Managing Intense Feelings for Kids and Grownups with Lindsey Kealey (165)

Managing Intense Feelings for Kids and Grownups with Lindsey Kealey (165)

Social emotional learning for all of us – brain breaks not timeouts recommended

Join our online community!

Brain breaks and the 3 C’s for connecting.

Whether you’re a parent balancing life in the pandemic or a teacher managing highly emotional kids, this episode is a resource for you.

Co-host Dr. Ann Kelley and child specialist, Lindsey Kealey dive into strategies for teaching kids how to regulate their emotions and promote positive connection with others, called social emotional learning. Linsey Kealey has developed a trauma-based, neuroscience-informed program that uses social emotional learning and problem-solving strategies to help all of us make positive decisions and thrive in our relationships. She utilizes the Three C’s method, connect, calm and collaborate, to help transform the way we interact with ourselves and others. They discuss the three C method of connection to help cultivate healthy relationships and positive development in our children. .

Our guest today

Lindsey Kealey is a University instructor of human development and family sciences and education at Oregon State University. She is the author of PAWsitive Choices Social and Emotional Learning and the host of The PAWsitive Choices Podcast. Lindsey earned a Bachelor’s of Science in Human Development and Family Sciences with an emphasis in child development and holds a Masters of Arts in Teaching. Her university work, as well as her experience coaching families and teachers, helped her craft a curriculum that integrates interpersonal neurobiology, trauma-responsive practices, and problem-solving to help children thrive.

Lindsey Kealey working with social emotional learning

More about PAWsitive Choices…

PAWsitive Choices is a comprehensive social and emotional learning program for families and schools that teaches children how to regulate emotions, make positive choices, learn from mistakes, and collaboratively solve problems. This trauma-responsive curriculum equips educators and caregivers with practical tools and strategies to help strengthen relationships and promote resilience.

Show Transcript

Lindsey: So we almost think that this is going to take a lot of time, but in the long run, you’ll find yourself having to teach less and less because they’re learning those skills. They’re internalizing them. So it can feel counterintuitive of well man setting up a brain break kid or teaching my child about problem solving.

It is a task. It is something to do, but not only is it going to make them more successful and thrive, it’s going to help make our lives easier. And I think that’s motivating for adults.

Today’s session on social emotional learning begins right now with Dr. Ann Kelley and Sue Marriott.

Ann: Hi, welcome to the show. I’m here with Lindsey Kealey.

Lindsey: Thanks for having me.

Ann: I’m so glad to have you. So you are a social, emotional learning specialist for children. Is that right?

Lindsey: That’s correct.

Ann: Well, Lindsey, tell us a little bit about yourself.

Lindsey: I am an Instructor of education and also human development and family science. With an emphasis in early childhood education. And I am a fellow neuro nerd. I love your podcast. It resonates with me so much. So I’m just really passionate about translating the science just as your podcast does to help, not only my university students and graduate students, but also families and elementary educator.

So I like to synthesize the science that’s out there about our personal neurobiology and then infuse that both in my college courses and then also with family coaching. And when I go and coach in elementary schools, so it’s really just an honor and privilege to get to work with so many different people in different sectors and disseminate this great information about how we can better connect with you.

Ann: And we need to continue to disseminate that for the young humans out there, because, you know, as a parent myself, all the information I could have used when my kids were younger, to help them deal with those huge, big emotions that they can have and you know, how to cope and really learn how to get ahold of themselves and to connect to other people. So when I took a look at your curriculum, I was really excited to have you on the show.

Lindsey: Thank you. It’s really a neat position that we’re in, whether we’re educators or parents, or even just as we’re connecting with our partners. If someone doesn’t have children in their life, it’s a beautiful opportunity for us to get to better understand ourselves and kind of our emotional landscape.

And then how that translates to. Who we’re connecting with and how we can practice that empathy and then help others understand what’s happening within them. If they’re experiencing strong feelings. And that’s something that I always talk about with my students and other adults I work with is that to begin, you want to explore your own emotional landscape and practice that emotional regulation.

And that’s really what. Children can learn the best buys by modeling. So when we, you know, start with ourselves, then that’s one of the best places to start. I think, I think some teachers and parents say, well, like I need to teach my kid. I need to change their behavior right away. And I think when we step back, it starts with us.

And that’s really nice because we have a lot of autonomy and agency over our actions.

Young black mother taking care of her depressed little daughter at home.

Ann: Well, what do you typically try to teach your graduate students and parents and teachers about how to do that? Right? Because it’s, it is such an important step instead of always being the teacher out there to our children, to really be able to understand how hard it is to do inside of ourselves and to be able to really model it.

So what if some of the things that you recommend when you’re talking to parents and teachers?

Lindsey: Well to begin with, I like to bring attention to the work of Dr. Kristin Neff and self-compassion because trying to navigate social problems takes a lot of self-compassion and vulnerability, I think. And so being able to just like, put your hand on your chest and take that deep breath in and just give yourself.

Because as we’re trying to connect with others and teach kids, you know, regulation skills with those big feelings, they experience, it’s very likely that it could make us feel dysregulated. You know, I have this glitter brain frame. So if you think about for those listeners who can’t see this, the picture frame that has the glitter in it, and I’ve just put a picture of a brain inside of that.

And if you think about the glitter as being kind of like the neuro-transmitters and chemicals in your brain, when you get really upset, I show this to my students and young children. It’s almost like the glitter in your brain or those neurochemicals get all mixed up. So it’s really hard to make positive choices.

It’s hard to be our best selves and show up when we feel dysregulated. And I think one of the most encouraging things that I can tell people is that one of the best ways to model vulnerability and to help build resilience in children is to repair with them. So I have. A big glitter brain and the small one.

And so when our brains get dysregulated and maybe you know, we’re not super kind, or we said, we say, Hey, I told you that five times sit down and maybe we’re not showing up how we’d like to, we can simply model for children or even, you know, our other adult relationships and say, you know what? My brain felt really mixed up.

I was really upset. And I’m sorry for speaking to you the way I did. And next time I’m going to take calming breaths and I’m going to try some things out to help my own brain. And I’m sorry about. The way I talk to you. So when we repair, I think that kids learn so much, you know, we don’t have to worry about being the perfect parents to the perfect teachers or the perfect partner, but rather we can model repair and we can come together and really solve those social problems.

Ann: You don’t have to hold the idea of perfection that we’re not going to make mistakes. And so often we want to rush in and explain why we did something don’t we like, no, let me tell you I’m so charged up, but this is why you need to understand. The concept of letting your brain kind of settle so that you can find your body and then come to the connection. Yeah, that’s a really important reminder, I think to us all

Lindsey: yes. And I think when we start just by saying, you know, I felt really upset. I felt really dysregulated. If you’re speaking to an adult, like you mentioned, rather than going into a list of reasons of why we did a certain thing, or, well, I talk like this because you did X, Y, and Z.

If we just say, you know, I had a lot of strong feelings when we had this discussion that almost lets the other person kind of take a sigh of relief and it feels like you’re on the same team rather than the other person getting on the defense and saying, well, I had these reasons why I acted like this in the first place. So if we just say, you know, I had these really strong feelings that I’m kind of wrestling with or working through that. It’s like it unites our common humanity with one another.

Ann: Well, when you’re trained to help parents or teachers, let’s think about the kids with big emotions, with their bodies, for whatever reason, history experience, but they tend to have huge emotions, and dysregulate frequently. Those can be really tough times to be able to get ahold of yourself and parent. But what are the things you recommend? Like what do you talk to individuals about how to deal with a child that is extremely dysregulated and upset?

Lindsey: I actually have a lot of experience. One of the beginning of my educational journey and my journey to creating a social emotional curriculum started my second year of teaching.

I began as a kindergarten teacher and day one, I thought this is going to be a great year. And it turned out that I had seven students who had really strong social, emotional, and behavioral challenges or needs. And so that looked like certain students hitting one another, you know, running out of the classroom, a lot of physical aggression and violence I saw and a big part of that had to do with trauma and adverse.

Experiences. And when I learned about their backgrounds and where they’re coming from, the amount of stress that was flooding their systems, it was just astonishing that they could come to school to begin with and show up. So that certainly gave me a lot of empathy, as I learned about trauma and how that affects the brain.

So that kind of set me off on a pathway of how do I help children who were literally throwing chairs across the classroom or who are running out the front door of the school. And now we’re calling backups to find kids in the neighborhood. I mean, this is something that some teachers will experience really big problems and behavioral challenges.

And so I kind of started with a host of behavioral challenges that were extreme. And then I kind of worked backward from there.

Ann: I can imagine teachers out there can really relate to what you are saying. And I I’m thinking about being in your position and having students run all over the place and you can have deep compassion for their histories, but you also have to like manage them.

And I just have such empathy for teachers out there. And I think actually after the year of the pandemic, I think a lot more of us have a kind of connection to teachers and what they have to deal with on an everyday basis because what’s coming together for them is a history. Probably many kids that have had trauma and have that manifested in terms of dysregulating and behaviors that are tough. So anyway, I just think about that from a really compassionate place for the teachers out there and for you in that moment and trying to go, ah, how do I deal with it?

Lindsey: Definitely. So beginning with just connecting with yourself and again, holding space for self-compassion and telling yourself, wow, this is really hard. I mean, there was this bout of physical aggression with these students and I need to really be at a place of peace as much as you can. Right. That’s challenging to do that, but before you engage with children or with a difficult situation, being able to make sure your brain is calm and ready to teach. I think that’s really huge.

So in working with children with a variety of needs, and then also with working with children who maybe don’t have trauma or a lot of challenges, I found there are three practices, three things you can do that I call the three CS and that is to connect. To calm and then collaborate. And I found that when you do those three things, really with any problem that you have, it helps you get to the end, the ultimate goal, which is to have accountability, to have repair and to really teach kids to build skills so that they learn from that experience.

So when you connect with the child, that could just be acknowledging where they’re coming from, you could just narrate their experience. I could tell you a really upset when you know that student took the ball out of your hands. That really made you mad. Gosh, it’s frustrating when people take things out of our hands. So that’s just the first day just connecting with them.

Ann: That’s not an easy step though, right? Like it can sound easy. Right. You know, connect first, but you’re describing kids that are hitting one another. Like how do you take a moment for the of connection when you’re in the middle of this really intense behavioral acting out.

And I know parents, and even when I’ve talked with couples, when they’re really, really angry, that connection step can be so difficult. How do you help people make that first step? I want to go to the calm and the collaborate whole heartedly agree with you, but let’s take a moment at that first. What do you recommend? How do you help people connect?

Lindsey: Well, if someone, maybe let’s say one person who’s trying to facilitate the problem solving is also dysregulated, you could start by just saying, I can tell you’re upset and you know, if you’re not in a head space to start to guess, well, are you frustrated? Are you sad? You could just start by saying, I can tell that your brain feels mixed up or that you feel upset. And I think that allows the other person to feel, felt like Dr. Dan Siegel. So the person just knows, oh, you can tell something is on my heart or I’m, I’m having a difficulty with the situation. So to say, I can tell you’re upset.

And then I think that allows the other person to feel felt. I think that’s a pretty simple thing to say and then move on from there when you can. So maybe it’s, you’re not in a situation where like, for instance, if it’s a safety issue in the classroom to say, oh, I can tell that maybe if it’s two children, both of you are really upset.

We need to change how our environment looks right now. So let’s have this student go over. I call something a brain break. So that’s allowing students and I’m showing to the screen now a little tub with calming tools inside of it. So rather than hopping to, I need to teach you a lesson or tell you why your behaviors were right or wrong.

That’s the third C collaborate. We need to first get them in a place where they’re able to calm down. To be able to learn and be ready to hear what you have to say. And so you could say, we need to, you know, the second C is to calm. Let’s take some deep breaths, let’s get you in a space that’s safer, or that allows you to feel settled before we start problem solving this situation.

And for adults that could be like, I can tell you’re upset. What do you need right now? So maybe the other person accused them into oh, My brain probably needs something. You know what? I’m going to go take a lap around the neighborhood cause I might need to get my energy out. So that’s something where we can help the other person identify that they need to meet one of their own needs

Ann: One of things as that it can be just a quick line, right? It’s not that you have to kind of sit down and have this empathetic moment with a kid that is acting out. But what you’re saying is even if you just observe about what’s going on in the connection, I see you’re upset. You’re probably both upset. That ,in and of itself, that quick line is a step into the experience of connection.

That kind of calms the nervous system in that one moment. And so often we jump up with trying to teach the lesson, and that is as a parent, as a partner, it’s like, let me tell you why I’m upset. So I know I keep saying that, but it’s so hard for our nervous systems to calm down. So I like what you’re saying. Sometimes it’s just one quick line. It doesn’t have to be a momentous moment.

Lindsey: Exactly. And I found that when you skip that connection piece and you go straight to calm some of us, maybe we don’t go straight to the collaborate. And I want to tell you why you’re wrong or let’s fix this. Sometimes we start with, we want to help them calm down.

We see that need, but we say you need to calm down. And oftentimes the other person isn’t necessarily receptive to that. What do you mean? I need to calm down, calm down, right?

Ann: Somehow that never works. You know, if you say calm down, don’t be afraid. Okay. Let me get busy, let me get right on that (both laughing)

Lindsey: It’s powerful just to say I see you. I can see something’s up and you could say, I see that both of us are upset. We both need to take a break. I think that we need to regroup or for children I say, we need to let our brains settle and then we can come back together. But you know, right now I need to go sit at my desk and take a sip of my coffee and what do you need?

