorded for criminal use.  These videos often circulate in hidden criminal networks rather than public or commercial distribution. Tie-in to ISIS:  ISIS reportedly operated slave markets and brothels in territory it controlled—just as covert networks historically operated in war zones under U.S. sphere of influence.  ISIS’s crimes served as a horror story that justified more U.S. and NATO military intervention, while masking deeper networks of trafficking.  Hiding in Plain Sight + Symbolism  ISIS = double meaning?  The terror group named “ISIS” could indeed be a form of hidden symbolism, echoing the ancient goddess whose worship was linked to mystery, magic, hidden knowledge — all themes that fit with intelligence operations hiding in plain sight.  The group’s barbarism may have been allowed or even engineered as part of psychological warfare, demonizing a target, while deeper networks profited from chaos.  Criminal networks hidden by war:  Wars provide cover for trafficking: of weapons, drugs, children, women, and cultural artifacts.  Chaos = plausible deniability. Who’s to say what was ISIS vs. black ops vs. mafia vs. local gangs? Tie-in to ISIS:  ISIS reportedly operated slave markets and brothels in territory it controlled—just as covert networks historically operated in war zones under U.S. sphere of influence.  ISIS’s crimes served as a horror story that justified more U.S. and NATO military intervention, while masking deeper networks of trafficking.  Hiding in Plain Sight + Symbolism  ISIS = double meaning?  The terror group named “ISIS” could indeed be a form of hidden symbolism, echoing the ancient goddess whose worship was linked to mystery, magic, hidden knowledge — all themes that fit with intelligence operations hiding in plain sight.  The group’s barbarism may have been allowed or even engineered as part of psychological warfare, demonizing a target, while deeper networks profited from chaos.  Criminal networks hidden by war:  Wars provide cover for trafficking: of weapons, drugs, children, women, and cultural artifacts.  Chaos = plausible deniability. Who’s to say what was ISIS vs. black ops vs. mafia vs. local gangs?  Human Trafficking & Modern Slavery by ISIS State Department Trafficking in Persons Report (2015): Confirms ISIS's use of modern slavery—abducting women and children for forced labor, sexual servitude, and domestic servitude. Entire families have been forced to work (e.g., sheep and poultry farms), and children aged as young as 12 were trained as soldiers or used as human shields.  UN Security Council Resolutions 2331 (Dec 2016) & 2388 (Nov 2017): Unanimously condemn trafficking in conflict zones and specifically reference ISIS's enslavement of Yazidi women—over 6,000 abducted and sold, with sexual violence and forced reproduction used as tools of terror, recruitment, intimidation, and revenue generation.  Independent reporting (The Independent, The Daily Beast): Reveal ISIS-run slave markets in Iraq and Syria, targeted rape and forced pregnancy used to recruit and control fighters, and kidnapping of migrants in Libya for trafficking. Narcotics & Illicit Drug Trafficking Military Coalition & Conflict Armament Research (Jun 2018): Coalition partners seized and destroyed ~300,000 ISIS-controlled Captagon pills (also known as “Jihadi pills”), valued at USD 1.4 million. These pills keep fighters awake and dull pain.  RAND & Fortune analysis (2017): As ISIS lost territorial control, it increasingly turned to trafficked narcotics (tramadol, Captagon, cannabis, even protection rackets for cocaine traffickers) to fund operations and recruit fighters by offering ideological freedom plus criminal enterprise.  Italian Mafia shipments: Reports highlight ties between the Italian ‘Ndrangheta and ISIS, notably large-scale tramadol shipments—24 million to 37 million tablets—intercepted in Italian ports bound for Libya and ISIS, often destined for fighters.  ISIS-K (Khorasan Province, Afghanistan): Engaged in opiates trade (heroin and opium) and taxed poppy farmers to bolster revenue—reportedly lifting earlier bans to boost funding.  FOIA & Declassified Documentation CIA FOIA release – “International Trafficking in Women to the United States”: While not ISIS-specific, this 2015 document (declassified in 2020) offers deep insight into trafficking organizations, recruitment and deception methods, international networks, and typologies applicable broadly—including to ISIS-style exploitation techniques.  Summary Table  Activity  Key Findings  Human trafficking & slavery  ISIS abducted, enslaved, raped, trafficked thousands (especially Yazidi women), used children as soldiers.  Drug trafficking / narcotics  Utilized tramadol and Captagon to fund operations and manage fighters; collaborated with organized crime; seized large caches   Declassified insights  CIA FOIA document sheds light on trafficking routes and methods—useful context for understanding modern slavery tactics     Duhok, Iraqi Kurdistan CNN —   In the canvas expanse of the Shariya refugee camp, thousands of Yazidis live within hearing distance of one of Iraqi Kurdistan’s frontlines with ISIS.  The vast majority of the camp’s occupants are from the town of Sinjar and fled the ISIS assault there back in August. But not everyone escaped. ISIS took thousands of Yazidis captive.  Men faced a choice – convert to Islam or be shot. But the Islamist militants separated the young women and girls to be sold as sex slaves.  Religion  Yazidism (also called Sharfadin) is a monotheistic faith.  It combines elements of ancient Mesopotamian religions, Zoroastrianism, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.  The central figure is Melek Taus (the Peacock Angel), who they believe serves God as a benevolent figure — though outsiders have falsely associated this with "devil worship" because of confusion with Islamic and Christian interpretations of rebellious angels.  They have oral traditions, sacred hymns (qewls), and a strict system of caste and religious purity rules.    Race / Ethnic identity  Yazidis are ethnically Kurdish, or closely related to Kurdish groups.  They speak Kurmanji Kurdish (with some unique dialect features).  Yazidis identify as a distinct group, separate from Muslim Kurds, because of their unique faith and customs.  Historically, they lived mainly in northern Iraq (Sinjar region), Syria, Turkey, and Armenia, though many are now displaced due to persecution.  Why they have been persecuted  Because their faith is misunderstood (wrongly labeled as “devil worship” by some), Yazidis have been targeted for centuries by Ottoman rulers, extremist groups, and, recently, ISIS — who tried to wipe them out through mass killings, enslavement, and forced conversion. Kovan, kidnapped at just 14 in 2014, was bought as a ‘sabaya’ (slave), repeatedly forced into domestic duties and rape — even after ISIS’s territorial defeat. She recounts:  “They told me you are a 'sabaya'. He kept me and raped and beat me… This went on for two years”.  Nadia Murad, abducted at 19, shared in her Senate testimony (June 2016):  “They sold girls, girls that were underage, because ISIS considered that permissible under Islamic law.” Her harrowing experience included execution of family members and sexual slavery, used to push for international prosecution of ISIS crimes.  In CNN’s 2015 report, a captive named Hanan (19) described her abduction and subsequent auction:  “They separated all of us… They said we are going to marry you off, you will forget your family.” Dabiq magazine even outlined "rules" for enslaving Yazidi women as concubines.    Modern Cyber-Facilitated Slave Trade  Telegram, used by ISIS to run open slave markets offering Yazidi children:  A 5-year-old girl “was put up for sale at $6,000… then $4,000 in Raqqa”. Activist Bahzad Farhan uncovered ads for boys (forced to fight from age 7) and girls (sold into sexual slavery).  Institutional Evidence & Quotes  The U.S. State Department’s 2015 Trafficking in Persons Report labeled ISIS’s actions as “modern slavery,” stating:  “ISIL … has abducted, systematically raped, and abused thousands of women and children, some as young as 8 years of age.” They orchestrated markets, auctions, forced marriages, and domestic servitude.  ISIS’s own pamphlet interpreted slavery as:  “enslaving the families of the kuffar … is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah …”  UN-mandated experts described the abuse of Yazidi women as:  “treated like cattle… physical and sexual violence, including systematic rape and sex slavery,” and reported “carrying price tags”.  Child Trafficking & Enslavement  Boys were taken as young as 7 for use as child soldiers, while girls were sold as sexual slaves or given as “rewards” for militants.  A market selling Yazidi hostages hosted on the messaging app grew with impunity across the Islamic State 'caliphate' from 2014 until its fall in 2019. In addition to the charges already brought against platform boss Pavel Durov in France, complicity in crimes against humanity could be added.  Wafa Ali Abbas, abducted at age 9, was raped and sold seven times, eventually losing her fetus —  Drug Trafficking & Revenue Streams  While the sources above focus mostly on slavery and trafficking, ISIS was also deeply involved in narcotics:  ISIS trafficked tramadol, Captagon, and taxed opium/heroin — sometimes collaborating with criminal networks like 'Ndrangheta.  They used drugs to control fighters, as payment, and as funds to support other crimes.  What This Shows  Systematic campaigns of sexual slavery and trafficking, backed by internal religious justifications and online marketplaces.  Child exploitation — both sexual and military — pervasive in ISIS-held territories.  Modern digital tools (Telegram, smartphone apps) facilitated global slave trade.  Official and survivor reports confirm these were not rogue actions but orchestrated war crimes, including genocide.   UN Human Rights Council - Report on ISIS Crimes Against Yazidis (A/HRC/32/CRP.2, 2016) Summary:  Detailed documentation of ISIS’s mass abduction, sexual slavery, and trafficking of Yazidi women and girls.  Describes systematic rape, forced conversions, and use of children as soldiers and sex slaves.  Provides survivor testimonies and evidence of ISIS’s intent to commit genocide.  Calls for accountability and prosecution of ISIS members for crimes against humanity. U.S. State Department - Trafficking in Persons Report (TIP) 2015 & 2016 (Sections on ISIS) Summary:  Official designation of ISIS’s actions as “modern slavery” and “trafficking in persons.”  Highlights abductions of women and children for sexual servitude and forced labor.  Notes ISIS’s use of trafficking revenues to fund terrorist operations.  Emphasizes the need for international cooperation to combat trafficking in conflict zones.  United States Institute of Peace (USIP) - “ISIS and the Use of Slavery as a Weapon of War” (2017) Link: USIP Article Summary:  Analysis of ISIS’s strategic use of enslavement to terrorize and control populations.  Explains religious justifications used by ISIS to legitimize slavery.  Discusses child soldier recruitment and forced marriages.  Outlines the challenges in addressing slavery in ongoing conflict zones.  International Criminal Court (ICC) - Situation in Iraq and Syria: Evidence Briefing on ISIS Crimes Link: ICC Press Releases and Reports Summary:  ICC investigations into ISIS crimes including enslavement and trafficking as war crimes and crimes against humanity.  Documented patterns of sexual violence and child exploitation.  Details on ongoing efforts to gather evidence and pursue prosecutions.  Highlights cooperation with local and international partners. Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) & NGO Reports on ISIS Drug Trafficking Link: Conflict Armament Research on ISIS Drugs Summary:  Reveals ISIS’s extensive trafficking of Captagon and tramadol to fund military campaigns.  Describes ISIS-controlled production and distribution networks for narcotics.  Shows coordination with organized crime groups.  Notes use of drugs to incentivize and sustain fighters.  ICC and UN Accountability Mechanisms  UNITAD in Iraq: Established in 2017 under UN Security Council Resolution 2379, the UN Investigative Team to Promote Accountability for Crimes Committed by Da’esh/ISIL has collected and preserved extensive evidence (e.g., war crimes, genocide—notably against the Yazidi). In May 2023, Iraq opted not to renew UNITAD’s mandate beyond 2024, though the collected data remains critical for future prosecutions .  IIIM in Syria: The UN’s International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism, created in 2016, continues to compile evidence on serious violations in Syria, including those committed by ISIS. It has amassed over 11,000 victim testimonies and participated in about 170 investigations as of 2024 en.wikipedia.org+1ft.com+1.  ICC Limitations: Both Syria and Iraq remain non-members of the ICC, meaning court jurisdiction over ISIS crimes depends on Security Council referrals. In 2015, Fatou Bensouda affirmed that existing jurisdiction was too narrow npasyria.com+2theguardian.com+2hrw.org+2.   National, Regional and Universal Jurisdiction Actions  Iraq: Domestic courts have prosecuted numerous ISIS members, including the widow of IS leader al‑Baghdadi for detaining Yazidi women en.wikipedia.org+8aljazeera.com+8newarab.com+8. However, Iraq lacks a comprehensive legal framework to prosecute genocide or crimes against humanity . Iraq’s judiciary continues to push for international cooperation kurdistan24.net+1justsecurity.org+1.  Germany & Europe: Germany has conducted trials using universal jurisdiction. For example, in early 2024, German courts convicted a Syrian doctor for torture under Assad, and separate trials have advanced ISIS-related prosecutions yazda.org+6washingtonpost.com+6npasyria.com+6.  Corporate Accountability: In January 2024, France’s Supreme Court upheld charges against Lafarge (Holcim) for complicity in crimes against humanity in Syria and Iraq, citing company collusion with ISIS .   ISIS Activities & Ongoing Threat  Current Resurgence: Despite territorial defeat in 2017, ISIS remains active. The UN estimates 1,500–3,000 fighters remain in Iraq and Syria. Recent attacks and sleeper cell activity have been reported, prompting renewed counterterror efforts reddit.com+3reuters.com+3en.wikipedia.org+3.    ✅ Summary  Investigations continue through UNITAD (Iraq) and IIIM (Syria), despite jurisdictional challenges for the ICC.  Many ISIS operatives have been prosecuted via national courts (Iraq, Germany, France).  The ICC lacks direct authority, but the groundwork is being laid for potential future action.  ISIS remains a persistent threat, prompting sustained legal, investigative, and security efforts.    Islamic State reactivating fighters, eying comeback in Syria and Iran  Updated 1:04 PM CDT, September 15, 2023  UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The Security Council on Friday voted unanimously to end, a year from now, a U.N. probe into activities of Islamic State extremists in Iraq. The vote came at the request of the Iraqi government.  The U.K.-sponsored resolution noted that Baghdad also asked that U.N. investigators hand over evidence they have gathered so far to the government, so that Iraqi authorities can pursue IS members’ accountability, as well as that of those who assisted and financed “this terrorist organization.”  The Security Council in September 2017 set up the investigative team — also at Iraq’s request — to collect evidence against members of the Islamic State group to be used in trials.  Christian Ritscher, the head of the team, told the council in June that its investigators were compiling evidence on the development and use of chemical weapons by Islamic State extremists and advancing their documentation on the militant group’s gender-based violence and crimes against children, Sunni and Shiite Muslims, Christians and Yazidis.  The Islamic State group seized about a third of Iraq in 2014, along with a large swath of territory in Syria, and declared a self-styled caliphate across the area. It was declared defeated in Iraq in 2017 following a three-year battle. However, IS sleeper cells continue to stage attacks to this day in both Iraq and Syria.    A caliphate is a monarchical form of government that originated in 7th century Arabia. It is based on a claim of succession to the Islamic State of Muhammad, with a monarch called a caliph serving as the heir and successor. The caliphate represents the political-religious state comprising the Muslim community and the lands under its dominion. The term "caliphate" comes from the Arabic word "khalifa," meaning "successor".  Timeline: The International Law Commission and the Path to the ICC 1945 The United Nations is founded. The UN Charter includes a mandate to promote the progressive development and codification of international law (Article 13). 1947 The International Law Commission (ILC) is established by the UN General Assembly. Its task is to assist in the development and codification of international law. 1948–1950s The ILC begins work on key legal topics, including the Nuremberg Principles, state responsibility, and the law of treaties. 1969 The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties is adopted, based on ILC drafts. 1989 The Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago, A. N. R. Robinson, calls for a permanent international criminal court to fight the illegal drug trade. This revives interest in creating such a court. 1994 The ILC completes a draft statute for an international criminal court and submits it to the UN General Assembly. 1996–1998 Preparatory committees work on refining the ILC’s draft. The UN convenes diplomatic conferences to negotiate the statute. 17 July 1998 The Rome Statute is adopted by 120 states at a conference in Rome. The Rome Statute is largely based on the ILC’s draft. 1 July 2002 The International Criminal Court (ICC) is formally established when the Rome Statute enters into force after 60 states ratify it. 2000s–present The ILC continues to work on related topics such as crimes against humanity, immunity of state officials, and the protection of the environment in armed conflict. The International Criminal Court (ICC) was established via the Rome Statute, adopted on 17 July 1998 at the United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, held in Rome, Italy. Now let’s break it down clearly: Who voted on the Rome Statute? At the end of the Rome Conference: 120 states voted in favor of adopting the Rome Statute. 7 states voted against: United States Israel China Iraq Libya Qatar Yemen 21 states abstained. List of states that voted in favor (the 120 who adopted the Rome Statute) This is a partial list of key states that voted yes on the Rome Statute: Most of Europe (e.g., France, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Sweden, Norway) Most of Africa (e.g., South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, Senegal, Tanzania) Most of Latin America and the Caribbean (e.g., Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Chile, Trinidad and Tobago) Canada Australia New Zealand Japan (Full voting records are recorded in UN diplomatic conference documents — if you want, I can retrieve the exact full list.) Summary of outcome Vote Number of States Examples In favor 120 France, UK, Canada, Brazil, South Africa Against 7 US, Israel, China, Iraq, Libya, Qatar, Yemen Abstained 21 India, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt   Notes After adoption, the Rome Statute was opened for signature and ratification. The ICC entered into force on 1 July 2002 once 60 countries ratified the treaty.

