Kevin Franke A Victim or an Enabler? FBI Expert Breaks It Down

Kevin Franke faced an agonizing revelation this past August. He found his wife, Ruby Franke, and their family therapist, Jodi Hildebrandt, detained, with his two youngest children in a healthcare facility for critical malnourishment treatments.    In the year leading up to this grim discovery, Kevin had only received infrequent communication from his now-estranged wife. This drastic shift in family dynamics traces back to the involvement of marriage counselor, Jodi Hildebrandt, in their lives. In a candid conversation with PEOPLE, Kevin's attorney, Randy Kester, expressed, “Kevin was taken aback. The allegations against Ruby and Jodi left him stunned. It dawned upon him the magnitude of deception he had been subjected to."    The couple, who once reveled in the limelight due to their "8 Passengers vlog" on YouTube, had amassed a dedicated following of approximately 2.5 million subscribers. Their content chiefly revolved around the daily adventures and life lessons of their six children. However, even this digital haven suffered a setback when the couple decided to part ways, a year before Ruby's dramatic arrest.    Eyewitness accounts and police allegations shed light on the distressing environment the Franke children were exposed to, particularly in Kevin’s absence. With Ruby and the two youngest residing at Jodi's residence, there are serious accusations concerning the treatment of 12-year-old Russell Franke. Claims have emerged about him being physically restrained with ropes, and even more distressingly, of cayenne pepper and honey being deliberately applied to his injuries by Ruby and Jodi.    Diving deeper into Jodi Hildebrandt’s background reveals a checkered professional history. She commenced her association with the Frankes in 2021. Prominently specializing in sex addiction, Jodi faced reprimands from state authorities back in 2012, owing to an improper relationship with a client. That very year, following her personal battles of a divorce and strained ties with her children, Jodi launched 'ConneXions'. Her venture, as advertised on her website, pledges to "empower individuals to thrive in their relationships," with an emphasis on liberating individuals from "distortions" to embrace "Truth, connection, and freedom."    This counselor-client relationship between the Frankes and Jodi intensified, culminating in a pivotal trip involving Ruby, Kevin, and another therapist. Post this journey, Ruby's perspective on her marriage had radically shifted. Recollecting this phase, Kester quoted Ruby's exact words to Kevin: "Your attitude is infesting the family." She firmly believed that their only recourse was separation. Kevin, despite these developments, continued attending several sessions a week with Jodi. In a turn of events, when their son Chad decided to reside with Kevin, Jodi intervened, advising separation. According to Kester, Jodi’s influence permeated so deeply that Kevin became increasingly isolated, with Ruby being granted limited access to contact him.    However, red flags had been raised about the family earlier. In June 2020, social workers began probing into the Franke family dynamics, spurred by unsettling content on their YouTube channel. This included incidents like Ruby openly denying lunch to 6-year-old Eve and then 15-year-old Chad confessing to sleeping on a beanbag for a staggering seven months following a harmless prank on his sibling. Yet, these inquiries hit a dead-end as Utah's Division of Child and Family Services couldn't validate the abuse claims.    Recent times saw Ruby frequently shuttle between her residence in Springville and Jodi's home in Ivins, Utah. During one of these transitions, they were apprehended, following consistent efforts by an alert neighbor and the couple’s estranged daughter, Shari, 20, to alert authorities. Voicing his concerns, the neighbor stated, “Child protective services conveyed that their hands were tied until a calamity occurred."    Currently, both Ruby and Jodi are incarcerated at Washington County Purgatory Correctional Facility, awaiting legal proceedings, while their counseling licenses remain suspended. Kevin, although interrogated, has not faced any charges. However, the debate on his role rages on. A concerned neighbor remarked, "Is Kevin culpable? Absolutely. His decision to vacate the home was critical."    In a landscape rife with digital celebrities, this distressing tale underscores the reality that not all that glitters online is gold. The Franke family's unraveling story serves as a reminder to always look beyond the screen. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