Okay. You can go take a brain break or maybe you can just do a lap around the recess. So, you know, the playground let’s help you calm down. So I think when you really get to the bottom of it, it’s helping children become regulated, building those skills for them, and then being able to teach. Help them understand why, whatever they did was a problem, so they can move forward and then have that long lasting behavioral change is the ultimate goal.

I think with maybe even beneath that is strengthening our relationships because really kids don’t care what, you know, until they know that you care for them. So that’s a big part of it strengthening that relationship.

Ann: Yeah. I like the way you’re saying .Kids don’t care what,you know until they feel like you care. That’s a really powerful statement.

Lindsey: I’d have to look and see who it’s attributed to. It might be too anonymous, but that’s something that I, I always go back to with my graduate students who are thinking, well, I need to get the reading, writing, math scores up, you know, when they’re doing their student teaching placements, they’re so focused on maybe a child’s behavior. I need them to sit at the carpet and listen, otherwise their reading score isn’t going to be where I need it to be. But if we say relationships first, academic second. Then actually that’s the most productive approach to take, because if the child’s not in the learning state, if their brain’s not regulated, if their prefrontal cortex is not online, then they’re not going to get that reading skill.

They’re not going to learn multiplication or division when they’re in that brain state. So it’s one of my joys in what I do is helping people make that realization and have that aha moment.

Ann: In those steps we’ve talked about the three C’s and we’ve talked about the connect and then the calm. And you mentioned the brain break. Talk a little bit more about the brain break. I think that’s part of what your curriculum is based on, is that right, about ways to help individuals first connect, but then in the calming place that there’s things that they can do to calm themselves before they jump into the collaborative. Can you talk a little bit more about the brain break?

Lindsey: Definitely. So I think that oftentimes as adults, we want to help children calm down and we all know that something that needs to happen, especially when you’re in an aisle at target and maybe you’re with your child and they’re having a moment because they want a toy. And you said, no. So we all want them to experience that sense of calm.

But in my research, I’ve looked at the things that get in the way. And so some common practices like. Or in the educational setting and classrooms that might be, oh, you’re missing five minutes of recess or you’re missing fun Friday, or there’s different things that we do with the best of intentions, thinking that telling a child, oh, you need to go take a timeout.

We think that’s going to help them calm down. However, if we look back at that, what does that ultimately accomplishing. Some of the unintended consequences of having children take a timeout is if they’re going over to a corner of the room, let’s say in the house, and they’re just sitting there rather than thinking, you know, wow, what I did was wrong. And I put that made my sister feel really upset when I did this or that. So what we really want kids to do is still feel like they’re connected to us and that they’re worthy of love and belonging. So if we say go take a. You just did something really bad that can kind of cause a rupture, a disconnection.

So if we say something like, you know what, buddy, I can tell your brain feels mixed up. Let’s have you take a brain break or a calming break. That way you’re feeling better. And then we can solve this problem. So it’s really, it’s not putting the blame on the person. So that’s shame. I am that. And then.

Guilds Bernay Brown’s work. What I did was bad. And so when we are able to shift our language, take a linguistic turn, so to speak and say, you know what, let’s help your brain settle down rather than take a time out. Ultimately it’s accomplishing the goal of having a child remove themselves from maybe a situation, maybe it’s Thanksgiving dinner, and they’re, you know, having a moment, they have those strong feelings.

It’s allowing them to remove themselves from that environment or that situation. But we’re wording it in a way that promotes shame resilience and that fosters a secure attachment. So I think that’s powerful. So a brain break really is allowing a child to go to a space that’s safer and that’s calm for them.

And then know that they have a variety of things they can do to help their brain feel settled. So that’s the goal. And when we think about how we tell them to do that, it can make a big difference.

Ann: You think about shame is being sent out of the village, right? That’s kind of what induces shame historically.

And. To like go take a time out is this inducement of you’ve done something bad and now we need to punish you. Right. And, and like you said, all of a sudden I have this idea of this child in the corner and no you’re right. Unlikely that me, myself in the corner as a child or anyone else will be sitting there really having reflective functioning about how much they made a mistake and how much they desire to repair. Not so much. Right.

Lindsey: Exactly. And it can go one of two ways or it can go both ways. There’s a variety of ways this can go, but it’s oftentimes either my mom or dad they’re so mean I don’t deserve this or that could also be I’m so bad and I’m not even good enough to sit at the table with, you know, at Thanksgiving or, you know, my family doesn’t care from your love and be like, I can’t even be around them.

I’m unworthy. And so I would rather have a child have their response and their brain of thinking, wow, if maybe at their grandparents’ house, grandma’s really mean. I’d rather have almost have that cognitive pattern because the child’s not internalizing shame thinking that they are bad, but ultimately we don’t want our children to be having this reflective time where they’re thinking we’re all bad.

Right. Right. And we want them to feel like we’re on the same page. So something that happens I think is when I propose that we can shift our understanding of time outs, I get the response from parents of, well, what do you mean time outs are bad? You know, maybe they grew up in, they were spanked or they had other forms of discipline that didn’t feel good.

And so they’re thinking I don’t want to go that direction. So I’m going to go with the timeout in their mind. They’re thinking that’s so much better than these other really punitive responses that caregivers can provide. And so I think. If we’re able to let parents know, and I make this clear with my graduate students as well, is that, we’re not saying that we’re just letting accountability fall to the wayside.

You know, we’re not saying, oh, your brain’s upset. And you know, kumbaya gave me a hug. Now we’re walking. We were going right along. We wanted to backtrack because it’s really important for us to have those boundaries. Right. It’s in our children’s best interest to help them learn from their mistakes rather than when parents say, oh, doesn’t a brain.

Isn’t that like a permissive thing to do, but it’s like, oh, actually rather you’re allowing that child to calm down to still feel connected to you. And that’s why you have to follow up with problem solving. That’s a really important piece that has to be there.

Ann: Well, I also think the piece of the brain break, as you’re talking about it, it feels like it really also supports accountability, right? Because it’s, it’s not even the, what falls after that, where the time out is not really fostering accountability where you’re saying, take a brain break. You’re suggesting your brain is dysregulated. And so you’ve got to go and actively work on calming yourself down. And I love that you have like a, a brain break bucket and it’s good for all of us.

I need a brain break sometimes, you know, like, like what are the things that would go in your personal bucket as an adult, but also as a child? Like, what do you put in your bucket that actually lowers your cortisol level and calms you down, but keeps you connected. But there’s also this active engagement with yourself instead of, like you said, letting yourself run into the rumination of “I’m a victim or I’m a perpetrator”, right? Like I’m so bad or the world’s so bad. It’s like, I’m so dysregulated and I’m upset because I’ve been connected with, by, I hear you’re upset, so I’m going to, I’m going to calm myself down and it really does support that journey. Doesn’t it, to the next.

Lindsey: Exactly because one of our goals is to build skills.

So when, when our children progress or development, and now they’re in high school, we want them to have healthy coping mechanisms. And one of the reasons that sometimes when a parent will say, well, you know, why do I need to take the time to build a brain break kit or to teach healthy choices to my child?

Let’s say five years old. Well, one of the reasons is let’s look down the developmental trajectory when they’re in high school, we want them to have skills. So when they’re under extreme pressure, we don’t want them to go out and, you know, use drugs or to do behaviors that are risky to their health or to others.

So it’s important for us to take a skill based approach and to help kids understand that they have autonomy and agency over what they do when they’re feeling dysregulated. That’s really important.

Ann: Absolutely. They’re also teaching that, that pause, and that reflective functioning is so important, right? Because I think of how often people, one of their brain break is they’re going to go pick up their phone, but it actually for older individuals that is not actually adding to reflective functioning, is it, it’s just like that. Like, what’s the difference between a brain break and just sort of distancing.

I’m going to take a break, but I’m actually going to go away and. You know, completely disconnect from the moment in my body where a brain break is teaching from the very youngest age, it seems a way to take a moment to go and calm down and self-reflect et cetera, instead of just disappear. So it seems like it really is teaching developmentally this step of stopping and going internal and being aware of the internal.

Lindsey: Exactly. And I think having intentionality around it and having a game plan of connection. So it’s not go to your room and take a brain break so we can start to shift our language. And how about you go take a brain break, help your brain feel better, but if we don’t have that wraparound where they come back and connect with us again.

It can kind of undermine our original purpose. So if you say, okay, go take a brain break. When you’re ready, let’s come back and talk about this. So there’s that intentionality rather than a child grabbing their little tub and just taking the Legos out. Okay. Now it’s time for dinner. It’s almost like you’re completing the stress cycle.

They they’re able to calm down. Now we come back together and we say, okay, let’s talk about that. How are you feeling now? What was going on for you? I think it’s important. Same thing with our adult relationships. If you have an argument I know from personal experience with my husband, if you know, if we have some challenges in our relationship and we say, okay, we need to take a break.

I’m going to go on a walk. Okay. You’re going to maybe even play video games, maybe an adult that is helpful for them to calm down. Let’s come back together. What do you think? Three of. Okay, great. Three o’clock let’s come back and we’ll talk about this. So you have that intentionality of, we are going to connect with each other.

Again, some people they scroll Instagram and maybe that’s exactly what they need in the moment. And when they know that they are going to come back and repair or connect, then I think that can really be helpful.

Ann: And that’s the last, C, the collaborative, like, so you’re going to take this part to calm and to really collect yourself. And then. The idea of collaborating, we are going to come back together and then that that’s so helps. We always talk about this on the podcast of how much that promise that we are going to come back in and that plan holds that connectivity and, and you can’t completely disappear into your own stuff because you know, you’re going to be coming back and talking. So you have to reconnect to it. Kind of have some mindsight about it

Lindsey: Precisely. It’s some of the things that would maybe go on a child’s brain break kit or tub.

Ann: Perfect. Next question. I was going to ask you, what would you put?

Lindsey: So it’s really powerful when you have a child come alongside and kind of co-create it with you.

So a lot of times when I work with parents, they could have like, you know, a journal and Crayons. I think it’s powerful to have a mirror for younger kids, especially, and pair that with an emotions chart so when they sit down, they can start to think, well, how do I feel? And with the curriculum, there’s like brain breaks steps.

So they really have a clear picture of, okay, I start with the timer. So I highly recommend that caregivers or even in the classroom, a lot of teachers are doing this in their classroom, having some kind of visual time. So a child knows, okay, I’m going to do this for five minutes. There’s kind of like a limit.

They know whether it’s a timer like this or a sand timer. They’re watching the sand go down and they’re getting a feel for, okay, I’m halfway done with this little break of mine.

Ann: So you may have a timer put in the bucket so that they’re aware of timing. Is that what you’re saying? That they’re aware like, oh, I’m going to do this and for this amount of time and they can feel it. And then you mentioned a feeling’s chart and mirror, tell me a little bit more about the mirror. Why a mirror?. And would that be for all ages? What are your thoughts about that?

Lindsey: You know, it really can start as young as children who are ready for it. So if you kind of go through, if you have a clear picture for what kids can be doing, when they’re in a brain break, Write it down or you have pictures of them doing it, or, you know, if you have something kind of like a visual aid, you want them to be able to know they’re setting the timer, have them begin with breathing because it’s really difficult to connect with what your feelings are if you’re not in a calm state of mind, because it does require your prefrontal cortex and critical thinking to don’t. Well, what am feeling? And maybe for children as young as two or three, maybe they’re not in the place with their emotional literacy to do that. And that’s powerful as adults when we come alongside and sit down with them and maybe you hold the mirror up and say, I wonder how do you feel?

And so if you have an emotions poster where you’re able to juxtapose what their face looks like in the mirror, and then hold that. The feelings poster and say, oh, your face kind of looks like this one, how your eyebrows are tilted down and you have a little cheer here and you’re just kind of bringing awareness to their somatic experience and helping them understand how they feel.

So that’s a step certainly that a child could take. And then also you’re going to want to have them have a healthy choice of some kind. So. Kranz and a journal or Play-Doh or a favorite book, a stuffed animal, maybe like a little, you know, a set of Legos. Some kids really benefit from just starting to tinker with something that helps them calm down.

Some parents will say, well, aren’t we just rewarding them. They get to go over and then play with Legos. Like right. Sometimes parents can think, wait a second. That might not feel right. But if, as long as we understand the goal is for them to settle and develop healthy coping skills. And I always say, remember when your child.

Well, we want them to do something healthy when they’re upset. We want them to read a book. Goodness. If they could just play some video games or do some kind of building of some kind, rather than going out and doing risky behavior, that’s really powerful. That’s what we want. And so understanding to give kids tools like that is really powerful for them to know what to do to help their brains feel better.

Sue: Hey, we’d like to extend an invitation to join our private community at Therapist Uncensored.com/join – that is supercast.com. This Group is growing, it’s thriving. There are reading pods, and you will receive an ad-free feed and you’re going to get first crack at super exciting things that we do periodically bringing some of the authors in studying directly with for as little as $5 a month, please sign up at TherapistUncensored.com/join

Ann: And so part of your curriculum is having pictorial representations of these kinds of steps. So that younger kids who can’t track all that, and don’t have the kind of sequencing that would needed to go from one step to the other.

Lindsey: Some of the curriculum walks you through the steps in a pictorial way. For those that are just listening and not being able to see these pictures, have these steps along the way that can help them identify their feelings, et cetera, and help them know, oh, I breathe here. And then I go from one place to the next.

I have a free YouTube video that explains how to set up a brain break, what can go inside and it’s done in a kid friendly way. So you could sit with your child, you could watch it together. So they have the background and then create your own calming kit of sorts.

So that’s something that I will share with you so that listeners can have that as a resource, just to kind of get a feel for maybe if this is something they want to do.It’s a starting point for.