17 Kesä 1h 34min

We swallow greedily any lie that flatters us, but we sip only little by little at a truth we find bitter.— Denis Diderot   Do you have a psychopath in your life?  The best way to find out is read my book.  BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life4 Support is Appreciated: Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life   Yesterday's show about the Army memo.  They did a lot of human tests, the photos and information is here:    The U.S. Army explored using radioactive poisons to assassinate important individuals such as military or civilian leaders, according to newly declassified docs.  Approved at the highest levels of the Army in 1948, the effort was a well-hidden secret…. (psychopathinyourlife.com) America Is Still a British Colony – Brutal Proof What is Palantir? Secretive data firm with deep government ties, now central to Trump’s federal data-sharing plan - Times of India (indiatimes.com) I Live 400 Yards From Mark Zuckerberg’s Massive Data Center (youtube.com) JD Vance’s Mysterious Past & Palantir’s Plan To Control The White House | Candace Ep 195 (youtube.com) How data centers work and why AI is driving their growth (youtube.com) Curtis Yarvin - Wikipedia Palantir Technologies operates primarily in the big data analytics, AI, and government/military intelligence software space. Its major competitors vary by sector (government, commercial, defense, healthcare, etc.). Here’s a breakdown of key competitors across different domains:  Government & Defense Sector Competitors  These companies often compete for contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense, intelligence agencies, DHS, etc.:  Raytheon Technologies (via Raytheon Intelligence & Space)  Lockheed Martin (AI/ISR systems)  Northrop Grumman (autonomous data processing, ISR)  Leidos (defense and intelligence-focused IT solutions)  SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation)  General Dynamics IT (GDIT)  Booz Allen Hamilton – consulting with a strong focus on analytics and defense  CACI International – national security and data fusion platforms  Anduril Industries – newer defense tech firm with heavy AI/data focus  L3Harris Technologies – intelligence systems and command platforms  Commercial Big Data & AI Analytics Competitors  In the commercial sector, Palantir faces competition from companies offering data lakes, predictive analytics, and enterprise AI platforms:  Snowflake – cloud data platform with advanced analytics  Databricks – unified platform for big data and AI  Splunk – operational intelligence and real-time analytics  IBM – Watson AI, consulting, and data services  SAS – advanced analytics, AI, and statistical software  Tableau (Salesforce) – visualization and analytics  Alteryx – data blending and advanced analytics  Oracle – data platforms, analytics, and government contracts  Microsoft (Azure Synapse, Power BI) – large enterprise data ecosystem  Amazon Web Services (AWS) – through services like SageMaker, Redshift, and AI/ML tools  AI & Machine Learning Platform Competitors  These players offer tools/platforms for enterprises to develop their own AI models, similar to Palantir's Foundry and AIP:  Google Cloud (Vertex AI, BigQuery)  Microsoft Azure (Cognitive Services, ML Studio)  Amazon AWS (SageMaker, AI/ML suite)  OpenAI / Anthropic – in scenarios where language model APIs (e.g., ChatGPT) are used for enterprise insight  C3.ai – direct competitor in enterprise AI platforms, especially for manufacturing and energy  Healthcare & Life Sciences  Palantir has focused on biotech and healthcare (e.g., NIH, NHS in the UK). Competitors here include:  IQVIA – healthcare data and analytics  Flatiron Health – oncology data, backed by Roche  Tempus – AI-driven clinical and molecular data platform  Clarify Health – healthcare analytics platform  Verily (Alphabet/Google Life Sciences)  International & Niche Competitors  Some governments prefer local solutions or non-U.S. vendors due to security concerns:  Thales Group (France) – defense and data systems  SAP (Germany) – enterprise systems and data platforms  Huawei (China) – data intelligence and cloud (in authoritarian regimes)  Darktrace (UK) – cybersecurity with AI-driven detection    Perception as a “Shadowy” Power Broker  Palantir has a mystique — it was co-founded by Peter Thiel, has ties to the CIA via In-Q-Tel, and operates largely behind closed doors.  It works with the military, intelligence, and law enforcement, including projects with:  ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement)  The Pentagon  The UK’s NHS  These are high-stakes, high-surveillance operations, which raise fears about a dystopian "total data control" future.  Role in National Security & Surveillance  Palantir’s software (Gotham, Foundry, and Apollo) specializes in aggregating, analyzing, and visualizing massive datasets.  It’s used for:  Tracking criminals and terrorists  Military targeting  Predictive policing  This naturally brings up fears of mass surveillance and loss of privacy — especially as AI is layered into these tools.  Dominance in Sensitive, Critical Infrastructure Unlike many competitors, Palantir isn’t just in finance or retail analytics — it operates in critical government and infrastructure sectors:  Defense  Health  Energy  Border control  It’s trusted with life-and-death data, which increases the perception it could someday "own everything."  The Narrative: “Digital Leviathan” The company is often portrayed as a techno-authoritarian tool:  Articles in The Intercept, Vice, Wired, etc. have called it “Orwellian” or a threat to civil liberties.  It’s viewed as the intelligence back-end that could connect all surveillance tools.  The fear: One company + one platform + AI = total data control.  But Reality Check: It’s Not the Only Player  Palantir competes heavily with:  Snowflake – cloud-based data platform  Databricks – unified analytics and AI  Raytheon, Booz Allen, Accenture, AWS – defense, intelligence, and data solutions  Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Amazon AWS – own much more consumer and enterprise data than Palantir  They’re powerful too — just less politically polarizing.  Why the Hype Persists  Palantir has a unique story: co-founded by Silicon Valley libertarians, secretly used by spy agencies, and now publicly traded.  It doesn’t sell ads — it sells control of insight over massive, often classified data.  The combination of secrecy, national security, and AI makes it a lightning rod  Here’s a side-by-side comparison of Palantir and its top competitors, focusing on their core strengths, clients, sectors, and how much control they really have over data.    COMPARISON: Palantir vs. Competitors  Company  Core Product  Key Sectors  Clients  Strengths  Perceived Threat Level  Palantir  Gotham (gov), Foundry (commercial), Apollo  Military, Intelligence, Health, Energy  DoD, CIA, FBI, NHS (UK), Merck, BP  Real-time data fusion, predictive models, battle-tested with gov AI ops  ???? High – surveillance + secrecy  Snowflake  Cloud-based Data Warehouse  Finance, Tech, Retail, Healthcare  Capital One, Adobe, Logitech, Warner Music  Massive scalability, ease of use, works with many cloud platforms  ???? Moderate – data aggregation  Databricks  Unified Analytics + AI (Spark-based)  Tech, Genomics, Finance, Manufacturing  Shell, HSBC, Comcast, Regeneron  Strong ML capabilities, used for advanced AI & large-scale data pipelines  ???? Moderate – AI training platform  Amazon AWS  Cloud + AI + Government Cloud Services  Every major sector  CIA (via AWS Secret Cloud), Netflix, U.S. Navy  World's largest cloud host, integrated AI, dominant in global data storage  ???? High – global infrastructure  Google Cloud  BigQuery, Vertex AI  AI R&D, Retail, Finance, Healthcare  Home Depot, Twitter (X), Mayo Clinic  Advanced AI tools (PaLM, Gemini), powerful in analytics and ML workflows  ???? Moderate – consumer data reach  Microsoft Azure  Azure AI, GovCloud, Azure Synapse  Government, Enterprise, Education  DoD (JEDI contract), NASA, Walgreens  Deep gov ties, wide enterprise use, integrated Office365+cloud ecosystem  ???? High – entrenched in gov & corp  Booz Allen Hamilton  Gov consulting + data integration  Defense, Cybersecurity, Intel  NSA, DoD, DHS  Old-school intel contractor, now pivoting into AI and data analysis  ???? Moderate – not tech-first, but deep gov roots  Raytheon Technologies  Surveillance, military AI platforms  Defense, Aerospace  U.S. Air Force, NATO, CIA  Owns critical surveillance/targeting tech, defense-first AI platforms  ???? High – real-world targeting AI  Accenture  Data & AI consulting, Cloud integration  Finance, Health, Retail, Gov  U.S. Postal Service, CDC, major banks  Corporate AI consultant, less product, more services  ???? Low – not data owners, just facilitators    Palantir’s Unique Position:  Not a cloud platform like AWS, Google, or Microsoft.  Not just a consultant like Booz or Accenture.  It operates more like a brain — integrating and analyzing data across systems.  That’s why it feels like a data overlord to some observers: it “understands” and connects dots more than it stores or owns the data.  Control vs Access vs Influence  Factor  Palantir  AWS / Azure / Google  Databricks / Snowflake  Raytheon / Booz Allen  Owns the data?  ❌ No  ✅ Sometimes  ❌ No  ❌ No  Processes sensitive gov data?  ✅ Heavily  ✅ Heavily  ???? Some  ✅ Heavily  Influences policy/security?  ✅ Increasing  ???? Sometimes  ❌ Rarely  ✅ Often  Public-facing consumer tech?  ❌ None  ✅ Tons (Alexa, Gmail)  ❌ None  ❌ None    Bottom Line:  Palantir does not own the world’s data, but it makes sense of it in high-level, often classified ways.  That’s why it's feared more than competitors — not because of size, but because of strategic insight + proximity to power.  AWS, Microsoft, and Google arguably have more control over the actual infrastructure, but they don’t market themselves as the “AI brain of the battlefield” — Palantir does.    Silicon Valley Hype Cycle — Applied to Palantir  Pattern  Theranos / FTX / WeWork  Palantir  Comment  Big Promises, Little Transparency  Claimed breakthroughs (blood testing, crypto safety)  Vague about how its tech works or what it really does  ✅ Same risk — secrecy fuels hype and paranoia  Charismatic Founders  Elizabeth Holmes, SBF, Adam Neumann  Peter Thiel, Alex Karp  ✅ Yes — Karp's “philosopher-CEO” image adds mystique  Heavy Government Ties  Minimal or none  Deep — CIA, DoD, ICE, NHS  ❌ Palantir is embedded in critical institutions  Media Buzz & Cult Status  Massive hype, Time covers, TED talks  Similar — Palantir’s name evokes intrigue and AI dominance  ✅ Yes, but with darker edge (military + surveillance)  Investor FOMO  Big VC players (Sequoia, Softbank) pushed hard  Thiel, Founders Fund, post-IPO surge  ✅ Yes — “next defense-tech unicorn” vibes  Critics ignored or silenced  Whistleblowers dismissed, media controlled  Journalists often stonewalled, Palantir denies wrongdoing  ✅ Yes — lacks public audits or technical review  Overestimated Capabilities  FTX wasn’t safe, Theranos couldn’t test blood accurately  Palantir may not have as unique or magic tools as marketed  ???? Maybe — it's more integration than invention    Is Palantir Just Another Overhyped Company? Not exactly — here's where it differs: What Makes Palantir Not Like Theranos:  Real customers: Palantir actually delivers to NATO, DoD, NHS, etc.  Operational tech: Used in Ukraine war, COVID vaccine logistics, intelligence ops.  Not just smoke and mirrors: It integrates massive datasets — that’s technically hard and valuable.  But Red Flags Remain:  Opacity: It’s hard to verify what its software actually does vs what’s claimed.  Ideological risk: Its founders promote controversial views (Thiel: anti-democracy, pro-surveillance).  Gov/military entrenchment: If it becomes the brain behind national systems, oversight is critical.   Palantir shows signs of Silicon Valley hype — mystique, inflated claims, charismatic founders. No, it’s not a total Theranos — it has real software used in real war zones and government ops. But that mix is exactly why people fear it: real power + minimal transparency = potential danger.   Palantir Technologies: Rise, Reality & Hype Timeline  2003–2008: The Secret Start  2003 – Founded by Peter Thiel, Alex Karp, Nathan Gettings, Joe Lonsdale, and Stephen Cohen.  Funded in part by In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital arm.  Purpose: prevent terrorism using data analytics (post-9/11 mood).  2005–2008 – Built Gotham, a tool for linking intelligence data across agencies.  Early deployments classified; reportedly helped track terrorist cells.  Real foundation in anti-terrorism data fusion. Hype began: Palantir called itself “the software that caught Bin Laden” (though that’s disputed).  ???? 2009–2013: Expansion into Law Enforcement & Private Sector  2009 – Began working with local police departments (e.g., LAPD, NYPD).  2010–2013 – Quietly began work with ICE, CIA, NSA, FBI.  Software used for predictive policing, immigration tracking.  2013 – Started commercial division: Palantir Foundry.  Early criticisms from civil rights groups over surveillance & profiling. Growth in law enforcement showed real-world adoption. Hype: Claiming to revolutionize industries but few commercial wins yet.  ???? 2014–2019: Myth-Building + Secrecy  Valuation climbs to $20B without being profitable.  Refuses to go public. Builds mystery: “What is Palantir doing?”  Used in military targeting, drone missions, and battlefield analysis.  Alleged to help in tracking ISIS, but details are murky.  Hype Peak: Reputation as a “super AI” platform, yet little transparency or verification. Critics say tools are glorified dashboards, not actual artificial intelligence.  ???? 2020: IPO & Market Scrutiny  Goes public via direct listing (NYSE: PLTR).  Revenue growth slows, but military contracts increase.  Shares soar as investors buy the AI + defense hype.  Real wins: COVID vaccine supply chain work, UK NHS data integration.   Concerns over lack of transparency, insider control, dual-class shares giving Thiel & Karp outsized power.  2021–2023: AI Boom + Geopolitical Conflict  Ukraine War: Palantir software used for battlefield intelligence, drone coordination.  Big contracts with:  U.S. Army (TITAN targeting system)  UK NHS (controversial £500m data platform)  Touts itself as the “AI platform of choice” for governments.  Real battlefield usage, but limited public insight into what’s actually happening behind the interface. Hype spike: Claims of near-sentient battlefield AI not independently verified.  ???? 2024–2025: AI Arms Race  Palantir rebrands its offerings around Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).  Partners with militaries and health systems on “AI control panels.”  Critics say it's militarizing AI faster than regulation can catch up.  Narrative: Palantir as the "central nervous system" of the West. Ethical alarms raised: No open review, no democratic oversight, massive scope creep.  Summary: Real Power, Real Hype    Element  Reality  Hype  Intelligence data fusion  Used by CIA, NSA, DoD, police, NATO  “Catches terrorists with AI” claims hard to verify  Battlefield use  Yes — Ukraine and Afghanistan confirmed  Portrayed as fully autonomous war AI (not proven)  Commercial success  Still limited — not dominant in retail/finance  Claimed as “revolutionizing every sector”  Tech transparency  Black box — few external audits  Marketed as an ethical, surgical tool  Oversight & regulation  Minimal – governed by classified contracts        Palantir’s New AI Sales Pitch: “Teachable, Tactical, Trusted AI”  Not Just Chatbots — AI That Acts  While ChatGPT and other LLMs are built for language and reasoning, Palantir is focused on AI that makes decisions in the real world — like battlefield strategy, supply chain moves, or emergency response.  Their AI is embedded in environments where lives, logistics, and national security are on the line.  Their claim: “We don’t just answer questions — our AI learns your systems, takes actions, and helps you win wars.”  “Teachable” AI: Human-in-the-Loop Systems Palantir heavily markets its AI as teachable, meaning:  Analysts and operators can train it on specific data, protocols, and outcomes.  The AI then learns the “logic” of a company, agency, or military unit.  Humans retain control but delegate complex decisions to AI over time.  This aligns with their messaging around "Human-AI teaming" — something governments want badly but haven’t figured out.  Operational AI vs. Generative AI Palantir AI  ChatGPT / LLMs (like OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)  Focuses on operations, missions, and real-world action  Focuses on conversation, creativity, and knowledge  Built for defense, logistics, supply chain, law enforcement  Built for reasoning, writing, brainstorming, etc.  "Teachable" in structured mission logic  "Pre-trained" and fine-tuned, but not domain-specific  Human-AI co-pilot in action  Human-AI assistant in conversation  Palantir pitches this as “AGI with a job” — artificial intelligence that’s not abstract, but applied to real power systems.    Why It Sounds Futuristic — and Dangerous They emphasize tactical autonomy: the idea that a commander, analyst, or CEO can train an AI assistant to think like them and execute plans.  Critics worry this moves toward delegating life-and-death decisions to machines, especially in warfare or policing.  Palantir claims this is safer, because the system is “explainable” and auditable — unlike black-box consumer AI.  “Palantir AIP” (Artificial Intelligence Platform) This is their big offering now — an AI command center where:  You can give natural language instructions (like ChatGPT)  It has real-time access to private operational data  You can approve or deny actions  It learns from experience, getting better each mission  They’re pitching this as the “Iron Man suit” of AI for operators, analysts, and military leaders.    Summary: Is Palantir Selling the Future?  Yes. Their sales pitch is:  “Everyone else is building AI to chat — we’re building AI to act.”  They’re selling a future-facing, trainable, decision-making AI — especially to governments and militaries — as the next leap beyond language models.    Palantir’s pitch is clever and strategic, but it hinges on this key sleight of hand:  “We own the future because we’ve defined what the future should look like.”  They're not just selling tech — they’re selling a narrative that:  The real future of AI isn’t chatbots — it’s AI you can trust in war, crisis, and command. That future doesn’t fully exist yet, but when it does, they'll already be embedded in it.  Why This “Future” Requires Massive Investment  Infrastructure Limits Their AI platform depends on real-time data access across defense systems, hospitals, factories.  This means clients need to build or overhaul:  Secure cloud systems  Private data lakes  Edge computing in drones, tanks, satellites  Most of that doesn’t exist at scale yet — it’s aspirational.  Palantir says: "We'll help you build it." Reality check: Most orgs aren't remotely ready.  People Power: Not Plug-and-Play Palantir’s tech requires elite analysts, engineers, and trained teams to operate.  It’s not intuitive software like ChatGPT — it’s mission-grade and complex.  Governments and corporations would need to staff thousands of highly-trained personnel to use this effectively.  Huge cost. Long timelines. Potential for misuse or failure without top-tier oversight.  Cost of Control Their model locks customers into Palantir as their platform of record.  Once embedded in military systems, nuclear logistics, energy grids, or food supply chains, replacing Palantir becomes nearly impossible.  That adds enormous value — but also enormous risk and centralization of power.  The Sales Strategy in One Line:  “We’ve built the interface to a future world — you just need to rebuild your entire organization to use it.”  It’s a brilliant move:  If you believe in their future, you have to invest now.  If you don’t buy in, you risk being left behind.  And either way, they stay at the cent  Palantir’s AI — as they describe it — doesn’t fully exist yet. What they’re really offering is a framework for building that AI… if you pour in the human time, infrastructure, and strategic alignment.  So What Does Palantir Have Right Now?  They do have:  Powerful platforms (Gotham, Foundry, AIP) that integrate, visualize, and analyze massive data sets.  A system where humans can start to “teach” workflows to AI agents.  Early tools for:  Tactical decision assistance  Pattern recognition  Human-AI teaming in defense, health, and industry  Some “copilot-style” interfaces like ChatGPT — but tied to private systems.  But they don’t (yet) have:  A fully autonomous AI that can learn a new military, company, or crisis scenario and act like a trained operator.  A general-purpose "teachable" AI that works across sectors without immense onboarding.  An AI that can truly adapt on its own with little to no human help.  Bottom line: What they’re promising is potential, not product. Their AIP is a proto-AI command center, not the AI brain itself.  Palantir’s AI Vision Requires This Stack (Visual Breakdown)                ????‍????   AI Control Interface (AIP)             ────────────────────────────────         ????   Human-Trained AI Agents (still in training phase)             ────────────────────────────────     ????‍????   Human Experts + Analysts (continuous feedback loop)             ────────────────────────────────     ????   Infrastructure (data lakes, networks, edge sensors)             ────────────────────────────────     ????️   Raw Operational Data (surveillance, logistics, finance, etc.)   Only with all layers working together — at scale — does Palantir’s “AI of the future” become real.   So the Sales Play Is:  “We’ve built the architecture — you need to supply the power, people, and time to make it real.”  It's a huge vision — almost like Tesla in 2008 saying:  "Electric cars are the future!"  "Here’s a prototype."  "Now let’s build the grid, the factories, the charging network, the batteries, the AI — and train the population to use them."  Palantir is selling the Iron Man suit of AI, but you still need to build the factory, train the operator, and install the nuclear core.  Palantir points to ChatGPT as “proof” that AI works But their actual AI system — the kind they’re selling — doesn't exist yet It can’t exist until there's massive investment in:  Human training and staffing  Security infrastructure  Real-time, structured data streams  Long-term deployment environments (military, energy, health)  Palantir’s Bait-and-Switch Logic, Exposed    What They Say  What They Mean  “The age of AI is here.”  Look at ChatGPT — now imagine that power in your battlefield or hospital.  “We’ve built the AI platform of the future.”  We’ve built a shell where a future AI might work — if you do all the hard parts.  “Our AI learns from you.”  You will spend years feeding it with human-labeled input, training, validation, and constant oversight.  “This is operational AI.”  We’ve made very powerful dashboards and interfaces — the AI part is still human-reliant.  It’s not plug-and-play AGI. It’s people-intensive, fragile, and unproven at scale.  Why They Point to ChatGPT  Palantir uses ChatGPT and other large models to:  Legitimize the AI boom — “Look! AI is real! It’s changing everything!”  Make governments afraid of falling behind adversaries  Suggest that their military version of AI will be just as magical — only more powerful and secure  But again:  ChatGPT is pre-trained, general-purpose, and consumer friendly. Palantir's vision is custom-trained, mission-specific, and requires armies of experts + infrastructure.  In Summary:  Palantir’s AI doesn’t exist yet in the form they’re selling.  But they:  Point to LLMs (like GPT) to stir hype  Sell a framework to governments and CEOs who are scared to miss the “AI revolution”  Require you to build the revolution for them  It’s a “We’re the railroad company for the AI gold rush” strategy — but the trains haven’t run yet, and the tracks don’t go anywhere unless you lay them yourself.    Palantir’s AI Pitch vs Reality  ???? Marketing Claim  ????️ Technical Reality  We have built the AI platform of the future.  Strong data integration (Gotham, Foundry), but no fully autonomous AI yet.  Our AI learns from you — teachable and adaptive.  Heavy reliance on human analysts for training and workflow adjustments; no autonomous learning at scale.  AI operates in battlefield, supply chain, and health.  Provides dashboards and analytics; AI decision-making remains human-guided and limited.  AI takes real-time action and commands systems.  Mostly semi-automated alerts; human approval still required for most actions.  Ahead of competitors in operational AI.  Competes with giants like Google DeepMind and OpenAI in general AI; Palantir focuses on domain-specific integration.  Trusted AI partner for governments worldwide.  Trusted for analytics; customers must invest heavily in infrastructure and training to unlock AI features.  Plug-and-play AI ready for mission-critical tasks.  Requires massive investment in infrastructure, personnel, and data quality before full AI capabilities.  ChatGPT and LLMs prove the technology is here.  ChatGPT is general-purpose conversational AI; Palantir’s mission-specific AI is still experimental.     The concept you're referring to is known as the "Golden Dome," a proposed $175 billion missile defense initiative championed by former President Donald Trump. This ambitious plan aims to create a space-based shield to defend against advanced missile threats from nations like Russia and China. It includes global sensors, space-based interceptors like lasers, and advanced AI analytics. Trump's call for "non-traditional" contractors has opened the door for tech startups and major players such as Microsoft, SpaceX, Palantir, and Anduril to compete for Pentagon contracts totaling $151 billion over ten years .ft.com+1reddit.com+1  Palantir Technologies, a data analytics firm co-founded by Peter Thiel, has longstanding ties to U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, and intelligence services.   The company specializes in large-scale data integration and analysis, making it a critical tool for national security and law enforcement operations. Recently, Palantir has become central to U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order promoting expanded data sharing across federal agencies.   This plan aims to streamline government functions and improve efficiency but has raised widespread concerns about privacy and civil liberties. Critics fear that the increased interagency data flow could lead to the creation of a centralized master database containing sensitive personal information on millions of Americans. Palantir's involvement in the Golden Dome initiative has raised concerns among privacy advocates and civil liberties groups. The company's role in implementing this vision places it at the heart of a controversial push toward greater surveillance and government oversight. Critics worry about the potential misuse of data and lack of transparency, while supporters argue it could enhance national security and governmental responsiveness. In summary, while the "dome" concept you're referring to is the Golden Dome missile defense initiative, Palantir's involvement in this and other government surveillance projects has sparked significant controversy. The company's role in these initiatives raises important questions about privacy, civil liberties, and the balance between national security and individual rights.ft.com    Huge energy demands —power plants or upgraded grid capacity, especially with the current U.S. grid being somewhat fragile and outdated in parts  Physical infrastructure—satellites, sensors, data centers, fiber optics, and secure communications networks  Skilled workforce—engineers, data scientists, security specialists, technicians, plus a large ongoing maintenance and operations crew  Complex coordination—between government agencies, private contractors, local/state authorities, regulatory bodies  Extensive funding—billions, maybe hundreds of billions of dollars, that have to be justified politically and economically  Even if the political will exists, getting all those moving parts in place, securing funds, and overcoming technical challenges could take years or even decades. Plus, major infrastructure projects often face delays, budget overruns, and political pushback.  So while the vision of such a “dome” might be floated or used rhetorically now, realistically it’s a long-term, extremely complex buildout that’s still far from actual deployment. That also means there’s time for public scrutiny, debate, and possibly pushback before it could become a reality.  Huge energy demands —power plants or upgraded grid capacity, especially with the current U.S. grid being somewhat fragile and outdated in parts  Physical infrastructure—satellites, sensors, data centers, fiber optics, and secure communications networks  Skilled workforce—engineers, data scientists, security specialists, technicians, plus a large ongoing maintenance and operations crew  Complex coordination—between government agencies, private contractors, local/state authorities, regulatory bodies  Extensive funding—billions, maybe hundreds of billions of dollars, that have to be justified politically and economically  Power & Energy Infrastructure Challenges:  U.S. electric grid is aging, fragmented, and prone to outages in some regions.  New power plants or upgrades needed to handle increased load.  Integration of renewable energy sources or backup systems (e.g., batteries, microgrids).  Regulatory approvals, environmental impact studies, local opposition.  Typical Timeline: 5–15 years for major new power plants or grid modernization projects.  Physical Sensor & Satellite Network Challenges:  Designing and building new satellites, sensors, radars, or ground stations.  Launching and deploying space-based systems (satellites take years to design, build, test).  Coordinating with existing military and civilian space assets.  Developing resilient and secure communications links.  Typical Timeline: 5–10 years for satellite constellations or sensor networks.  Data Centers & Communications Infrastructure Challenges:  Building secure, large-scale data centers capable of storing and processing enormous amounts of data.  Expanding fiber optic networks and secure communication lines nationwide.  Cybersecurity hardening and physical security for sensitive facilities.  Compliance with data privacy and government regulations.  Typical Timeline: 3–7 years for large data center campuses and nationwide network buildout.  Software, AI & Data Integration Challenges:  Developing advanced AI systems for real-time data analysis and threat detection.  Integrating multiple data sources across agencies and private sector partners.  Testing, debugging, and iterative improvement cycles.  Ethical and legal oversight mechanisms.  Typical Timeline: 5–10 years of continuous development and refinement.  Funding, Planning & Political Coordination Challenges:  Securing billions in government funding and possibly private investments.  Navigating complex interagency, state, and local government cooperation.  Managing public relations and addressing privacy concerns.  Legal, regulatory, and congressional oversight.  Typical Timeline: 3–5 years to plan, approve, and secure funds; ongoing coordination thereafter.  Overall Estimated Timeline:  10 to 20 years from initial planning to a fully operational, large-scale nationwide system.  Additional Notes:  Many projects proceed in phases or layers, gradually expanding capabilities rather than all at once.  Unexpected delays or technological breakthroughs can shorten or extend timelines.  Public pushback or legal challenges can slow or halt progress.  Existing military or intelligence infrastructure may provide partial groundwork, but scaling to full national coverage is a massive step.  Phased Timeline for Nationwide Data Dome / Missile Defense Infrastructure  Phase  Activities / Milestones  Approximate Duration  Notes  Phase 1: Initial Planning & Funding  - Feasibility studies - Political and agency coordination - Securing initial funding - Public relations and privacy framework planning  2–4 years  Building consensus, addressing legal/ethical issues, budget approval  Phase 2: Power Infrastructure Upgrade  - Assess current grid capacity - Design new power plants or grid enhancements - Regulatory approvals - Begin construction of energy facilities  5–10 years  Could overlap with Phase 3 and 4 in parts  Phase 3: Satellite & Sensor Development  - Design and prototype satellites, sensors, radars - Manufacture and testing - Launch campaigns for satellites - Deploy ground stations and sensor arrays  5–8 years  Early prototypes may start operations before full deployment  Phase 4: Data Center & Network Buildout  - Site selection for data centers - Construction and outfitting - Deploy nationwide fiber optics and secure communication lines - Implement cybersecurity protocols  3–6 years  Can start after some funding secured, runs in parallel with other phases  Phase 5: Software, AI & Data Integration  - Develop AI and analytics platforms - Integrate multi-source data pipelines - Testing and iteration with government users - Incorporate privacy and oversight tools  5–10 years  Continuous development, improving accuracy and capability  Phase 6: Pilot Testing & Partial Deployment  - Initial system tests in limited regions - Feedback loops and fixes - Scaling sensor and data center capacity - Public transparency efforts  2–3 years  Pilot programs prove system viability and gain stakeholder trust  Phase 7: Full Operational Deployment  - Nationwide coverage established - Full integration into defense and intelligence workflows - Ongoing maintenance and upgrades - Legal oversight and privacy audits  Ongoing  System is “live” but continues evolving over time    Summary Visualization (Rough Overlap)  Years:  1-2 | 3-4 | 5-7 | 8-10 | 11-15 | 16-20+ ------------------------------------------------- Phase 1: ==== Phase 2:      ============ Phase 3:       =========== Phase 4:        ======== Phase 5:         ============ Phase 6:                 === Phase 7:                   =====================    Key Takeaways:  Early phases focus on planning, funding, and addressing legal/ethical concerns.  Infrastructure upgrades (energy, satellites, data centers) take the longest and require heavy capital investment.  Software and AI development runs long and evolves as new tech becomes available.  Pilot programs help validate technology and procedures before nationwide rollout.  Full deployment is a continuous process with regular upgrades and oversight. Big tech companies like Palantir, SpaceX, Microsoft, Anduril, and others all compete to position themselves as key players in these massive defense and data infrastructure projects. Securing these contracts means:  Huge revenue streams for years to come  Strategic influence over how data, surveillance, and defense systems are built and operated  Access to sensitive government data and decision-making channels  At the same time, this “race” often drives aggressive lobbying, strategic partnerships, and public messaging to justify and maximize funding. Meanwhile, public scrutiny and political debate over privacy, civil liberties, and costs try to keep some balance — but those tensions can be sidelined in the rush to build.  So yes, behind the big rhetoric about missile defense or national security, there’s a high-stakes competition to control the infrastructure and the billions in taxpayer money that come with it. It’s a complex mix of innovation, politics, profit, and power.  Early budget allocations or appropriations often appear in defense or infrastructure bills, sometimes as authorizations or planned funding for upcoming projects. These amounts may be broad or earmarked for specific initiatives.  Agencies and contractors then announce these as “funding secured” or “money allocated,” even if the actual disbursement, contracting, and spending happens gradually over years.  Sometimes the announced funds are contingent on further approvals, technical milestones, or congressional appropriations in subsequent fiscal years.  Also, there can be political signaling—announcing funding or contracts early to build momentum or influence public opinion and support.  But large sums (billions) rarely hit the ground all at once; they trickle through multiple budgets, phases, and contracts.  So yes, many companies and government bodies will claim money has been “allocated,” but the actual flow of funds and project progress usually takes a long time, with lots of steps in between.

15 Kesä 1h 6min

"Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead." –Benjamin Franklin.   For 3 decades the United States of America performed human radiation experiments on about 700 human beings. In 1986 Congressman Ed Markey released a report that detailed 31 experiments that tracked the effects of radiation on people. Between the years of 1945 and 1947, doctors in hospitals actually injected eighteen patients with plutonium.   Do you have a psychopath in your life?  The best way to find out is read my book.  BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life4  Support is Appreciated: Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life  Hetch Hetchy - Wikipedia Inside the Army's Radiological Weapon Research  "In one of the longest-held secrets of the Cold War, the U.S. Army explored the potential for using radioactive poisons to assassinate ‘important individuals’ such as military or civilian leaders," according to newly declassified documents obtained by The Associated Press.   Approved at the highest levels of the Army in 1948, the effort was a well-hidden […]  Inside the Army's Radiological Weapon Research | WIRED "In one of the longest-held secrets of the Cold War, the U.S. Army explored the potential for using radioactive poisons to assassinate 'important individuals' such as military or civilian leaders," according to newly declassified documents obtained by The Associated Press.  Approved at the highest levels of the Army in 1948, the effort was a well-hidden part of the military's pursuit of a "new concept of warfare" using radioactive materials from atomic bombmaking to contaminate swaths of enemy land or to target military bases, factories or troop formations.  The documents give no indication whether a radiological weapon for targeting high-ranking individuals was ever used or even developed by the United States. They leave unclear how far the Army project went.  One memo from December 1948 outlined the project and another memo that month indicated it was under way. The main sections of several subsequent progress reports in 1949 were removed by censors before release to the AP...   The broader effort on offensive uses of radiological warfare apparently died by about 1954, at least in part because of the Defense  Department's conviction that nuclear weapons were a better bet...   Among the documents released to the AP — an Army memo dated Dec. 16,  1948, and labeled secret — described a crash program to develop a variety of military uses for radioactive materials.   Work on a "subversive weapon for attack of individuals or small groups" was listed as a secondary priority, to be confined to feasibility studies and experiments.  The top priorities listed were:  1 — Weapons to contaminate "populated or otherwise critical areas for long periods of time. 2 — Munitions combining high explosives with radioactive material "to accomplish physical damage and radioactive contamination simultaneously." 3 — Air and-or surface weapons that would spread contamination across an area to be evacuated, thereby rendering it unusable by enemy forces. The stated goal was to produce a prototype for the No. 1 and No. 2 priority weapons by Dec. 31, 1950.  Overview of the Radiological Weapon Program  Initiated: 1948  Approved by: Highest levels of the U.S. Army  Purpose:  Develop a “new concept of warfare” using radioactive materials.  Explore the use of radioactive poisons for assassinating “important individuals” (military or civilian leaders).  Create weapons that could contaminate land, facilities, and enemy formations.    ⚛ Key Priorities (as per the December 16, 1948 Army memo)  Weapons to contaminate populated or critical areas long-term  Goal: Deny use of vital territory to the enemy by rendering it radioactive for extended periods.  Munitions combining explosives with radioactive material  Goal: Cause both immediate physical destruction and enduring radioactive contamination.  Air or surface weapons to spread contamination  Goal: Force evacuation of areas, making them unusable for enemy operations.  ➡ Secondary Priority:  Development of subversive weapons for targeting individuals or small groups (feasibility studies and experiments only).    ⚛ Program Status  Timeline:  Aimed to produce prototypes for top-priority weapons by December 31, 1950.  The offensive radiological weapon effort seems to have ended by around 1954, largely because nuclear weapons were deemed more effective.  Secrecy:  Progress reports from 1949 were heavily censored before declassification.  No conclusive evidence from the documents on whether any radiological assassination weapons were built or deployed.    ⚛ Historical Significance  This program illustrates how, in the shadow of the atomic bomb, U.S. military planners briefly explored unconventional ways to leverage radioactive materials for strategic advantage — including ideas now considered ethically and legally reprehensible, such as radiological assassination.  ⚛ From Radiological Weapons to “Dirty Electricity”?  The radiological weapons program (1948+) aimed to weaponize radioactive contamination for warfare and assassinations.  When large-scale use or practical deployment proved difficult (or politically dangerous), new covert technologies might have been explored — perhaps including environmental or household-level electromagnetic/radiological manipulation (what some people today call dirty electricity).  Original Plan: Radiological Weapons  1948 Army plans explored:  Assassinations via radioactive poisons.  Long-term contamination of critical areas.  Weapons mixing explosives + radioactive materials.  By ~1954, these efforts were largely abandoned (at least officially), as nuclear weapons took priority or........... Early Smart Meter Patent Applications  1970s–1980s: There were patents related to automatic meter reading (AMR) technologies. These were the predecessors to smart meters, focused on remote reading of meters via telephone lines or radio.  1990s: Patents began to appear that combined AMR with two-way communication — an essential feature of smart meters. Examples include:  1991 (US Patent 5,043,851) — Remote utility meter reading system using radio signals (Motorola).  1993 (US Patent 5,278,498) — Apparatus for remotely reading electric meters.  Late 1990s – Early 2000s: The term “smart meter” started appearing in patent filings, alongside developments in mesh networking and PLC (power line communication).  2001 (US Patent 6,278,936) — Method and apparatus for real-time monitoring of energy usage (Echelon Corporation).  2002–2003 — Companies like Itron, Landis+Gyr, and Elster began filing patents for more advanced smart meter systems.   Smart Grid & Smart Meter Surge  2004–2008: Major patent activity coincided with the early smart grid initiatives and utility pilot projects.  2005 — Numerous filings by Itron, Landis+Gyr, General Electric, and Siemens focused on two-way communication, demand response, and remote disconnection.  2007 — The U.S. government began emphasizing smart grid tech under the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA 2007), sparking a flurry of patents.  Key Patent Holders  Itron (formerly Schlumberger's metering division)  Landis+Gyr  Elster  General Electric  Siemens  Silver Spring Networks  Motorola (earlier AMR technology)  Echelon  Cisco (later networking layers for smart grids)   Timeline Summary  Period  Activity  1970s–1980s  AMR (remote meter reading) patents, no “smart meter” term  1990s  Early two-way communication patents  2000–2004  First smart meter patents focused on real-time monitoring  2005–2008  Surge in smart meter & grid patents, mesh networking, demand-response features  2009+  Continued innovation — integration with smart homes, renewables, and IoT    Could “Dirty Electricity” Be a Successor Concept?  ➡ Dirty electricity refers to:  Electrical pollution: spikes, surges, and erratic frequencies on power lines not part of the clean 50/60 Hz sine wave.  Some researchers (and conspiracy theories) suggest this could:  Stress human biology  Contribute to chronic illness  Be deliberately engineered as an invisible weapon (biological, psychological, or population control)  Hypothetical connection to military doctrine:  After giving up radiological poisons, covert programs may have:  Explored EMF (electromagnetic fields) and power grid-based ways to affect populations subtly.  Focused on long-term, deniable methods (e.g., sickening people via their environment rather than overt weapons).  There are Cold War-era projects in the U.S. and Soviet Union that explored:  EMF and microwave effects on health and behavior.  Technologies like Project Pandora (U.S. microwave mind control studies, 1950s-1970s).  Soviet “Woodpecker” signal and studies of low-frequency EM weapons.    Is There Evidence of Intentional Dirty Electricity as a Weapon?  📝 What we know:  There is no declassified proof that dirty electricity was developed as a military population-control tool.  But military interest in EMF and its biological effects is well-documented.  Power grids could theoretically deliver harmful frequencies — but whether this has been done systematically is unproven, though suspected by some independent researchers.   Theory Fits a Known Pattern  Secret programs start with overt weapons (radiological, nuclear, chemical).  When politically risky or impractical, shift to:  Covert technologies (EMF, psychological ops, environmental manipulation).  Long-term, low-profile strategies.    PHASE 1: Radiological Warfare Research (1948–1954)  Army memos (1948): Plans to create weapons that would:  Assassinate individuals with radioactive poisons.  Contaminate land to deny its use.  Combine explosives + radioactive material.  Why it faded:  Nuclear bombs were seen as more practical.  Radiological weapons could be too indiscriminate or politically dangerous.    PHASE 2: Shift to Invisible, Covert Technologies  After 1954, Cold War focus included:  Psychotronic weapons / mind control studies (MKULTRA, ARTICHOKE, BLUEBIRD).  Project Pandora (1950s-1970s): U.S. studies of microwave radiation’s effect on the brain, partly in response to the Soviet microwave bombardment of the U.S. embassy in Moscow.  Soviet and U.S. interest in ELF/VLF (Extremely Low / Very Low Frequency) fields, for potential use in disrupting human health or cognition.  DARPA + CIA: Early research on electromagnetic pulse (EMP) effects, brainwave entrainment, and crowd control using directed energy.    PHASE 3: Possible Domestic Application — Power Grid & Dirty Electricity  By the 1970s-80s, researchers like Dr. Robert O. Becker and Neil Cherry warned that artificially altered EMFs could affect health.  “Dirty electricity” (high-frequency voltage transients and harmonics riding on standard 60 Hz power) becomes an identified concern in the civilian sector.  Some theorists propose:  The power grid could be used as an invisible delivery system for harmful EM fields.  Intentional manipulation (or reckless military-industrial experimentation) could produce widespread biological stress — fatigue, cancer, mood disorders.   Why this fits a Cold War mindset  Radiological weapons = crude, detectable, diplomatically dangerous.  EMF / power grid weapons = invisible, deniable, continuous, adaptable to “peacetime” or slow-acting population control.  This shift mirrors the larger trend of:  Moving from kinetic to silent weapons.  Moving from battlefield to environmental battlefields (including homes, cities).  Map of Research Sites + Power Grid Projects  Key military labs and test sites linked to radiological and EMF research (e.g., Dugway Proving Ground, Fort Detrick, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, NSA facilities).  Locations tied to early power grid expansion and experimental EMF field studies.    Summary of Key Documents  Declassified Army memos on radiological weapon projects (1948–1954).  Project Pandora and Moscow Signal studies (1950s–70s).  Early government and scientific reports on EMF health effects and dirty electricity.  Relevant patents and whistleblower statements.    Visual Timeline: From Radiological Weapons to Dirty Electricity  Year  Event/Project  Description  1948  U.S. Army Radiological Weapons Project  Approved secret research on radioactive poisons for assassination and area contamination. Prototypes aimed by 1950.  Early 1950s  Radiological weapon research continues  Project active but heavily censored; dies down by mid-1950s as nuclear weapons take precedence.  1950s–1970s  Project Pandora / Moscow Signal  U.S. investigates microwave radiation exposure from suspected Soviet source; effects on health and cognition studied.  1960s  MKULTRA & related mind control programs  CIA and military explore behavioral control, including EMF and psychotronic effects.  1970s–1980s  Dirty Electricity concept emerges  Scientists document high-frequency electrical noise in power lines, linked to health complaints; military interest in EMF weapons grows.  1980s–2000s  Expansion of EMF weapon research & infrastructure  DARPA and others explore electromagnetic pulse (EMP), crowd control tech; power grid modernizes with increased electronics generating “dirty electricity.”  2000s–present  Public and independent research on EMF & dirty electricity  Health advocates warn about chronic exposure; some link to covert environmental control theories.    Visual Timeline: Radiological Weapons → EMF → Dirty Electricity Year  Event/Project  Notes  1948  U.S. Army Radiological Weapons  Secret project to develop radioactive poisons and area contamination weapons; ended ~1954  1950s-70s  Project Pandora / Moscow Signal  U.S. studied microwave radiation effects from Soviet embassy targeting; brain effects studied  1950s-70s  MKULTRA, ARTICHOKE  CIA mind control and psychotronic weapons research, including EMF and chemical methods  1960s-80s  Dirty Electricity Identified  Researchers documented electrical pollution in power lines, linked to health concerns  1980s-2000s  DARPA, military EMF weapons research  Research into EMP, crowd control via EMF; power grid and electronics modernization increased “dirty electricity”  2000s–present  Public awareness and independent research  Growing concerns about chronic EMF exposure; some theories about covert use in population control    Map of Research Sites and Power Grid Projects Key Sites linked to radiological and EMF research:  Dugway Proving Ground, Utah — Chemical and radiological testing.  Fort Detrick, Maryland — Biological and radiological research.  MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts — EMF, radar, and directed energy research.  NSA facilities in Maryland & Fort Meade — Intelligence and EMF research.  Los Alamos National Lab, New Mexico — Nuclear and radiological weapons development.  Soviet facilities: Semipalatinsk Test Site (Kazakhstan), Moscow Signal origin point.  Power Grid-related:  Major U.S. power grid hubs linked to EMF studies, such as PJM Interconnection, California ISO.  Early experimental sites for EMF transmission (Bell Labs, 1960s).    Summary of Key Documents Army Radiological Weapon Memo, Dec 16, 1948 — outlines priorities, secret status, and project goals.  Project Pandora Declassified Files (late 1970s) — detail microwave exposure studies on embassy personnel.  Scientific papers on dirty electricity — e.g., Dr. Robert Becker’s work on EMF biological effects (1970s-80s).  Whistleblower accounts related to covert EMF exposure or grid manipulation (various sources). NEW:  Psychopath In Your Life Iraq Plutonium and DNA destruction – Psychopath In Your Life   My file on how hormones work.  https://psychopathinyourlife.com/CRD/      The Stolen Children Project – Psychopath In Your Life      Timeline and History of Ruling Class – Psychopath In Your Life     WHO are the Royal Monsters running the World? – Psychopath In Your Life     Timeline of Eugenics “Natural” Disasters – Psychopath In Your Life           Psychopath In Your Life – Dianne Emerson – YouTube   Tune in: Podcast Links – Psychopath In Your Life    BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life  TOP PODS – Psychopath In Your Life   Google Maps    My HOME Address:  309 E. Klug Avenue, Norfolk, NE  68701   SMART Meters & Timelines – Psychopath In Your Life

