US Election: Waiting Out a Close Race

US Election: Waiting Out a Close Race

Our Global Head of Fixed Income and Thematic Research, Michael Zezas, outlines how investors should navigate the closing days of the presidential campaign -- including a vote-counting period that could extend past Election Day.


----- Transcript -----


Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I’m Michael Zezas, Morgan Stanley’s Global Head of Fixed Income and Thematic Research. Today is going to be a little bit different. We’re exactly six days away from the US election. The race is neck-and-neck, and I want to sketch out what investors should expect in the next couple of weeks.

It’s Wednesday, October 30, at 10 AM in New York.

This is an historic election, and the outcome remains highly uncertain. What’s more, there’s a good chance we won’t know the winner on election night due to close vote counts. My colleagues and I have spent a lot of time on this show trying to give our listeners a sense of how the election might impact different economies around the word as well as markets, sectors, and specific industries. But today I want to take a step back and highlight a few things that investors should keep in mind right now.

To sum up what we’ve covered so far: The key policies at stake are taxes, tariffs, and immigration. Congressional composition will be critical in determining the extent of tax cut extensions in either win outcome. Domestic, consumer-oriented sectors are most exposed to tax changes, while clean-tech is the most exposed to potential efforts at a repeal of the Inflation Reduction Act. Macro impacts vary depending on the scope of policies and their sequencing, but we see downside risks to growth in a Republican win outcome.

As our listeners know, a candidate needs 270 Electoral College votes to win. Former President Trump’s most likely path to victory is through the Sun Belt – Arizona, North Carolina and Georgia; while Vice President Harris’ most likely path to victory is through the so-called Blue Wall – Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

In terms of the Senate, polling and prediction markets have consistently implied higher likelihood of Republicans winning control. Democrats are defending more seats in states that Trump won in 2020, as well as more seats in states Biden won by a small margin. As far as the House of Representatives, Republicans need 11 of the 25 toss-up seats to maintain control of the House, and Democrats need 15. The generic ballot is the most reliable House indicator, in our view. It’s a political poll which asks not which candidate you plan to vote for to represent you in Congress, but rather which political party – Democrat, Republican or Independent – that you would support. The generic ballot historically correlates with the House winner, and it currently favors Democrats.

All this leaves us with two key takeaways:

First, don’t expect conclusive results on election night. Early vote data from key states reflects our view that vote-by-mail levels are lower than in 2020 but still elevated versus historical levels. And it may take days to get all the mail-in votes counted.

Second, full election results may differ from early returns. Why is that? A candidate may have a deficit in election night vote counts but still come back to win the race once all ballots are counted. This depends on two key variables: The share of the electorate who vote by mail; and the skew among those ballots toward Democrats – a blue shift – or Republicans – a red shift.

So again, we need to be patient and wait for the final results. And when that happens, we will start digging deep into the post-election outlook for the economy and markets.

Thanks for listening. If you enjoy the show, please leave us a review wherever you listen to podcasts and share Thoughts on the Market with a friend or colleague today.

Jaksot(1506)

Mike Wilson: How Confident Are U.S. Businesses in the Economy?

Mike Wilson: How Confident Are U.S. Businesses in the Economy?

On today’s episode, Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson shares a readout on the firm’s proprietary Business Conditions Index. Are the data softening more than investors realize?

17 Kesä 20193min

Andrew Sheets: The Dangers of Cheering for Weaker Data

Andrew Sheets: The Dangers of Cheering for Weaker Data

On today’s podcast, Chief Cross-asset Strategist Andrew Sheets provides a bit of historical perspective on the logic of rooting for weaker data and lower interest rates.

14 Kesä 20193min

Michael Zezas: Why ‘Slowbalization’ May Be Feeding Trade Tensions

Michael Zezas: Why ‘Slowbalization’ May Be Feeding Trade Tensions

Head of U.S. Public Policy Michael Zezas says that independent of current trade concerns, the trend toward globalized supply chains is fading, as companies respond both to political and market incentives.

12 Kesä 20193min

Mike Wilson: Why Trade Tensions Are Only Part of the Story

Mike Wilson: Why Trade Tensions Are Only Part of the Story

Investors and media have been hyper-focused on trade and Fed policymaking. But according to Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson, some key economic data points are the real story to watch.

10 Kesä 20193min

Andrew Sheets: For Markets, Signs, Signs, Everywhere Signs

Andrew Sheets: For Markets, Signs, Signs, Everywhere Signs

On today’s podcast, Chief Cross-asset Strategist Andrew Sheets says that while discussion of a Fed rate cut may have helped markets rebound, several longer-term signals are troubling.

7 Kesä 20193min

Michael Zezas: U.S.-Mexico Trade Adds to Recession Risks

Michael Zezas: U.S.-Mexico Trade Adds to Recession Risks

On today’s episode, Head of U.S. Public Policy Michael Zezas says further escalation of trade tensions could come with a cost. Are the risks of a global recession increasing?

5 Kesä 20192min

Mike Wilson: U.S. Equities: How Much Correction is Ahead?

Mike Wilson: U.S. Equities: How Much Correction is Ahead?

On today’s TOTM, Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson says trade tensions may be rattling markets, but the fundamentals are the real culprit behind the correction. So where are equities headed next?

3 Kesä 20193min

Andrew Sheets: Fed to the Rescue? Maybe Not.

Andrew Sheets: Fed to the Rescue? Maybe Not.

On today’s podcast, Chief Cross Asset Strategist Andrew Sheets examines the notion that the Fed stands willing and able to reduce interest rates and support markets.

31 Touko 20193min

Suosittua kategoriassa Liike-elämä ja talous

sijotuskasti
mimmit-sijoittaa
psykopodiaa-podcast
rss-rahapodi
ostan-asuntoja-podcast
rss-lahtijat
leadcast
rss-rahamania
lakicast
rss-yritys-ja-erehdys
rss-neuvottelija-sami-miettinen
oppimisen-psykologia
hyva-paha-johtaminen
rss-karon-grilli
pomojen-suusta
rss-myynnin-myllerryksessa
rss-seuraava-potilas
kasvun-kipuja
rss-strategian-seurassa
rss-puhutaan-rahasta