Ann: That’s terrific. And we’ll have that in our show notes. We’ll have a link to that in our show notes. So anybody listening and can get some brainstorming ideas, how to make your own brain break. And also just, I would love adults out there to be thinking about what would be in their chest, because so often we don’t actually think about that.

We engage in it, but we don’t actually engage in it in that really active, thoughtful way that says, oh, my goal here is to actually. Not get away from the person that just pissed us off. I mean, yes, initially that is, but it actually really is to settle the chemicals as you represented in the, in the shaking of your, what do you call that?

Oh, a glitter, glitter, right? Okay. The shaking of your glitter brain, you’re like representing that part of what you’re trying to do is calm the chemicals in there. And I like what you’re saying, like, okay. Yes. So we have some, something that might be rewarding, but rarely are kids going to act out so that they can go and take a brain break because they likely to play with these kinds of things at other times. Also, they are not that thoughtful when we’re dysregulated and acting out. And in fact, I like it because it’s suggesting that taking a brain break is not the form of punishment. It is the form of calming down. And then, like you said, we’re coming back to the collaborativeness.

Once we come back to being collaborative. Talk to us about discipline in that like we’ve hit somebody, right. Or child has hit somebody or they’ve thrown something across the room. We’ve helped them calm down. And now we’re going to collaborate with them. Are there any recommendations you have in terms of how to engage with the kind of consequences and accountablility?

Lindsey: Definitely and I think you mentioned the word discipline, and I think that’s really powerful for us to think about what that means and what that means personally to us. And a lot of that has to do with our own upbringing. So when you hear the word discipline, when I do this, a family coaching, I just kind of ask, how does that feel in your body?

When someone says, what does, what’s your discipline philosophy? Or even just the word. And for some people it can be anxiety or fear. It could be a lot of feelings. Okay. When we think about discipline rather than thinking, oftentimes we think discipline means punish, but if we just swap that out, it’s a little linguistic turn and we say, we equate discipline with T.

That can change everything. It’s a game changer. So rather than saying, you know, maybe it’s you and your partner, how are we going to discipline our son for throwing the Legos? And it hit his brother in the face, right? How are we going to discipline him rather than thinking, how are we going to punish him?

If you just think, what are we going to teach him through this experience? When you start to make that little shift in your mind that can really help you because ultimately if we’re doing discipline practices, that in the moment might seem like they’re effective in the short term, maybe some parents for their form of discipline that looks like spanking, or that might look like, okay, no iPad or no birthday parties, you know, for the month, or, you know, sometimes we just, we’re so quick to assign a consequence or a punishment for a certain behavior,

Ann: Especially when we’re really pissed off. Right. Because there’s the satisfaction of you just done something and you are grounded for two months. There’s this. Oh, that feels so good because it makes me feel like I have some control, which obviously in that moment, that’s not really about teaching. That’s about retribution. It’s about anger, which is understandable. Don’t get me wrong. Like the best of them they’re too stiff, a consequences because I was really, really pissed off. But like what you’re saying, and that’s not really about teaching and we think we want to take the iPad away for a month to teach. I think you’re not saying don’t do that, but what you’re saying.

How do you get to a place where, how are we going to teach them not to do that rather than how are we going to punish them for doing it?

Lindsey: Yes. And I think as much as we can tie whatever followup we’re going to have with the child, whatever teaching opportunity that can look like accountability. So if a child’s being really inappropriate with a piece of technology, The appropriate accountability follow-up piece might be to take the iPad away for a month, but it’s connected.

But if we go back to the situation where a child maybe was unsafe and threw some blocks that their brother’s head, and now you’re dealing with that situation, taking away TV or. Ipad isn’t necessarily, it might not be naturally connected. So how can we come up with an accountability system where we’re building empathy and we’re also following through with processing what happened?

So what that can look like if I think one of your original questions was what does that look like? The collaboration piece, the followup. So that can look like I like to reframe as collaborative problem solving. So we’re coming alongside a child and helping them understand what did they do? And even before that, asking them, what were you feeling and thinking, because when they’re able to understand what was going on for them behind the behavior, that’s going to lead to the long-term behavioral change.

Right? If we get to the root of it, just like in couples therapy and couples counseling, we want to understand what’s at the root of this behavior or this need. We want to do that with kids. So when we allow them to step back, think about what they were thinking and feeling, then we can go into what happened.

And then once we figure out what happened, we can start to ask kids, well, why is this a problem? We can build empathy. Oh, when you did this, wow. Look, your brother has a little bump on his head and he’s crying, man. I know you were upset. So we validate that feeling. You were really mad and you were thinking, that is my block.

My brother took my block and that’s mine. And you know what? That’s so normal to feel upset. All feelings are welcome, but not all behaviors are helpful. So how can we help kids understand that? And that’s the first piece is helping them understand what was going on for them. And then you move on to the accountability and a plan for next time.

Ann: So the point, I guess, also of the brain break,in parenting specifically, although I, like you said, you keep bringing it back to couples and I can always relate to that. dynamic but as the child is taking the brain break, so are we, and so it’s highlighting for me as I’m listening that you’re separating the teaching consequence portion of it, the teaching process of it from when the child is really activated, but also when we’re really activated, right?

Cause as the child is taking a brain break, we are. And so it separates the idea that we’re going to quickly come up with. Plan as we’re really pissed off and totally dysregulated ourselves. So we’re going to have to kind of step back and calm. And so when we come back at it and I love what you’re saying about inviting the kids to do that, like, what are your thoughts about what happened?

And I imagine even like, what do you think. It’s going to help you not do that. Sometimes I even found with my kids, sometimes they would come up with stiffer consequences than I would, you know, as you kind of engage them as they get older, of course, they’re like, I think I shouldn’t. And it’s so interesting when you allow them, isn’t it to be part of it. They kind of own it more rather than just feel victimized in the. Yes.

Lindsey: And I think what it allows us to do when we engage in like authentic curiosity. So when we sit down with them and we’re having a collaborative problem solving conversation, we really want to begin with curiosity. So in our head, we might be thinking you were upset because your brother took your block.

Well, maybe something else was going on for him. Maybe that child was feeling really sad because, you know, no one has acknowledged him, you know, all the attention has been going to baby brother or, you know, sometimes kids are experiencing something totally different. So this is a problem solving reflection form.

It’s a PDF and it’s two-sided and I’ll give a, download a PDF, download. So on the front side. So this is more of the processing of the problem, kind of what the language sounds like. It’s how were you feeling? What were you thinking then? What happened? Why is this a problem? And there’s different categories.

Like it was a problem of safety that maybe effected learning. So I was coaching one family and the daughter was really having a hard time getting ready for school and she would fight it and say, no, I’m not getting my backpack on. And so when I went into the coaching session, I sat down with her and I said, well, why do you think it’s a problem to not get your backpack on and not put your shoes on?

And she’s like, I don’t know. And then we talked about it more and she said, you know, I think that’s a problem because it affects my learning. Cause we get to school late and I miss half the math lesson. So really kind of helping them get to the bottom of it. And then as you mentioned about allowing them to be a part of the solution, that’s kind of like the repair, the accountability.

So after you ask them, you know, what positive choice can you or someone else make the next time? We want to ask them, what’s the strategy you can use. So we know that we want to be safe with our brother. Cause safety is important for the block scenario. What can we do next time? Cause you were feeling, we identified that you were upset.

Let’s say the child was really mad. What can you do when you feel mad the next time? Oh, you can take. Deep breaths. You can take a self-initiated brain break. You’ll find that maybe your child will just go over and they’re playing with the toys and they’re flipping the timer and then they come back and they keep playing with their sibling.

So that’s great when they can identify, this is something I want to do preemptively.

Ann: Oh, I think that really exciting for a lot of parents out there to see their child actually engage in that and to be able to catch them if they did take their brain break and like, I’m so impressed with you. I saw how you did that.

Lindsey: Yeah. That’s what really seemed to help you. That was the. The full strategy used, and then you ask them, what can we do to solve the problem? And when we give children a menu of choices, so for instance, this problem solving reflection says, talk it out, apologize, make a sorry, letter, do something kind for the other person, clean up the mess.

So for the students I had, who would throw chairs across the room, rather than saying we’re removing recess, or you’re going to be in the office for the next two hours, it takes let’s be a part of the solution. So that child would help me put the chairs back and the books away. They would be a part of cleaning it up and then maybe I think a big thing we can do is having a redo as part of that accountability.

Okay. Let’s try again. So let’s pretend and you can have them act it out, so, okay. Let’s pretend that you’re upset again. And you could have baby brother come back in the room and let’s tell him, I feel upset when you take my toy. Okay. And, and so you help them act out what it could look like instead. And in couples therapy, that’s, you know, let’s make a plan for next time.

And what would that have sounded like? So I think it really, this information applies to all people learning how to better connect with each other. But definitely, as you mentioned, having children be a part of that solution and coming alongside is really powerful because they do take ownership of. And they’re much more invested.

Ann: That’s so true. And I love that the suggestions gives somebody some agency to say, I’ve done this and now I really am making the repair and the reconnection. That’s so hopeful. Isn’t it? It’s like as we can have a redo, I mean, it’s not just learning how to do it, is it, it’s not just learning how to be able to connect with your brother again or pick up the chair.

It’s that feeling that’s given to the child. Of when I make mistakes, I can really re-engage and repair and it isn’t something that I just get cut off and sent away. It’s really adds so much hopefulness. Doesn’t it? It adds so much, I guess I keep coming back to the word agency and connection.

Lindsey: Those are huge. And I think that, you know, adults and parents they’ll ask me, I want to make sure that I’m not doing things that are fostering shame, or I want to make sure that whatever practice I’m doing is that okay? Maybe they’re asking me if one of their approaches is okay or not. And I always say a great litmus test is asking yourself, how would that feel for me?

What would that be like if this was used on me? So let’s say you’re at a dinner party and your partner, you’re talking with a group of friends and you interrupt your partner to share a story. And then, you know, they say. You just interrupted me. This is the third time this week, you know, you need to go walk away from the group or you need to go take a break.

Like I, whenever I give that example, everyone’s like, oh, that feels so bad. Like I would be humiliated. That’d be the worst thing ever. So that kind of helps us understand, oh, when I invite my child to take a break, What’s a better way of saying it. Maybe it’s private. So if you’re in a family setting, I keep thinking of Thanksgiving, rather than saying, Sarah, you need to go take a brain break. Now that’s almost defeating the purpose. Sure. We’re using the vernacular brain break, but it’s done in a way where everyone’s listening and that can have a humiliating aspect. So if you come alongside and say, Hey, like you’re whispering. I do think your brain needs a break right now. Okay. Yeah. Let’s walk over together.

That’s so much more honoring. So allowing ourselves to think, what would that feel like for me? And that gives adults a north star, if, oh yeah. I feel comfortable with this because it would feel okay with, so .

Ann: It’s really doing a mind body. Check-in isn’t it like, was your body going to feel if that exact same thing was directed towards you?

Would your body feel more threatened and wanting to disconnect and go away and hide, or was it going to feel more engaged to like, oh my gosh, I’m so sorry. I keep interrupting you. I don’t mean to, right. Is, am I going to want to repair? I’m going to want to hit you, you know, like, like, right. So like, it really does allow that reflective part to feel, what would I feel like? Which is what the whole goal is, right? This connection, the interpersonal part to like, we really want with our kids or with our partners or with our friends, our goal isn’t to shame somebody for interrupting us it’s to slow them down and help them connect to us more. Right.

Lindsey: Definitely. And that goal of just strengthening that foundation of connection. When I work with parents and educators who say, I don’t have time for this collaborative problem solving process, my life is so busy. We’re going to soccer games, or I’m trying to teach reading, writing, and math. I don’t have time for this.

Another simulation you can do is how would you feel if you got in a fight with a coworker and you were not your best self, you’re putting yourself in the shoes of your child, you were having a bad day. You had something happened at home that was unsettling. You know, we’re not your best self with them.

All of us are a lot of us, as adults would want to come back and repair we’d want the next two work to be able to say, Hey, you know what, yesterday I was so upset about this has nothing to do with you. I really apologize for the way I treated you. That’s something that for a lot of us that feels good.

Like we want to be able to repair and have that follow up. So for children, if we keep moving on and we don’t take the time to like, Stop and go back and repair with their sibling or with a peer at school. It’s not allowing them to have to complete the stress cycle. It’s not allowing them to have that followup with that person.

And then now with this child, there’s little ruptures in their relationships, whether it be with siblings or even other adults in their life. There’s these little ruptures and it’s like this feeling where they don’t have that repair and they don’t have that follow-up piece. And I think that can start to chip away at even their self-concept.

Ann: No, I think that’s so well said. No, I really agree with you. And when we say we don’t have time, your example is we don’t have time because we’re busy with soccer and math and the social, emotional learning, the things that you’re really taking the time to focus on and really want to help our listeners.

And. And to teach the social emotional learning is really what is gonna be at the core of the child’s ability to not only be happy in the future, but actually be really successful to be able to connect and not have ruptures that stay in the body. And that creates cortisol that doesn’t get resolved, right?

Unresolved conflict is what sticks with our body and what adds the stress. And so by taking the time to teach the social emotional part, you really are setting your kid up for success in a different way than anything else you could do. Would you agree with that?

Lindsey: I completely agree. Not only are you setting them up for success and we know that that’s something we want. Another thing I tell adults is it feels like we’re, you know, we’re crunched for time, but actually when you take the time and do this teaching with your child, you know, it’s a big bang for your buck. It’s actually going to save you time in the long run, because you’re not going to have to keep coming back and addressing the same problem over and over.

So it’s really about that. Long-term behavioral change. And I’ll give you an example. I had a student in kindergarten one year and she had a lot of strong feelings and some sensory and emotional regulation skills that we were working on. And there was the same problem every day after lunch, where she would come in after lunch into the classroom and feel really dysregulated she’d run around the room and, you know, would start to touch other kids.