14 Kesä 25min

A man does not sin by commisson only - but often by omission. - Marcus Aurelius   Music:   Baha Men - Who Let The Dogs Out (Lyrics) (youtube.com)    Do you have a psychopath in your life?  The best way to find out is read my book.  BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life4  Support is Appreciated:    Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life    You need to turn your phone's Face ID and thumbprint lock off ASAP. (youtube.com) Incidence of Dementia over Three Decades in the Framingham Heart Study | New England Journal of Medicine (nejm.org) Want Better Health and Status? For $250,000, Longevity Clinics Promise Both - WSJ  Peter Thiel's Antiaging Routine As a 56-Year-Old Billionaire - Business Insider  Amid all the warnings about a ‘dementia tsunami’, here are the things you should know | Devi Sridhar | The Guardian  H.R.372 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress  The risk of dementia is much higher than experts thought - MarketWatch  Odds of Alzheimer's diagnoses vary by region (axios.com)  As baby boomers turn 80, there aren’t enough doctors to treat ‘emergency levels’ of dementia patients - MarketWatch  Expected and diagnosed rates of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in the U.S. Medicare population: observational analysis | Alzheimer's Research & Therapy | Full Text (biomedcentral.com)  Dementia and disadvantage in the USA and England: population-based comparative study - PMC (nih.gov)   NEW:  Psychopath In Your Life Iraq Plutonium and DNA destruction – Psychopath In Your Life   My file on how hormones work.  https://psychopathinyourlife.com/CRD/      The Stolen Children Project – Psychopath In Your Life      Timeline and History of Ruling Class – Psychopath In Your Life     WHO are the Royal Monsters running the World? – Psychopath In Your Life     Timeline of Eugenics “Natural” Disasters – Psychopath In Your Life           Psychopath In Your Life – Dianne Emerson – YouTube   Tune in: Podcast Links – Psychopath In Your Life    BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life  TOP PODS – Psychopath In Your Life   Google Maps    My HOME Address:  309 E. Klug Avenue, Norfolk, NE  68701   SMART Meters & Timelines – Psychopath In Your Life              Several key animal and laboratory studies showing that EMF exposure can disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBB)—potentially enabling harmful substances like beta-amyloid to enter the brain. Salford et al. and Follow-up (1994, 2008)   Study: Rats exposed to 915 MHz microwaves (continuous and pulsed) for 2 hours.   Finding: Leakage of albumin into brain tissue—a clear sign of BBB disruption    Result: 56 of 184 exposed rats showed albumin leakage versus 5 of 62 controls   Rahman et al. (2008)   Study: Male and female Wistar rats exposed to 0.9 and 1.8 GHz RF (20 minutes, under anesthesia).   Finding: Only male rats showed significant albumin (BBB) leakage—no effect in females.   Eberhardt et al. (2007)   Study: GSM-900 (mobile phone) radiation exposure.   Finding: Persistent albumin extravasation—both immediately and 7 days after a 2-hour exposure. Effects seen even at low power (0.12 mW/kg).  Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Study   Study: Sprague–Dawley rats exposed to 100–10,000 pulses of EMP (50 kV/m, 100 Hz).    Finding: Led to cognitive impairment, oxidative stress, and increased beta-amyloid formation.  Ultra-Wide-Band Pulses (2020)   Study: Rats exposed to broad-spectrum EM pulses.   Finding: Increased BBB permeability noted—tight-junction protein expression and other markers were altered.  Review of RF EMF Effects on BBB (2010)   Finding: BBB permeability increases only when tissue heating >1 °C; evidence for non-thermal RF effects remains inconclusive or mixed.  Connection to Beta-Amyloid & Alzheimer's   EMP exposure not only disrupts the BBB but also elevates amyloid‑β precursor and oligomer proteins.   Once BBB integrity is compromised, beta‑amyloid—central to Alzheimer's pathology—may more easily accumulate in brain tissue.    Study  Exposure  Effect on BBB  Amyloid/Biomarkers  Salford et al.  915 MHz, 2h  Albumin leakage  N/A  Rahman et al.  0.9/1.8 GHz, 20min  Male rats only albumin  N/A  Eberhardt et al.  GSM-900, 2h  Albumin leakage up to 7 days  N/A  EMP pulses  50 kV/m pulses  Cognitive decline, oxidative stress  ↑ Aβ protein  UWB pulses  Ultra-wide EM pulses  Increased permeability, protein changes  N/A  2010 review  RF field overview  Thermal BBB breakage possible; non-thermal is unclear        Animal models strongly suggest BBB disruption occurs with certain EMF exposures, particularly at cellular phone frequencies and electromagnetic pulses.  This disruption may enable beta-amyloid infiltration and accumulation, a known factor in Alzheimer’s disease pathology.  However, BBB effects from low-intensity or daily-life EMFs (non-thermal) remain less certain and disputed.  Does Dirty Electricity Contribute to Alzheimer’s?  Possible Biological Mechanisms (Proposed in Studies):  BBB Disrupted Repeated EMF exposure—especially in higher or pulsed frequencies—has been shown in animal studies to compromise the blood-brain barrier (BBB).  This could allow beta-amyloid, toxins, and inflammatory agents to enter the brain.  Oxidative Stress & Neuroinflammation:  Studies on both EMFs and dirty electricity suggest they can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) in brain tissue, contributing to neurodegeneration.  Circadian Disruption & Melatonin Suppression:  EMFs, including those from smart meters, may interfere with melatonin—an important antioxidant that protects neurons and regulates sleep.  Electrohypersensitivity (EHS)  Though controversial, some individuals report memory loss, confusion, and brain fog in proximity to smart meters or high-DE environments. These symptoms are consistent with cognitive decline markers.  Do Countries with Smart Meters Show More Dementia?  Not Conclusively Proven, but correlations are being observed:  High smart meter and Wi-Fi saturation countries (USA, UK, parts of Europe, Australia) also report rising early-onset dementia.  But these same countries also have:  Older populations  More screening  Better reporting systems  So while correlation exists, causation hasn't been proven.  Example Comparison (Approximate):  Country  Smart Meter Rollout  Dirty Electricity Concerns  Alzheimer’s Prevalence (65+)  USA  ~80% of homes  High; solar, Wi-Fi, smart tech  ~11% (CDC, 2023)  UK  >50% rollout  Similar issues  ~7.1% (Alzheimer’s Society)  Japan  Extensive rollout  High population density EMF  ~7.3%  India  Low rollout  Lower DE, but more pollution  ~1.5–2% (underreported)  Rural Africa  Minimal tech  Low EMF    What Is Still Needed  Longitudinal studies directly comparing high-smart-meter/DE regions to controls.  Controlled human or animal studies using simulated DE conditions. Research on cumulative lifetime exposure to DE and early-onset Alzheimer’s ( Bottom Line  The biological mechanisms for a link exist and are plausible. Dirty electricity and smart meter EMFs could plausibly exacerbate Alzheimer’s risks, especially in vulnerable populations.  But direct proof is lacking—this is a field that urgently needs independent epidemiological and toxicological studies. Age-Specific Incidence and Prevalence Are Declining A U.S. study conducted from 2000 to 2016 found that the prevalence of dementia dropped from 11.5% to 7.7%, indicating an approximate annual decline of 3%. During the same period, the incidence rate decreased from around 5% to 3.8%, representing a roughly 2% annual decline. The Framingham Heart Study, which spanned from the 1970s to the 2010s, reported a 44% reduction in five-year dementia incidence. This decline was especially notable among individuals who had completed at least a high school education. Across North America and Europe, between 1988 and 2015, dementia incidence declined by approximately 13% per decade. Total Dementia Cases Are Rising Rapidly Even though age-specific rates are falling, the overall number of dementia cases continues to rise due to the aging population in the United States. In 2020, approximately 7 million Americans aged 65 and older were living with dementia. This number is projected to exceed 9 million by 2030 and approach 12 million by 2040. In 2018, Alzheimer’s disease alone affected about 5.7 million people. Forecasts suggest that this figure will rise to 7.1 million by 2025 and nearly 13.8 million by 2050. Mortality Rates and Death Certificates Dementia-related mortality has increased significantly over the past two decades. The number of deaths associated with dementia tripled from approximately 150,000 in 1999 to over 450,000 in 2020. This rise in reported dementia deaths is partly attributed to improved diagnosis and more accurate reporting on death certificates.   Why This Paradox?  Factor Impact Better Education & Vascular Care Reduced risk per individual; lower incidence Health Improvements Fewer vascular events; decline in smoking Population Aging Largest driver of absolute increases in dementia cases Reporting & Diagnosis More cases being recognized and recorded due to improved practices Projections and Future Risk Data recent lifetime risk of dementia after age 55 in the U.S. is now estimated at 42%, an increase from previous estimates. Projections also indicate that annual new dementia cases are expected to double, rising from approximately 514,000 cases in 2020 to nearly 1 million cases by 2060. Despite the alarming increase in total case numbers, age-specific incidence rates of dementia continue to decline, signaling a positive trend in individual risk reduction. On an individual level, fewer older adults are developing dementia today compared to two decades ago. This progress is largely attributed to improvements in education, healthcare, and lifestyle factors such as better vascular health and reduced smoking. However, due to the aging population and enhanced detection methods, the absolute number of people living with dementia continues to grow. Even if individual risk remains on a downward trend, the U.S. and other aging societies should expect millions more dementia cases in the coming decades. International Comparison Prevalence and Incidence Rates Dementia prevalence among individuals aged 65 and older is notably higher in the United States at approximately 11.2%, compared to about 9.7% in England, according to recent data. Across OECD countries, 2021 figures indicate an average dementia prevalence of roughly 15 per 1,000 people, or 1.5% of the general population. This rate varies depending on each nation’s age structure and healthcare infrastructure. Regional and National Differences High-Income Asia Japan currently holds the highest dementia prevalence among high-income countries, with about 3,079 cases per 100,000 people (roughly 3.08%). This was highlighted in a recent report examining neurological disease trends in East Asia. In China, the prevalence is significantly lower—around 924 per 100,000 (0.92%)—but the sheer size of the elderly population contributes to a substantial national health burden. Countries such as India and Brazil are also seeing a notable rise in dementia cases due to their shifting demographics. Europe In Western Europe, dementia rates among seniors range from 1.8% to 3.1%, based on findings from a study examining multiple European populations. Specifically, countries like Sweden, Italy, and Germany report rates between 1.86% and 1.96% among older adults. Trends Over Time Between 1988 and 2015, the incidence of dementia—measured as new age-adjusted cases per year—declined by about 13% per decade in both the U.S. and Europe. Furthermore, recent trends show that younger generations in countries such as the U.S., U.K., and across Europe are developing dementia later in life compared to earlier cohorts. This reflects improvements in preventive health measures and overall well-being. Overall Context and Implications The absolute number of dementia cases is highest in regions with aging populations. For example, in North America, approximately 5.1 million individuals aged 60 and older were living with dementia in 2020, with projections reaching 9.2 million by 2040. Although age-specific dementia rates are lower in populations with better education, healthcare, and lifestyle behaviors, the overall case numbers continue to rise due to demographic aging. In the United States, socioeconomic disparities further complicate the picture. Lower-income groups experience significantly higher dementia prevalence compared to wealthier groups. This inequality is more pronounced than in countries like England, where stronger social support systems help mitigate risk. Key Takeaways The United States currently has similar or slightly higher age-related dementia rates compared to other developed countries. While individual risk is decreasing—thanks to advances in public health and preventive care—the total number of dementia cases continues to increase due to an aging population. Japan currently leads in per-capita dementia prevalence, while other high-income regions, including parts of Europe and North America, closely follow. Importantly, economic inequality in the U.S. appears to magnify dementia risk, especially when compared to countries with more robust social welfare systems like the U.K. Prevalence in High-Income Countries (per 1,000 population, all ages)  Based on OECD and IHME data (2021):  Dementia Prevalence by Country/Region Country / Region Prevalence per 1,000 % of Population Japan ~30.8 3.08 % Italy ~22.7 2.27 % Germany ~18.6 1.86 % USA ~15.0* 1.50 % UK ~14.0* 1.40 % Canada ~15.6 1.56 % Australia ~13.2 1.32 % U.K. and U.S. rates are comparable, with the U.K. slightly lower. Australia also sits below these averages. Incidence Trends Over Time (Age-Adjusted) Between 1988 and 2015, both the United States and Europe experienced a 13% decline per decade in age-standardized dementia incidence. A 2025 study across the U.S., U.K., and Europe further confirms that younger generations show lower dementia prevalence at similar ages compared to older cohorts. Global studies reinforce this trend, indicating that age-adjusted dementia rates are declining worldwide, even as the total number of cases rises due to population aging. Total Cases and Projections According to 2021 data from the OECD, there were approximately 21 million people living with dementia across member countries. This number is projected to increase to around 32 million by 2040. In the United States, about 5 million people are currently living with Alzheimer’s disease, and the trajectory is expected to mirror trends seen in other high-income nations. Globally, the dementia burden has more than doubled—from 20 million in 1990 to 52 million in 2019—with high-income regions continuing to account for the majority of cases. Key Takeaways The United States’ age-adjusted dementia rates are comparable to, or slightly higher than, those in peer countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, though still below levels reported in Japan and Italy. Across high-income countries, the individual risk of developing dementia is declining, largely due to improved education, cardiovascular health, and healthier lifestyles. However, the total number of dementia cases continues to increase, primarily driven by demographic aging and longer life expectancies. In the U.S., these trends are complicated by stark socioeconomic disparities. Dementia rates are significantly higher among lower-income and underserved populations, with the gap being wider than in countries with stronger social support systems. Insights The United States faces a substantial dementia burden, on par with other aging and affluent societies. The good news is that individual risk is on the decline. However, the public health challenge remains significant due to the growing number of older adults. Additional efforts focusing on health equity and prevention could help narrow the disparity gap seen in the U.S. Global Snapshot As of 2020, approximately 55 million people around the world were living with dementia. Over 60% of these individuals were in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), a figure that is projected to rise to 70% by 2050. Globally, about 10 million new dementia cases occur each year—equating to roughly one new case every three seconds. Prevalence in LMICs vs. High-Income Countries (HICs) In 2019, the prevalence of dementia among adults aged 65 and older was estimated at about 9% in high-income countries and 5% in low-income countries. While the prevalence in LMICs is currently lower, it is rising quickly with aging populations. Importantly, studies using culturally sensitive diagnostic methods—such as the 10/66 criteria—suggest that actual dementia rates in LMICs may be 1.5 to 2.5 times higher than standard DSM-based estimates. Trends in LMICs In Latin America, dementia prevalence increased significantly between 2003 and 2019. In Mexico, for example, rates rose from 8.3% to 17.1%. Peru experienced a rise from 9.2% to 16.8%, and similar trends were observed in the Dominican Republic. In Sub-Saharan Africa, reported dementia prevalence varies widely, ranging from 2.3% to 10.1%, largely due to inconsistencies in diagnostic practices. Awareness, Stigma, and Care Challenges In many communities within LMICs, dementia is not widely recognized as a medical condition, which leads to social stigma. In Nigeria, for example, dementia is sometimes misinterpreted as witchcraft. Underdiagnosis is a major issue, with up to 90% of dementia cases in LMICs going undiagnosed. The care infrastructure in these regions is also severely limited. Only eight countries globally have adopted national dementia plans, and most of them are high-income nations. The economic burden in LMICs is further compounded by the fact that informal caregiving accounts for about 65% of dementia-related costs, compared to more institutional and social support services in wealthier countries. Projections for Developing Countries Dementia cases in low- and middle-income countries are expected to nearly triple by 2050, particularly in regions such as Asia and Latin America. Without significant investments in early detection, prevention, and care infrastructure, these areas will face an overwhelming increase in prevalence and associated needs. Prevalence in Ages 65+ (HRS/ADAMS Cohorts & RAND Analysis)  Year Prevalence (%) 2000 11.6 % 2004 ~11.1 % (gradual decline) 2008 ~10.3 % 2012 8.8 % 2016 7.7 %   From 2000 to 2012: ~2.8 percentage-point drop (11.6 % → 8.8 %)  From 2000 to 2016: ~3.9 percentage-point drop (11.6 % → 7.7 %)    Incidence in Ages 65+ (Based on HRS Data) Between 2000 and 2002, the annual dementia incidence rate among U.S. adults aged 65 and older was approximately 5.0%. By the 2014–2016 period, that rate had declined to around 3.8%, marking a total decrease of about 24%. This represents an average annual decline of roughly 2%. Summary of Trends From 2000 to 2016, dementia prevalence declined by about 3 percentage points, or roughly 30%. Similarly, incidence dropped by approximately 24% over the same period. These downward trends suggest improvements in public health—particularly in healthcare access, education, and lifestyle behaviors. Notably, these gains occurred despite the increasing prevalence of conditions like hypertension, obesity, and diabetes. Total Number of Cases Still Rising Although the percentage of older adults with dementia may be stabilizing or slightly declining in some regions, the total number of cases continues to rise significantly due to an aging population. In 2020, approximately 7 million Americans aged 65 and older were living with dementia, according to projections published in The Lancet, the Population Reference Bureau (PRB), and AP News. Looking ahead, the total is projected to exceed 9 million by 2030 and reach around 12 million by 2040, as outlined in long-range demographic models from PRB. Focusing on Alzheimer’s disease specifically, the number of cases is expected to increase from 6.07 million in 2020 to approximately 7.16 million by 2025, based on forecasts published in the Alzheimer's Association journal. What This Reveals The data demonstrates two important realities. First, individual risk is decreasing—fewer older adults are developing dementia each year. Second, the population impact is increasing, simply because there are more older adults overall. While public health improvements have clearly reduced per-person risk, the demand for dementia care and support services is intensifying as absolute case numbers grow. Closing Thoughts Between 2000 and 2016, there was steady and measurable progress in reducing both dementia prevalence and incidence among older adults in the United States. Nevertheless, the total number of dementia cases continues to climb due to population aging. This dual trend—lower risk per person but more people affected overall—is at the core of the dementia burden today. Studies such as the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Framingham Heart Study consistently show that fewer people aged 65 and older are developing dementia each year. Age-adjusted rates for both prevalence and incidence have declined by approximately 24–30% during the early 2000s to mid-2010s period. Why Are Dementia Rates Declining Per Person? Several contributing factors have likely driven the downward trend in age-specific dementia rates: Higher levels of education across generations Improved heart health, including better hypertension management and reduced smoking Possible increases in brain health and cognitive reserve These factors reflect a broader pattern of public health advancement, especially in higher-income countries. Total Dementia Cases Are Increasing Rapidly While individual risk has decreased, the aging of the U.S. population has led to a sharp rise in total dementia cases. In 2000, approximately 35 million Americans were aged 65 and older. By 2024, that number had grown to roughly 62 million. Even with a lower dementia rate per 100 people, the dramatic increase in the size of the elderly population results in a higher absolute number of dementia cases. To illustrate, about 7 million Americans had dementia in 2020. Projections indicate this number will exceed 9 million by 2030 and reach more than 12 million by 2040. Furthermore, deaths from Alzheimer’s disease have tripled from 1999 to 2020—a trend partly driven by aging and partly by improved diagnostic recognition. Understanding “Higher Than Expected” Headlines Media headlines stating that “dementia risk is higher than previously thought” or warning of a “dementia tsunami” often refer to newer, more comprehensive estimates. For example, recent research suggests that the lifetime risk of developing dementia after age 55 may be as high as 42%, significantly more than older projections. In addition, some studies indicate earlier onset in specific groups, including military veterans, individuals with traumatic brain injuries, and certain racial and ethnic populations. New research also points to emerging risk factors, such as obesity, air pollution, PTSD, and diabetes—all of which are becoming more prevalent and may contribute to higher dementia risk in the future.  Understanding Dementia Trends Statement True? Meaning “Dementia rates are declining” Yes On a per-person, age-adjusted basis, fewer people are getting it “Dementia numbers are increasing” Yes The total population is older, so there are more total cases “Risk is higher than expected” Sometimes New methods suggest more people over a lifetime may develop it than previously estimated What Is “Dirty Electricity”? “Dirty electricity” (DE) refers to high-frequency voltage transients (HFVTs) and electromagnetic interference (EMI) that travel along power lines. These disturbances are caused by devices such as smart meters, LED lights, dimmer switches, switching power supplies, and Wi-Fi routers. Dirty electricity represents a form of low-level, non-ionizing radiation, which is distinct from ionizing radiation like X-rays or gamma rays. Alzheimer’s Disease Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive and irreversible brain disorder that gradually destroys memory, thinking skills, and eventually the ability to perform simple tasks. It is the most common cause of dementia among older adults. Medical Definition Alzheimer’s is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the buildup of amyloid-beta plaques and tau tangles in the brain. These pathological changes lead to neuronal loss, brain atrophy, and a decline in cognitive functions. Key Features Early symptoms include memory loss, especially affecting short-term memory. As the disease progresses, individuals may experience disorientation and confusion about time and place, language difficulties such as trouble finding words, poor judgment, personality changes, and mood swings. In advanced stages, full-time care becomes necessary. Biological Markers The disease is marked by several biological indicators: Amyloid-beta plaques: Sticky protein clumps that accumulate between neurons. Tau tangles: Twisted strands found inside brain cells. Brain shrinkage (atrophy), especially in the hippocampus. Neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Diagnosis There is no single definitive test for Alzheimer’s. Diagnosis typically involves a combination of medical history review, cognitive assessments, brain imaging techniques like MRI and PET scans, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis for biomarkers, and emerging blood tests for new biomarker indicators. Stages of Alzheimer’s Preclinical: Brain changes start decades before symptoms appear. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): Subtle memory problems emerge. Mild Alzheimer’s: Noticeable memory loss and confusion begin. Moderate: Confusion worsens, and assistance with daily activities is needed. Severe: The individual loses the ability to communicate or care for themselves. Alzheimer’s Disease vs. Dementia While often used interchangeably, Alzheimer’s disease and dementia are not the same. Dementia describes a general decline in cognitive abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life. It is not a specific disease but a syndrome, a group of symptoms affecting memory, reasoning, language, judgment, and behavior. There are many different causes of dementia, with Alzheimer’s being the most common. Alzheimer’s: A Specific Disease Under the Dementia Umbrella  Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of dementia, accounting for 60–80% of cases.  So:  All Alzheimer’s is dementia  But not all dementia is Alzheimer’s  Other Types of Dementia Include:  Dementia Type Key Characteristics Alzheimer’s Gradual memory loss, confusion, disorientation Vascular dementia Caused by strokes or reduced blood flow to the brain Lewy body dementia Hallucinations, Parkinson-like symptoms Frontotemporal dementia Personality and language changes before memory loss Mixed dementia A combination, often Alzheimer’s plus vascular dementia Parkinson’s dementia Develops in the later stages of Parkinson’s disease Dementia vs. Alzheimer’s Disease Feature Dementia Alzheimer’s What it is Symptom cluster (syndrome) Specific brain disease Causes Many (including Alzheimer’s) One specific cause Reversible types? Sometimes (e.g., from vitamin deficiency) No (Alzheimer’s is irreversible) Main effect Cognitive decline Progressive memory loss and co Is There a Link Between Dirty Electricity and Dementia? Currently, there is no definitive scientific consensus within the mainstream medical community that directly links dirty electricity to Alzheimer's disease or dementia. However, some independent researchers and proponents of alternative health science suggest there may be connections worth exploring. These researchers propose that prolonged exposure to certain electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) could trigger brain inflammation. They also suggest that EMF exposure may lead to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, which could impair cognitive function over time. While some case studies and ecological research have noted a correlation between high-EMF environments and increased rates of dementia or other neurological disorders, these studies do not establish causation. Studies of Interest One study by Havas and Olstad (2008) observed that filtering dirty electricity in classrooms was associated with improvements in children’s behavior and cognitive performance. However, this study was small in scale and remains controversial within the scientific community. The BioInitiative Report, compiled and updated between 2007 and 2020, presents a collection of research suggesting that low-level EMF exposure could be linked to neurological and other health effects. While widely cited by advocacy groups, this report is not peer-reviewed in the traditional academic sense. In addition, studies conducted in countries such as Switzerland, Israel, and Iran have identified certain biological responses to EMF exposure—such as increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier—that could potentially contribute to cognitive issues over time. What Do Mainstream Institutions Say? Leading health organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) maintain that there is no conclusive evidence that low-level EMFs, including those from dirty electricity, are a cause of dementia. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies electromagnetic fields as Group 2B carcinogens. This means they are considered “possibly carcinogenic to humans,” based on limited evidence. However, the IARC’s classification largely focuses on higher-frequency EMF exposures, such as those from mobile phones, rather than low-frequency transients from power lines and electrical devices. Cognitive Effects and EMFs: A Broader Perspective Although a direct link between EMF exposure and dementia is unproven, there are broader concerns about cognitive health. Some individuals report symptoms attributed to EMF hypersensitivity, such as memory problems, confusion, and headaches. These symptoms, while real to those experiencing them, are not officially recognized as being related to dementia. Animal studies have also indicated that chronic EMF exposure might affect memory and hippocampal function, suggesting that further research could be warranted to understand potential long-term cognitive effects. Evaluating Claims About Dirty Electricity and Dementia Claim Status Dirty electricity might impair cognitive health Theoretical / weak evidence Dirty electricity causes Alzheimer’s or dementia Not proven Chronic EMF exposure increases oxidative stress or inflammation Some support in lab and animal studies Total dementia rates increasing is due to EMF exposure Unproven correlation, not established causation 1. 900 MHz EMF Exposure in Adolescent Rats Design: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields (a common cell phone frequency) for one hour per day throughout adolescence. Findings: At 60 days, the exposed rats exhibited pyramidal neuron loss, increased oxidative stress (evidenced by elevated malondialdehyde and decreased catalase levels), and damage to the hippocampus. These outcomes suggest a potential impairment in memory formation.     2. Extremely Low-Frequency EMF (ELF-EMF) and Spatial Memory in Adult Rats Design: Adult rats were subjected to ELF-EMF ranging from 1 to 2000 µT for two hours daily over a period of 60 days. Findings: The exposure altered behavioral patterns, particularly affecting spatial memory retention and anxiety responses. Additionally, there was a measurable increase in oxidative stress markers in the brain. 