5 Loka 202317min

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, the shocking practices of former counselor Jodi Hildebrandt were brought to the limelight. Just how influential were Hildebrandt's methods in the destruction of countless marriages?    Before her arrest, Jodi Hildebrandt was a practicing therapist known for her unique and highly controversial counseling methods. As described by the podcast hosts, many of her former clients now claim that her techniques and teachings either directly caused or played a significant role in their divorces. Hildebrandt was known to separate spouses, pathologize patients' behaviors using non-DSM-5 recognized addictions, and encouraged individuals to isolate from those not adhering to her teachings.    Psychologist John Delatorre, a guest on the podcast, expressed his concerns. "It sounds like she was never on a path to begin with," Delatorre said, suggesting that Hildebrandt might be fitting into the stereotype of the "wounded healer" – individuals who join the mental health field to address their traumas but instead inflict harm due to unresolved personal issues.    Tony Brueski brought to attention that despite brief suspension in 2012, Hildebrandt regained her license shortly afterward and continued her practices. The Mormon church even stopped recommending her due to her disclosing sensitive HIPAA information. The question of how Hildebrandt managed to evade significant consequences for such a long time is perplexing.    Delatorre explained that every licensed provider has a licensing board aimed at protecting the general public. He highlighted, “The licensing board isn't going to know what's going on unless you tell them." The issue might stem from the hesitation of clients or institutions to raise a complaint against their therapists. And while Hildebrandt might appear as an outlier, Delatorre was quick to note she's not unique. Many counselors face charges by their licensing boards for various unethical practices.    Addressing the question of how much freedom therapists have in choosing their counseling methods, Delatorre said, “Some individuals have integrated, right? So they take pieces of all different kinds of theories and mold it into one." He went on to discuss the danger of therapists becoming too rigid in their ideologies, leading them to dismiss alternative viewpoints and therapies. This isolation can cause them to become even more entrenched in their beliefs.    From Brueski's description, it appears Hildebrandt took an extreme stance, with some former clients even suggesting she had a vendetta against men. Delatorre responded, “She's the only one that knows if she had an agenda… or if this was just a secondary aspect of being so regimented in her own ideals.”    The narrative of Jodi Hildebrandt's counseling methods, as laid out in the podcast, paints a worrying picture of unchecked practices that might have harmed more than they helped. It serves as a grim reminder of the significant role and responsibility that mental health professionals hold in their clients' lives.    As the episode concluded, one question lingered: How many more "Jodi Hildebrandts" are out there, and what safeguards are in place to prevent further harm? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

4 Loka 20237min

"How often do people actually file complaints against their therapists, and how often should they?" This pressing question was tackled head-on in a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," with host Tony Brueski and guest psychotherapist and author, Shavaun Scott. Their discussion zeroed in on the intricacies of the mental health profession and provided deep insights into the dilemmas faced by patients.    Many therapy seekers presume that an occasional mismatch with a therapist is just a matter of differing perspectives, often concluding, "We just don't see eye to eye." Yet, Shavaun Scott raises a flag, stating, "I don't think as many people complain and make a formal complaint as they probably should." While there's a distinction between being uncomfortable with feedback and flagging inappropriate advice, the conversation circled the need for an empowered stance.    Discussing the potential pitfalls, Shavaun touched on the gray areas. “There are times when a therapist may be giving someone feedback, and the person just doesn't want to hear it," she elaborated. However, she also pointed out the detrimental side of the spectrum, where therapists provide bizarre suggestions or those that might exacerbate a patient's issues, particularly in couples or parenting counseling.    The ability to file complaints online has simplified the process. Ideally, a legitimate complaint would prompt the licensing board to ask the therapist in question to justify their methods. But can this process be easily circumvented? Taking the case of Jodi Hildebrandt as an example, Brueski questioned the ease with which someone could merely fabricate an acceptable explanation. Shavaun admitted, “She certainly could lie,” but highlighted instances in California where evidentiary hearings forced clinicians to defend their practices in person.    But what happens when therapists themselves are battling with their own mental health issues? Can personal experiences overshadow professional recommendations? There's a vast difference between therapists with genuinely altruistic intentions and those who might be termed "dangerous quacks." Shavaun acknowledges this continuum, noting the rigorous process involved in becoming a licensed mental health clinician. Yet, she admits, “you do get some weird ones in there,” drawing parallels with varying expertise levels in any profession, from medicine to hairdressing.    Stressing the importance of due diligence, Shavaun advises potential clients to be diligent consumers, especially when dealing with sensitive areas like marriage or parent-child relationship counseling. "Do interviews before you choose a professional," she suggests. A 15 to 30-minute preliminary phone call can offer significant insights into a therapist's approach and expertise. She adds, "Talk to at least three, and don’t make a choice until you’ve talked with someone that you feel really is insightful.”    The conversation took a sharp turn when Brueski mentioned how some professionals, like Jodi Hildebrandt, gained business through endorsements from religious bodies or other authority figures. An implicit trust often accompanies such recommendations, but the episode underscores the need for personal agency and informed decisions.  Concluding our deep dive into this provocative podcast episode, one can't help but wonder, "In our quest for healing and understanding, how do we ensure we're placing our trust in the right hands?" Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