And I would say, okay, take a brain break. And I would give different tools, but I never really, this is before. Was practicing this with fidelity, the collaborative problem solving. But when I finally took the time, maybe this is after a couple of weeks to sit down with her, have this collaborative problem solving conversation, allow her to apologize to the kids that she would, you know, go and be maybe up really close in their faces.

Once I had that conversation with. It was really just one problem solving conversation and follow through the behavior stopped. So we almost think that this is going to take a lot of time, but in the long run, you’ll find yourself having to teach less and less because they’re learning those skills.

They’re internalizing them. So it can feel counterintuitive of well man, setting up a brain break kit or teaching my child about problem solving. It is a task. It is something to do, but not only is it going to make them more successful and thrive, it’s going to help make our lives easier. And I think that’s motivating for adults.

Ann: Absolutely. Well, I love what you have. Is there anything that we haven’t gone over that you feel, but as we’re starting to wrap up, that would be like, ah, just want this, make sure that everyone out there, especially for those that maybe wouldn’t be able to have access to some of the curriculum that you’re talking about, we’re going to put the connection to the show notes.

So if they’re interested in contacting, you we’ll have your contact information in there, but if somebody is out there and they’re not able to access this kind of curriculum, what would you recommend? What was the one thing you’d want them to know?

Lindsey: I think it just goes back to the three CS, making sure that with any situation you encounter, how can you foster connection?

Whether that’s with yourself of whoa, I feel upset. I’m really dysregulated right now. My child’s having a moment in target and everyone’s looking at me, right? So you can connect with yourself. Wow. This is hard connect with the child or your partner. I can tell you right. So that’s kind of the first thing, just that check-in and then going back to reiterate the comm.

Let’s take a break. What healthy choice works for me. So maybe you set up a brain break kit, or maybe it’s just some books and a stuffed animal. And that’s, that’s just something your child knows works for them. Maybe for yourself. It’s taking a little walk around the block. A lot of my graduate students say does Netflix and chocolate work or wine or the cake, you know, for adults it looks different.

So finding some things that work for you for your own calming process. And then finally, how are you having more collaborative conversations? And maybe that just sounds like. How were you feeling what was going on for you when I observed this behavior and then what can we do to solve it? What can we do next time?

I think just coming back to the three CS and just knowing I can always connect common, collaborate, even if it’s really abbreviated something else I will mention is giving yourself the gift of time. Sometimes adults, when they’re starting to learn this, they think, oh, I have to implement this perfectly.

And I have to know what is my collaborative conversation sound like? What’s the accountability I’m going to implement, but rather you can just say, you know, I can tell you’re upset. I’m upset. My brain is really mixed up. Let’s problem solve this when we get home. So you don’t have to have this whole game plan in the middle of target where you’re, you know exactly what the repair is going to be.

But rather, you know what, this afternoon after you come back from grandma’s, we’re going to problem solve this. So just give yourself. And I know you mentioned that when as a, child’s taking a brain break, you yourself, you’re gathering your thoughts. And you’re also having that sense of regulation. And I will maybe one less piece to add is the concept of inner regulation.

And this is something, you know, Dr. Siegel speaks to and then inter regulation. So I really want to emphasize that a brain break. Isn’t necessarily telling the child to go and sit in the corner, even sit in a nice little bean bag with their bag. We also want to make sure that we’re emotionally present connected to them.

So maybe a brain break is, Hey, let’s go over together. We’re going to sit down and we’ll both start doodling on a piece of paper because that closeness might be just what a child needs. Just like with our adult relationships instead of being, well, you go on a walk, I’m going to go here. Maybe you go on a walk together and you’re just quiet, but you’re still together.

You know, that co-regulation or that inter regulation, that’s important. So we’re not, you know, I want to make sure that we still include that because that is really healing and helpful when we can regulate together.

Ann: I love that you added that part. I love that you added that the regulation isn’t always going off by ourselves and trying to figure it out.

It is that you add that interpersonal part, especially for couples and friends and like, you know, how do we reconnect? I mean, how do we calm ourselves down together? What are the things cause that allows the other person to be a resource, right? Instead of the answer is to go away and come back. It’s instead letting them know, I’m a resource, even when you’re upset, I’m a resource in your bag of resources. To me, we can be a resource. I have a friend the other day that said that every time she and her partner were having complicated experiences. They would go sit in the, they have a kind of side jacuzzi and they would go sit in it. It’s awesome. And they would have to talk about whatever it was in that dynamic. So they had developed a situation where they could find a sense of connection or another example in graduate school that I’ve always found funny is that they used to encourage couples to go when they’re having a really intense fight to go stand in the bathtub. And that’s awesome. Isn’t that awesome. It’s like, it kind of immediately brings out the situation where we’re connected through humor and in this is what you said, it sort of forms a sense of connection. As we’re trying now to work through something that would typically be firing our brains, you know?

So I like that you added the interpersonal that we can together interconnect to come. And that, to think about that. Cause you said, you know, the graduate students are. Wine and Netflix and like absolutely all those can be, but it might be also helpful. I would think to help people develop what’s in their chest that makes sure that it’s not just always an escape and a disappearance in in a numbing, because we can choose to put in our chest.

These are like really numbing qualities instead of also like, I like the time limit, right? Like, yes, go do that. But there’s this time that you’re going to come back. And what other activities that involve interconnectedness, not just numbing and disappearing that can calm your brain and then re-engage you, right?

Because if you’re just numbing and then turning it off, maybe you haven’t actually, re-engage your desire for connection and collaborativeness. Cause that last step is collaborative, right? Like if you’ve just disappeared, how have you primed yourself for collaborative?

Lindsey: Exactly. And I think that when we think about our regulation toolkit, we do sometimes resort to a revert to the chocolate and the Netflix.

And I tell this to my students in a perfect world. What would be your coping skills? Oh, making a healthy snack calling my mom. Cause she’s always a great listener going on a walk. If you can kind of build a toolkit of healthy choices, healthy coping skills ahead of. And then just really get in the habit of practicing those outside of a stressful situation.

Then that can be kind of the best case scenario for us. And when I speak to adults who are saying, in terms of connecting with my child, why should I do that? I don’t have time for that. I just tell them to calm down to a break. Sometimes adults say. See necessarily the value of co-regulation and I’ll just start by saying, okay, let’s look down the developmental trajectory when your child is grown up.

When they find a partner to be with, how do you want them to respond to their partner, their partner, to respond to them. When they come home from work from a long, stressful day, we want to co-regulate. So if you tell your partner, gosh, I had the worst day ever. Man, my coworkers are being really challenging.

You wouldn’t want your partner to say that sounds like a personal problem. How about you? Go do stuff. Right. Like we’d want to feel felt, oh, what can I do? Like, let me order us pizza. Or, you know, we want to have someone who comes alongside and regulates with us. So that is, I think as adults start to think about, oh yeah, I want to foster this value of co-regulation because that’s ultimately what I want for my child when they’re adults. And when they’re looking for someone who’s going to be a healthy partner.

Ann: Absolutely. Yeah. I agree with everything you just said. And if you were a listener out there and you’re thinking actually, I don’t want somebody to co-regulate with me. I think I’m supposed to go do it on my own. My kid needs to learn to do it on our own.

There’s not always somebody going to be there. I mean, yes, that is the case. But if that’s where you’re really deeply entrenched, you might want to, you know, we started off the whole podcast with talking about self awareness and looking within ourselves. And if that’s where you’re landing, it may be that you probably.

Could it be chance that you were left on your own to self-regulate a lot as a child and that’s what you’ve developed as your go-to, but that might be something you want to think about. Talk about, look into, right, because it’s interpersonal connectedness is what. Helps the world go around. And if you’ve learned so many things, like I’ve got to do it on my own and pick myself up, it really might be a sign that you need some more compassion and connection, and like learning to jump out in a more co-regulating way.

And to challenge yourself, to maybe take a look. That’s so powerful to think back about our early childhood experiences are kind of our cohesive narrative as we form it. And I think that giving us ourselves compassion. So maybe you naturally lean towards wanting to self-regulate or inner regulate. That could be because that was really adaptive for you.

Maybe growing up, you had a caregiver who wasn’t really safe. If you were vulnerable with your emotions, maybe that wasn’t safe. And so for you to do it on your own was actually really adaptive. That worked well for you. But then we can kind of get curious and things. Does that still serve me? Right. Does that, is that still adaptive or is that actually maladaptive now?

Because here I have a partner who feels like I’m stonewalling them, and this is really getting in the way of our connection. I love what you said about holding space for both. Sometimes we need time to ourselves and other times we can come together. And I think when we articulate that to someone else, like, you know what.

I’m so glad you’re there for me. I am so glad you want to sit in the jacuzzi with me, but actually what I do need now is to go on a walk by myself, but let’s do that later. I think giving yourself permission to utilize both forms of regulation has really empowered. Well said,let’s he so happy to have you on the show?

Thank you for joining us. If somebody does not actually have access to the show notes, if they wanted to reach out to you how would they do that? Also we want to mention that you have your own podcast. It is for all ages, and it’s called positive choices, right?. Spelled PAW.

Lindsey: It’s the PAWsitive Choices Podcasts spelled what the PAW – the logo of the curriculum is a paw with the heart in it, because the curriculum that’s for young children has animal characters, and there’s a lot of American sign language integrated throughout, and they use their paws to communicate with one another. So that’s kind of where it comes from.

So they can search the PAWsitive Choices podcast or go to Positivechoices.com. Those are two great ways to connect. And I have, when I leave, you’ll put it in the show notes, positivechoices.com/resources, and I have links to free downloads YouTube videos. So if someone doesn’t have access to the curriculum, they can learn about all the topics we talked about today with the three. With problem solving and with taking brain breaks.

Ann: I think that’s definitely one of the goals of our podcast is to get this information out to those that might not have access otherwise. So thank you for helping us in that endeavor. Of course. And we’ve so much enjoyed having you on the show.

Lindsey: It’s been great. Thank you so much.

Sue: We’d like to extend an invitation to anybody, listening to join our private online community. You can find that at therapistuncensored.com/join. The reason that you might be interested in such a thing is that for as little as $5 a month, you were going to get an ad-free feed, some premium content. And really it’s a very, very cool community. Occasionally we do reading pods where we gather and read together, study groups of various things. Sometimes we’re able to meet the authors or the scholars directly as we study their work.

And of course it supports the show. So please consider joining us therapistuncensored.com/join

Jack: Therapist Uncensored is Anne Kelley and Sue Marriott. This podcast is edited by Jack Anderson.

More resources on dealing with challenging emotions and kids, social emotional learning:

https://therapistuncensored.com/episodes/tu33-adverse-childhood-experiences-a-roadmap-to-understanding-and-treatment/

https://therapistuncensored.com/episodes/tu52-using-mindfulness-movement-and-yoga-to-manage-arousal-with-guest-kelly-inselmann/

Trauma-Informed Therapy with Children, with Robyn Gobbel, MSW, RPT (Therapist Uncensored Episode 142)

Helping the Intense Child: The Nurtured Heart Approach (Therapist Uncensored Episode 128)

Raising Secure Children With Guest Tina Payne Bryson (Therapist Uncensored Episode 27)

The Space Between Self-Esteem and Self Compassion: Kristin Neff TED Talk

Raising An Emotionally Intelligent Child by Dr. John Gottman

The Power of Vulnerability TED Talk by Brené Brown

Become a neuronerd!

Dive deeper with us! Join our private community to support the show and as a bonus you get extra episodes and early access to study opportunities. Join now to get 10% off, so go ahead, it’s as little as $5 a month and takes just a couple clicks and you are in!

Check out our socials: Youtube, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter & LinkedIn!