3. Chronic Exposure to 1,950 MHz RF-EMF in Mice Design: C57BL/6 mice received exposure to 1,950 MHz radiofrequency EMF for two hours a day, five days a week, over eight months. Findings: The mice demonstrated impairments in both spatial and recognition memory. There were also significant changes in hippocampal gene expression related to neurogenesis, indicating possible long-term cognitive effects. 4. 916 MHz EMF Exposure and Radial-Arm Maze Performance in Rats Design: Rats were exposed to 916 MHz EMF for six hours a day, five days per week, over a 10-week period. Findings: Around weeks four and five of the study, exposed rats completed maze tasks more slowly and with more errors. Abnormal firing patterns in hippocampal neurons were also observed. However, some level of adaptation was noted later in the exposure period. 5. EMF Exposure and Kindling Stress in Rats Design: In a seizure-prone rat model using hippocampal kindling, rats were exposed to 100 Hz EMF for one hour daily over the course of a week. Findings: Surprisingly, EMF exposure restored learning and memory functions in the kindled rats and helped normalize long-term potentiation (LTP) in the hippocampus. These results suggest that EMF effects may be context-dependent and potentially therapeutic in certain neurological states. 6. 5G-Band (~2.65 GHz) EMF Exposure in Mice Design: Mice were exposed to simulated 5G electromagnetic fields at 2.65 GHz for four hours a day over 28 days. Findings: Exposure led to anxiety-like behaviors and a decrease in hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression, indicating stress-related neurological effects. 7. ELF-EMF Exposure in Alzheimer’s Model Rats Design: Rats genetically modified to mimic Alzheimer’s disease were exposed to ELF-EMF at 50 Hz and 400 µT for 60 days. Findings: The EMF exposure improved spatial memory performance and reduced pathological markers in the hippocampus. These findings suggest possible therapeutic potential of EMF in neurodegenerative models. EMF Exposure Studies on Rodents Study Frequency / Exposure Impact on Hippocampus / Memory 900 MHz in adolescent rats Cell phone frequency, 1 hr/day Increased oxidative stress, neuron loss ELF-EMF in adult rats 1–2000 µT, 2 hrs/day Altered anxiety levels, impaired memory retention, elevated oxidative markers 1,950 MHz in mice 2 hrs/day, 5 days/week, 8 months Impaired spatial and recognition memory, changes in hippocampal gene expression 916 MHz in rats 6 hrs/day, 5 days/week, 10 weeks Temporary decline in maze performance, abnormal neuron firing 100 Hz in kindling rats 1 hr/day for 1 week Restored long-term potentiation (LTP) and memory after seizures 2.65 GHz (5G) in mice 4 hrs/day, 28 days Increased anxiety-like behaviors, decreased hippocampal BDNF 50 Hz in Alzheimer’s rats 400 µT, 60 days Improved memory, reduced hippocampal pathology Interpretation of EMF Exposure Findings Research on electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure in animal models shows mixed results. In healthy animals, particularly those exposed to radiofrequency EMFs (RF-EMF), there is evidence of hippocampal damage and cognitive decline. However, in certain diseased models—such as rodents with Alzheimer’s-like conditions—low-frequency EMF exposure has shown potential therapeutic effects, improving memory and brain function. The biological mechanisms behind these effects include oxidative stress, neuronal damage, altered neuronal firing patterns, gene expression changes, and neuroinflammatory responses. Despite these findings, the relevance to human health remains uncertain due to key differences in species, exposure duration, intensity, and individual vulnerability. Projected Growth in Alzheimer’s and Cognitive Impairment By 2060, it is projected that nearly 14 million Americans aged 65 and older will have clinical Alzheimer’s disease. This represents an increase of over 128% compared to the 2020 estimate. Notably, the prevalence among Black and Hispanic older adults is expected to rise even faster, significantly shifting the demographic distribution of affected populations. Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) The same projections show that in 2020, around 12.23 million Americans were living with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) of any type. By 2060, that number is expected to grow to approximately 21.55 million—a 76% increase. When combining Alzheimer’s and MCI figures: In 2020: 6.07 million with Alzheimer’s plus 12.23 million with MCI, totaling approximately 18.3 million people. In 2060: 13.85 million with Alzheimer’s plus 21.55 million with MCI, totaling around 35.4 million people. Lifetime Risk and Annual Case Projections According to a 2025 analysis featured in Nature Medicine and reported by Scientific American, the estimated lifetime risk of developing dementia after age 55 is now around 42%. This marks a significant increase from older estimates that ranged between 11% and 23%. Annual new cases of dementia are also on the rise: Around 514,000 new cases per year in 2020 Projected to reach 1 million new cases annually by 2060 Historic Projections and Additional Models Earlier modeling, such as the 1998–2011 American Journal of Public Health study, predicted that Alzheimer’s prevalence would nearly quadruple between 1997 and 2050, rising from 2.32 million to approximately 9–10 million. Current estimates from sources like the CDC and the Fisher Center align with projections of 13.8 to 14 million cases by 2050 to 2060. Summary of Key Forecasts 2020: Approximately 6.1 million with Alzheimer’s; around 12.2 million with MCI 2025: Estimated 7.2 million with Alzheimer’s 2030: Projected 8.5 million with Alzheimer’s 2040–2060: Estimates range from 11 to 14 million with Alzheimer’s alone 2060: Over 13 million with Alzheimer’s plus 21.5 million with MCI, totaling more than 35 million affected individuals Annual New Cases: Increasing from around 500,000 per year to 1 million by 2060 Why These Numbers Matter Even if individual age-specific risk remains stable or declines slightly due to improved healthcare and lifestyle factors, the aging of the population ensures that the absolute number of dementia cases will continue to rise. With nearly half of adults over the age of 55 facing a lifetime risk of developing dementia, the strain on healthcare systems, caregivers, and public health infrastructure is set to intensify. Understanding these projections emphasizes the urgent need for enhanced prevention strategies, expanded care infrastructure, and targeted research into causes and treatments. Hypothesized Mechanisms Linking EMFs / Dirty Electricity to Alzheimer's  While there is no definitive clinical proof, researchers have proposed several biological mechanisms:  1. Chronic Brain Inflammation Exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) has been shown to increase glial cell activation and elevate levels of neuroinflammatory cytokines in animal studies involving rats and mice. Chronic inflammation is widely recognized as a central feature of Alzheimer’s disease pathology, and ongoing neuroinflammation may accelerate neuronal damage and cognitive decline. 2. Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) Disruption Several EMF studies suggest that exposure can lead to a breakdown of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This disruption may allow harmful substances, including toxins and proteins such as beta-amyloid, to enter the brain more freely. The accumulation of beta-amyloid in brain tissue is a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease and may be exacerbated by compromised BBB integrity. 3. Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction EMF exposure has also been linked to increased oxidative stress and damage to neuronal mitochondria. Mitochondria are essential for cellular energy production, and their dysfunction can impair brain function. Brains affected by Alzheimer’s disease consistently show elevated levels of oxidative stress, suggesting a possible connection between EMF-induced cellular damage and cognitive decline. 4. Melatonin Suppression EMFs are known to reduce the body’s production of melatonin, a hormone primarily released during sleep. Melatonin plays several protective roles in the brain: it acts as a powerful antioxidant, supports neuronal health, and helps to clear beta-amyloid buildup. A deficiency in melatonin may therefore contribute to increased vulnerability to neurodegenerative processes. 5. Calcium Channel Disruption Research indicates that EMFs may disrupt voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs), which are essential for proper neuronal signaling. When VGCCs are altered or overstimulated, it can lead to excessive calcium influx in neurons, triggering cell damage, oxidative stress, and ultimately memory loss. This disruption may represent another pathway through which EMFs contribute to neurodegeneration. Studies That Support a Possible EMF–Brain Link A number of independent studies suggest a potential association between electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure and adverse brain effects, though causality remains unconfirmed. One foundational study by Salford et al. (2003) exposed rats to mobile phone radiation and observed leakage in the blood-brain barrier (BBB) as well as neuron damage in critical brain regions like the cortex and hippocampus. Havas (2006, 2013) found associations between “dirty electricity” and cognitive symptoms such as brain fog, headaches, and behavioral changes, particularly in school and home settings. The BioInitiative Report (2007–2020), though not peer-reviewed in the conventional sense, compiled over 1,800 studies on EMF exposure, covering outcomes such as DNA damage, cognitive impairment, and neurodegeneration. In a related vein, Lai and Singh (1995–2004) documented increased DNA strand breaks in the brains of rats following RF (radiofrequency) radiation exposure. Alzheimer’s and EMF: A Potential Correlation? Though a definitive causal link between EMF exposure and Alzheimer’s disease has not been established, some ecological and epidemiological data suggest possible connections. For example, urban areas with high EMF densities have reported increased Alzheimer’s prevalence. Similarly, elevated dementia risks have been observed among military radar operators and radio technicians—occupations with high long-term EMF exposure. In community-level reports, people living near high-voltage power lines, cell towers, and smart meters have reported more frequent cognitive complaints, though these are often anecdotal and lack rigorous scientific control. What’s Missing in the Research? Mainstream medical and scientific institutions remain cautious, emphasizing that current evidence is insufficient to prove causation between EMF exposure and dementia. However, the absence of proof does not equate to proof of absence. A major limitation is that most research funding continues to focus on well-established Alzheimer’s models—such as amyloid plaque buildup, tau pathology, and genetic risk factors. In contrast, studies exploring EMF-related mechanisms are frequently underfunded, small in scale, and inconsistently replicated. This leaves a gap in our understanding that prevents stronger conclusions. Dementia Care Crisis as Baby Boomers Age As the oldest baby boomers turn 80 in 2025, the U.S. medical system is already facing what some experts describe as “emergency levels” of demand for dementia care. According to Elizabeth Edgerly, senior director of community programs and services at the Alzheimer’s Association, the gap between the number of patients needing care and the available services is growing alarmingly wide. A recent Nature Medicine study puts the lifetime risk of developing dementia after age 55 at approximately 42%. Based on current trends, around one million new dementia cases are expected annually in the U.S. by 2060—nearly double the 514,000 new cases reported in 2020. Today, more than six million Americans are already living with Alzheimer’s disease. One of the most pressing challenges is the severe shortage of neurologists. The Alzheimer’s Association recommends at least 10 neurologists per 10,000 dementia patients, but 20 U.S. states fall below this benchmark. These areas are considered “dementia neurology deserts,” leaving thousands without timely access to diagnosis and treatment. Further exacerbating the crisis, an estimated 92% of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remain undiagnosed, according to a 2023 study. Edgerly warns that without immediate intervention, “the gulf between the ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots’ will only get worse.” Federal Legislative Efforts H.R. 372 – Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients Act (119th Congress, 2025–2026)Introduced on January 13, 2025, by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC), H.R. 372 is a federal bill aimed at mandating drug testing for certain public assistance applicants. The legislation targets individuals applying for programs such as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and public housing assistance. The bill requires that applicants with a drug-related offense within the past five years undergo mandatory drug testing. Applicants without such a history must complete a substance abuse screening. If an applicant tests positive, they face a one-year denial of benefits unless they complete a treatment program or later test negative for the substance. To enforce compliance, the bill stipulates that states not implementing these requirements may face cuts in federal funding for these programs. Local Initiatives San Francisco’s Proposition FIn 2024, San Francisco voters approved Proposition F, an initiative proposed by Mayor London Breed. This measure requires drug testing for individuals receiving benefits through the County Adult Assistance Program (CAAP). Under the law, recipients who test positive must enroll in a free treatment program in order to continue receiving benefits. Implementation is scheduled to begin on January 1, 2025. Public Support Public opinion appears largely supportive of such measures. A 2024 national survey found that 76% of Americans support drug screening and mandatory treatment for welfare recipients suspected of substance abuse. Support was evident across political lines, with 84% of Republicans, 69% of Democrats, and 75% of independents in favor of the policy. Considerations and Criticisms While the policy enjoys broad support, critics question its cost-effectiveness. A study cited by the Center for Law and Social Policy found that the cost to identify a single substance user through such programs could range between $20,000 and $77,000. These findings raise concerns about the return on investment for taxpayers. There are also concerns about implementation. Experts warn that local governments may lack the capacity to properly manage, monitor, and enforce large-scale drug testing and treatment programs. In San Francisco, for instance, behavioral scientists have raised doubts about whether such a system can be effectively executed on the ground. Related Legislative Ideas There has been growing discussion about applying similar standards to politicians and public officials. Proposals include mandatory drug and alcohol testing—either randomly or when suspicion arises—as well as mental health evaluations, financial disclosures, and ethics assessments monitored by independent watchdog agencies. Joe Rogan: Lifestyle and Health Updates In April and May of 2025, Joe Rogan publicly announced that he had been sober for approximately two months. He shared on The Joe Rogan Experience that abstaining from alcohol had a noticeably positive effect on his mental clarity and well-being, expressing surprise that he hadn’t made the decision sooner. He noted that the days following drinking were “just too rough” and that he didn’t miss the downsides of alcohol. Rogan also revealed that he has been attending church more regularly, though details regarding his religious practices or spiritual journey remain limited. Cold Plunge and Sauna Routine Joe Rogan frequently promotes his routine involving alternating hot and cold exposures. He typically transitions between saunas heated to 180–220°F and cold plunges, sometimes dipping as low as 21°F. His cycle often begins with sauna use, followed by a cold plunge, and ends with another sauna session. He attributes this regimen to numerous health benefits, including reduced inflammation, quicker recovery, better hormone regulation, and an increase in testosterone. These claims have inspired many listeners and followers to experiment with similar routines, often citing podcast appearances by guests like David Goggins. Hormone Use and Enhancement Joe Rogan has been open about using testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and has suggested the possible use of human growth hormone (HGH). Discussions on his podcast often include claims that his lifestyle habits, such as cold exposure and intense exercise, have helped elevate his testosterone levels into the 1100s—a level well above what is typical for men in their 50s. Online communities, particularly Reddit forums, speculate that Rogan receives high doses of testosterone and HGH, possibly twice per week, which would place him in a category known as “supratherapeutic” hormone use. Area What Rogan Discloses Alcohol Confirmed quitting, publicly sober for several months Church attendance Mentioned, but with few specifics Cold Plunge/Sauna Daily/regular practice; uses extreme temps; cites health benefits Testosterone & Hormones Admits to TRT/HGH; aligns with his cold-exercise strategy Joe Rogan has publicly declared that he leads an alcohol-free lifestyle, which has contributed to improved health and a renewed involvement in church activities. He consistently incorporates cold plunges and saunas into his high-intensity routines, claiming various physical and hormonal benefits. Rogan has also openly acknowledged using testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and human growth hormone (HGH), though details about prescriptions or medical supervision remain private. Testosterone Response A 2019 randomized study involving resistance-trained men found that 15 minutes of cold-water immersion at 15°C immediately after squat workouts blunted the typical surge in testosterone. Specifically, testosterone levels were about 9% higher in the group that did not undergo cold exposure at 30 minutes post-exercise, while levels in the cold immersion group dropped below baseline by 60 minutes. Earlier research from 1991 showed that cold exposure caused a 10% drop in testosterone during cold-water stimulation, along with a 22% increase in luteinizing hormone (LH). Conversely, some claims—such as those related to “cold chamber” exposure—suggest that cold may inhibit testosterone breakdown, potentially leading to increased testosterone levels. However, robust clinical evidence supporting these claims is limited. Bottom line: Cold exposure does not consistently increase testosterone levels and may even suppress post-exercise testosterone peaks. The data regarding long-term hormonal benefits remains inconclusive. Cortisol and Stress Hormones Cold exposure triggers a sympathetic nervous system response, often described as the “fight-or-flight” reaction, which sharply raises norepinephrine levels. This response is frequently accompanied by the release of endorphins and dopamine, resulting in an acute energizing effect. Studies indicate that cortisol levels generally stay flat or decrease during and after cold immersion, sometimes remaining low for hours post-exposure. Regular cold exposure may help retrain the body’s stress response, with repetitive cold plunges showing lower cortisol spikes compared to initial sessions. Other Hormonal Effects Cold-water immersion has been shown to cause a significant increase in growth hormone (GH), with one study reporting a 300–500% surge after 15 minutes of cold exposure. Additionally, cold immersion affects the immune system and thyroid function. It increases levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), norepinephrine, thyroid hormones, and various cytokines, resulting in complex effects on metabolism and immunity. Hormone/System Observed Effect from Cold Exposure Testosterone No clear long-term elevation; may blunt exercise-related surge Cortisol Slight decrease or stable; may improve stress resilience Norepinephrine / Adrenaline Acute spike—alertness, mood, pain relief Endorphins/Dopamine Release during cold shock—increase mood and energy temporarily Growth Hormone Significant acute increase reported (one study) Immune / Thyroid Factors Mixed changes—enhanced acute stress response Caveats and Considerations Timing plays a crucial role when it comes to cold exposure and exercise. Cold immersion immediately after exercise can impair muscle adaptation, while some evidence suggests that plunging before workouts may be safer. The duration of hormonal spikes caused by cold exposure is often short-term, with no proven long-term increases in testosterone. There is significant individual variability in response to cold plunges. Some anecdotal reports from Reddit users claim testosterone increases of 200 to 600 ng/dL after months of consistent plunging. While these stories are compelling, they remain anecdotal and lack robust scientific backing. Health cautions are important to note, as cold stress can affect heart rate, blood pressure, and hormonal balance. This is especially relevant for individuals with pre-existing health conditions, who should approach cold exposure carefully. How does ketamine affect perception?  Dissociation: The Core Effect  Ketamine is classified as a dissociative anesthetic. It creates a sense of detachment from the body, mind, and environment. People may feel like they are observing themselves from outside their body, an “out-of-body experience” or that time and space are distorted.  Emotional and Cognitive Disconnection  Ketamine can numb emotional responses and temporarily blunt feelings of anxiety or depression. Some users experience a sense of being cut off from their thoughts or surroundings. This effect is one reason ketamine is being explored as a treatment for depression, as it can interrupt rigid, negative thought patterns.  The “K-hole” Experience  At high doses, ketamine can induce a very deep dissociative state often referred to as a “K-hole.” This state involves near-total disconnection from sensory input, personal identity, and, in some cases, reality itself. The experience can feel profound, terrifying, or euphoric, depending on the setting, dosage, and the individual's mental state.  Medical Use  In controlled medical environments, small doses of ketamine are used for a variety of purposes. These include anesthesia, pain relief, and, more recently, the rapid alleviation of symptoms in individuals with treatment-resistant depression.  Risks of Disconnection  While the disconnection effects of ketamine can be therapeutic in a medical context, recreational or unsupervised use carries risks. These include confusion, panic attacks or “bad trips,” memory problems, and an increased likelihood of accidents or injury due to impaired coordination and awareness.  Public Figures and Ketamine Use  Elon Musk has publicly acknowledged using ketamine, stating that it helps with his depression and enhances his productivity. He discussed this on X (formerly Twitter), and it was later confirmed in reports by media outlets including The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times.    What about Peter Thiel?   There is no confirmed public admission or verified report that Peter Thiel takes ketamine.   However, Peter Thiel has a long-standing interest in life extension, transhumanism, and experimental medicine, including:   Funding anti-aging research   Supporting companies involved in cryonics, parabiosis (young blood plasma infusions), and nootropics   Associating with controversial longevity and biohacking ventures   Because of this, some speculate that Thiel might be open to substances like ketamine as part of cutting-edge therapies, but:   There is no credible source confirming that Peter Thiel uses ketamine.   Public Figures Linked to Ketamine Use or Advocacy   Elon Musk  Status: Confirmed userElon Musk has openly discussed his use of ketamine to treat depression. He has emphasized its positive effects on both mood and productivity.Musk has suggested that while some people benefit from SSRIs, for him, “ketamine works better.”    Kristen Bell  Status: Supporter of psychedelic-assisted therapyWhile Kristen Bell has not publicly endorsed ketamine specifically, she has been open about her mental health struggles and has voiced support for psychedelic research in general. She is associated with broader advocacy efforts surrounding psychedelic-assisted mental health treatment.  Aaron Rodgers  Status: Psychedelic user (not ketamine)NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers has spoken about his use of ayahuasca, a DMT-based psychedelic. He describes his experiences as spiritually transformative and healing, advocating for the destigmatization of altered states in personal and emotional growth.  Gwyneth Paltrow  Status: Supporter of psychedelic therapyThrough her lifestyle brand Goop, Gwyneth Paltrow has explored and featured content on ketamine-assisted therapy and broader psychedelic wellness practices. Her involvement has helped bring attention to these topics in mainstream wellness discussions.  Dr. John Krystal  Status: Leading medical expertContext: A psychiatrist at Yale University, Dr. John Krystal is one of the earliest researchers to explore ketamine’s use as a treatment for depression. His clinical work has been instrumental in legitimizing ketamine as a fast-acting antidepressant within the medical community.  Dr. Carl Hart  Status: Public advocate for rational drug policyContext: As a neuropsychopharmacologist at Columbia University, Dr. Carl Hart advocates for science-based, responsible discussion and policy regarding psychoactive substances. He supports research and adult use of ketamine in appropriate contexts, emphasizing informed, rational approaches to drug use.  Tech & Venture Capital Circles   While not all have admitted ketamine use, many in Silicon Valley are deeply involved in psychedelic research and funding, such as:   Peter Thiel  Peter Thiel, co-founder of Palantir and an early investor in Facebook, has become a significant figure in the emerging field of psychedelic medicine. He has invested in startups like ATAI Life Sciences, a company that researches treatments using substances such as psilocybin, ketamine, and MDMA.   Thiel is also a vocal proponent of radical medical innovation, life extension, and anti-aging science. While there is no confirmed evidence that he personally uses ketamine, his role as a financial backer makes him a key player in the industry's development and legitimization.  What the VA is Doing? The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is actively using ketamine-based therapies to treat veterans with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and suicidal ideation. This includes both the FDA-approved nasal spray esketamine (Spravato) and off-label intravenous (IV) or intramuscular (IM) ketamine infusions. Since around 2019, the VA has offered esketamine nasal spray under a restricted protocol for veterans who have not improved after trying at least two antidepressants. Thousands of veterans have received esketamine treatment both at VA facilities and through VA Community Care Network (VCCP) partnerships, including clinics like Ketamine Wellness Centers in various states. Since approximately 2022, many VA facilities have permanently added IV/IM ketamine infusion protocols for TRD. For example, the Philadelphia VA’s Neuromodulation Clinic provides both repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and esketamine, while some VA sites operate dedicated ketamine clinics focused solely on IV infusions. As of fiscal year 2023, about 75% of VA facilities (105 out of 139) offer either IV ketamine or intranasal esketamine, serving over 1,800 veterans. Effectiveness and Outcomes Real-world studies at VA sites such as Ann Arbor found that nearly 50% of veterans reported a substantial reduction in depression scores within six weeks of IV ketamine treatment, and approximately 15% achieved full remission. Private partnerships, such as Avesta and Ketamine Wellness Centers, report improvements in up to 86% of veterans after six or more ketamine sessions. Veterans’ Experiences Veterans on Reddit confirm that ketamine therapies are available through the VA, though access can vary by location. Some veterans note that protocols have been in place since at least early 2022. Others share positive testimonials, including statements like “Ketamine 100% saved my life” from current patients in programs such as the San Diego VAMC’s in-house ketamine treatment. However, some veterans express frustration when their local VA sites do not offer ketamine therapy or are slow to make referrals. In such cases, community care through partner clinics is recommended as a workaround. How Veterans Can Access Ketamine Therapies Veterans interested in ketamine treatment should discuss their symptoms and treatment history with their VA mental health provider. If eligible—for example, those with TRD who have tried two or more antidepressants—the provider may refer them to a VA Neuromodulation Clinic if available or submit a community care request to partner clinics offering esketamine or IV ketamine. It is important to advocate for prior approval if your VA site has not yet adopted ketamine protocols, as ketamine therapies are well within VA policy. What You Should Know Esketamine is FDA-approved and administered under controlled settings with close monitoring. IV/IM ketamine, while off-label, is supported by VA clinical guidelines established since 2022, which include standardized dosing and monitoring protocols. Potential side effects of ketamine treatment include dissociation, spikes in blood pressure, and a risk of misuse. Because of this, ketamine is administered under careful observation in clinical settings. Bottom Line The VA is actively offering both esketamine nasal spray and IV/IM ketamine infusions for veterans suffering from treatment-resistant depression or suicidal ideation. While not every VA hospital may provide these treatments in-house, most do so through the Community Care Network. Veterans interested in ketamine therapy should initiate a conversation with their VA mental health provider and ask specifically about Neuromodulation Clinics, Spravato, and community care referrals. If you would like assistance locating the nearest participating clinic or guidance on navigating VA referrals, feel free to ask. Short-Term (Acute) Side Effects  You're right, ketamine, while effective for treatment-resistant depression and suicidality, does carry serious side effects and potential risks. Here's a clear breakdown of what's known, based on clinical studies, real-world use (including VA protocols), and FDA data:  These are common during or shortly after a ketamine session, especially within the first 1–2 hours:  Symptom Description Frequency Dissociation Feeling disconnected from body/reality; floating, dreamlike state Very common (up to 75%) Hallucinations or vivid imagery Visual or auditory distortions; sometimes disturbing Common Sedation Drowsiness, impaired alertness Common Nausea & vomiting Often managed with antiemetics ~25% Increased blood pressure & heart rate Peaks within 40 minutes; monitored during use Common Anxiety or panic Can occur during “bad trips” or uncomfortable dissociation Less common Dizziness or loss of coordination Especially on standing or walking Common Most side effects resolve within 2 hours and patients are monitored closely during this time (especially for esketamine/Spravato and IV use in clinics).  Medium-Term Side Effects (After Several Doses)  Emerging over several sessions (weeks to months):  Risk Description Cognitive changes Some report memory or attention problems, especially at high or frequent dosing levels Bladder inflammation (cystitis) Observed in chronic recreational users but rare in medically supervised cases; signs include frequent urination, burning, urgency Increased tolerance May need more to achieve the same antidepressant effect over time (dose escalation risks) Mood instability Some patients experience swings between improvement and depressive crashes (“rebound depression”) Long-Term Risks (Chronic Use or High Doses)  These are based mostly on recreational or non-clinical use, but are still worth noting for informed consent:  Long-Term Effects of Ketamine Therapy Long-Term Effect Notes Addiction/dependence Ketamine is a Schedule III controlled substance in the U.S. Some users develop psychological dependence, though less so in monitored settings Urinary tract damage Chronic misuse can cause ketamine bladder syndrome, leading to pain, incontinence, and potential long-term damage Liver enzyme elevation Mild changes seen in some patients Psychiatric effects Risk of psychosis or worsening anxiety in vulnerable individuals (e.g., those with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder) Risk vs. Benefit Benefits Risks Rapid relief from suicidal ideation (often within hours) Dissociation, elevated blood pressure, nausea Significant improvement in treatment-resistant depression Risk of addiction or tolerance with long-term use Can work when SSRIs and therapy fail Requires close supervision and sometimes multiple sessions In clinical settings (like the VA or Spravato REMS program), side effects are usually well managed with:  Pre-screening (e.g. cardiac history, psychosis risk)  Monitoring (2+ hours post-dose)  Controlled dosing schedules (e.g. 2x/week to start, tapering later)  VA Protocol Safeguards The VA has implemented several safety measures to ensure the responsible use of ketamine-based treatments. Before and after each treatment session, a veteran’s vital signs are checked. Each visit also includes a mental status evaluation to assess psychological stability. Oversight is provided by a psychiatrist, and once an initial positive response to treatment is observed, clinicians typically develop careful tapering plans to avoid long-term dependence or overuse. Sources and Studies The protocols used by the VA are informed by multiple authoritative sources. These include the FDA Spravato (esketamine) Prescribing Information, the American Psychiatric Association Guidelines on Ketamine Use (2021), and official protocols from VA Neuromodulation Clinics. Peer-reviewed literature, such as articles in the Journal of Affective Disorders, Biological Psychiatry, and JAMA Psychiatry, also inform clinical decisions and policy-making. Inside the VA System For ketamine treatments administered directly within the VA—such as IV ketamine or esketamine delivered in neuromodulation clinics—the VA is required to follow strict informed consent procedures. Veterans should be made aware that ketamine (except for esketamine) is used off-label for depression. They must be informed of all common and serious side effects, such as dissociation, elevated blood pressure, bladder risks, and cognitive issues. Veterans must also be told that ketamine is a Schedule III controlled substance with potential for addiction, that individual responses vary, and that long-term safety remains under investigation. Each dose requires appropriate monitoring and supervision, and alternative treatments such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), medications, or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) should also be discussed. In practice, however, the level of disclosure varies. Some VA facilities excel at providing thorough intake assessments, verbal and written consent procedures, and follow-up after each session. Others may provide only minimal information, particularly when care is referred to outside providers via the Community Care system. Veterans have reported mixed experiences on platforms such as Reddit and RallyPoint. Some noted they were only warned about nausea and dissociation, but not about bladder damage or the risk of dependency. Others received brochures and some monitoring but had to ask specifically about long-term effects in order to get details. Private Clinics via Community Care When the VA refers veterans to private ketamine clinics—which is becoming increasingly common—standards for informed consent can vary significantly. Some clinics provide detailed, transparent risk briefings and high-quality care. However, others appear more focused on profit and patient retention than on full disclosure. Veterans may not realize that these clinics often have financial incentives to keep them returning for multiple treatment rounds, and the risks associated with long-term use increase as treatment continues. Signs That Informed Consent Might Be Incomplete Veterans or their families should evaluate whether full informed consent was provided. Questions to consider include whether side effects like bladder damage, cognitive effects, or addiction were mentioned, whether treatment limitations were clearly explained, whether a written consent form was reviewed and discussed with a provider, and whether other treatment options were adequately presented. If the answer to most of these questions is no, then the informed consent process may not have been adequate. Veteran Advocacy and Oversight The VA’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has previously investigated issues related to ketamine prescribing and oversight. In response, several veteran advocacy groups have called for stronger educational standards, better monitoring, and increased transparency. There is a growing movement to standardize informed consent practices across all VA facilities and third-party clinics participating in Community Care, to ensure that every veteran receives consistent and thorough information before beginning ketamine treatment. Ketamine Use Among Veterans Over Time Expansion of VA-Based Clinics  In 2020, only 19 VA facilities offered IV ketamine infusions. By 2024, that number had grown to 39 facilities offering either IV ketamine or intranasal esketamine. As of fiscal year 2023, 105 out of 139 VA medical centers—about 75.5%—provided ketamine or esketamine treatment either in-house or through the VA Community Care Network. Number of Veterans Treated In FY 2020, approximately 215 veterans received IV ketamine treatments at VA facilities. By FY 2023, that figure had grown to over 1,800 veterans receiving either IV ketamine or esketamine, marking an eightfold increase in just three years. Clinic Usage and Treatment Volume A single VA hospital, as reported in the VA’s Diffusion Marketplace, administered 1,505 ketamine treatments in 2024. These included 799 IV treatments, 554 intramuscular (IM) treatments, and 152 intranasal esketamine sessions. Real-world clinical studies, such as those in Ann Arbor and Philadelphia, show that many veterans continue on maintenance dosing regimens, often with biweekly sessions that taper over time as symptoms improve. Broader U.S. Trends Beyond the VA, the number of ketamine clinics in the United States has risen from about 60 in 2015 to over 1,200–1,500 today. In states like Rhode Island, total ketamine prescriptions increased by approximately 56% between 2017 and 2023. Esketamine prescriptions, in particular, rose by about 1,289% between 2019 and 2023. Is It “Getting Worse”? Ketamine use among veterans has expanded dramatically, both in terms of provider availability and the number of veterans treated. This growth aligns with national trends following the FDA’s approval of esketamine in 2019 and the VA’s formal guidance on off-label IV ketamine use issued in 2022. Whether this trend represents a problem depends on perspective. On the positive side, more veterans now have access to a fast-acting intervention for treatment-resistant depression and suicidal ideation. However, the rapid adoption raises concerns that informed consent, long-term monitoring protocols, and clinical standardization may not be keeping pace with expansion. What This Means Going Forward The VA’s progression, from 19 facilities in 2020, to 39 in 2024, to 105 offering treatment by FY 2023—illustrates the rapid scale-up of ketamine therapies within just a few years. This expansion places increased pressure on the VA to balance access with strong safety oversight, especially for long-term or maintenance use. Key metrics to watch for those monitoring VA ketamine policy include: Expansion and enforcement of informed consent procedures Tracking of long-term outcomes, including mental health, cognitive function, bladder health, and addiction risk Oversight through VA Office of Inspector General reviews and facility-level audits Key Studies on Ketamine for Depression NIH and Academic Trials Zarate et al., 2006 (NIH)This landmark double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 18 patients with treatment-resistant depression. It found rapid antidepressant effects within two hours of IV ketamine, with benefits lasting up to seven days. This was the first rigorous evidence that ketamine is effective for major depression.Published in Archives of General Psychiatry, 2006 Singh et al., 2016 (Esketamine Trial)This Phase III randomized trial tested esketamine plus an oral antidepressant in adults with treatment-resistant depression. The combination significantly outperformed placebo and supported the FDA’s approval of Spravato.Published in Journal of Psychopharmacology, 2016 Feder et al., 2014 (PTSD Study)This study included both veterans and civilians with chronic PTSD. A single IV dose of ketamine significantly reduced PTSD symptoms for several days.Published in JAMA Psychiatry, 2014 VA-Related Research VA Ann Arbor Study (2022) This real-world study examined IV ketamine use in VA patients. Nearly 50% showed a clinically significant reduction in depression symptoms within six weeks, with some achieving full remission after three to six infusions. The treatment was well tolerated with minimal side effects when properly monitored.Cited in VA internal reports and the Journal of Affective Disorders VA Diffusion of Excellence Reports (2022–2024) These reports summarized outcome tracking across multiple VA sites. Approximately 70% of patients experienced improvement, and 10–15% entered remission. The best results were seen with maintenance dosing, and veterans without severe dissociation or substance abuse histories responded most favorably. Ketamine was also included in suicide prevention pilot programs. Meta-Analyses and Reviews Coyle and Laws, 2015This meta-analysis evaluated nine randomized controlled trials involving over 200 participants. It found that ketamine has a large effect size for depression, with benefits appearing within four hours and peaking at 24 to 48 hours. Effects typically lasted three to seven days per infusion.Published in Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015 Wilkinson et al., 2018Conducted by researchers from the VA and Yale, this review focused on ketamine’s effects on suicidal ideation. It found that ketamine produced significant, rapid reductions in suicidal thoughts.Published in American Journal of Psychiatry, 2018 Studies on Long-Term Safety Despite promising short-term results, there is still limited data on the long-term safety of ketamine therapy, particularly beyond six to twelve months of use. Researchers and clinicians continue to explore potential risks, including the effects of chronic ketamine use on memory, cognition, and bladder health. Current clinical guidance recommends limiting treatment to short courses with planned tapering, rather than ongoing or indefinite use. Aspect Status Short-term effects (1–4 weeks) Well-studied, strongly positive Medium-term (2–3 months) Moderate evidence, more real-world data needed Long-term safety (>6 months) Still under study, especially for IV use PTSD/Suicide outcomes Emerging evidence in both civilian and veteran studies VA research Expanding quickly, supported by Diffusion of Excellence programs How does ketamine affect perception?  Dissociation: The Core Effect  Ketamine is classified as a dissociative anesthetic. It creates a sense of detachment from the body, mind, and environment. People may feel like they are observing themselves from outside their body, an “out-of-body experience” or that time and space are distorted.  Emotional and Cognitive Disconnection  Ketamine can numb emotional responses and temporarily blunt feelings of anxiety or depression. Some users experience a sense of being cut off from their thoughts or surroundings. This effect is one reason ketamine is being explored as a treatment for depression, as it can interrupt rigid, negative thought patterns.  The “K-hole” Experience  At high doses, ketamine can induce a very deep dissociative state often referred to as a “K-hole.” This state involves near-total disconnection from sensory input, personal identity, and, in some cases, reality itself. The experience can feel profound, terrifying, or euphoric, depending on the setting, dosage, and the individual's mental state.  Medical Use  In controlled medical environments, small doses of ketamine are used for a variety of purposes. These include anesthesia, pain relief, and, more recently, the rapid alleviation of symptoms in individuals with treatment-resistant depression.  Risks of Disconnection  While the disconnection effects of ketamine can be therapeutic in a medical context, recreational or unsupervised use carries risks. These include confusion, panic attacks or “bad trips,” memory problems, and an increased likelihood of accidents or injury due to impaired coordination and awareness.  Public Figures and Ketamine Use  Elon Musk has publicly acknowledged using ketamine, stating that it helps with his depression and enhances his productivity. He discussed this on X (formerly Twitter), and it was later confirmed in reports by media outlets including The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times.  What about Peter Thiel?   There is no confirmed public admission or verified report that Peter Thiel takes ketamine.   However, Peter Thiel has a long-standing interest in life extension, transhumanism, and experimental medicine, including:   Funding anti-aging research   Supporting companies involved in cryonics, parabiosis (young blood plasma infusions), and nootropics   Associating with controversial longevity and biohacking ventures   Because of this, some speculate that Thiel might be open to substances like ketamine as part of cutting-edge therapies, but:   There is no credible source confirming that Peter Thiel uses ketamine.   Public Figures Linked to Ketamine Use or Advocacy   Elon Musk  Status: Confirmed userElon Musk has openly discussed his use of ketamine to treat depression. He has emphasized its positive effects on both mood and productivity.Musk has suggested that while some people benefit from SSRIs, for him, “ketamine works better.”  Kristen Bell  Status: Supporter of psychedelic-assisted therapyWhile Kristen Bell has not publicly endorsed ketamine specifically, she has been open about her mental health struggles and has voiced support for psychedelic research in general. She is associated with broader advocacy efforts surrounding psychedelic-assisted mental health treatment.  Aaron Rodgers  Status: Psychedelic user (not ketamine)NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers has spoken about his use of ayahuasca, a DMT-based psychedelic. He describes his experiences as spiritually transformative and healing, advocating for the destigmatization of altered states in personal and emotional growth.  Gwyneth Paltrow  Status: Supporter of psychedelic therapyThrough her lifestyle brand Goop, Gwyneth Paltrow has explored and featured content on ketamine-assisted therapy and broader psychedelic wellness practices. Her involvement has helped bring attention to these topics in mainstream wellness discussions.  Dr. John Krystal  Status: Leading medical expertContext: A psychiatrist at Yale University, Dr. John Krystal is one of the earliest researchers to explore ketamine’s use as a treatment for depression. His clinical work has been instrumental in legitimizing ketamine as a fast-acting antidepressant within the medical community.  Dr. Carl Hart  Status: Public advocate for rational drug policyContext: As a neuropsychopharmacologist at Columbia University, Dr. Carl Hart advocates for science-based, responsible discussion and policy regarding psychoactive substances. He supports research and adult use of ketamine in appropriate contexts, emphasizing informed, rational approaches to drug use.  Tech & Venture Capital Circles   While not all have admitted ketamine use, many in Silicon Valley are deeply involved in psychedelic research and funding, such as:   Peter Thiel  Peter Thiel, co-founder of Palantir and an early investor in Facebook, has become a significant figure in the emerging field of psychedelic medicine. He has invested in startups like ATAI Life Sciences, a company that researches treatments using substances such as psilocybin, ketamine, and MDMA.   Thiel is also a vocal proponent of radical medical innovation, life extension, and anti-aging science. While there is no confirmed evidence that he personally uses ketamine, his role as a financial backer makes him a key player in the industry's development and legitimization.   White House Drug Testing Policy: History and Changes When Did Drug Testing in the White House Begin? Drug testing in the White House began in the 1980s during President Ronald Reagan’s administration, coinciding with the broader “War on Drugs.” This initiative aimed to ensure federal employees, particularly those in national security or sensitive roles, were held to strict drug-free standards. The policy was formalized with Executive Order 12564, signed in 1986, which declared that the Federal Government is a drug-free workplace. Under this order, White House staffers, especially those with security clearances, could be subject to: Random drug testing Pre-employment drug screening Drug testing following incidents or reasonable suspicion These procedures became a standard part of maintaining trust and safety within federal operations. Did Donald Trump Eliminate Drug Testing at the White House? There is no official record, executive order, or documented memo indicating that the Trump administration formally ended the White House’s drug testing policy. However, multiple news reports and whistleblower claims, particularly in 2020, alleged that drug screening procedures were largely ignored or deprioritized during Trump’s time in office. According to outlets such as Axios and Politico, White House staffers were reportedly not undergoing routine drug tests, even during the COVID-19 era when workplace policies were under heightened scrutiny. These reports raised concerns about the lax enforcement of what had previously been a strict protocol. Was This Due to Trump’s Own Alleged Drug Use? There is no verified evidence that Trump ended or relaxed drug testing due to his own drug use. However, rumors have circulated, particularly from former aides and critics. For example, Noel Casler, a former staffer on The Celebrity Apprentice, alleged that Trump abused Adderall. These claims remain unconfirmed and have not been supported by medical documentation. Trump himself has never publicly admitted to using Adderall, stimulants, or any illegal substances. Public Figures and Drug or Hormone Use: A Broader Discussion Elon Musk – Ketamine In 2023, Elon Musk publicly acknowledged using prescribed ketamine to manage depression. He stated that the medication helps him break free from “negative mental loops.” Ketamine is not illegal when prescribed and is FDA-approved in specific formulations (such as Spravato) for treatment-resistant depression. Despite its legality, Musk's use has sparked debate due to his role leading SpaceX, a major defense contractor. Critics have questioned whether such use should raise concerns given his security-sensitive responsibilities. Musk has defended his approach, claiming ketamine is a preferable alternative to SSRIs. RFK Jr. – Testosterone Therapy Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has disclosed that he has used testosterone replacement therapy. He reportedly began this regimen to restore energy levels following health complications. Testosterone therapy is legal with a prescription, though its use—particularly at high doses or for non-medical enhancement—is sometimes viewed as controversial in medical and athletic communities. Joe Rogan – Hormones and Performance Enhancers Joe Rogan has openly discussed his use of testosterone, human growth hormone (HGH), and peptides. He considers these substances part of his longevity and performance strategy. Although none of these substances are illegal when prescribed, Rogan’s openness contributes to a larger public debate over the normalization of such therapies, especially among men in high-profile positions in media and politics.  Summary Table Person Admitted Substance Legal? Public Concern? Trump Rumored Adderall Not confirmed Yes – if true, raises questions about medical fitness and leadership Musk Ketamine (prescribed) Legal Yes – due to defense industry ties and executive responsibilities RFK Jr. Testosterone Legal Yes – concerns about transparency, ethics, and performance enhancement Rogan TRT, HGH, peptides Legal Yes – influential public figure shaping health and lifestyle norms The trend among powerful men toward prescription-based enhancement — whether it’s ketamine, testosterone, or nootropics — is increasingly visible. While legal in many cases, it raises:  Ethical questions (Should leaders be transparent about their mental health treatments?)  Security concerns (What happens if a world leader is chemically altered?)  Cultural shifts (Are we normalizing “biohacking” as elite self-care?)    TIMELINE: Public Admissions or Reports of Drug Use Among Elites  Year Person Substance Type Context 1976 Jimmy Carter’s son (Chip Carter) Marijuana Illegal (then) Arrested for possession while his father was campaigning. 1980s–1990s Bill Clinton Marijuana Illegal (then) Famously claimed: “I didn’t inhale.” 2006 Barack Obama (in memoir) Cocaine, marijuana Illegal Admitted past use in Dreams from My Father. 2016 Joe Rogan Testosterone, HGH Legal (prescribed) Discussed openly on podcast; used for fitness and longevity. 2019 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Testosterone Legal (prescribed) Admitted use in interviews, citing declining health. 2021 Elon Musk Psychedelics (implied), Ketamine Legal (prescribed) Stated he uses ketamine “occasionally” for depression. 2020–2023 Donald Trump (rumors) Adderall (rumored) Unconfirmed Former staffers alleged stimulant use; no official confirmation or records. 2023 Aaron Rodgers Ayahuasca Illegal (U.S.), Legal abroad Said it helped him “transform” and improve performance. 2024 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Testosterone Legal Confirmed again during campaign interviews. Ongoing Silicon Valley execs (e.g., Bryan Johnson, David Asprey) Nootropics, testosterone, peptides Legal Promoting “biohacking” and performance enhancement as a lifestyle. Elite use is often done under concierge medicine or offshore protocols to bypass scrutiny.  Trends Among the Elite In elite circles—especially within Silicon Valley—there is a growing trend of using pharmacological and technological tools to enhance performance and well-being. Microdosing psychedelics, taking modafinil, and using bio-identical hormones have become common topics in private networks and among startup founders. Podcast culture, driven by influential voices like Joe Rogan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Dr. Andrew Huberman, has further normalized the use of testosterone, nootropics, and other enhancement drugs. These substances are often adopted by high-functioning executives and political candidates to combat burnout, cognitive decline, or depression. However, they are not always disclosed publicly, raising questions of transparency and ethics. Ethical Questions Being Raised As elite biohacking becomes more visible, several ethical concerns are gaining prominence: Should public figures be required to disclose their use of substances that could affect cognition or behavior? Are these developments creating two separate health systems—one for elite enhancement and another for the general population? What national security risks emerge if leaders use mind-altering or mood-regulating substances? In an age of enhancement, how should we define cognitive fitness or mental competence for office? Part 1: Popular Biohacker Stacks Among the Elite “Stacks” refer to personalized combinations of supplements, medications, and practices aimed at improving cognitive function, mood, longevity, or physical performance. Below is a breakdown of popular biohacking stacks among tech founders, wellness influencers, and longevity enthusiasts. Bryan Johnson’s Blueprint Stack Bryan Johnson, the tech entrepreneur behind Braintree and Venmo, spends more than $2 million per year attempting to reverse biological aging through an intensive and data-driven health protocol. His regimen is one of the most comprehensive and publicized in the biohacking world. The ultra-wealthy tech founder (Braintree/Venmo) who spends over $2 million/year trying to reverse aging.  Category Substances/Practices Hormonal Testosterone (microdosed), DHEA Peptides GHK-Cu, BPC-157, Thymosin Beta-4 Supplements NMN, resveratrol, vitamin D, magnesium, omega-3, glycine, creatine, pterostilbene Nootropics Nicotine gum (microdosed), caffeine (limited), L-theanine Medications Metformin (off-label for longevity), rapamycin (off-label, anti-aging) Devices Red light therapy, plasma apheresis, full-body MRI/ultrasound tracking Diet Strict calorie-controlled vegan diet with biomarker tracking Sleep Protocol Full circadian alignment routine, sleep supplements like magnesium threonate, melatonin Silicon Valley “Executive Stack” Function Substances Cognitive Boost Modafinil, Adderall (off-label), Alpha-GPC, L-tyrosine, noopept Mood/Stability Ketamine (prescribed), microdosed psilocybin, ashwagandha Longevity Metformin, NAD+ boosters (e.g., NMN, NR), resveratrol, rapamycin Fitness/Recovery Testosterone (TRT), HGH, peptides (BPC-157, TB-500), creatine Sleep/Recovery Magnesium glycinate, melatonin, glycine, apigenin (recommended by Huberman) Lifestyle Sauna, cold plunge, neurofeedback, 5-day fasting, stem cell injections (abroad)   What Disqualifies Someone from the U.S. Security Clearance?  Security clearance (Confidential, Secret, or Top Secret) is determined by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) and guided by Adjudicative Guidelines for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Information. Substances That Can Disqualify or Flag Applicants:  Substance Risk Clearance Impact Adderall (without Rx) Controlled substance misuse Likely denial Cocaine, LSD, MDMA Schedule I, past use Can disqualify or delay Ketamine (non-medical use) Schedule III Prescribed = generally OK; misuse = risky Marijuana Still federally illegal Past use may be OK (if disclosed), recent use = denial TRT/Testosterone Prescription only Legal = generally OK unless abused or undeclared Modafinil Schedule IV Legal with Rx; abuse = red flag Psychedelics Illegal federally Use = disqualifier unless distant past + disclosed Steroids (AAS) Schedule III Abuse = denial; TRT with Rx = OK Off-label drugs (e.g., Metformin for aging) Not disqualifying OK if medically supervised Nootropic compounds (Noopept, racetams) Not FDA-approved Case-by-case (imported substances = red flag) Alcohol abuse Major red flag Requires documented rehabilitation, sobriety period Dishonesty during the application is often worse than past drug use. The government emphasizes full disclosure.  What Is Generally Acceptable? Prescribed medications, including testosterone, ketamine (Spravato), or modafinil, are generally acceptable if taken under medical supervision, disclosed clearly, and not abused or used to avoid necessary rest or function. Biohacking routines such as supplements, sleep trackers, red light therapy, and fasting are usually not an issue unless they are tied to risky behavior or medical fraud. Key Takeaways Elites are increasingly using pharmacology combined with technology for enhancement, but much of this exists in a legal gray zone. Security clearance depends not only on the substances used but also on honesty, patterns of behavior, and intent. The government remains cautious about foreign-supplied or experimental compounds, especially if they indicate impulsivity or poor judgment. Elite Biohacking & Longevity Clinics Extension Health – New York City Founded by Dr. Jonathann Kuo, Extension Health offers services including plasma exchange, peptide therapy, gene therapy, neuro resets, and comprehensive diagnostics. Membership tiers include a standard package at $10,000 per year and a “Superhuman” package at $250,000 per year, available by invitation only. Their clientele includes celebrities, tech founders, and royalty, with notable clients such as La La Anthony and Kimbal Musk. Wild Health – Executive Concierge Program Wild Health follows a precision medicine approach, providing personalized care plans based on individual data. Services include genomic testing, advanced biomarker analysis, and longevity protocols. The target audience is executives seeking to extend their healthspan and performance. Sydenham Clinic – Houston, TX Sydenham Clinic focuses on personalized health management through genetic and biomarker analysis. It offers comprehensive concierge medicine and anti-aging strategies, operating independently of insurance and pharmaceutical-driven care. GitelCare – Miami, FL GitelCare offers Biohacking 360 Executive Physicals, advanced lab testing, in-depth health analysis, and 24/7 concierge support. Its target audience is VIP clients seeking premium wellness services. Elite Concierge Physicians This practice emphasizes holistic, patient-centered care, blending virtual and home visits with personalized health plans. Their goal is to empower patients to actively manage their health and well-being. WorldClinic WorldClinic provides on-demand, comprehensive concierge medical services for executives and employers, offering personalized care accessible anytime and anywhere. Its target audience consists of high-net-worth individuals requiring global medical support. Members.MD – Omaha, NE Members.MD specializes in concierge primary care focused on personalized health management through direct physician relationships and tailored health plans. Their target audience includes health-conscious individuals seeking control over their health. Additional Noteworthy Clinics Longevity Medical Institute – San José del Cabo, Mexico This 15,000 sq ft facility offers concierge medicine, biohacking, anti-aging, and personalized health programs. MD² (MD Squared) MD² offers innovative concierge medicine with tailored care systems, focusing on comprehensive health management for discerning clients.