Jaksot(286)

TU102: Finding Neurological Safety through Relationships, with Guest Bonnie Badenoch (Replay)

TU102: Finding Neurological Safety through Relationships, with Guest Bonnie Badenoch (Replay)

The Power of Co-Regulation Explore the myth of self-regulation, the natural neurobiology of co-regulation and it’s capacity to engage safety and heal trauma. Learn about using interpersonal neurobiology (IPNB) and Polyvagal Theory to establish safety and security in therapy and in relationships. Therapist Uncensored co-host Sue Marriott LCSW CGP talks with author and therapist Bonnie Badenoch about the concept of using safety to reshape your neural landscape through authentic relationships. Badenoch guides us through her progression of building a bridge between science and practice to cultivate the best therapeutic mind. You’ll learn how exercising “happy humility” and compassion can allow for an ideal presence in our day-to-day life using our autonomic nervous system. Also, special hats off to Steve Porges and polyvagal theory. 0:00-30:00 What creates safety? How do our internal systems want us to be received? Sympathetic activation happens when there’s a need to control something in light of an obstacle. Internal systems challenge to remain in an open and receptive state. Polyvagal theory and Steve Porges. How can we explore the relationship between safety and curiosity and best use the language of “safety,” versus “comfort” and “discomfort”, especially towards the beginning of therapy and in new relationships? Badenoch contends that there’s no such thing as a maladaptive experience; that humans are always adaptive and require co-regulation. What’s the difference between co-regulation and auto-regulation? Is there a “myth” of self-regulation? Discussion of ideal parent figure protocol. Badenoch explores the connection between co-regulation, neural circuitry and forging relationships in your life. 30:00-60:00 Social Baseline Theory is what happens to our perceptions when someone we trust is with us. The difficulty and pain of tasks is always reduced when we’re with a trusted beloved and this relaxes our amygdala response. Badenoch walks us through her experience of feeling safe during and between client sessions. It’s key to have mutual, caring, receptive relationships with people who are willing to listen rather than jump in and try to offer advice. Young therapists. Everyone’s doing the best they can with what they have in their neural make up but how can we embody a therapeutic presence in the world through compassion or a “happy humility”? Resources: A Symphony of Gifts From Relational Neuroscience (1) Excellent PDF from Bonnie Badenoch Being a Brain-Wise Therapist: A Practical Guide to Interpersonal Neurobiology [2008] Badenoch  The Brain-Savvy Therapist’s Workbook [2011] Badenoch  The Heart of Trauma: Healing the Embodied Brain in the Context of Relationships [2017] Badenoch The Heart of Trauma Healing the Embodied Brain in the Context of Relationships by Steve Porges! For our listeners! Our long-awaited Advanced Course is launching soon! Purchase today for the lowest price possible. Pre-sale pricing ends September 18.  CLICK HERE TO PURCHASE Join Us On Patreon For as little as $5 a month you can join our exclusive community of Therapist Uncensored Neuronerds to gain private, more in-depth episodes AND to support production of this podcast to provide access to the science of relationships across the globe.   YES SIGN ME UP FOR PATREON, OR FIND OUT MORE, click here! THANK YOU to all of our current Patrons!! Tweet

1 Elo 201950min

TU101: Treating Attachment Disruptions in Adults With David Elliott (Replay)

TU101: Treating Attachment Disruptions in Adults With David Elliott (Replay)

We knew we had to interview Dr. Elliott upon finding his book, Attachment Disturbances in Adults, Treatment for Comprehensive Repair(2016). It immediately became Sue’s current favorite read and that is saying a lot! We cover quite a lot in this podcast, especially about treatment, but if that still isn’t enough, these show notes are PACKED with PDF’s of great material offered by Dr. Elliott! Below you will find 4 full PDF handouts about the salient ideas of their synthesis of treatment for adults with attachment disruptions. In today’s episode you will hear about why attachment matters, background thoughts on insecurity and prevalence, brand new (to the US) and updated attachment research and then we mostly focus on how to apply all this knowledge with clients with attachment issues, and ourselves. Dr. Elliott introduces our audience to the 3 Pillars of Comprehensive Treatment: Ideal Parent Protocol, Metacognition and Fostering Collaborative Capacity. While he touches on them all, please download the 4 PDF attachments provided below, and start by reviewing the Overview. If for any reason you have trouble getting them, contact us and we will shoot them over to you! Dr David Elliott’s Bio: Dr. Elliott received his Ph.D. in Psychology in 1989 from Harvard University. His clinical training while at Harvard included externships at the Tufts University Counseling Center, the Outpatient Psychiatry Clinic of St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center in Brighton, Massachusetts, and a clinical psychology internship at McLean Hospital, the psychiatric teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School. He also completed a post-doctoral fellowship at McLean Hospital, where he worked on the Adolescent and Family Treatment Unit and at the hospital’s mental health outpatient clinic. He was licensed as a Psychologist in Massachusetts in 1990, and in Rhode Island in 1993. Recognizing from an early age that there are many dimensions to human experience, any and all of which can contribute to well-being or to difficulty, Dr. Elliott has maintained a commitment to learning and understanding the whole range of human possibility — from the deepest confusions and struggles of psychosis, to the patterns of personality that create personal and relational conflicts, to the development of the self in ways that promote both independence and intimacy, and to higher levels of growth that allow for flourishing and even a recognition of oneself as beyond the limits of the personal self. Four PDFs Overview of the Three Pillars Model of Attachment Treatment (Brown & Elliott, 2016) The Five Primary Conditions that Promote Secure Attachment (Brown & Elliott, 2016) Levels of Metacognitive Skills (Brown & Elliott, 2016) Fostering Collaborative Capacity and Behavior (Brown & Elliott, 2016) Additional resources for this episode: Daniel Brown, co-author of Attachment Disturbances in Adults This is his current website, which focuses on his meditation and spiritual development activities. Attachment Disturbances in Adults Treatment for Comprehensive Repair (2016) Daniel Brown andDavid Elliott  Clinical Application of the Adult Attachment Interview Edited by Howard Steele and Mariam Steele Our favorite clinical reference for those that want to learn much more deeply about using the AAI to treat attachment and learn about its usefulness with various populations. Video of Strange Situation to familiarize yourself with Mary Ainsworth and later Mary Main’s phenomenal work. These and other resources have been collected for you on our Resources page! If you appreciate this work you can help it continue by becoming a Patron – ie. a super fan, or what we call Neuronerds. Get access to a private community, direct access to us and more content  Click here to sign up for as little as $5 a month. You can also help us by subscribing on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify or Podbean to name a few and by leaving a review so others can discover this cool science. Remember, sharing is caring! Tweet

14 Heinä 201949min

TU100: Reflections and Favorites From 100 Episodes

TU100: Reflections and Favorites From 100 Episodes

100 Episodes and Going Strong! A Review of Our Most Popular and Referenced Episodes Tune in for a review of our listener’s favorite episodes and back stories about the evolution of Therapist Uncensored with co-hosts Ann Kelley and Sue Marriott. This is a show hosted by 2 therapists who share the most usable science on attachment relationships, psychotherapy, and trauma. It combines both host lead conversations and interviews with top experts in their respective fields – neuroscientists, therapists, researchers, musicians, pop-culture celebrities, and so on – that share their wisdom about relationships. Today we celebrate starting with colleague Patty Olwell, and evolving everything from our messaging, our website, our audio and editing, and our co-host relationship. This is the last show of Season 3, BUT we will be back with new shows by early September. In the meantime, we will be re-playing some of these favorites.  We look forward to our next season of deepening our conversations on attachment, neuroscience, polyvagal theory, depth psychotherapy, sexuality, and more! Most Popular Episodes By Everyone, Including Us! Known as “the bundle” of attachment, these episodes summarize the attachment spectrum and have building security at their core. They are, by far, the most referenced, reviewed, and appreciated! Episode 59: Dismissing/Avoidant attachment. Are you cool or just cut off? Episode 60: Preoccupation in Relationships-Grow your security by learning signs of Anxious Attachment Episode 61: It’s not crazy, it’s just a solution to an unsolvable problem – Disorganized Attachment Other Popular Episodes Include: *Note: listed in order of discussion plus a brief summary of the show conversation Episode 54- The Stress Response System –Attachment Across the Lifespan specifically looking at the elder years and how our attachment system affects us as caretakers of our parents or as the senior who may be undergoing the various losses inherent in aging. Stephen Porges –  Episode 93: Polyvagal Theory in Action: The Practice of Body Regulation The father of Polyvagal Theory! fat led to groundbreaking shifts in our understanding of how the nervous system responds to threat and trauma. Dan Siegel – Episode 16: Inside The Mind of Dr. Dan Siegel Father of interpersonal neurobiology Discussed how the current political, international and climate crises could be viewed as a chance to transform human connection. He called for us all to become pervasive leaders. Alan Sroufe – Episode 56: How We Come To Define Ourselves, Attachment Research Across The Decades If you’ve ever wanted to know how much you can predict a person’s development years in advance, then you’ll enjoy our conversation with Dr. Alan Sroufe. his research findings over the years and how insecure and secure attachment tendencies can develop and affect an individual through their lives. Bonnie Badenock – Episode 83: Establishing Neurological Safety Through Relationships  discussed how exercising “happy humility” and compassion can allow for an ideal presence in our day-to-day life using our autonomic nervous system. Sympathetic activation happens when there’s a need to control something in light of an obstacle. Internal systems challenge to remain in an open and receptive state. Patricia Crittenden – Episode 96, 97, & 98 One of the originators of attachment theory studied under Mary Ainsworth Ep 96: Attachment and Self-protective strategies Ep 97: Dynamic Maturation Model (DMM) Ep 98: Diving deeper into the DMM of Attachment – our summary Stan Tatkin – Episode 12: If It’s Not Good For You, It’s Not Good For Us talking about understanding how attachment plays out in Long term relationships In order to get over hidden shame, you need to expose it to safe people.  Shame can only be healed interpersonally. Different cultures social constructions of shame. Joining in sharing shame is very powerful tool. Connecting right brain to right brain. Popular Episodes On Sexuality Episode 3: Different Sex Drives Are We Screwed?  Esther Perel – Episode 46: Redefining Infidelity – On Love and Desire in Modern Relationships Dr Susan Ansorage – Episode 71: Speakably Sexy: Communicating To Make Sex Hotter and Relationships More Alive Doug Braun-Harvey – Episode 42 & Episode 43: Sexual Vitality-Refreshing Our Understanding of Sexual Health Discussing love and desire in intimate relationships. promote ways of having a healthy dialogue with partners – deshames sexual desire differences, and Research on how sexuality can manifest differently in our bodies we often make assumptions based on our own experiences of sexuality…what our partner(s) are feeling and this leads to hurt and misunderstanding. The rule of variability – speaking in gendered terms is not our aim – but recognizing the differences in sex drives, sex roles and physiology can be useful. 6 principles of sexual health – add pleasure back into the conversation about healthy sex ,and the whole conversation changes The balance between pleasure and safety as a way to think of sexual health – “Sexual debut” vs losing our virginity“ Headlines – Neuroscience In The News: Current Events That Bring Attachment and Neuroscience Into Our Living Rooms Taking on current events and helping to draw out the science about how our headlines are related to attachment and neuroscience of everyday living and stress. Episode 41: How To Handle Post Election Tensions – Tips for the Holidays and Beyond Episode 68: Separation at the Border, Compounding trauma and Insecurity Relational science professionals have a lot to offer to understand the human rights event that is unfolding on the US-Mexico border. Our podcast has been all about promoting security in ourselves and our loved ones, and a primary component to this is access to your caregiver when you are young. It effects our biology, or persistent sense of ourselves and our view of the world. Long term effect on these children-citizens of the world – our neighbors. If we help to breed insecure attachment, what long term effects does it have? Episode 80: Nervous Systems in the News – Dr. Blasey Ford, Sexual Trauma Stories and the Power of Patriarchy Bringing in Polyvagal theory into such a HUGE and important dialogue- the freeze response in sexual trauma which surrounds shame, the deepening of trauma, why people hold back reporting due to shame and the misunderstanding of this in interpreting what is abuse Attachment is about safety rather than secure connection-if we sense a safe, out of danger, we can then activate the present and empathetic response of connection with higher regions of our mind/body moving from autonomic nervous system to social engagement Healing Attachment Through The Three Pillars Dr David Elliott – Episode 34 Treating Attachment Disruption in Adults Dr Daniel Brown – Episode 87: Treating Complex Trauma Goal of our podcast was to bring this kind of wisdom and insight from scholars about treatment to our listeners and these two are invaluable! Both discuss es the 3 essential ingredients of effective and efficient treatment for many clinical issues such as anxiety, depression, addiction, PTSD and personality disorders. Both discuss treatment on the anxious preoccupied side of the attachment spectrum (red side of the spectrum) and rectifying impaired self-development, chronic levels of anxiety, and chronic compulsive caretaking Episodes Specifically About Psychotherapy Dr Louis Cozolino –  Episode 36 The Neuroscience of Psychotherapy Episode 89: Neurofluency in Therapy, Work, and Life Episode 39: Getting What You Want From Therapy – The Essentials of a Therapeutic Relationship Episode 41: The Dark Side of Therapy-Recognizing When The Therapeutic Relationship Goes Bad Episode 7: What Group Therapy is and 5 Reasons You Should Try It General Topics Episode 81: How Good Boundaries actually Bring Us Closer with Juliane Taylor Shore boundaries have nothing to do with whether you love someone or not. They are not punishments, judgments or betrayals. “Jello wall”: Stop and slow down all the input coming towards you so you can ask, “Is this true or not true?” and “If it is, is this about me or not about me?” This allows you to view the world around you without getting hurt. Allows you space to reflect and be in your own system. Dr. Steve Finn – Episode 51: Conquer Shame By Understanding The Science Behind The Feeling Differentiating shame and guilt. Shamelessness and debilitating shame are both toxic and yet there is a version of these feeling that is quite healthy. we discuss the contemporary research and the biology of this emotion and practical implications for your everyday life. Shaming and repairing is healthy, never shaming is not. Guilt is really healthy shame.  Physical effect of shame and biology. Episode 66: Lessons from the single-not-dating world on using attachment science in real life with Becki Mendivil How we can impact our everyday relationships at work. Bring up specific examples of approaching your child with more delight, your coworkers etc Episodes About Music Episode 45: Music, Emotions and Therapy and Interview With Bob Schnieder- Love of Music Episode 44: Your Brain On Music, How Music affects your mind, Memory and Happiness Episodes On Parenting Episode 29: Understanding Adolescent Self-Consciousness From a Brain-Wise Perspective Episode 47: Attachment Insecurity and Secure Parenting with Tina Payne Bryson Episode 72: Attachment Parenting vs the Science of Attachment More General Topics Episode 17: The Biology of Motivation and Habits: Why We Drop The Ball Episode 88: 6 Seps to Increasing Your Felt Sense of Security People seemed to really like the applicable nature of this one Sit up, eye contact, gentle smile, slow down, ground self (methods) prepare and practice Kristen Neff – Episode 73: Building Grit Through Self-Compassion  This is not feel-good, la-la, therapy-talk, it’s real science. Learn the important distinction self-esteem and self-compassion one can lead to psychological instability, self-criticism, stress, competition and difficulty within ourselves, our relationships and our culture. Treating yourself as your own best friend. It’s NOT a free pass, or being easy on yourself. It can be “fierce” and “protective” and “motivating.” Tina Adkins – EP 74: Mentalizing: A Critical Component for Secure Relating  Dan Hardick – Ep 62: The Luv Doc Dating and Relationship Advice From the Trenches  irreverent and bitingly honest insights on the dating scene and relationships that survive. Doc decades of listening to the lives, troubles and fantasies of Austin’s singles. Find out how people make assumptions about others and tend to overestimate themselves when finding a partner. Bottom line: based on your dating profile, would you date yourself? Have fun with this one and check out his column below! Richard Hill – Episode 67: A Practical Technique for Calm and Confidence  Mirroring hands Episode 95: Oxytocin, Dogs & Pets In General As Attachment Figures Episodes On Mindfulness And Meditation Kelly Insellman – Episode 52: Using mindfulness Movement and Yoga to Manage Arousal  Episode 52.5: Meditation Episode 63 Living with Cancer: The 6 Principles of Emotional Healing insight both for those directly experiencing the trauma of cancer and for those who love and support them. Sarah Peyton – Episode 40: Meditation And Neuroplasticity Provide a Path To Healing specific interventions and meditations that foster brain plasticity and empathy towards ourselves and others They explore what kinds of language can we use that lets brains relax and move into a space of fluidity Tweet

8 Heinä 201953min

TU99: Food, The Body, Trauma, & Attachment With Guests Paula Scatoloni & Rachel Lewis-Marlow

TU99: Food, The Body, Trauma, & Attachment With Guests Paula Scatoloni & Rachel Lewis-Marlow

What if we flipped the script and learned to see our body as a messenger that needs to be heard rather than an obstacle to be conquered when it comes to our relationship with food? When we take physiological perspective, we learn that the body has much to say not only about food but also emotional regulation and our basic human needs for attachment and defense. Using the sensory information, attachment system and working with defenses. Who are our guests on this episode, you ask? Well here ya go, they are pretty bad-ass and they were interviewed by Dr. Ann Kelley: Paula Scatoloni, LCSW, CEDS, SEP Paula is a somatic-based psychotherapist, Certified Eating Disorders Specialist, and Somatic Experiencing™ practitioner in Chapel Hill, NC. She has worked in the field of eating disorders for over two decades. Paula served as the Eating Disorder Coordinator at Duke University CAPS for nine years and has taught extensively on the etiology and treatment of eating disorders through workshops, professional trainings, and conferences. She co-developed the first intensive outpatient program for eating disorders in the U.S with Dr. Anita Johnston. She is the co-founder of the Embodied Recovery model and the Embodied Recovery Institute in Durham, NC. Rachel Lewis-Marlow, MS, EdS, LPC, LMBT Rachel is a somatically integrative psychotherapist, dually licensed in counseling and therapeutic massage and bodywork. She is a Certified Advanced Practitioner in Sensorimotor Psychotherapy and has advanced training and 25+ years of experience in diverse somatic therapies including Craniosacral Therapy, Energetic Osteopathy, Oncology massage and Aromatherapy. Rachel She is the co-founder of the Embodied Recovery model and the Embodied Recovery Institute in Durham, NC. provides ongoing training and supervision to clinical and support staff in the programmatic implementation of the Embodied Recovery model. In her private practice in Chapel Hill, NC, Rachel works with trauma, eating disorders, and dissociative disorders. TU99 Shownotes (are these not awesome or what? Patrons help us be able to do this, thank you you know who you are.) Typical Treatment Model Bio-Psychosocial model Bio: has been usage of pharmacology, re-feeding, nutritional rehabilitation, and yoga Psycho part has been education about emotion and emotional tolerance, dialectical behavioral therapy, supportive therapies to support emotional processing and cognitive distortions, cognitive behavioral treatment to address the distortions, and then try to change the behaviors by changing the cognitions, Social part: family and dynamics around having a place of belonging and one’s sense of belonging in the world, the culture, & the family Usually a treatment team: dietician, a therapist, family therapist, a psychiatrist, a physician Typical View of Recovery Goal: to get somebody to eat a prescribed amount of nutritional food in order to achieve a range of BMI or body size or shape eat it in what we call a normative style, which is a very relative term Focus is on how behaviors are a response to an attitude towards the body itself What’s Missing? Being curious about what the body is saying and expressing through the eating disorder behaviors Shifting the Perspective: The Embodied Recovery Model The Embodied Recovery Model is Somato–Psycho-Social. It expands the role of the body to include anatomy, physiology, kinesiology, movement, and posture. The 5 Core Principles of the Embodied Recovery Model The 5 Core Principles facilitate the intersection between somatic organization, subjective experience of self, and basic human needs for attachment and defense. Shifting from bio-psycho-social model to somato-psycho-social model. Directly resourcing the body so that it becomes a resource in recovery rather than an obstacle to recovery. Collaborate with the body at the physiological level to support the infrastructures that govern emotional regulation, memory, and sustained healing. Shifting the focus from what people with eating disorders are saying about their bodies to what their bodies are saying about what it means to be alive (defense structures) and what they need to thrive (attachment system). subjective experience meaning it’s not so much what people think about themselves but it’s actually the experience of the body and through the body Redefining recovery as an experience of embodiment rather than the absence or reduction of eating disorder symptoms. the idea that when we’re actually working with our body, and we know how to dialogue with it then, it’s going to support us and our relationship with food.  Somatic Scaffolding  Distorted body image: what’s happening is that the visual image of the body through the eyes and the interoceptive message (signals from the body inside) don’t match up. the visual information that they’re getting is impacted by the internal sensations they’re having and thoughts attempt to make sense of that really loud internal signals translate to interoceptively feeling huge because the internal noise is huge Embodiment: an intersection of our own awareness and our physical container-where our consciousness and our physical body intersect Eating disorder behaviors are a window into places where we are not a fully embodied 3 main areas examined in Somatic Scaffolding: the information (Sensory System), what’s being processed (Attachment System), and how it’s being processed (Defense System). Sensory Integration System Not working optimally due to genetics or trauma (generational, gestational, birth, childhood, etc). Sensitivity: Someone who is highly sensitive to textures, smells, sound, etc. experiences an internal experience of threat, which impacts the ventral vagal system Vagal system gets overloaded and overwhelmed and starts to shut down. Then we go into sympathetic or dorsal states, which do not give support for effective ingestion, digestion, and elimination. Have to pay attention to what helps resource sensory system (Learn more about this in TU93 and TU94 on Polyvagal Theory) Attachment System the relational dynamics that build the capacity for attachment (See TU 59, 60, & 61 for more info on different attachment styles) is illustrated in our basic developmental movement patterns of yield, push, reach, grasp, and pull that exist not just involuntary movement but in the primitive reflexes cellular movements the expansion and contraction movements build the capacity to connect in attachment and disconnect in our acts of defense Learning to yield yield – the perfect, relaxed state where you’re fully who you are in relationship with something else Being able to embody that phase of action, that rest, is an important action. It’s not the absence of something it is the presence of something, right. And when we can do that that is an essential part of the cycle of ingestion and digestion. It helps us know enough I’m done. I can just finish…it supports this capacity of I’m enough there’s enough I’ve had enough. Defensive defensive system – the impact of trauma trauma – something that is fundamentally impactful to us on a foundational level Is the impact truncating our attachment system that brings us into connection, or is it truncating our ability to defend ourselves and separate? Is a defense system intact or was there something that has been incomplete and is still trying to resolve “If we haven’t been able to fully complete a defensive action, our nervous system is dysregulated and isn’t going to support ingestion, digestion and elimination.”-Rachel Lewis-Marlow, Co-founder of The Embodied Recovery Institute we don’t want to try to get someone to engage in an attachment action when the reason that their body is deregulated is because it hasn’t been able to complete a defensive action. Window of tolerance A robust window of tolerance enables us to identify things like: when we’re hungry & when we’re full regulate body temperature regulator physiological & emotional state reach out to others when in distress move from sympathetic arousal to parasympathetic with ease and flow Smaller window of tolerance caused by something that happened with the primitive reflexes trauma physiology running the system because of birth trauma or attachment deficits we live outside this window most of the time and develop self-protective strategies “[These strategies] can look like anything we do in order to feel more regulated. And with eating disorders, what’s happened is that those behaviors are the only choice they have in order to come back in the window.” -Paula Scataloni, Co-founder of The Embodied Recovery Institute“ Effective treatment looks at how the attachment dynamic manifests in all the different layers of organization, and how does each member of the treatment team address it. training the nervous system to do what it didn’t get to do in the first three years of life (Learn more about Neuroplasticity in TU40  and Neurofluency in TU89) Ensuring that the individual’s body has the physiological and neurobiological capacity to handle the treatment strategies first Encompasses all elements of somatic scaffolding Brings in and examines the attachment, defensive, regulatory, and co-regulatory capacities of the entire family system “If we just treat and help the client develop regulatory capacity but the family system is not supported, then we’re just helping them in the office and then sending them out into a system that has struggles.” – Paula Scataloni, Co-founder of the Embodied Recovery Institute Resources: Embodied Recovery Institute Website Understanding The Connection Between, Eating, Attachment, And Trauma By Paula Scatoloni, LCSW, CEDS, SEP Trauma-Informed Approaches to Eating Disorders Dr. Walter Kaye’s website Bonnie Bainbridge Cohen’s website This is the heart of Therapist Uncensored – the reason we started this podcast. We are so honored to be able to bring this kind of excellent content to you guys and to help you understand yourself and the ones you love. Like this one? You may be interested in this one, too. TU93: Polyvagal Theory in Action – The Practice of Body Regulation With Dr Stephen Porges(Opens in a new browser tab) If you appreciate this work you can help it continue by becoming a Patron – ie. a super fan, or what we call Neuronerds. We are approaching our 100th episode (can you believe it!!!) and we are having special offers up until our 100th episode!  Click here to sign up for as little as $5 a month. You can also help us by subscribing on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify or Podbean to name a few and by leaving a review so others can discover this cool science. Remember, sharing is caring! Tweet

27 Kesä 20191h 1min

TU98: Dive Deeper into a Model of Attachment Science (the DMM) by Ann Kelley & Sue Marriott

TU98: Dive Deeper into a Model of Attachment Science (the DMM) by Ann Kelley & Sue Marriott

Dive deeper into this new (to us) model of interpreting attachment science and discover how to apply it into your daily life. Sue Marriott LCSW, CGP and Ann Kelley PhD have fun breaking down the last two episodes where Dr. Patricia Crittenden so generously shared her model called the Dynamic Maturational Model (DMM). Focus is on personal and clinical importance in this last of a 3-part series on the DMM. Before we begin: A’s (Red in the DMM)=Historically referred to as Blue on TU B’s (Blue in the DMM)=Historically referred to as Green on TU C’s (Green in the DMM)=Historically referred to as Red on TU AC’s = Historically referred to Tie Dye on TU **Note: We know the colors may be a bit confusing, but it is important to us that you receive information as Dr Crittenden has published it. It is by happenstance that our colors are the same (with the exception of tie dye), but they represent different thinking and behavioral patterns. When we refer to color in the episodes and in the show notes, we are referring to the colors we have historically used on the TU podcast and the letters and self-protective strategies of the DMM. This is only in order to maintain consistency and make the information more easily understood by our listeners. However, the colors as shown in the slides and as listed above, are the way Dr Crittenden uses them in her fantastic work! Brief Hierarchy of Attachment Theory: There’s a lot of similarity between the more familiar Mary Main et al ABC-D model of attachment and the Patricia Crittenden’s DMM interpretation of attachment, but there are also some very important differences. What’s in A Name? Dynamic Maturational Model (DMM) – potentially intimidating mouthful, BUT let’s break it down What it means: Sue and Ann share their take on Dr Crittenden’s walk through the developmental process that happens in attachment from infancy to adulthood. (Listen to Episode 96 and Episode 97). As we mature into different stages of our life, our needs and self-protective strategies (what the DMM helps us learn) we use change accordingly. The beautiful thing about the DMM is the way it incorporates culture, sexuality, key relationships, and danger/safety into the attachment mix. Speaking of safety…. One key difference between the DMM and traditional attachment models is the emphasis on SAFETY rather than SECURITY. According to the DMM: -attachment is about the dyadic relationship in danger, it does not just live in the person -we take in information from the environment (parent in infancy) and shift this into “behaviors” or self-protective strategies. -these strategies develop to protect us. They are our brain’s way of helping us reduce danger and increase connectedness by creating closeness, proximity, and safety. Information Processing -It’s physiological. There are 3 systems: Somatic: what does our body feel…our heart, our stomach feel Cognitive: how we process the information, how do we make meaning Emotional: what’s coming up Bottom line, we can learn from our body. They are connected but not hierarchical. Security = Integration of all 3 of these info systems (Therapist Uncensored’s model ie. getting to the green) The Attachment Spectrum As you move out on the spectrum, (in the DMM, it’s a circle, which is also really cool) we begin to inhibit or exaggerate information based on the response in our environment/the response of our caregivers. We will tend to lean Blue or Red or Tie Dye (check out episodes 59, 60, 61 for more detailed info on each color). NOTE: These colors are Ann and Sue’s Attachment & Regulation Spectrum, not colors from the DMM. It is NOT conscious and forms in the first 2 years via Neuroception. Neuroception (listen to our episode on Polyvagal Theory for more info) tells us, as infants, that if we cry, our caregiver will react a certain way. We inhibit information according to what will keep us safe and bring us closer to our caregiver. The distortive and inhibitive behaviors that develop are functional adaptations to meet the infant’s needs. It is a way of accessing the parts of the caregiver that are available and also keeping the infant out of disorganization. Think organized chaos – the infant may be highly dysregulated but in an organized way rather than disorganized. Exaggerating, de-emphasizing or dissociating, etc. when there is danger is how we, as infants, learned to keep ourselves sane and intact. Bringing Crittenden’s work out of the research and into real life What we love: -Dr Crittenden’s inclusive approach to applying attachment theory across the lifespan. -Dr Crittenden’s stance that self-protective strategies are functional adaptations to keep us as safe. –The compassionate and understanding perspective of the self-protective behaviors we use every day. To summarize the DMM, Dr. Crittenden’s own words say it best: “My work is about all the things that we do when we’re in danger and how stunningly competent even our infants are at figuring out what you need to do to stay safe -here in this family where I was born with these parents who live in this culture facing these problems right now and these other problems that this culture knows about historically.” “Which strategy in this model is best? Every behavioral strategy is the right strategy for some problem, but no strategy is the best strategy for every problem. We need them all… If it protects you, it is the right strategy.” Final Thoughts: We love that the DMM really brings a fresh perspective to the field of attachment. Healing happens when you understand what got encoded in your body on an unconscious level from your personal experiences and your family and cultural history and then learn and implement strategies to help you move from Red or Blue or Tie Dye to Green. Security looks like the integration of all of these different dimensions that Crittenden talks about. It’s not having to distort any information and accepting and loving your whole self. YOU deserve this. Every single one of us deserves this. This is the heart of Therapist Uncensored – the reason we started this podcast. We are so honored to be able to bring this amazing research to you guys and to help you understand yourself and the ones you love. If you appreciate this work you can help it continue by becoming a Patron – ie. a super fan, or what we call Neuronerds. We are approaching our 100th episode (can you believe it!!!) and we are having special offers up until our 100th episode!  Click here to sign up for as little as $5 a month. You can also help us by subscribing on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify or Podbean to name a few and by leaving a review so others can discover this cool science. Remember, sharing is caring! Resources: Raising Parents Attachment Representations and Treatment (2008) by Patricia Crittenden The Organization of Attachment Relationships Maturation, Culture & Context (2000) by Patricia Crittenden “The secret lives of children” 2017, in Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry by Patricia Crittenden “Dynamic Maturational Model of Attachment and Adaptation – theory and practice” PDF Ed. Ari Hautamaki Tweet