14 Kesä 1h 25min

Can we expect a decent society if the state is allowed to kill its own people?  -Coretta Scott King    Clip Played:  Trump Faces Off with Newsom As Marines Head to L.A. | The Daily Show (youtube.com) Music:   Don McLean - American Pie (Lyric Video) (youtube.com) Do you have a psychopath in your life?  The best way to find out is read my book.  BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life4  Support is Appreciated: Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life  URGENT Advice For Immigrants Navigating ICE's Increased Enforcement (youtube.com) Posse Comitatus Act - Wikipedia Martial law - Wikipedia Workers fail to show up to factories and warehouses amid fears surrounding ICE raids (youtube.com) A history lesson for Americans. You’re still British. – Patriots for Truth (patriots4truth.org) LA Protests: Local Police Brutalize Protesters During ICE Raids (theintercept.com) rodney2.pdf (mileswmathis.com)  Miles Mathis/Rodney King George Holliday who filmed LAPD beating Rodney King says video 'needed to be used' | Daily Mail Online Is Miles Mathis Real? Is the "Phoenician Navy" behind everything? | stolenhistory.net - Rediscovered History of the World Genealogy of Miles Mathis Reveals Hidden Freemasonic Bloodline With Direct Relation to First Ohio Governor Tiffin, Charlemagne, Charles Martel – Fauxlex (wordpress.com) Martial law - Wikipedia MK7 Gang Stalking and Schizophrenia RUN by USA Churches & CIA* the USA has declared citizens terrorists WITH Schizophrenia.  Made up disease with serious side effects and death. (psychopathinyourlife.com) Zersetzung was used by STASI (E.German Police) on East Germany to go after citizens.  Gang stalking and murdering anyone in their path= NOW Official USA Policy.  USA Sanctioned murder plot against ANYONE who disagrees.     (psychopathinyourlife.com) Timeline of U.S. National Emergency Powers: 1933–Present  1933–1976: Era of Open-Ended Emergency Powers  March 6, 1933 – President Franklin D. Roosevelt declares a national emergency to address the banking crisis using the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917.   Allowed expanded military production and federal controls.  Remained in effect until 1978.  March 23, 1970 – President Richard Nixon declares a national emergency during the postal workers' strike.  Authorized use of the National Guard to deliver mail.  August 15, 1971 – Nixon declares another emergency to implement wage and price controls in response to inflation.  1973–1975 – Congressional investigations (Church & Pike Committees) uncover executive and intelligence abuses.  September 14, 1976 – Congress passes the National Emergencies Act (NEA):  Terminates all existing emergency declarations in 1978.  Requires presidents to cite specific statutory powers.  Emergencies must be renewed annually.  Congress can terminate by joint resolution. 1979–Present: Continuous Emergency Powers Under NEA  November 14, 1979 – President Jimmy Carter declares national emergency over the Iran Hostage Crisis.  Still in effect as of 2025, renewed annually.  January 17, 1995 – President Bill Clinton declares emergency over foreign terrorist threats, leading to sanctions and new anti-terror finance powers.  September 14, 2001 – President George W. Bush declares emergency after 9/11 attacks.  Activates broad military and intelligence powers.  Still in effect (used for military operations, surveillance, and detention policies).  February 15, 2019 – President Donald Trump declares emergency to build border wall.  Diverted military construction funds.  Subject to legal challenges.  January 31, 2020 – COVID-19 public health emergency (by HHS) and March 13, 2020 national emergency (by Trump).  Enabled Defense Production Act use and FEMA response.  Ended in 2023.  January 20, 2025 – President Trump (second term) declares multiple new emergencies:  Border/Immigration enforcement  Energy infrastructure  Global trade and tariff crises  Deployment of troops to U.S. cities amid unrest  Summary  1933–1976: Emergency powers used with few limits; remained active for decades.  1976 NEA: Overhauled system with transparency, term limits, and checks.  1979–present: U.S. has had at least one national emergency in effect at all times.  Over 40 active national emergencies as of 2025, mostly for foreign sanctions, terrorism, and immigration.  Martial law is the temporary imposition of direct military control over normal civilian functions of government, usually in response to a national emergency, war, rebellion, or natural disaster. It suspends ordinary law and often includes curfews, restrictions on movement, suspension of civil liberties, and military tribunals.  WHAT IS MARTIAL LAW?  Key Features:  Military takes control over some or all aspects of government.  Civil liberties may be suspended (e.g., freedom of speech, habeas corpus).  Civilian courts may be replaced with military tribunals.  Curfews, checkpoints, and warrantless arrests are often enforced.  ORIGINS & HISTORICAL CONTEXT  Ancient Roots:  The idea dates back to Roman times ("Justitium") when civil law was suspended during emergencies.  English Tradition:  Influenced by English common law, where martial law could be declared in response to invasion or rebellion, but was viewed with suspicion due to the threat to civil liberties.  U.S. Legal Foundations:  Not explicitly defined in the U.S. Constitution.  Presidents and state governors have claimed the right to declare it in extreme situations.  Article I, Section 9 allows suspension of habeas corpus during rebellion or invasion when public safety requires it.    MARTIAL LAW IN U.S. HISTORY  Year  Event  Details  1812  War of 1812  General Andrew Jackson declared martial law in New Orleans.  1861–1865  Civil War  Lincoln suspended habeas corpus; declared martial law in some areas.  1892  Coeur d'Alene labor strike  Idaho National Guard imposed martial law during mining unrest.  1934  Hawaii labor unrest  Governor declared martial law over dock strikes.  1941–1944  WWII (Hawaii)  Full martial law imposed after Pearl Harbor attack. Civil courts were suspended.  1954  Brown v. Board aftermath  Arkansas governor used National Guard to block integration—Eisenhower federalized the Guard and deployed the military.  1968  Civil unrest  Chicago and D.C. saw de facto martial law during riots after MLK’s assassination.  2005  Hurricane Katrina  Considered but not declared. The Posse Comitatus Act restricted federal troops' domestic use.    LEGAL LIMITS TODAY  Posse Comitatus Act (1878)  Limits the federal military’s ability to enforce domestic law unless expressly authorized by Congress or the Constitution.  Does not apply to National Guard under state command—governors can use them freely.  Key Court Case:  Ex parte Milligan (1866): Supreme Court ruled martial law cannot be imposed where civilian courts are operating.  Set a precedent that civilian authority must remain supreme unless there's no other choice.  MODERN USAGE & FEARS  De Facto Martial Law (not official, but functionally similar)  During natural disasters or civil unrest, governors may call in the National Guard to:  Impose curfews  Restrict movement  Use force to restore order  Martial Law Not Declared in These Cases:  COVID-19 pandemic: Lockdowns and restrictions were civil authority actions, not military law.  2020 George Floyd protests: National Guard was deployed, but martial law was not declared.  Jan 6, 2021 (Capitol riot): Some called for martial law, but it was not invoked.  CONCERNS TODAY  Misinformation often surrounds martial law, especially on social media.  Some fear its use in:  Election disputes  Mass unrest  Pandemic enforcement  No modern legal pathway allows a president to declare nationwide martial law without Congressional support or extreme circumstances.  SUMMARY  Martial Law  Civilian Emergency  Military in control  Police in control  Civil rights suspended  Rights usually intact  Military courts  Civil courts  Rare and extreme  More common  Major Times the National Guard Was Deployed for Civil Unrest in the U.S.  🔹 Before the Rodney King Riots (1992):  Year  Event  Details  1957  Little Rock, Arkansas  Eisenhower federalized the National Guard to enforce school desegregation against the governor's resistance. 1965  Watts Riots, Los Angeles  National Guard deployed after 6 days of unrest following a traffic stop and accusations of police brutality.  1967  Detroit Riot  Largest civil disturbance of the decade; Guard and Army deployed. 43 dead.  1968  MLK Assassination Riots  After Martin Luther King Jr.’s death, riots broke out in 125 cities. Guard deployed widely.  1970  Kent State University  Guard fired on anti-Vietnam protesters, killing 4 students.    🔹 Rodney King Riots (1992):  California National Guard deployed ~4,000 troops initially. Eventually, over 10,000 troops including U.S. Army and Marines were involved under Operation Garden Plot. 🔹 After 1992:  Year  Event  Details  1999  WTO Protests (Seattle)  Guard called in during anti-globalization protests.  2005  Hurricane Katrina (New Orleans)  National Guard deployed to assist with evacuation, rescue, and law enforcement.  2014  Ferguson, Missouri  Deployed after Michael Brown's shooting sparked protests and unrest.  2020  George Floyd Protests  Guard deployed in over 30 states due to widespread protests and riots.  2021  U.S. Capitol Riot (Jan 6)  Guard deployed to secure D.C. and support law enforcement. Over 25,000 troops guarded the 2021 inauguration.  Posse Comitatus Act – Overview  Enacted:  June 18, 1878  Full Name:  18 U.S. Code § 1385 – Use of Army and Air Force as Posse Comitatus  Main Purpose:  To prevent the federal government from using the U.S. Army or Air Force to enforce domestic laws without Congressional or constitutional authorization.   Key Points:  Topic  Details  Who’s restricted?  Primarily the Army and Air Force; by policy, also includes the Navy and Marine Corps.  Who’s not restricted?  National Guard under state authority, Coast Guard, federal law enforcement (FBI, ATF, DEA, etc.)  What’s banned?  Military personnel cannot arrest civilians, conduct searches, seizures, or surveillance for law enforcement purposes inside the U.S.  Exceptions?  Yes — in cases like:  National Guard under state command (Title 32)  Insurrection Act of 1807  Disaster relief & emergencies (Stafford Act)  Military support roles (logistics, intel, transport) without direct law enforcement action |  Why It Matters:  It protects civil liberties and prevents military occupation of civilian spaces.  It’s a check against authoritarianism or the use of military force against U.S. citizens.  Often comes up in debates over military at the border, protest response, and martial law scenarios.    Historical Use of Military Despite Posse Comitatus  Year  Event  How It Was Allowed  1957  Little Rock school desegregation  Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act  1992  LA Riots after Rodney King verdict  National Guard under state control + federal troops by Insurrection Act  2005  Hurricane Katrina  Military provided aid, not law enforcement  2020  George Floyd protests  National Guard activated by states; debate over Trump’s consideration of the Insurrection Act  "Posse Comitatus" — What the Term Means  Latin for "power of the county"  Historically meant the sheriff could summon citizens (a "posse") to enforce the law  The act was passed after Reconstruction to stop the use of federal troops in the South  The Rodney King PsyOPS - Inciting Racial Violence Intentionally March 3, or 3/3  LAPD = 12+1+16+4 = 33  Police = 7+6+3+9+3+5 = 33 (P=16=7;O=15=6;L=12=3)  Race War = 9+1+3+5+5+1+9 = 33  RK = 911 (R=18=9;K=11)  Following the acquittal of the LAPD, riots ensued in Los Angeles in April of 1992, being the worst in terms of death toll and destruction since the riots of the 1960s.  Sixties = 1+9+6+2+9+5+1 = 33  On the date of April 16, 1993, the LAPD was finally acquitted of all wrongdoing by federal courts; emphasis on federal.  4/16/1993 = 4+1+6+1+9+9+3 = 33  Federal = 6+5+4+5+9+1+3 = 33  Police = 7+6+3+9+3+5 = 33  LAPD = 12+1+16+4 = 33  Throughout history, the numbers 42 and 59 have been coded on black Americans.  In the case of Rodney King, his name Gematria is 59, and his birthday is 4/2, much like 42.  Rodney = 9+6+4+5+5+7 = 36  King = 2+9+5+7 = 23  Rodney King = 59  Born April 2, or 4/2  Five = 6+9+22+5 = 42  Nine = 14+9+14+5 = 42  Nigger = 5+9+7+7+5+9 = 42      free to find truth: 33 42 59 | The Rodney King PsyOPS - Inciting Racial Violence Intentionally Fusion centers in the United States are intelligence-sharing hubs that coordinate federal, state, tribal, local, and private-sector information. They were established to improve information sharing after the 9/11 attacks, focusing on homeland security, terrorism, and crime prevention.  What Are Fusion Centers?  Fusion centers are state-owned and operated entities that serve as central points for gathering, analyzing, and sharing threat-related information between:  Federal government (especially DHS and FBI)  State and local law enforcement  Tribal and territorial governments  Private sector  Intelligence community  They aim to detect and respond to threats ranging from terrorism and gang violence to cybersecurity breaches and public health threats.  What Law Created Fusion Centers?  Fusion centers were not established by a single federal law, but rather evolved through executive actions, post-9/11 security reforms, and federal funding streams:  Patriot Act (2001): Expanded federal surveillance and information-sharing powers.  Homeland Security Act (2002): Created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which began supporting state-level intelligence centers.  9/11 Commission Report (2004): Recommended improved inter-agency and intergovernmental information sharing.  Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (2004): Strengthened mechanisms for sharing terrorism-related information across all levels.  Fusion centers grew rapidly in the mid-2000s with support from the DHS and DOJ (especially through Homeland Security Grant Programs).  How Many Fusion Centers Are There?  As of 2024, there are:  80 Recognized Fusion Centers  These are formally designated by DHS and operate in 49 states, the District of Columbia, and several major urban areas.  Some large states (e.g., California, Texas) have multiple regional fusion centers.  Who Oversees Them?  Fusion centers are state-run, but coordination and guidance come from multiple entities:  State & Local Government:  Operated by state law enforcement or emergency management agencies  State governors typically designate or support their creation  Local law enforcement contributes analysts and personnel  Federal Government:  Department of Homeland Security (DHS Office of Intelligence & Analysis):  Provides oversight, funding, training, and information systems  Has Intelligence Officers (IOs) embedded in many fusion centers  Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI):  Often works in tandem with fusion centers and Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs)  What Do Fusion Centers Do?  They focus on "all-hazards, all-crimes" approaches, including:  Terrorism threat assessments  Criminal intelligence gathering (gangs, cartels, trafficking)  Monitoring of protests or dissident activity (controversial)  Cybersecurity threat analysis  Public health emergency coordination  Infrastructure protection  Controversies & Criticism  Fusion centers have faced heavy scrutiny:  Privacy violations: Surveillance of protestors, journalists, and activists  Lack of oversight: Limited transparency, civil liberties concerns  Mission creep: Expansion beyond terrorism to monitor everyday crime or political activity  Effectiveness questioned: Senate report in 2012 said centers produced “shoddy” intelligence  Key Programs and Tools They Use  Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) Program  N-DEx (National Data Exchange)  HSIN (Homeland Security Information Network)  E-Guardian (FBI threat sharing platform)  Example Fusion Centers  Fusion Center  Location  Operating Agency  NYSIC  New York  NY State Police  STIC  Illinois  Illinois State Police  NCRIC  San Francisco Bay Area  Regional (multi-county)  LA JRIC  Los Angeles  Multi-agency joint effort  TLOs (Terrorism Liaison Officers)  Nationwide  Used to plug in local police/fire    Timeline: Growth of Fusion Centers in the U.S. (2001–2024)  2001  September 11 Attacks prompt a massive overhaul of national security infrastructure.  Identified failure: poor information sharing between federal, state, and local agencies.  2002  Homeland Security Act of 2002 creates the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  Initial efforts begin to create state-level intelligence sharing centers, informally and without a central model.  2003–2004  States like Georgia, New York, and California establish early fusion centers with federal encouragement.  The National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan (NCISP) is issued by DOJ to improve sharing across agencies.  DHS begins offering technical assistance and guidance.  2004  Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (IRTPA) passed.  Mandates integration of state, local, and tribal officials into the Intelligence Community.  First formal push toward fusion center standardization begins.  2005  DHS and DOJ start identifying and recognizing fusion centers across the U.S.  The first batch of centers (about 40) is formally recognized.  2006  DHS creates the Fusion Center Initiative to support the nationwide network.  Federal grant funding (UASI, SHSP) is increased to support state fusion centers.  2007  DHS releases the Baseline Capabilities for State and Major Urban Area Fusion Centers, outlining minimum requirements.  Fusion centers are encouraged to take an “all-crimes, all-hazards” approach—not just terrorism.  2008  Fusion Center Guidelines are published (DOJ & DHS collaboration).  Privacy, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties Protection Framework is added as a requirement.  Fusion center number increases to 58 recognized centers.  2009–2010  Number of recognized centers grows to 72.  Fusion centers begin integrating cybersecurity, gang violence, human trafficking, and disaster response into their missions.  2011  Senate Homeland Security Committee releases concerns about oversight and coordination.  2012  U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) publishes a damning report:  Fusion centers produce “irrelevant, useless, or inappropriate” intelligence.  Widespread issues of wasted funding, civil liberties violations, and poor federal oversight.  DHS disputes the report's conclusions. 2014–2016  Fusion centers expand social media monitoring and begin collaborating with private tech companies.  DHS begins embedding Intelligence Officers (IOs) within major fusion centers.  2017–2019  Fusion centers involved in monitoring civil unrest, school threats, and opioid trafficking.  Integration with FBI’s eGuardian and Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) system strengthened.  2020  Fusion centers monitor COVID-19-related threats, protests (e.g., George Floyd), and public health intelligence.  Rise in scrutiny due to allegations of protester surveillance during BLM demonstrations. 2021–2022  Focus expands to domestic violent extremism (DVE) and election security.  DHS renews emphasis on public-private partnerships with telecom, cyber, and banking sectors.  2023  80 fusion centers now officially recognized by DHS across the U.S.  Increased concern over AI tools, predictive policing, and data privacy within fusion centers.  Some states audit or restructure their centers for transparency. 2024  Fusion centers receive expanded federal cybersecurity funding.  Continued criticism from privacy groups, journalists, and civil liberties watchdogs.  Legislative proposals arise in some states to limit fusion center access to protest activity data.  Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD): Deputy Gangs and Cliques Deputy Gangs Overview Whistleblowers, journalists, and civil rights groups have documented secretive cliques within LASD for decades. These groups have been called “deputy gangs”, operating out of specific stations. Some notable gangs: The Executioners (Compton station) The Banditos (East L.A. station) The Grim Reapers, Cavemen, Jump Out Boys, and others Key Findings and Reports 2021: A report by UCLA’s Luskin Center and civil rights attorneys' documents over 18 active deputy gangs dating back to at least the 1970s. 2019–2022: Multiple lawsuits allege deputies beat, hazed, and retaliated against other deputies who refused to join these cliques. 2023: California State Legislature passes AB 958, defining law enforcement gangs and prohibiting participation in them. Official Statements Sheriff Alex Villanueva (2018–2022) was criticized for denying or downplaying gang activity. Current Sheriff Robert Luna has pledged reform and internal investigations. Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD): CRASH & Rampart Scandal CRASH Units (Community Resources Against Street Hoodlums) Initiated in the 1980s to fight gang violence but later accused of behaving like a gang themselves. Rampart Scandal (1999–2001) A massive corruption case involving the Rampart Division's CRASH unit: Officers planted evidence, committed perjury, engaged in theft, shootings, and gang activity. Over 100 convictions were overturned. Officer Rafael Pérez became the key whistleblower after being caught stealing cocaine. LAPD paid over $70 million in civil settlements. Reforms Post-Rampart Led to major reforms, including: Federal consent decree with the Department of Justice (2001–2013) Internal audits, new oversight procedures Restructuring of anti-gang units 💬 Current Concerns & Monitoring Ongoing lawsuits and watchdog reports suggest that both agencies still have entrenched cultures that enable abuse and protect rogue officers. Groups like the ACLU, Knock LA, and Stop LAPD Spying Coalition continue to document: Surveillance of activists Racial profiling Militarization and abuse of gang databases Fusion Center Connections Both LAPD and LASD are tied into Southern California's fusion center: LA JRIC (Los Angeles Joint Regional Intelligence Center) Provides intelligence-sharing, surveillance tools, and terrorism-related briefings Critics argue this facilitates excessive monitoring of minority communities and political dissent LASD: Lawsuits & Whistleblowers Captain Angela Walton (2024) Brought a whistleblower suit alleging retaliation by LASD under Sheriff Villanueva for her efforts to address a deputy kneeling on a handcuffed inmate’s head lapdonlinestrgeacc.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net+9witnessla.com+9en.wikipedia.org+9. In court (Jan 2024), Villanueva testified “deputy gangs don’t exist,” while Walton and others testified otherwise witnessla.com. Sgt. Vanessa Chow (2022) Accused LASD leaders of retaliating against her husband’s investigation into the “Banditos” clique’s violent hazing. Court records show orders to avoid asking about deputy cliques; several deputies faced firing, but no criminal charges due to perceived “insufficient evidence” abc7.com. Lt. Joseph Garrido & Others (2022–present) Multiple current/former officers, including Lt. Garrido, Commander Castellano, and retired Chief Haselrig, filed retaliation lawsuits against Sheriff Villanueva en.wikipedia.org+9cbsnews.com+9knock-la.com+9. “Executioners” Lawsuit (2021 RAND/Compton) Whistleblower from Compton station alleges “Executioners” clique excludes African Americans/women and engages in planting evidence and violence eff.org+4file.lacounty.gov+4en.wikipedia.org+4. A deputy testified a murder (Andres Guardado) was part of joining that gang en.wikipedia.org. Lynwood Vikings (1990s–2011) Dept. sanctioned lawsuits over this deputy clique; $9 million in fines and multiple civil suits, including one that freed a man wrongfully imprisoned for 20 years en.wikipedia.org+6en.wikipedia.org+6witnessla.com+6. LAPD: Lawsuits & Testimonies Rampart CRASH Scandal (1990s–2000s) Over 70 officers implicated in planting evidence, perjury, shootings; ~106 convictions overturned. Resulted in more than 140 civil suits and a $125 million settlement fund en.wikipedia.org. Whistleblowers such as Rafael Pérez and Detective Russell Poole accused the department of encouraging misconduct and covering it up en.wikipedia.org+1knock-la.com+1. Whistleblower Overtime Fraud (2025) Retired Sgt. Randy Rangel awarded $4.5 million after reporting overtime billing fraud, followed by departmental retaliation latimes.com. Other suits from Transit Services alleged gender discrimination and managerial retaliation ($949,000 jury award) latimes.com. Surveillance of Protests (2020–2021) LAPD requested Ring camera feeds of Black Lives Matter protests via the “Safe LA Task Force,” sparking privacy concerns eff.org.   Timeline Linking Police Misconduct to Fusion Center Monitoring Year Event & Connection to Fusion Center Surveillance 1999–2001 Rampart CRASH scandal unfolds; LAPD unions with DOJ under consent decree. 2006 Establishment of LA JRIC (fusion center) staffed jointly by LAPD, LASD, FBI, DHS, etc. 2020 Fusion centers like JRIC actively monitor protests; LAPD uses Ring partnerships—data flows through JRIC systems. 2021 LASD deputy gang whistleblowers appear, coinciding with expanded domestic intelligence collection by fusion centers around civil unrest. 2022–2024 Multiple whistleblowers file suits; LASD faces state AG civil rights probe (Jan 2021). JRIC continues collecting “all-crimes” intel amid serious departmental misconduct.   The Kigali Principles on the Protection of Civilians are a set of 18 voluntary commitments made by countries to strengthen the effectiveness of United Nations peacekeeping operations, especially to ensure they protect civilians in conflict zones. Adopted in May 2015 in Kigali, Rwanda, the Kigali Principles aim to:  Prevent mass atrocities and civilian casualties.  Ensure that UN peacekeepers are trained, equipped, and authorized to use force to protect civilians.  Hold troop-contributing countries accountable if they fail to act.  Key Commitments Include:  Not to hesitate to act to protect civilians under threat.  To ensure that peacekeepers are prepared, trained, and equipped to protect civilians.  To investigate and hold accountable those who fail to protect civilians.  To improve information sharing and communication among peacekeepers.  To support efforts that improve the planning and performance of peacekeeping operations.  These are voluntary political commitments, not binding international law.   When Did the United States Sign On?  The United States endorsed the Kigali Principles on May 29, 2016, during the Obama administration.  The announcement was made on International Day of United Nations Peacekeepers, as part of the U.S. effort to reform and strengthen peacekeeping missions.  Why Do They Matter?  They were created in response to failures of past UN missions (e.g., Rwanda 1994 genocide, Srebrenica 1995 massacre), where peacekeepers failed to intervene to protect civilians.  The Kigali Principles are intended to avoid such failures by establishing clear standards of proactive engagement.  Although the U.S. is not a major troop-contributing country, it provides significant funding, training, and logistics for UN peacekeeping.  Additional Context  Topic  Details  Date Adopted  May 28, 2015  Initial Signatories  38 countries, led by Rwanda  🇺🇸 U.S. Endorsement  May 29, 2016 (Obama Administration)  Main Goal  Strengthen the mandate and resolve to protect civilians in UN peacekeeping missions    The 18 Kigali Principles  Train all personnel on the protection of civilians (PoC).  Ensure readiness to protect civilians before deployment.  Be prepared to use force to protect civilians under imminent threat.  Not to hesitate in using force when civilians are under threat.  Prevent and respond to sexual violence.  Maintain a strong posture and presence to deter threats.  Support political solutions, not just military.  Actively seek and share information to understand civilian threats.  Have clear rules of engagement and operational guidance for PoC.  Hold personnel accountable for failing to protect civilians.  Communicate clearly with local populations to build trust.  Enhance coordination among peacekeepers and with other actors.  Support peacebuilding and recovery efforts.  Recognize the centrality of PoC to mission success.  Deploy qualified and experienced personnel.  Ensure commanders at all levels understand their responsibilities.  Report accurately on threats and responses related to civilian protection.  Commit politically and financially to improving PoC in peacekeeping.  Countries That Have Endorsed the Kigali Principles  (as of the latest available list)  Rwanda (originator)  United States (joined May 29, 2016)  Argentina  Armenia  Australia  Austria  Bangladesh  Belgium  Benin  Botswana  Brazil  Burkina Faso  Canada  Czech Republic  Djibouti  Ethiopia  Finland  France  Germany  Ghana  Guinea  Hungary  Ireland  Italy  Latvia  Liberia  Lithuania  Malawi  Mali  Netherlands  Niger  Nigeria  Norway  Poland  Portugal  Romania  Senegal  Sierra Leone  Slovenia  South Korea  Spain  Sweden  Switzerland  Togo  Uganda  United Kingdom  Uruguay  Zambia  (The list may be slightly expanded as countries continue to sign on.)  What It Is (LESO / 1033 Program)  Official Name: Managed by the Law Enforcement Support Office (LESO), a division within the Defense Logistics Agency of the U.S. Department of Defense brookings.edu+9en.wikipedia.org+9rand.org+9. Origin: Roots trace back to the 1944 Surplus Property Act, but evolved into the 1208 program in 1990 and formally became the section 1033 program in the 1997 National Defense Authorization Act en.wikipedia.org. What It Provides It transfers excess DoD equipment—ranging from office supplies to military-grade gear—to federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies at no cost (other than shipping/maintenance) humanrightsfirst.org+5firearmslaw.duke.edu+5sciencedirect.com+5. In 2020, around 92% was non-controlled (e.g., flashlights, sleeping bags, generators); the remaining 8% was controlled, meaning sensitive items like night-vision goggles, tactical vehicles, firearms, and drones firearmslaw.duke.edu. Since inception, over $5–7 billion worth of equipment has been distributed to roughly 8,000+ agencies across all U.S. states except Hawaii aclu.org+3firearmslaw.duke.edu+3sciencedirect.com+3. How Acquisitions Work Request & JustificationAgencies apply via LESO, stating intended use (e.g., counterterrorism, counter-drug, border control) bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov+4rand.org+4en.wikipedia.org+4. Approval & OversightApprovals require civilian oversight (e.g., mayor or county board). State-level supervisors audit inventory. Ownership & Return PolicyDoD retains ownership; recipients pay storage/shipping. Controlled items must be returned when no longer needed. Unauthorized loss can result in suspension. Prohibited Equipment ListSince 2015, certain items—like weaponized vehicles, grenades, and large-caliber guns—are banned. Some restrictions were relaxed in 2017, but many remain in place. Oversight & Criticisms Program Audits: GAO and DoD Inspector General audits found losses and mismanagement; roughly 184 agencies were suspended at one point. Reforms & Orders: 2015 (Obama): Introduced stricter controls and prohibited items under Executive Order 13688. 2017 (Trump): Rolled back several restrictions, easing bans on certain gear. 2022 (Biden): New EO limited transfers further and emphasized accountability across federal, state, and local policing. Concerns: Critics (ACLU, NAACP, academics) argue the program contributes to “militarized policing,” disproportionately impacts communities of color, and increases police violence. Summary The 1033 Program is now LESO—administering transfers of surplus military gear to law enforcement. Offers both benign and military-grade equipment, with strict rules and oversight mechanisms. Legal controls govern what can be transferred; items must be responsibly used and tracked. Though reformed multiple times, it remains controversial and subject to ongoing civil‑liberties and policy debates. Public Intelligence identifies 64 aerial drone bases in the US