13 Kesä 201926min

TU97: The Dynamic Maturational Model (DMM) of Attachment With Guest Patricia Crittenden (Part 2)

TU97: The Dynamic Maturational Model (DMM) of Attachment With Guest Patricia Crittenden (Part 2)

Note: This episode is Part 2 of 2. It stands alone, but to start at Part 1 click HERE.   “So which strategy in this model is best? Every behavioral strategy is the right strategy for some problem, but no strategy is the best strategy for every problem. We need them all.” – Dr Patricia Crittenden, creator of the Dynamic Maturational Model of Attachment & Adaptation (DMM) using culture and context. LOOKING FOR THE SLIDES? DOWNLOAD THE PDF HERE: Rudiments-of-the-DMM-PDF VERSION OR THE POWERPOINT VERSION HERE:  Rudiments of the DMM Powerpoint version  Or if you have great eyesight 🙂 you can view them here. Therapist Uncensored Episode 97 Show Notes: Before we begin: A’s (Red in the DMM)=Historically referred to as Blue on TU B’s (Blue in the DMM)=Historically referred to as Green on TU C’s (Green in the DMM)=Historically referred to as Red on TU AC’s = Historically referred to Tie Dye on TU **Note: We know the colors may be a bit confusing, but it is important to us that you receive information as Dr Crittenden has published it. It is by happenstance that our colors are the same (with the exception of tie dye), but they represent different thinking and behavioral patterns. When we refer to color in the episodes and in the show notes, we are referring to the colors we have historically used on the TU podcast and the letters and self-protective strategies of the DMM. This is only in order to maintain consistency and make the information more easily understood by our listeners. However, the colors as shown in the slides and as listed above, are the way Dr Crittenden uses them in her fantastic work! Let’s Dive In: To understand self-protective strategies, we have to understand the information the brain is using, even in infancy – it’s neurological. A’s, the B’s and the C’s emphasize different sorts of information. Strategies by Age Group and Model Representation: Infancy DMM                           Ainsworth                ABC+D A-2: Avoidant                           A1-2                    A1-2 B1-2: Reserved                    B1-4                    B1-4 B3: Comfortable                    C1                       C1-2 B4-5: Reactive                                              D-Controlling C1-2: Resistant/Passive Preschool Preschoolers utilize false positive affect. A’s split their own self from the other, and they focus on the parent. They take the perspective of the powerful person. C’s split their negative affect, showing either the vulnerable or the invulnerable affect. They hide the other from view. DMM                             Ainsworth               ABC+D A1-2: Avoidant                                                 A1-2 A3-4: Compulsively Caregiving/Compliant      B1-4 B1-2: Reserved                                               C1-2 B3: Comfortable                                               D-Controlling B4-5: Reactive C1-2: Resistant/Passive C3-4: Aggressive/Feigned Helpless School Age DMM                             Ainsworth               ABC+D A1-2: Avoidant                                                 A1-2 A3-4: Compulsively Caregiving/Compliant                       B1-4 B1-2: Reserved                                                C1-2 B3: Comfortable                                          D-Controlling B4-5: Reactive C1-2: Resistant/Passive C3-4: Aggressive/Feigned Helpless C5-6: Punitive/Seductive Adolescence DMM                             Ainsworth               ABC+D A1-2: Avoidant                                                 A1-2 A3-4: Compulsively Caregiving/Compliant                        B1-4 A5-6: Compulsively Promiscuous/Self-Reliant                    C1-2 B1-2: Reserved                                          U/Cannot Classify B3: Comfortable B4-5: Reactive C1-2: Resistant/Passive C3-4: Aggressive/Feigned Helpless C5-6: Punitive/Seductive Adult DMM                               Ainsworth                    ABC+D A1-2: Avoidant                                                        A1-2 A3-4: Compulsively Caregiving/Comp                    B1-4 A5-6: Compulsively Promiscuous/Self-Reliant        C1-2 A7-8: Delusional Idealization/Externally Assembled Self              U/Cannot Classify B1-2: Reserved B3: Comfortable B4-5: Reactive C1-2: Resistant/Passive C3-4: Aggressive/Feigned Helpless C5-6: Punitive/Seductive C7-8: Menacing/Paranoid A/C: Includes Psycopathy (extreme A/C combination) Description of each group:* The A’s (our blue. red in the DMM) A1-2: The A1-2 strategy uses cognitive prediction in the context of very little real threat. Attachment figures are idealized by over-looking their negative qualities (A1) or the self is put down a bit (A2). Most A1-2s are predictable, responsible people who are just cool and businesslike. Type A strategies all rely on inhibition of feelings and set danger at a psychological distance from the self. This strategy is first used in infancy. A3: Individuals using the A3 strategy (compulsive caregiving, cf., Bowlby, 1973) rely on predictable contingencies, inhibit negative affect and protect themselves by protecting their attachment figure. In childhood, they try to cheer up or care for sad, withdrawn, and vulnerable attachment figures. In adulthood, they often find employment where they rescue or care for others, especially those who appear weak and needy. The precursors of A3 and A4 can be seen in infancy (using the DMM method for the Strange Situation), but the strategy only functions fully in the preschool years and thereafter. A4: Compulsively compliant individuals (Crittenden & DiLalla, 1988) try to prevent danger, inhibit negative affect and protect themselves by doing what attachment figures want them to do, especially angry and threatening figures. They tend to be excessively vigilant, quick to anticipate and meet others’ wishes, and generally agitated and anxious. The anxiety, however, is ignored and downplayed by the individual and often appears as somatic symptoms that are brushed aside as being unimportant. A5: A5 individuals use a compulsively promiscuous strategy (Crittenden, 1995) to avoid genuine intimacy while maintaining human contact and, in some cases, satisfying sexual desires. They show false positive affect, including sexual desire, to little known people, and protect themselves from rejection by engaging with many people superficially and not getting deeply involved with anyone. This strategy develops in adolescence when past intimate relationships have been treacherous, and strangers appear to offer the only hope of closeness and sexual satisfaction. It may be displayed in a socially promiscuous manner (that does not involve sexuality) or, in more serious cases, as sexual promiscuity. A6: Individuals using a compulsively self-reliant strategy (Bowlby, 1980) do not trust others to be predictable in their demands, find themselves inadequate in meeting the demands or both. They inhibit negative affect and protect themselves by relying on no one other than themselves. This protects the self from others, but at the cost of lost assistance and comfort. Usually this strategy develops in adolescence after individuals have discovered that they cannot regulate the behavior of important, but dangerous or non-protective, caregivers. They withdraw from close relationships as soon as they are old enough to care for themselves. There is a social form of the strategy in which individuals function adaptively in social and work contexts, but are distant when intimacy is expected, and an isolated form in which individuals cannot manage any interpersonal relationship and withdraw as much as possible from others. A7-8: Delusionally idealizing individuals (Crittenden, 2000) have had repeated experience with severe danger that they cannot predict or control, display brittle false positive affect, and protect themselves by imagining that their powerless or hostile attachment figures will protect them. This is a very desperate strategy of believing falsely in safety when no efforts are likely to reduce the danger (cf., the “hostage syndrome”). Paradoxically, the appearance is rather generally pleasing, giving little hint of the fear and trauma that lie behind the nice exterior until circumstances produce a break in functioning. This pattern only develops in adulthood. Individuals using an A8 strategy (externally assembled self, Crittenden, 2000) do as others require, have few genuine feelings of their own, and try to protect themselves by absolute reliance on others, usually professionals who replace their absent or endangering attachment figures. Both A7 and A8 are associated with pervasive and sadistic early abuse and neglect. The B’s (our green, blue in the DMM) B1-2: Individuals assigned to B1-2 are a bit more inhibited with regard to negative affect than B3s but are inherently balanced. B3: The Type B strategy involves a balanced integration of temporal prediction with affect. Type B individuals show all kinds of behavior but are alike in being able to adapt to a wide variety of situations in ways that are self-protective, that protect their children, and that as often as possible cause others no harm. They communicate directly, negotiate differences, and find mutually satisfactory compromises. They distort cognitive and affective information very little, especially not to themselves. Finally, they display a wider range of individual variation than people using other strategies – who must constrain their functioning to employ their strategy. This strategy functions in infancy. By adulthood, two sorts of Type B strategies can be differentiated. Naive B’s simply had the good fortune to grow up in safety and security. Mature B’s, on the other hand, 1) have reached neurological maturity (in the mid-30’s), 2) function in life’s major roles, e.g., child, spouse, parent, and 3) carry out an on-going process of psychological integration across relationships, roles, and contexts. Where naive B’s tend to be simplistic, mature B’s grapple with life’s complexities. B4-5: Individuals assigned to B4-5 exaggerate negative affect a bit, being sentimental (B4) or irritated (B5) but are inherently balanced. The C’s (our red, blue in the DMM)  C1-2: The C1-2 (threatening-disarming) strategy involves both relying on one’s own feelings to guide behavior and using somewhat exaggerated/changing displayed negative affect to influence other people’s behavior. Specifically, the strategy consists of splitting, exaggerating, and alternating the display of mixed negative feelings to attract attention and manipulate the feelings and responses of others. The alternation is between presentation of a strong, angry invulnerable self who blames others for the problem (C1,3,5, 7) with the appearance of a fearful, weak, and vulnerable self who entices others to give succorance (C2,4,6,8). C1-2 is a very normal strategy found in people with low risk for mental health problems and a great zest for life. Infants display the C1-2 strategy. C3-4: The C3-4 (aggressive-feigned helpless) strategy involves alternating aggression with apparent helplessness to cause others to comply out of fear of attack or assist out of fear that one cannot care for oneself. Individuals using a C3 (aggressive) strategy emphasize their anger in order to demand caregivers’ compliance. Those using the C4 (feigned helpless) give signals of incompetence and submission. The angry presentation elicits compliance and guilt in others, whereas vulnerability elicits rescue. The precursors of this strategy can be seen in infancy (using the DMM method for the Strange Situation), but the strategy only functions fully in the preschool years and thereafter. C5-6: The C5-6 strategy (punitively obsessed with revenge and/or seductively obsessed with rescue) is a more extreme form of C3-4. It involves active deception to carry out the revenge or elicit rescue. Individuals using this strategy distort information substantially, particularly in blaming others for their predicament and heightening their own negative affect. The outcome is a more enduring and less resolvable struggle. Those using a C5 (punitive) strategy are colder and more distant

29 Touko 201956min

TU96: Treating Attachment & Self-Protective Strategies With Guest Patricia Crittenden(Part 1)

TU96: Treating Attachment & Self-Protective Strategies With Guest Patricia Crittenden(Part 1)

Treating Attachment & Self-Protective Strategies “If it protects you, it’s the right strategy.” – Dr Patricia Crittenden, creator of the Dynamic Maturational Model of Attachment & Adaptation (DMM) using culture and context. LOOKING FOR THE SLIDES? DOWNLOAD THE PDF HERE: Rudiments-of-the-DMM-PDF VERSION OR THE POWERPOINT VERSION HERE:  Rudiments of the DMM Powerpoint version  Or if you have great eyesight 🙂 you can view them here. Are you ready to move from describing injured developmental pathways and symptoms – to addressing how to heal from disrupted development? We are on the case! In this episode co-host Sue Marriott LCSW, CGP discusses exactly that with Dr. Patrica Crittenden, founder of the Dynamic Maturational Model of Attachment & Adaption (DMM) using culture and context to understand, decode and heal early relational injuries. Their conversation was deep and wide, thus will be published in two sections. In today’s episode, TU96, Dr. Crittenden focuses on wide-reaching cultural aspects of development, safety and danger. She uses decades of observations, assessment, research and clinical work to describe her take on what she refers to as the American Attachment researchers and elucidates how her model is similar and where and why it differs. Dr. Crittenden’s focus on applying this rich research clinically aligns perfectly with the mission of this podcast. Whether you are a clinician, foster parent, educator or are interested for your own personal reasons, you will find her perspective fresh and thought-provoking! Please see the PACKED resources and show notes below! Who is Patricia Crittenden and why do want to know her…. Dr. Mary Ainsworth Dr. Crittenden studied under Mary. D. Ainsworth from 1978 until 1983, when she received her Ph.D. as a psychologist in the Social Ecology and Development Program at the University of Virginia. In addition to Mary Ainsworth’s constant guidance and support, her psychology master’s thesis on the CARE-Index, was developed in consultation with John Bowlby and her family systems research, on patterns of family functioning in maltreating families, was accomplished with guidance from E. Mavis Hetherington. John Bowbly Dr. Crittenden has served on the Faculties of Psychology at the Universities of Virginia and Miami and held visiting professorships at the Universities of Helsinki (Finland) and Bologna (Italy) as well as San Diego State University (USA) and Edith Cowan University (Australia). In 1992 she received a Senior Post-doctoral Fellowship, with a focus on child sexual abuse and the development of individual differences in human sexuality, at the Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. In 1993-4 she was awarded the Beverley Professorship at the Clark Institute of Psychiatry (Canada). In the last two decades, Dr. Patricia Crittenden has worked cross-culturally as a developmental psychopathologist developing the Dynamic-Maturational Model (DMM) of attachment and adaptation, along with a developmentally attuned, life-span set of procedures for assessing self-protective strategies. She has received a career achievement award for “Outstanding Contributions to the Field of Child and Family Development” from the European Family Therapy Association in Berlin. Currently, Dr. Crittenden’s work is focused on preventive and culture- sensitive applications of the DMM to mental health treatment, child protection, and criminal rehabilitation. Before we begin: A’s (Red in the DMM)=Historically referred to as Blue on TU B’s (Blue in the DMM)=Historically referred to as Green on TU C’s (Green in the DMM)=Historically referred to as Red on TU AC’s = Historically referred to Tie Dye on TU **Note: We know the colors may be a bit confusing, but it is important to us that you receive information as Dr Crittenden has published it. It is by happenstance that our colors are the same (with the exception of tie dye), but they represent different thinking and behavioral patterns. When we refer to color in the episodes and in the show notes, we are referring to the colors we have historically used on the TU podcast and the letters and self-protective strategies of the DMM. This is only in order to maintain consistency and make the information more easily understood by our listeners. However, the colors as shown in the slides and as listed above, are the way Dr Crittenden uses them in her fantastic work! Therapist Uncensored Episode 96 Shownotes: “We crave information about danger because we live so safely, and we know there has to be danger out there and our brains are evolved to hunt for it.” – Andrea Claussen, student of Crittenden What patterns are emerging culturally? Life makes sense the way we live in it – the strategy that is dominant in each culture represents the best solution to the problems/for the dangers that are prevalent and have been prevalent historically that these people have experienced Western countries have become safer than that ever were before. We’ve fallen in love with the idea of security, but the trick is to survive danger. Bowlby knew attachment is about protection from danger and not the state of security. What is the DMM about? Crittenden’s work is about “all the things that we do when we’re in danger and how stunningly competent even our infants are at figuring out what you need to do to stay safe here, in this family where I was born, with these parents who live in this culture facing these problems right now and these other problems that the culture knows about historically.” Infants: Embedded in a series of systems Only experiences systems through the interaction with parents Know historical danger in a pre-conscious way, personal dangers in a more conscious way, may even carry mother’s experience with danger epigenetically As infants become preschoolers who become school-aged children who become adolescents repeatedly refine their understanding of how to stay safe in this family, in this setting, in this culture As their mind matures and makes it possible for them to use more of the information that is around them. The socioeconomic biases that predict security in the U.S. are not necessarily what is going to predict safety in the DMM. Attachment From Bowlby to Crittenden: Attachment functions to promote survival by protecting and comforting the person when there is danger Attachment is not about security, it is about surviving danger, which is a completely different starting point than American attachment begins with and to organize a protective strategy. The Brain The brain needs information if you’re going to behave in the context of danger in a way that will elicit a attachment, care-giving and protection. The brain operates with three kinds of information: Somatic information from your body – How does your stomach feel right now? Are Your hands shaking or you aroused? Somatic information will override everything else. Cognitive – action consequence sequences -straight behavioral learning Affective – information that is processed through the limbic system that comes from intense contextual stimulus These three sources of information, your body, the temporal consequences and the intensity of signals in the state all give you information that predict danger or safety. Infants learn the meanings of these forms of information from interacting with their parents. Attachment theory in general: Infant brains use simple information, and they create simple strategies. More mature brains transform information in more ways and then it better predictions, and they organize more elegant protective behavior The Differences Between the DMM and American Attachment Click HERE to download the slides (these will be discussed in detail in Part 2, Ep 97, but you are welcome to check them out here!) American attachment theory Attachment is a characteristic of the infant. The A, B, C, D model codes only the infant or only the adult (AAI). Attachment is a property of a person, not a relationship.  Ainsworth named observations in children patterns. DMM model Attachment is not in one person. It is the process between two people that makes the younger weaker, more vulnerable, and the other more safe and comfortable when there is threat. Security is not so important. Adaptation is important Crittenden calls observations self-protective strategies. Self-protective strategies: Asks “does it protect you in your context?” A strategy that is the best solution to the problems in your life context that is adaptive will feel good and comfortable and safe. American attachment theory assumes a normative, safe environment. DMM says globally, it is not always safe. A more typical environment has danger in it, and you need to adapt to that. We need attachment relationships that will protect us in dangerous circumstances. Find Episode 97, Part Two of this discussion, here. Gain private access, more in-depth episodes and exclusive content with us through Patreon.  Become a Super Neuronerd, a Gold Neuronerd or an Out and Proud PLATINUM NEURONERD today!   Join our exclusive community of Therapist Uncensored Neuronerds for just $5 a month! Help us create a ripple of security by sharing the science of relationships around the globe! NEURONERDS UNITE! Click here to sign up. Resources: Rudiments-of-the-DMM-PDF VERSION Raising Parents Attachment Representations and Treatment (2008) by Patricia Crittenden The Organization of Attachment Relationships Maturation, Culture & Context (2000) by Patricia Crittenden “The secret lives of children” 2017, in Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry by Patricia Crittenden “Dynamic Maturational Model of Attachment and Adaptation – theory and practice” PDF Ed. Ari Hautamaki Tweet

15 Touko 201941min

TU95: Oxytocin & Dogs (& Pets in General) as Attachment Figures

TU95: Oxytocin & Dogs (& Pets in General) as Attachment Figures

Oxytocin and dogs! Our pet relationships provide a trust and bonding boost, and is the natural love drug our bodies make at key relational moments such as child-birth, nursing, orgasm and falling in love.* In this episode we discuss how to create this moral molecule without even needing complicated human relationships by connecting mutually to our companion pets. What’s not to love about that? The science now is clear – this inter-species relationship is mutually beneficial and potentially life-changing for both of you. Lower cortisol, higher oxytocin, more trust and connection – ba bing! Most of us can relate to having a beloved pet that has been a significant part of our lives. We love them, and the cool thing is, they love us back unconditionally it seems, without regard to our moral failings. In fact, there is now crazy hard science research to back up the power of this connection, particularly regarding dogs. In our last episode, we told you that we’d be talking more about the love drug, oxytocin, and how we can actively induce the release of this hormone in our bodies in order to promote our favorite subject, building security. In this one we get real and walk the walk of vulnerability.  So, what do pets, specifically dogs, have to do with oxytocin and building security? Well, security happens through safe connection, and connection both induces the release of oxytocin and is created by it’s presence. This cascade creates a feeling of physiological safety and openness and warmth in our bodies, which helps us to bond and build security. Believe it or not, we can consciously manipulate our body’s release of oxytocin through the bond we create with our beloved pets. And if you’ve been following the podcast, you know this ties into the previous 2 episodes on Polyvagal Theory and our autonomic nervous system. In this episode, join Ann and Sue as they talk about what this experience looks like in real life and how to cultivate the love-drug cross-species. Also hear Sue’s incredibly powerful story of tragic loss, and renewed hope, all related to pets. *Of course we are simplifying a bit – nothing is all good. Oxytocin isn’t always a love-drug, it can cause aggression or feelings of loneliness. For example if the wolves had made eye-contact as the companion dogs did (the wolves made much less eye contact and had no increase in the hormone), it would probably have spiked aggression rather than bonding (an urge to protect their bonded pack rather than attach to the alien human), but we are focusing here on the most major findings of the neuropeptide. Cooper comforting Sue… I know so MANY of you have pets as primaries, it’s a real relationship (scientifically and intuitively) that truly comforts and heals. Episode 95 show notes: Oxytocin – Ann and Sue’s favorite neuropeptide, AKA the cuddle drug, the love drug, the moral molecule. Research shows that the bond we have with our pets is reciprocal. The pleasure center of the brain lights up in us and in our animal partners. Cortisol levels decrease, and oxytocin levels increase in humans and animals when we have high eye contact. The most significant increase (up to almost 300%) is seen with dogs and varies based on breed. It’s an extra boost if we catch our dogs looking at us first. Don’t be embarrassed about your significant other with 4 legs, or less. Hear about bonding with fish, monkey’s picking and humans grooming behavior, and what lice has to do with it all. Dogs and any other beloved pet can be serious attachment figure in our lives, helping us to build a sense of safety and security in the world. It can be a very powerful relationship that is just as strong, and sometimes stronger, than human connections. Granted some people have pets as just animals, an object to guard their home or to rescue or to get dates, but that is totally different from the potential real attachment relationships that in the right circumstances can enhance the lives of the whole family. Sue shares how dogs have been a consistent, benevolent, reliable, caring, protective force in her life. To illustrate this, she shares a vulnerable personal story about her relationships with her dogs, Jackson and Cooper, through some traumatic experiences. Story take-aways: Teenage parenting tip: if you want to get your teen to talk to you, do something active with them so you aren’t staring at them waiting to talk. Engaging in something actively where they don’t have to make direct eye contact is more likely to open up a reluctant talker – like walking dogs, or dribbling balls, or parallel doodling – sneaking up on the conversation is conducive to getting them to open up without stress. Oxytocin is better than crack. Important note: the bond with Jackson and later, Cooper, didn’t replace the relationship with people during these hard experiences. The connection, however, is unique and sometimes better than the connection with people if you come from experiences where people didn’t earn your trust. Back to Oxytocin and Cortisol Science Oxytocin bounces across species and is not species-dependent. Think chimpanzees holding each other , the owl caring for the duck in the owl’s nest, the hippo and the giant turtle. It is normally associated with childbirth, nursing, love-making orgasm and everybody produces it. It causes the milk let-down response that nursing women experience when a baby cries or in response to someone in distress. Companion animals – but especially companion dogs – pick up our distress and actively want to nurture us and vice versa. Lesser known oxytocin response: tribalism-aggressive and protective behaviors So how do we really facilitate oxytocin flow with people? Learn to trust by taking small calculated risks Vulnerability begets nurturing Use gentle eye contact – soft gaze for extended time (not fight or make out gaze, just looking with interest and curiosity and care) Sue and Ann discuss research studies, how the breed of dog effects eye contact and bonding, and other examples of the connection between dogs and people. Dopamine: the hunt and find chemical, think looking for a date Dopamine + Oxytocin = amazing from a romantic standpoint. Thanks for joining us as we get vulnerable and walk the walk with you. We get it. That’s why we are working to build security one episode at a time! Resources: How Dogs Love Us – A Neuroscientist and his Adopted Dog Decode the Canine Brain – by Gregory Berns Gazing into the puppy-dog eyes may actually be good for you – NPR audio Oxytocin and Cortisol Levels in Dog Owners and Their Dogs Are Associated with Behavioral Patterns: An Exploratory Study A 1980 study found that more heart-attack victims with pets survived beyond the one-year mark than those without, a finding that was reproduced 15 years later. Dog – Human Chemistry, the Role of Oxytocin  Smiling faces are attractive to dogs, thanks to oxytocin  Oxytocin Gaze Positive Loop and the Co-evolution of Human-Dog Bonds. The Pet Effect – Health Related Aspects of Companion Animal Ownership Who doesn’t love special offers? Gain private access, more in-depth episodes and exclusive content with us through Patreon.  Become a Super Neuronerd, a Gold Neuronerd or an Out and Proud PLATINUM NEURONERD today! 🙂  Join our exclusive community of Therapist Uncensored Neuronerds for just $5 a month! Help us create a ripple of security by sharing the science of relationships around the globe! NEURONERDS UNITE! Click here to sign up. Cooper looking regal and standing guard emotionally Tweet

1 Touko 201933min

Suosittua kategoriassa Koulutus

rss-murhan-anatomia
psykopodiaa-podcast
voi-hyvin-meditaatiot-2
rss-liian-kuuma-peruna
jari-sarasvuo-podcast
adhd-podi
aamukahvilla
rss-vapaudu-voimaasi
rss-niinku-asia-on
rss-uskonto-on-tylsaa
rss-narsisti
salainen-paivakirja
psykologia
ihminen-tavattavissa-tommy-hellsten-instituutti
rss-tule-tule-hyva-ero
rss-finnish-with-eemeli-podcast
rss-koira-haudattuna
rss-valo-minussa-2
rss-jennan-planetaario
rss-tyohyvinvoinnin-aakkoset