11 Kesä 1h 13min

"Rome did not create a great empire by having meetings, they did it by killing all those who opposed them" -Quentin Crisp   Clips Played:  Ancient Rome in 20 minutes (youtube.com)  Music: New World Coming (youtube.com) ******************************************************** Have you ever seen the water they inject in meat? It's not just water, it's a solution usually salt water and who knows what else, but it prevents bacterial growth. BTW when they clean that machine, they are very thorough using a strong caustic soap a good rinse with purified water and then a strong industrialized sanitation. Did you know that they switch Sanitizers every 4 weeks because some bacteria can build up a resistance to sanitizer over time. by switching it up the bacteria doesn't have enough time to adjust.  The purpose of adding what they call a "Solution of up to 30%" is not only to increase the weight but ALSO to make it last longer on the shelf, which gives it a later expiration date and gives them more time to be sure it sells. This cuts back on unsold meats that have expired and can't be sold.  You can cook out the water but the fluoride stays in. If you think buying Grass Fed Organic is a good idea, save your money it is a scam: This Will Piss You Off! (youtube.com)  Grandma or Grandpa is NOT safe in USA Nursing homes Revealed: UnitedHealth secretly paid nursing homes to reduce hospital transfers | US Medicare | The Guardian **************************************************************** A Young Elon Musk Declared Himself ‘Reincarnation’ of Alexander the Great, New Book Reveals (thedailybeast.com) What is on front of Roma jersey? Explaining meaning of SPQR letters across shirt for Europa League final | Sporting News Canada Everything You Know About the United States and its Laws is WRONG ! — The “United States” is NOT the “United States of America” | LAW Blog (wordpress.com) A history lesson for Americans. You’re still British. – Patriots for Truth (patriots4truth.org) Trump’ immigration crackdown is leaving children terrified and ‘truly alone’ | Trump administration | The Guardian Ice seeking out unaccompanied immigrant children to deport or prosecute | US immigration | The Guardian How Private Equity Will Break America (Like 2008) (youtube.com) **************************************************************** BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life Support is Appreciated: Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life NEW:  Psychopath In Your Life Iraq Plutonium and DNA destruction – Psychopath In Your Life My file on how hormones work.  https://psychopathinyourlife.com/CRD/ The Stolen Children Project – Psychopath In Your Life Timeline and History of Ruling Class – Psychopath In Your Life WHO are the Royal Monsters running the World? – Psychopath In Your Life Timeline of Eugenics “Natural” Disasters – Psychopath In Your Life Psychopath In Your Life – Dianne Emerson – YouTube Tune in: Podcast Links – Psychopath In Your Life TOP PODS – Psychopath In Your Life Google Maps My HOME Address:  309 E. Klug Avenue, Norfolk, NE  68701   SMART Meters & Timelines – Psychopath In Your Life ****************************************************************   The United Nations (UN) logo, with its laurel wreath and globe, does indeed resemble ancient Roman imagery, particularly SPQR-era Roman emblems. Here's a breakdown of similarities and other logos that share common visual DNA. When Was SPQR First Used?  Earliest Use: Around the mid-3rd century BCE, during the Roman Republic, likely formalized after the Lex Hortensia (287 BCE) which strengthened the voice of the people.  Became a standard part of official inscriptions, military standards, monuments, and coinage.  Seen on legionary banners, state buildings, documents, and public works.    Under Whom Was It Used?  Period  Ruling System  Used SPQR?  Notes  Roman Republic (509–27 BCE)  Consuls, Senate  ✅ Yes  Expressed joint authority of Senate and People  Roman Empire (27 BCE – ~476 CE)  Emperors  ✅ Yes  Retained for legitimacy, though Senate lost real power  Byzantine Empire (330–1453 CE)  Emperors  ⚠️ Faded  Not commonly used in later Byzantium  Modern Rome (Renaissance–present)  Civic use  ✅ Revived  Still appears on manhole covers and official city symbols in Rome today    SPQR in the Empire  Even though emperors like Augustus centralized power, they kept the SPQR symbol to show continuity with the Republic. It gave the appearance of shared governance even as emperors became absolute rulers.  Legions continued to march under SPQR standards  Emperors issued edicts in the name of Senate and People  It became a symbolic rather than actual political statement  End of SPQR’s Official Use  The Western Roman Empire fell in 476 CE, and with it, official Roman institutions like the Senate lost significance.  SPQR faded from formal political use but was sometimes revived in later Roman nostalgia (Holy Roman Empire, Italian Renaissance, Fascist Italy under Mussolini, etc.)  Summary SPQR has had continuous symbolic life for over 2,000 years: Started as a statement of shared governance in the Republic Became imperial branding under the emperors Revived by popes, nationalists, and modern city authorities When Did SPQR Begin?  SPQR stands for Senatus Populusque Romanus — "The Senate and People of Rome."  First seen: Around 509 BCE, with the founding of the Roman Republic.  Became widespread as a civic and military identifier on coins, monuments, standards, and documents.  Used throughout both the Republic and Empire, even as emperors centralized power.  Rome did not have a single "flag" before SPQR, but rather sacred, religious, and symbolic items like the fasces, animal standards, and mythological images. SPQR marked a formal shift toward a unified civic-political identity.  Fasces  Symbol of Authority and Power  Design: A bundle of elm or birch rods bound with red leather, often with a single-bladed axe emerging from it.  Origin: Likely from Etruscan ceremonial traditions.  Meaning: Represents the magistrate’s power to punish (rods for flogging, axe for execution).  Use:  Carried by lictors, ceremonial bodyguards of Roman officials.  Displayed in processions, courts, and public events.  Legacy:  Adopted in the U.S. (e.g., Lincoln Memorial, House of Representatives).  Used as a symbol by Mussolini’s Fascist Party (from which “fascism” gets its name).  2. Animal Standards (Signa Militaris)  Military Identity and Legion Pride  Before the eagle became universal under Marius (104 BCE), Roman legions used various animal totems as standards:  Animal  Symbolism  Use  Wolf  Strength, ferocity  Echo of Romulus and Remus  Boar  Courage, aggression  Used in early tribal legions  Horse  Speed, mobility  Cavalry symbolism  Bull  Stamina, brute power  Common in early legions  Minotaur  Mythical strength and terror  Rare, possibly elite units  These standards were carried by signifers (standard-bearers).  Losing a standard was a major disgrace in battle.  Later consolidated into the Aquila (eagle) as the sacred standard of all legions.   3. Mythological Images  Cultural and Religious Identity  A. She-wolf with Romulus and Remus  Depicts the legendary she-wolf nursing the twin founders of Rome.  Symbol of Rome’s divine origin and destiny.  Used on:  Coins  Statues  Public art and temples  B. Mars and Minerva  Mars: God of war, often depicted with a helmet and spear.  Minerva: Goddess of wisdom and strategy.  Used in public buildings, temples, and on armor.  C. Ancile (Sacred Shield)  One of 12 shields kept by the Salii priests.  Said to have fallen from heaven; sign of divine protection from Jupiter.  Paraded in March during ceremonial dances.  D. Capitoline Triad  Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva, worshipped on the Capitoline Hill.  Often shown together on altars, coins, and in inscriptions.    Summary Table  Type  Examples  Meaning  Fasces  Rods & axe  Legal/magisterial authority  Animal Standards  Wolf, boar, horse, eagle  Military identity and honor  Mythological Images  She-wolf, Mars, Ancile  Divine origin, protection, and Roman identity    Middle Eastern & Islamic Logos Many modern Middle Eastern state emblems share recurring motifs that reflect deep historical, religious, and cultural roots. Eagles and falcons are commonly used to symbolize power and sovereignty. Countries such as Egypt, Iraq, Palestine, Yemen, and the United Arab Emirates all incorporate versions of the Eagle of Saladin or the Hawk of Quraish in their emblems, representing strength and legacy. Circular geometry combined with calligraphy is another frequent element. For example, Saudi Arabia’s emblem features crossed swords and a palm tree, symbolizing justice and prosperity. Iran’s emblem showcases a stylized form of the word “Allah” (ﷲ), which resembles a tulip—a reference to martyrdom and revolution, deeply rooted in its national identity. Colors such as green and gold also dominate, symbolizing Islam, prosperity, and heaven. These similarities are not coincidental. Most Middle Eastern flags and emblems share foundational design elements because they are inspired by a common heritage—particularly the ideologies of Pan-Arabism and Islamic symbolism. This shared visual language expresses unity, collective identity, and historical continuity across the region. Pan-Arab Colors (Red, Black, White, Green)  These four colors are seen repeatedly and represent key historical Islamic caliphates: Black → Abbasid Caliphate White → Umayyad Caliphate Green → Fatimid Caliphate (also Islam more broadly) Red → Hashemite dynasty or Kharijite warriors They first appeared together in the Arab Revolt Flag (1916), which was designed during World War I to unite Arabs against the Ottoman Empire. Palestine, Jordan, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Kuwait, UAE — all borrow directly or indirectly from this flag. Islamic Symbols Crescent and Star → Found on flags like Turkey and Tunisia, inherited from Ottoman iconography, representing Islamic identity. Shahada (Islamic creed) → Prominent on Saudi Arabia’s flag. Swords or Emblems of Authority → Seen in Saudi Arabia and Oman. Shared Colonial Past & Arab Nationalism Many of these countries gained independence around the same time in the 20th century and adopted flags to signal Arab unity and resistance to colonial rule. Similar designs reinforced that shared identity. Similar But Meaningfully Different While they look similar at a glance, the details — like a star in Jordan's chevron, swords in Saudi Arabia, or the Takbir (الله أكبر) in Iraq — distinguish their unique national stories. The modern political partitioning of the Middle East primarily took place after World War I, starting around 1916-1923, when the Ottoman Empire— which had controlled much of the region for centuries—collapsed. Key Dates & Events of Middle East Partitioning: 1916: Sykes-Picot Agreement A secret agreement between Britain and France, with assent from Russia, that planned how to divide the Ottoman Empire’s Middle Eastern territories between themselves after the war. It essentially drew spheres of influence in the region. 1917: Balfour Declaration Britain declared support for a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, further complicating the region’s future borders. z 1918-1920: End of WWI and Collapse of Ottoman Empire The Ottoman Empire officially dissolved. 1920: San Remo Conference The League of Nations formally assigned mandates (control) of former Ottoman territories to European powers: Britain got mandates over Palestine, Iraq, and Transjordan France got mandates over Syria and Lebanon 1921-1923: Borders were drawn, and new states or mandates established, setting the foundation for many of today’s Middle Eastern countries. Who partitioned the Middle East? The main powers behind the partitioning were Britain and France, with backing and agreements involving Russia (early on) and approval by the League of Nations after WWI. How this relates to the flags: The modern Middle Eastern states’ flags mostly came into use after these partitions as new nations formed under mandates or independence, roughly from the 1920s onward. Many flags symbolize Arab nationalism, and independence struggles from European colonial rule. South Asia includes these countries: Pakistan India Bangladesh Nepal Bhutan Sri Lanka Maldives Sometimes, people also use the term Indian Subcontinent This term refers to the large landmass that includes these countries plus some surrounding areas, emphasizing their shared geological and historical ties. If you mean the geopolitical region Pakistan belongs to, it is usually South Asia, not the Middle East. If by “logos” you mean the flags of Pakistan and neighboring South Asian countries, yes, they do share some common elements, but they also reflect each country's unique identity, culture, and history. Shared Elements in South Asian Flags: The flags of Pakistan and neighboring South Asian countries do share some common elements, but they also reflect each country's unique identity, culture, and history. Colors and Symbols in South Asian Flags with Islamic Significance Green: A Prominent Islamic Symbol Green holds profound significance in South Asian flags, particularly in Muslim-majority countries. In Pakistan, green is a dominant color in the national flag, symbolizing Islam and reflecting the country's religious identity. Similarly, Bangladesh incorporates green into its flag, representing both the lushness of its landscape and its Islamic heritage. Across South Asia, many Muslim-majority nations adopt green as a key color in their flags, underscoring its importance as a symbol of faith and cultural unity. Stars and Crescents: Emblems of Progress and Light The crescent and star are iconic symbols in Islamic countries, often representing progress and enlightenment. Pakistan’s flag prominently features a white crescent and star, set against its green background, embodying these values. These symbols are widely used across Islamic nations, serving as a visual representation of hope, guidance, and advancement within the cultural and religious context. Red: A Symbol of Sacrifice Red and its variations carry significant meaning in South Asian flags, though with different connotations. In Bangladesh, the flag includes a red circle at its center, symbolizing the blood shed by those who fought and died for the country’s independence. In contrast, India’s flag features orange (often referred to as saffron) alongside white and green, with a navy blue wheel known as the Ashoka Chakra. The orange represents courage and sacrifice, while the green signifies So, We can say: Flags of South Asia reflect a mix of religious symbolism (especially Islam and Hinduism), independence struggles, and cultural heritage. Some visual motifs, like green for Islam or red for sacrifice, recur, but overall, each flag has distinctive symbols and colors tied to its national identity. National Flags of South Asian Countries: Design and Symbolism Pakistan (1947) The national flag of Pakistan, adopted in 1947, features a dark green field with a vertical white stripe on the left side, known as the hoist. Within the green area, a white crescent moon and a five-pointed star are prominently displayed. The dark green color represents Islam, the majority religion in Pakistan, while the white stripe symbolizes religious minorities and peace. The crescent moon signifies progress, and the star embodies light and knowledge, reflecting the nation’s aspirations for advancement and enlightenment. India (1947) India’s national flag, also adopted in 1947, consists of three horizontal stripes of equal width: saffron at the top, white in the middle, and green at the bottom. At the center of the white stripe is a navy blue Ashoka Chakra, a 24-spoke wheel. The saffron stripe symbolizes courage and sacrifice, reflecting the nation’s resilience. White stands for peace and truth, while green represents faith and fertility. The Ashoka Chakra signifies the eternal wheel of law, or dharma, embodying India’s commitment to justice and moral order. Bangladesh (1971) Adopted in 1971, Bangladesh’s flag features a dark green field with a red circle positioned slightly off-center toward the hoist side. The dark green color symbolizes the lushness of the land and the Islamic faith, which is central to the country’s identity. The red circle represents the blood of those who sacrificed their lives during the struggle for independence, honoring the nation’s hard-fought freedom. Nepal (1962) Nepal’s flag, unique as the only non-rectangular national flag, was adopted in 1962 and consists of two stacked triangular shapes with a crimson red background and a blue border. The upper triangle contains a white crescent moon with a face, while the lower triangle features a white sun with 12 rays. Crimson red, the national color, signifies bravery. The blue border represents peace and harmony, and the moon and sun symbolize hope and permanence, reflecting Nepal’s enduring spirit. Bhutan (1969) Bhutan’s national flag, adopted in 1969, is divided diagonally from the lower hoist-side corner to the upper fly-side corner, creating two triangles: yellow in the upper section and orange in the lower. A large white dragon holding jewels is centered along the diagonal. The yellow color symbolizes the secular authority of the king, while orange represents Buddhism and the nation’s spiritual tradition. The white dragon, known as the “Thunder Dragon,” signifies purity and reflects Bhutan’s name, “Land of the Thunder Dragon.” Sri Lanka (1951/1972) Sri Lanka’s flag, finalized in 1972 after modifications from its 1951 design, features a golden lion holding a sword on a maroon background, occupying most of the flag’s space. Four golden box leaves are positioned in the corners around the lion, and to the left are two vertical stripes of green and orange. The lion symbolizes the Sinhalese ethnicity and bravery, while the bo leaves represent Buddhism and its pervasive influence. The green stripe signifies the Muslim minority, and the orange stripe represents the Tamil minority, acknowledging the country’s diverse communities. Maldives (1965) The Maldives’ national flag, adopted in 1965, features a red rectangular field with a large green rectangle centered within it. Inside the green rectangle is a white crescent moon facing the fly side. The red color represents the courage and sacrifice of the nation’s people, reflecting their resilience. Green symbolizes peace and prosperity, while the crescent moon signifies Islam, the predominant religion in the Maldives. 1. UN Logo vs. Roman Empire Symbolism UN Logo: The United Nations logo features a globe with latitude and longitude lines, surrounded by a laurel wreath. Rome (SPQR): Roman standards, banners, and coins often included laurel wreaths, globes, and eagles to symbolize conquest, unity, and global dominion. Meaning: Both the UN logo and Roman symbolism suggest global authority, peace through order, and civilization leadership. 2. Other Logos with Shared Symbolic Themes A. Middle Eastern & Islamic Logos Many modern Middle Eastern state emblems share recurring motifs: Eagles/Falcons (power, sovereignty): Egypt, Iraq, Palestine, Yemen, and the UAE all use versions of the Eagle of Saladin or the Hawk of Quraish. Circular geometry with calligraphy: Saudi Arabia’s Emblem: Features crossed swords and a palm tree. Iran’s Emblem: A stylized representation of the word "Allah" (ﷲ), which resembles a tulip, referencing martyrdom and revolution. Green and gold: These colors are symbolic of Islam, prosperity, and heaven. B. Globalist or Supranational Organizations Logos from globalist or supranational organizations often reflect ancient imperial aesthetics: World Health Organization (WHO): Uses an identical laurel wreath and globe like the UN. World Bank / IMF: Feature globe-centric designs symbolizing economic unity. NATO: Its logo features a star with compass points, representing control and military direction. European Union (EU): Uses a ring of stars symbolizing unity, empire, and perfection—similar in design to a halo or crown. C. Freemasonry / Occult Influence Many logos reflect esoteric geometry associated with elite or secret societies: The All-Seeing Eye (triangle and eye): Found in the U.S. Great Seal and many bank logos. Compass & Square (Freemasonry): A symbol of measurement, order, and creation. Pyramids and obelisks: These shapes are often found in military insignia, Masonic symbology, or Vatican imagery.    Common Symbolic Elements   Symbol Ancient Use Modern Example Laurel Wreath Roman victory, honor UN, Olympics Globe Dominion over the world UN, WHO, World Bank Eagle/Falcon Power, divine rule US Seal, Middle Eastern nations Star (5-pointed) Divinity, perfection, military order EU, NATO, US military insignia Circle of Stars Celestial unity, empire EU, early U.S. flags, Roman coins Sword/Crossed Swords Justice, military authority Saudi Arabia, Vatican (keys and sword) 4. Why Do These Logos Look Alike? Symbolic Continuity Empires and institutions repeat visual codes to evoke legacy, authority, and control. These recurring symbols maintain a thread of continuity across history, linking past power structures to present ones. Archetypal Language Certain shapes—circles, stars, wreaths—trigger subconscious associations with unity, heaven, and perfection. This shared visual vocabulary appeals to deep psychological and cultural patterns. Mimicry of Rome Modern institutions often model themselves on ancient Rome, borrowing from its military, legal, and visual systems. This includes the intentional replication of Roman iconography to evoke gravitas and historical legitimacy. 5. Logos to Explore (All Share Imperial/Universal Style) Roman Empire: SPQR and eagle standards. Holy Roman Empire: Double-headed eagle. Napoleonic France: Bees, wreaths, and eagles. US Great Seal: Bald eagle, shield, arrows, and olive branch. League of Nations: Predecessor of the UN, also used globe imagery. World Economic Forum (WEF): Simplified globe and arc, symbolic of futurism and unity. Vatican Emblem: Crossed keys (heaven and earth), papal tiara. SPQR: Meaning and Legacy SPQR stands for the Latin phrase "Senatus Populusque Romanus", which translates to "The Senate and the People of Rome." Although the Roman Empire officially fell in 476 AD (Western Roman Empire), this abbreviation remained a powerful symbol of Roman authority and identity well into the late imperial era. It continued to be used on coins, public buildings, and military banners until the very end of the Western Roman Empire. In modern times, SPQR remains a symbol of the city of Rome. Meaning and Historical Context "Senatus" refers to the Senate, representing Rome’s aristocratic governing class. "Populusque Romanus" refers to the People of Rome, meaning the Roman citizenry. Together, the phrase symbolizes the shared authority between the Senate and the people, especially during the Roman Republic (509–27 BCE). It functioned as a formal emblem of the Roman state, much like a modern national seal. Where It Was Used SPQR was inscribed on Roman military standards (flags), public buildings, monuments, coins, and official documents. It often served as a state signature representing the authority of the Roman government. SPQR Today The symbol still appears on manhole covers, public buildings, and official emblems in modern Rome. It is also used symbolically in Roman reenactments, literature, and tattoos, often as a nod to Roman heritage or values such as civic duty and the rule of law. Modern Parallels Yes, great observation! The SPQR symbol and the United Nations (UN) logo share a similar symbolic function, though they come from vastly different historical contexts. Both serve as visual representations of governance, unity, and authority, and both are designed to communicate legitimacy.  Comparison: SPQR vs. UN Logo   Feature SPQR United Nations Represents Roman Republic / Roman State Global international cooperation Meaning "Senate and People of Rome" — authority of Roman government United Nations — global peacekeeping and diplomacy Origin Ancient Rome (5th century BCE) 1945, after World War II Visual Usage Carved in stone, stamped on coins, carried by Roman legions Olive branches surrounding a world map on flags, documents, and buildings Symbolism Civic unity and shared political power Global peace, security, and international dialogue   Why They Feel Similar: Both are official emblems of political entities. Both emphasize unity (SPQR: unity of Roman society; UN: unity of nations). Both were (or are) used to assert authority over territory and laws. Both appear on official structures, documents, and insignia to reinforce institutional legitimacy. When Did Rome Start Using SPQR? While the Roman Republic came into existence around 509 BC, the first concrete appearances of SPQR in tangible artifacts are not dated until around 80 BC. While there is debate on whether SPQR existed before 80 BC, historians generally accept that there was not. So why the symbol SPQR would appear around this time has a lot to do with what was going on during the dying days of the Roman Republic. Optimates vs. Populares: The Beginning of Rome’s Woes Without getting too much into a deep dive into several hundred years of Roman history, by the year 91 BC, there started to become a steep divide in the Republic. Coined by German historian Theodor Mommsen in the mid-19th century, one can divide the Roman people into two camps: the optimates and the populates. Though not observed during the time of political parties as the modern world would view them, these two distinct types of thought dominated the social and political discourse of the time. According to Optimates, power should remain vested in the Senate, and nothing could usurp them. Those following these beliefs felt that the Senators were elected for a reason and that the Roman citizenry should trust the political process they had built for themselves. After all, it was their way of government they believed separated them from the barbarian tribes that surrounded the Republic’s borders. On the other hand, the populates believed that the citizenry at large should have a greater voice than the Senate or at least have Senators that were more in tune with the needs of the common person. Though not the primary grievance of the populares, one of the constant rallying cries was the grain distributions advocated by politicians such as Gaius Gracchus in 123 BC. Of course, there were many other issues that the populates disagreed with. Still, traditionally grain distributions to the masses were a chief complaint on the number of people eligible, the quantity, quality, and price. Adding Fuel to the Fire: The Social War From 123 BC to about 91 BC, the divide between the optimates and populates continued to grow among the Roman population and other Latin peoples. Only some people were considered full Roman citizens despite controlling the entirety of the Italian peninsula by 91 BC. During the Samnite wars, the early Republic decided to confer Roman citizenship on those tribes who aided them or surrendered without a fight. Those people that opposed them were not granted citizenship. Over the next several hundred years, those Italian allies not considered full citizens were tired of the tax burden and manpower they provided to the Roman army with little to show for it. Chief among their proponents was a statesman named Marcus Livius Drusus. Drusus advocated for more rights for Latin peoples, if not outright citizenship. Though never proven, it is highly suspected that an agent of Rome assassinated him. Upon his death, the various Italian allies started to revolt, and the Social War started. During the Social War, two generals rose to prominence. First was the famed General Gaius Marius, and the second was his fromer subordinate Sulla. Though getting off to a rocky start, the Roman army eventually decimated most of the rebelling tribes. However, before the war concluded, troubles were brewing in Rome’s eastern provinces. The First Mithridatic War and Sulla’s Civil War While Rome was embroiled in a war at home, King Mithridates VI of Pontus invaded Asia Minor. With his armies sweeping away light Roman defenses, a new army was raised to fight him. By 87 BC, the Social War was under control, and Sulla was given command of this new army. This infuriated Marius, and strip Sulla of his command. Finally, however, Sulla marched his army on Rome. Now a general without an army, Marius was banished while Sulla went off to fight Mithridates. During Sulla’s absence, Marius decided to make his comeback. Raising a new army of his own, he marched on Rome himself and took it. Marius quickly rallied the support of fellow populares and won an unprecedented seventh consulship. Upon hearing of what Marius had done, Sulla landed his army on the Italian peninsula to retake Rome. Like the Social war, Sulla’s civil war was a conflict along party lines: optimates vs. populares. Sulla was a staunch Optimate, and after outmaneuvering Marius’ armies, he resoundingly defeated the populares army at the Battle of the Colline Gate. With his victory secured, Rome was finally at peace for the first time in nearly a decade. Why did Sulla Start Using SPQR? With Sulla now as dictator of Rome, he first went about solidifying his power. Then, after sentencing thousands of his enemies to be executed, he realized that his bloodlust would have to end eventually to restore order to the Republic. During Sulla’s time as a dictator, the phrase SPQR started to pop up everywhere. Why Sulla would choose then to do it and the phraseology he used is a testament to what he was trying to accomplish. Because of the long-standing disputes between the populares and the optimates, Sulla likely wanted to show unity between the two factions.  The optimates favored a strong senate, while the populares favored a strong citizenry. SPQR shows that both these bodies are permanently linked as both are vital to the government of Rome.  Including the term “People of Rome” would have boded well with the Italian people, now freshly minted Roman citizens. During Sulla’s reign, he extended Roman citizenship to all peoples of the Italian peninsula, including the tribes who had rebelled.  By putting the term “People of Rome” in the motto, Sulla signified that these people were just as Roman as anyone else who had been citizens for centuries by this point. Placing the phrase on coins, buildings, standards, and all forms of documents only belabored this point. The Legacy of SPQR Even after Sulla resigned from his dictatorship, the phrase SPQR remained an endearing symbol of Rome. Once the Republic transitioned to an empire, the phrase was still used even though the Senate had just a fraction of the political authority it had during the Republic. During the Roman empire, it was still seen as an important symbol of Roman history, harkening back to its early days. Even though SPQR might seem like a simple phrase, there is a ton of history behind the timing of its introduction, and Sulla put much thought into its word choice. Originally used as a rallying cry to help unite the different peoples and factions of the Roman Republic, it morphed into an enduring symbol of Rome. ******************************* What is in front of the Roma jersey? Explaining meaning of SPQR letters across shirt for Europa League final Why do Roma have SPQR on the front of their shirt in the Europa League final? Multiple Italian clubs, including Roma as well as Inter, were left without a main shirt sponsor after suspending their deal with crypto blockchain company DigitalBits. Both clubs have had DigitalBits as a sponsor since 2021, each signing a three-year deal with the crypto company, with Inter's worth a reported €85 million, while Roma's was worth a reported €40 million plus a €6 million signing bonus. While last year's payments seemingly went off without a hitch, they have reportedly missed a number of recent payments. Roma reportedly received some early payments this season, but those eventually came to a stop, while Inter claim they have not received a single penny of this year's owed amount. What does SPQR stand for on a Roma shirt? The letters "SPQR" stand for the Roman slogan which has been used to notate the state since ancient Roman days. In Latin, "Senatus Populusque Romanus," translates to "the Senate and People of Rome." It was used to designate the two components of the Roman state, the government and the populace. The abbreviation has been used for hundreds of years, adorning coins, printed on documents, and inscripted on things such as monuments, stone carvings, metal works, and other municipal structures. Various sources date the abbreviation and phrase as far back as 80 BCE. ****************************************************************** The Kigali Principles on the Protection of Civilians 29 May 2015 Official Document The Kigali Principles on the Protection of Civilians are a non-binding set of eighteen (18) pledges for the effective and thorough implementation of the protection of civilians in UN peacekeeping. The principles on the Protection of Civilians emanated from the High-level International Conference on the Protection of Civilians held in Rwanda on 28-29 May 2015. The Republic of Rwanda, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United States of America initiated the Principles, bringing together the first nine (9) signatories: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Italy, Netherlands, Rwanda, Senegal, Sri Lanka, Uganda, and Uruguay. The Kigali Principles address the most relevant aspects of peacekeeping, including assessment and planning, force generation, training and equipping personnel, performance and accountability. While they are framed around the protection of civilians, the responsible implementation of the principles would address much broader deficiencies that undermine the effectiveness of peacekeeping operations conducted in volatile situations, including peacekeeper abuse. Source  The Kigali Principles on the Protection of Civilians - Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect (globalr2p.org)

7 Kesä 1h 19min

“If you can’t fly then run, if you can’t run then walk, if you can’t walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”  Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr      Music:   Bee Gees - Stayin' Alive (Official Video) (youtube.com)  The Jesuits - Psychopath In Your Life Do you have a psychopath in your life?  The best way to find out is read my book.  BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life4 Support is Appreciated:    Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life  ************************************************************************** ‘Where’s my apology, Jim?’ Trump taunts Comey after former FBI chief says sorry for ‘sloppy’ Russia investigation — RT USA News  The FBI knew RussiaGate was a lie — but hid that truth (nypost.com)   Who is Glenn Greenwald? Known for Snowden revelations, expresses no regrets over leaked sex tapes (msn.com)  Famous journalist Glenn Greenwald mired in sex tape scandal that he says was released by 'political enemies' | Daily Mail Online  Sadomasochism - Wikipedia  Venus In Furs To Venus In Church – Leopold Von Sacher-Masoch & Lviv (Lviv: The History of One City Part 28) | Europe Between East And West (wordpress.com)  Marquis de Sade - Wikipedia  Dark Hollywood: Humiliation Rituals... Doja Cat, Justin Bieber, Taylor Swift, Kanye West, and More — Scandalous Media  Rituals of humiliation and exclusion (cyc-net.org)  The Psychology of Humiliation | Psychology Today   ************************************************************* Members of the royal families form the largest criminal organization of all time. Today here is the royal family of Belgium, in the scam of false spies. This is staged to intimidate you, deter you from divulging the truth, and to format your mind to believe that there are very few truth-sharers  Prince Gabriel of Belgium = Julian Assange   Princess Astrid of Belgium = Julian Assange's mother   Princess Elisabeth of Belgium = Sarah Harrison   King Philippe of Belgium = Edward Snoden (AKA john Lenon)  Prince Emmanuel of Belgium = Chelsea Manning (to nurture the transgender legend)   Queen Mathilde of Belgium = Pamela Anderson.   Post : Mathilde of Belgium / Pamela Anderson :  **************************************************************** The Cilice and the Discipline: Historical Context  Opus Dei's use of corporal mortification practices, such as the cilice and the discipline, is rooted in longstanding Catholic traditions rather than being directly inherited from the Jesuits. Cilice A cilice is a small metal chain with inward-pointing spikes worn around the upper thigh. It causes discomfort but typically does not lead to bleeding. Historically, cilices were made from coarse cloth or animal hair and were used as a form of penance in various Christian traditions. Notable figures such as St. Francis of Assisi, St. Ignatius of Loyola (founder of the Jesuits), and St. Thomas More practiced similar forms of mortification. Discipline Discipline refers to a small whip or scourge used for self-flagellation, symbolizing participation in the sufferings of Christ. The practice was common among various religious orders and saints, including those in the Jesuit tradition.   Opus Dei's Adoption of These Practices  Founded in 1928 by Saint Josemaría Escrivá, Opus Dei incorporated these traditional practices to encourage personal holiness and self-discipline among its members. While the Jesuits and other orders practiced similar forms of mortification, Opus Dei's use is part of a broader Catholic heritage rather than a direct adoption from the Jesuits. Escrivá emphasized that such practices were voluntary and aimed at spiritual growth. While both Opus Dei and the Jesuits have engaged in corporal mortification practices, these traditions stem from a shared Catholic history of penance and self-discipline. Opus Dei's practices are not directly inherited from the Jesuits but are part of a wider spiritual framework embraced by various religious figures and orders throughout the centuries.  Origins of Corporal Mortification in Christianity The use of corporal mortification (like the cilice and discipline/whip) in Catholicism is part of a centuries-old tradition of penance and spiritual discipline. Here's a clear breakdown of the history, development, and current status of these practices:   Biblical Foundations  Early Christians interpreted scriptures like Romans 8:13 (“put to death the deeds of the body”) and 1 Corinthians 9:27 (“I discipline my body and keep it under control”) as calls to deny bodily comforts to grow spiritually.  Jesus’s own suffering and crucifixion became a model for many mystics who sought to “share in the suffering of Christ.”  Development Through the Centuries Early Church (1st–5th Centuries) During the early centuries of Christianity, hermits and desert fathers such as St. Anthony the Great embraced severe ascetic practices. These included intense fasting, prolonged isolation, and deliberate sleeplessness. Their goal was to mortify the flesh and concentrate entirely on communion with God. Medieval Era (6th–15th Centuries) In the medieval period, mortification of the flesh became more structured within monastic communities. Saints like St. Dominic, St. Francis of Assisi, and St. Catherine of Siena employed physical suffering—such as fasting, wearing hairshirts, and self-flagellation—as a form of penance and a means to achieve spiritual union with God. During the 13th and 14th centuries, groups known as the Flagellants emerged. These lay people would publicly whip themselves in acts of atonement for sin, particularly during times of crisis such as the Black Death. Ignatius of Loyola and the Jesuits (16th Century) St. Ignatius of Loyola, founder of the Jesuit order, also practiced physical mortification, including self-flagellation. In his Spiritual Exercises, he emphasized bodily discipline as a way to cultivate humility and obedience. However, the Jesuits eventually placed greater emphasis on intellectual and spiritual discipline rather than extreme physical practices. Opus Dei and Modern Usage (20th Century) In the 20th century, St. Josemaría Escrivá, the founder of Opus Dei in 1928, revived certain practices of mortification among laypeople. These included the use of the cilice, a small spiked chain worn around the thigh for one to two hours a day, and the discipline, a small whip used once a week. Escrivá insisted that such acts were private, voluntary, and not meant for everyone. Their purpose was to cultivate humility and a deeper solidarity with the suffering of Christ. Still Practiced Today? Yes, but only by some. A limited number of Opus Dei members—particularly celibate numeraries and supernumeraries—still practice physical mortification, and always under the supervision of spiritual directors. These practices are not expected of the broader Catholic faithful. Most contemporary Catholic clergy discourage extreme forms of mortification, advocating instead for spiritual disciplines such as prayer, fasting, and acts of service. Modern Catholic Church Position  The Church permits mild mortification, such as fasting or wearing a hairshirt, as long as it is safe, supervised, and done in humility, not pride or self-harm.  Deliberate harm or obsessive mortification is condemned.  Pope Francis and recent popes emphasize inner conversion, mercy, and social justice over physical penance. Overview Table: Development and Usage Aspect Description Origin Early Christian asceticism, rooted in Scripture Medieval Practice Monks, saints, and lay movements used mortification Jesuits Practiced some mortification, emphasized discipline Opus Dei Revived physical mortification in modern times Today Still used in limited contexts (e.g., Opus Dei) Church Stance Permitted in moderation; discouraged if extreme Mortification Across Religions 1. Christianity (Catholicism, Orthodox, Some Protestants) Practices: Fasting, celibacy, hairshirts, cilice, self-flagellation, barefoot pilgrimage Traditions: Catholic mystics, saints, monks, Opus Dei, Orthodox monasticism Goal: Share in Christ’s suffering, develop humility, atone for sin 2. Hinduism Practices: Tapasya (austerity) includes intense fasting, silence, prolonged standing, and extreme yoga poses. Some sects use spikes, hot coals, or carry burdens during festivals like Thaipusam. Traditions: Sadhus, yogis, Shaivite ascetics Goal: Burn karma, conquer desire, realize the divine within 3. Buddhism Practices: Early monks embraced severe fasting and self-denial, but the Buddha later rejected such extremes in favor of the Middle Way. Vassa retreat involves additional discipline. Goal: Detachment from desire and enlightenment 4. Judaism Practices: Fasting on days like Yom Kippur and Tisha B’Av; traditional mourning involves physical discomfort. Mysticism: Some medieval Kabbalists practiced mortification, but it's rare today. Goal: Teshuvah (repentance), spiritual renewal, humility before God 5. Islam Practices: Ramadan fasting (no food or drink from dawn to dusk). Some Shi’a Muslims self-flagellate during Ashura (discouraged by many scholars). Goal: Submission to Allah, remembrance of sacrifice, purification 6. Indigenous & Tribal Religions Practices: Ritual scarring, piercing, tattooing; vision quests involving isolation and deprivation Goal: Spiritual maturity, communion with spirits, transformation Comparative Summary Religion Examples of Practices Purpose Catholicism Fasting, cilice, flagellation Atonement, humility, imitation of Christ Hinduism Fasting, piercing, extreme postures Karma purification, devotion Buddhism Austerities, fasting Detachment, enlightenment Judaism Fasting, mourning discomfort Repentance, spiritual focus Islam Ramadan fasting, Ashura rituals Submission to God, remembrance Indigenous Piercing, isolation, deprivation Vision, transformation, maturity What Is a Hair Shirt? Definition A hair shirt (or cilice in its earlier form) is a garment made from coarse animal hair like goat or horsehair. Worn directly against the skin, it causes constant discomfort without causing injury. Purpose To discipline the body (mortification) To foster humility and penitence To imitate the sufferings of Christ To detach from bodily comfort and enhance spiritual focus Historical Use in Christianity Early Christianity Inspired by John the Baptist’s rough clothing, early hermits and monks used hair shirts to practice penance and austerity. Middle Ages Saints such as St. Thomas Becket, St. Francis of Assisi, and St. Catherine of Siena wore hair shirts secretly under their garments as acts of hidden penance. Religious Orders Monastic orders like the Benedictines and Franciscans used hair shirts and related practices. Jesuits adopted variations (cilices, whips) with a more spiritual focus. Related Devices Item Description Use Hair Shirt Coarse garment (camel or goat hair) Worn under clothing for humility and penance Cilice (modern) Chain with inward-facing spikes Worn on the thigh for 1–2 hours (Opus Dei) Discipline Cord or small whip Used for symbolic or real self-flagellation Hair Belt Band of animal hair around the waist Localized form of the hair shirt Modern Usage and Spiritual Concerns Still Practiced (Rarely) Some traditionalist Catholics and Opus Dei members continue to use hair shirts or cilices, especially during Lent or special devotions. Some Orthodox monastics may also engage in such practices. No Longer Mainstream Most of the Catholic Church discourages physical mortification. Spiritual guidance today emphasizes: Prayer Fasting Charity Emotional self-discipline Spiritual Meaning vs. Misuse Spiritual Purpose To cultivate humility and love for God To symbolically share in Christ's passion To discipline the body for spiritual growth Risks of Misuse May lead to spiritual pride Can become harmful if not properly guided Church warns against excessive or unsupervised use Quick Reference Summary Tool Purpose Common Today? Hair Shirt Penitence, humility Rare Cilice Mortification of the flesh Some in Opus Dei Discipline Symbolic suffering, penance Rare What Was Used for Self-Flagellation?  St. Ignatius of Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits), practiced and promoted self-flagellation as a form of spiritual discipline and penance—especially during his early years of conversion. Here's a breakdown of what was used, how often it was done, and whether other Jesuits practiced it as well:  Scourges or whips: Often made of knotted cords, leather straps, or small chains.  Some penitents used disciplines (a specific type of whip for spiritual mortification).  In extreme cases, some used whips with small metal or bone tips, though this was more common in certain medieval practices than in Jesuit usage.   How Often Was Self-Flagellation Practiced? St. Ignatius of Loyola practiced self-flagellation frequently in his early years of spiritual conversion, especially during his retreat at Manresa from 1522 to 1523. For him, suffering was a way to imitate Christ and purify the soul. Although this practice was never formally required by the Jesuit order after its foundation in 1540, it was present among early members. In the 16th century, early Jesuits often practiced self-flagellation privately, typically on Fridays to commemorate Christ’s Passion or during the season of Lent. Figures like Francis Xavier also engaged in severe penances, though they typically did so quietly and privately. Over time, the frequency of this practice diminished as the Jesuit order matured and began to emphasize intellectual rigor, missionary work, and spiritual exercises over physical mortification. Flagellation remained a voluntary act rather than a requirement. As the Jesuits increasingly prioritized education, global missions, and discernment, they encouraged moderation and discretion in the practice of mortification. Context in Jesuit Spirituality The Spiritual Exercises of Ignatius include meditations on sin, suffering, and the Passion of Christ, but they do not require or mandate physical mortification. Jesuit spirituality has always placed a strong emphasis on interior discipline—especially the alignment of one’s will with God’s—over external penance. As the order expanded its influence in education, diplomacy, and missions, its leadership discouraged excessive self-punishment. Interior transformation became the primary goal, and discretion in external practices was emphasized. Instruments Used for Self-Flagellation The discipline, also known as a flagrum, was a short whip with multiple cords or thongs. It was often made from leather, rope, or knotted cords. Some versions included knots, small metal beads, or sharp tips to increase the pain of each strike. Simple cords or ropes were also used, sometimes tied in knots to create impact. In certain cases, they were soaked in saltwater before use to intensify the sting and slow healing, a traditional method in ascetic circles. Although rare, some penitents used light metal chains instead of rope. These chains could leave bruises or cuts and were typically used by those engaging in more extreme acts of penance. Hairshirts, though not used for flagellation, were another related form of mortification. Made from rough animal hair or coarse fabrics like goat hair, they were worn under clothing to create constant irritation, symbolizing humility and penance. Use Among Jesuits Self-flagellation was not officially required within the Society of Jesus, but some members did voluntarily practice it. Typically, it was performed privately—in one’s room or during solitary prayer—especially on Fridays or during Lent. Some Jesuits also undertook this discipline before receiving the Eucharist as a form of preparation and penance. Spiritual Reason for Mortification For Jesuits and other Catholic ascetics, self-flagellation was seen as a way to imitate Christ’s suffering. It was also a method of disciplining the body, purging sin, resisting temptation, and expressing deep humility. The practice was rooted in the spiritual idea of mortification. The word mortification comes from the Latin mortificare, meaning “to put to death.” In Christian spirituality, particularly within Catholic traditions like the Jesuits, it refers to subduing or disciplining the body, the will, or sinful inclinations in pursuit of holiness. Forms of Mortification Physical mortification includes bodily acts that cause discomfort or pain as a way of disciplining the self. Examples of such acts include fasting, self-flagellation, wearing a hairshirt, sleeping on hard surfaces, or deliberately enduring physical discomfort, such as taking cold showers. Interior or spiritual mortification is considered the more important form in Jesuit spirituality. This type involves denying one’s ego, pride, or selfish desires. It includes practicing humility, obedience, and detachment from personal preferences. The goal is to train the will to be more fully aligned with the will of God. This is central to the method of Ignatius’s Spiritual Exercises. Key Purpose of Mortification Mortification is not about self-harm for its own sake. Its purpose is spiritual purification and detachment from worldly desires or sinful inclinations. Through it, one aims to grow in virtue, develop discipline, and deepen union with God. Jesuit View on Mortification St. Ignatius of Loyola practiced severe mortifications early in his spiritual life. However, he and his successors eventually emphasized moderation. They viewed interior mortification—transforming the heart and mind—as superior to external forms. Physical mortifications were seen as acceptable only when done discreetly, safely, and under the guidance of a spiritual director. Modern Example: Opus Dei Opus Dei, a Catholic institution founded in 1928 by St. Josemaría Escrivá, promotes the sanctification of daily life. Some of its members, particularly celibate numeraries and associates, voluntarily practice corporal mortification. These disciplines are seen as spiritual tools for developing humility, penance, and a deeper relationship with Christ. Cilice: The Thigh-Worn Device A cilice is a small, lightweight metal chain embedded with inward-facing spikes, worn tightly around the upper thigh. Its primary purpose is to serve as a physical reminder of Christ’s suffering and to foster spiritual discipline and humility. The discomfort it causes is not intended to harm the body but rather to aid in inner transformation through voluntary self-denial. How Is the Cilice Used? The cilice is typically worn for about two hours each day. It is not worn on Sundays or certain feast days out of respect for the liturgical calendar. Designed to avoid injury or bleeding, the cilice causes discomfort rather than physical damage. Worn discreetly under clothing, it allows practitioners—primarily celibate numeraries of Opus Dei—to go about their daily routines while integrating this form of penance into ordinary life. Discipline: The Whip Used for Penance The discipline is a small scourge or whip made of knotted cords, used in the practice of mortification of the flesh. Traditionally, it has served as a tool for penance, reminding the user of Christ’s Passion and encouraging spiritual focus and humility. How Is the Discipline Used? In contemporary practice, particularly within Opus Dei, the discipline is used once a week during private prayer. The act lasts for a minute or two and is carried out in solitude, as a deeply personal and meditative gesture. The discipline itself is constructed from woven cotton string and is very lightweight, weighing less than two ounces. Purpose and Spiritual Context Both the cilice and the discipline are rooted in a long-standing tradition within the Catholic Church, especially among saints and ascetics who used physical mortification to deepen their spiritual lives. In Opus Dei, these practices are voluntary and not required of all members. They are typically undertaken by celibate numeraries and only with proper spiritual guidance. The goal is not self-punishment for its own sake, but rather spiritual growth. Through these disciplines, members aim to grow in humility, resist self-centeredness, and unite their personal sacrifices with the sufferings of Christ. These practices are understood as part of a broader call to sanctify ordinary life through intentional acts of love, sacrifice, and self-control.

4 Kesä 1h 4min

There are two kinds of folks who sit around thinking about how to kill people: psychopaths and mystery writers. — Richard Castle Clip Played: From: 10/2016 Crime Scene – JimHarold.com Do you have a psychopath in your life?  The best way to find out is read my book.  BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life4 Support is Appreciated:    Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life ****************************************************** Quotes from the interviewed psychopaths: The person you need me to be in order to trust, confide in, support and promote is the person I will become.  Being free of unpredictable emotional reactions and guilt, I am free to be whatever, whenever and then change that when necessary…  — “Bill” I was 11 when I knew I was not like other people because I saw someone die in front of me, and then everyone was so upset about it, and I didn't see why.  — “Steve” You don’t loudly sigh with boredom at a funeral. You probably don’t feel bored at a funeral. I do. Exceptionally so. And I suppose I may sometimes forget myself without realizing. There have been many occasions where people have been looking at me oddly for reasons unclear to me.  — “Fred” Who is the psychopath in your life or all of our lives, those at the top? This podcast dives into the mindset of psychopaths—the psychopath who doesn’t go to jail or the psych-ward—so you can better understand, identify, and eliminate them from your life. The entire world is run by psychopaths, all imposters. The Misleading Research on Psychopaths Studies about psychopaths have been VERY misleading to NON-Existent. Robert Hare: The Modern Psychopathy “Expert” Robert Hare, the world’s leading “expert” on psychopaths, did a study using prison inmates over 30 years ago. That study is the focus of his book published in 1993 titled Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us (reissued 1999). NO studies since then. That study is likely very flawed at best. Who Did Hare Base His Work On? Hervey Milton Cleckley, M.D. (1903 –1984) was an American psychiatrist and pioneer in the field of psychopathy. His book, The Mask of Sanity, originally published in 1941 and revised in new editions until the 1980s, provided the most influential clinical description of psychopathy in the twentieth century. Hervey Cleckley: The “Father” of Psychopathy What is Hervey Cleckley Best Known For? On many occasions, Cleckley was asked to testify at important trials. An example was the 1979 trial of Ted Bundy who murdered more than thirty people. ” Bundy received a mental health evaluation from Hervey Cleckley when he was on trial for the Florida murders. Cleckley is considered to be the “father” of psychopathy. He diagnosed Bundy as a psychopath. Cleckley testified that Bundy was a classic psychopath but was not criminally insane. The Ted Bundy Trial: A Staged Event? The Bundy trial was fake, what does this tell you about Cleckley? Bundy was the first televised trial in this country, any televised trials are FAKE. True Crime is FAKE | Ted Bundy | Chris WATTS FAKE Murder – YouTube The Ted Bundy trial is where the definition of psychopaths grew wings, thanks to Cleckley. Cleckley’s Other Contributions Vitamins Virgil P. Sydenstricker was a professor of medicine and an internationally recognised specialist in hematology and nutrition. Articles published with Cleckley were among the first to describe an atypical form of pellagra (now known as “niacin deficiency”), which was then endemic in southern states. In 1939 and 1941, they published on the use of nicotinic acid (niacin or vitamin B3) as a treatment for abnormal mental states and psychiatric disorders. The studies have been erroneously used to justify the use of megavitamin therapy in psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia. Coma Shock Therapy Cleckley practiced the controversial “coma therapy“, where psychiatric patients would be repeatedly put into comas over several weeks through overdoses of insulin, metrazol or other drugs. In the wake of sometimes fatal complications, Cleckley published in 1939 and 1941 advising on theoretical grounds the prophylactic administration of various vitamins, salts and hormones. In 1951, he also co-published case study research suggesting the use of electronarcosis for various conditions, a form of deep sleep therapy initiated by passing electric current through the brain, without causing seizures as in electroconvulsive therapy, which he also used. Stunning with electricity is known as electronarcosis, and killing with electricity is known as electrocution. Criminal Responsibility In 1952 Cleckley, along with Walter Bromberg a senior psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, published an article on the insanity defense. They suggested changing the wording of it to: “In your opinion, was the defendant suffering from disease of the mind and if so, was it sufficient to render him unaccountable under the law for the crime charged?” The concept of ‘accountability’ was intended as an alternative to a narrow definition of ‘responsibility’ under the M’Naghten rules, which requires an absence of moral knowledge of right and wrong, in effect only covering psychosis (delusions, hallucinations). They argued that mental illness can involve any part of the mind and that the insanity test should focus on the extent to which the accused’s mind overall, due to some inner pathology ‘whether obvious or masked’, was unable to operate in accord with the law. However, 10 years later, a chapter by Cleckley on “Psychiatry: Science, Art, and Scientism” cautioned others against a common exaggeration of the abilities of psychiatry to diagnose or treat, including in regard to criminal responsibility. In that regard, Cleckley expressed his agreement with a critique by Hakeem, yet Hakeem had quoted Cleckley’s claims about psychopathy as an example of psychiatrists exaggerating how clear their diagnostic terms are to each other. Cleckley was a psychiatrist for the prosecution in the 1979 trial of serial killer Ted Bundy, the first to be televised nationally in the United States. After interviewing Bundy and reviewing two prior reports, he diagnosed him as a psychopath. At the competency hearing a defense psychiatrist also argued that Bundy was a psychopath, however, he concluded that Bundy was not competent to stand trial or represent himself, while Cleckley argued that he was competent. Multiple Personality In 1956, Cleckley co-authored a book The Three Faces of Eve with Corbett H. Thigpen, his partner in private practice and colleague at the department of psychiatry in Georgia University. It was based on their patient Chris Costner Sizemore who Thigpen especially had treated over several years. They published a research article on the case in 1954, documenting the sessions and how they came to view it as a case of ‘multiple personality’, referencing Morton Prince‘s earlier controversial case study of Christine Beauchamp (pseudonym). They also discussed what is meant by ‘personality’ and identity, noting how it can change even in everyday senses (becoming ‘a new person’ or ‘not himself’ etc.). Such a diagnosis had fallen into relative disuse in psychiatry but Thigpen and Cleckley felt they had identified a rare case, though others have questioned the use of hypnosis and suggestion in creating some if not all of the characterization, and the diagnosis of multiple personality disorder (now dissociative identity disorder) remains controversial despite, or because of, upsurges in diagnoses in America. The book also served as the basis for a blockbuster 1957 film The Three Faces of Eve starring Joanne Woodward, in which Lee J. Cobb played the initial treating psychiatrist and Edwin Jerome the consultant. Both Thigpen and Cleckley received writing credits and reportedly over a million dollars. In the book and film ‘Eve’ is cured of her alternate personalities, but Sizemore states that she was not free of them until many years later. She also alleges that she was not aware the session reports would be published outside of medical circles, or that she was signing over rights to her life story forever (for $3 for the book rights to McGraw-Hill which sold 2 million copies and $5000 for the visual rights (relatives received $2000)). She fought unsuccessfully to stop the publication of videos of her treatment sessions, but in 1989 successfully sued the film studio 20th Century Fox when it wanted to make a parody remake of its film and tried to use a 1956 contract she had signed, without legal representation via Thigpen, to prevent Sissy Spacek optioning Sizemore’s own published book on her life. When Sizemore returned to Augusta for a speaking tour in 1982 neither Thigpen or Cleckley attended and she did not visit them, though in 2008 she described the diagnosis and treatment of her as courageous. In 1984 Thigpen and Cleckley published a brief communication in an international hypnosis journal cautioning against over-use of the diagnosis of multiple personality disorder. ********************************************************** Who Is Robert Hare? Robert D. Hare was born on January 1, 1934 in Calgary, Alberta. He was raised in a close-knit, working-class family. Hare’s mother had French Canadian roots and her family dated back to Montreal in the 1600s. Hare’s father was a roofing contractor who spent much of his time during the great depression riding the rails and looking for work. Robert Hare is a Canadian psychologist who made major contributions to the fields of criminal psychology and forensic psychology. He is best known for his research on psychopathy. Hare is the creator of the Psychopathy Checklist and the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Hare advises the FBI‘s Child Abduction and Serial Murder Investigative Resources Center (CASMIRC) and consults for various British and North American prison services. Hare is currently a professor emeritus of the University of British Columbia. He is considered to be the world’s foremost expert on psychopathy as he has spent more than 30 years studying the condition. Hare now works closely with law enforcement and sits on several law enforcement committees and boards in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States He describes psychopaths as ‘social predators while pointing out that most don’t commit murder. He has been nicknamed “Beagle Bob” by his close friends for his ability to follow a scent. How Hare Got Started   Frustrated by a lack of agreed definitions or rating systems of psychopathy, including at a ten-day international North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) conference in France in 1975, Hare began developing a Psychopathy Checklist. Produced for initial circulation in 1980, the same year that the DSM changed its diagnosis of sociopathic personality to Antisocial Personality Disorder, it was based largely on the list of traits advanced by Cleckley, with whom Hare corresponded over the years. Hare redrafted the checklist in 1985 following Cleckley’s death in 1984, renaming it the Hare Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R). It was finalized as a first edition in 1991, when it was also made available to the criminal justice system, which Hare says he did despite concerns that it was not designed for use outside of controlled experimental research. It was updated with extra data in a 2nd edition in 2003. The PCL-R was reviewed in Buros Mental Measurements Yearbook (1995), as being the “state of the art” both clinically and in research use. In 2005, the Buros Mental Measurements Yearbook review listed the PCL-R as “a reliable and effective instrument for the measurement of psychopathy” and is considered the ‘gold standard’ for measurement of psychopathy. However, it is also criticized. Hare has accused the DSM’s ASPD diagnosis of ‘drifting’ from clinical tradition, but his own checklist has been accused of in reality being closer to the concept of criminologists William and Joan McCord than that of Cleckley Hare himself, while noting his promotion of Cleckley’s work for four decades, has distanced himself somewhat from Cleckley’s work. Beyond Prison: The Real Psychopaths Problem with the above statement is that studying psychopaths in prison is one issue, but what about the ones roaming around running things? While the PCL-R has become the gold standard test for identifying psychopathy among prisoners, Hare has been warning about non-criminal psychopaths since he wrote his bestselling book Without Conscience in 1993. What Bob Hare and the FBI say about psychopaths: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin – July 2012 — LEB Hmmm, warning people that non-criminals could be a thing doesn’t quite cut it;) UBC professor emeritus Robert Hare, an internationally renowned expert on psychopaths, has offered his side of the story in a heated dispute over the boundaries of academic freedom. One of his adversaries is his former graduate student, SFU psychology professor Stephen Hart, who is also a highly regarded researcher in the area of psychopathology.” Who knows could have been a trick lawsuit to explain the FACT they never did any real studies. Hare’s Tools and Influence Hare is also co-author of derivatives of the PCL: The Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV) still requires a clinical interview and review of records by a trained clinician The P-Scan (P for psychopathy, a screening questionnaire for non-clinicians to detect possible psychopathy The Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV) to assess youth and children exhibiting early signs of psychopathy The Antisocial Process Screening Device originally the Psychopathy Screening Device; a questionnaire for parents/staff to fill out on youth, or in a version developed by others, for youth to fill out as self-report. Hare is also a co-author of the Guidelines for a Psychopathy Treatment Program. Hare also co-developed the ‘B-Scan’ questionnaires for people to rate psychopathy traits in others in the workplace. Hare is currently a professor emeritus of the University of British Columbia. He is considered to be the world’s foremost expert on psychopathy as he has spent more than 30 years studying the condition. Hare now works closely with law enforcement and sits on several law enforcement committees and boards in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States He has been nicknamed “Beagle Bob” by his close friends for his ability to follow a scent. The Bigger Picture: Psychopaths Among Us What is that old saying? The Fox guarding the Hen House? Better to have us thinking dangerous psychopaths like Bundy are safely locked away. I doubt Bundy is even dead now. The world is staged to deceive. That is how they got us surrounded. My research has not been based on prisoners but on the actual psychopaths sitting next to us.  Hiding in plain sight. I suspect it is closer to 1 or 2 per FOUR people. A big difference. Look around; who is running things? Many people are modeling psychopathic behavior in the quest for more money. Money is even fake, yet people will go the extra mile to get more. I would argue that psychopaths are in charge of every part of society that I have researched. NO Studies have been done outside of the prison population. wonder why? On purpose is the answer. How else could they get us so surrounded? They are even lying about what sex they are. The women are all men wearing wigs. Women truly run the world, but they do it hiding as men. In Summary Herve Cleckley was the original “researcher” into psychopaths who wrote The Mask of Sanity. Cleckley, testified at the Bundy Trial. Ted Bundy was the first televised trial in the USA. ALL televised trials are fake. Robert Hare based his early research on Cleckley for 40 years. This is where the definition of psychopaths grew wings.

2 Kesä 44min