4 Loka 20237min

The trust placed in a therapist is significant. People open up about their most personal and deep-seated issues, hoping to find solutions and heal. But what happens when that trust is broken and, worse, when the guidance provided seems to intentionally destroy relationships? This question has been echoing throughout the latest episodes of the "Hidden Killers" podcast. The spotlight has been thrust upon Jodi Hildebrandt, a therapist recently accused of questionable practices that appear to have had a detrimental effect on couples who consulted her. As shared by podcast host Tony Brueski, "...absolutely miserably her counseling and marriage counseling failed them, oftentimes seeming like she was going out of her way to break the couples up." Moreover, it appears that there may be an underlying bias, as Brueski continued, "...seemingly she had quite a vendetta against males." Such allegations, if proven, could mean a breach of the ethical responsibility a therapist owes to their clients. The discussion escalated when legal implications came to the forefront. Former Federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani weighed in on the potential fallout. Speaking of potential lawsuits for emotional distress or professional malpractice, Rahmani explained, "It's possible, you know some sort of professional liability or malpractice claim." However, the practicalities of such actions are more complicated. There's a grave concern about Hildebrandt's diagnostic methods, as Brueski noted, "She is diagnosing folks with things that really aren't even in the DSM book." Misdiagnosis could indeed lead to significant harm to patients. Drawing parallels with another case, the Kouri Richins situation, Rahmani outlined the practicality of potential lawsuits. Essentially, pursuing legal action might be viable, but the outcome in terms of monetary recovery remains uncertain. "The chances of you collecting on this might be slim to none," Rahmani pointed out, emphasizing that even if a judgment is secured, enforcing it is another challenge altogether. Yet the controversy around Hildebrandt does not end with her therapy methods. More serious charges have emerged, including child abuse. The public's response to such allegations is unpredictable. Rahmani, with his experience in representing and suing celebrities, provided a perspective that might be hard for many to digest. He said, "I've seen it where people...refuse to believe that their favorite celebrity can do any wrong despite the evidence." This is a stark reminder that public perception can often overshadow facts and testimonies. Concluding their discussion, both Brueski and Rahmani seemed to share a mutual concern. Despite the grave charges and evidence, there might still be a group of loyal followers who could continue to champion Hildebrandt and her co-accused. In the world of social media and digital influence, where belief systems can spread like wildfire, the consequences of misplaced trust are more magnified than ever. The conversation on "Hidden Killers" underlines the need for due diligence and the importance of upholding ethical standards, especially in professions that have a direct impact on people's lives. But the unsettling question remains: What if, despite all the evidence and legal outcomes, such individuals return to public life and continue to influence unsuspecting followers? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

3 Loka 20236min

Does a therapist's background truly reflect the quality of the service they provide? This question has taken center stage after a recent discussion on the "Hidden Killers" podcast where Tony Brueski and former FBI Special Agent, Jennifer Coffindaffer, scrutinized the credentials and malpractice allegations against Jodi Hildebrandt.    In the eye of a storm are allegations against Hildebrandt regarding her questionable practices. “We've, in the last week, learned more about Jodi Hildebrandt's practice... Lots of men specifically claiming abuse,” Brueski opened the discussion. As Coffindaffer delved into her background, it was revealed that Hildebrandt might not have had the qualifications she professed. “She just in a nutshell, was not qualified to even be giving this sort of counseling. No,” Brueski remarked, to which Coffindaffer added, "From my understanding, her background... was really working in a drug rehab type facility."    One of the most alarming aspects to emerge was the scale of Hildebrandt's influence. Despite her apparently insufficient background, “people, millions, 2 million, right? Were subscribing to listen to advice,” Coffindaffer said. The situation begs the question of why so many sought guidance from someone whose credentials might not stand up to scrutiny. It's a stark reminder of the importance of due diligence, especially when it concerns one's mental health.    While the focus was predominantly on Hildebrandt, Brueski also pointed out another individual named Ruby, who, like Hildebrandt, had "no PhDs or anything in counseling." Yet both had an alarming level of influence, further emphasizing the risks associated with blind trust.    A pressing concern is the lasting damage caused by Hildebrandt's alleged malpractice. As Brueski aptly stated, “That's what I'm wondering about is the damage that has been done.” Given the sensitive nature of therapy and the intimate trust patients place in their therapists, such malpractice allegations are particularly concerning.    The potential for legal action was another focal point of their conversation. Despite the apparent harm caused by Hildebrandt's practices, the feasibility of victims seeking justice remains unclear. "I think those are difficult cases to prove and quite costly," commented Coffindaffer, hinting at the challenges victims might face in court.    However, beyond the legal intricacies and the potential for redress, a more pressing concern looms: the long-term consequences of such alleged malpractice. “We're not talking murder here... And it makes me wonder, you know, how long will these people really go away if they are convicted?” Brueski inquired. Coffindaffer responded, “I don't think they're going to be gone long.” The high profile nature of the case might not necessarily lead to stricter sentences.    In wrapping up their discussion, Brueski and Coffindaffer pondered the future of such individuals. Given their influence and the dedication of their following, a return to the public eye wouldn't be surprising. Coffindaffer eerily forecasted, "I can hear the podcast right now... I think that she absolutely will use this situation in the future to have another podcast."    What's clear is that the aftermath of these allegations will continue to unfold, with countless individuals left grappling with the repercussions. As we reflect on the information revealed and anticipate the next developments, we're compelled to ask: How much should trust weigh in the realms of public influence and therapy, and where should we draw the line? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

3 Loka 20236min

In the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers", host Tony Brueski sat down with renowned Defense Attorney Bob Motta, also known for his contributions to the podcast "Defense Diaries". The two delved deep into the recent controversies surrounding therapist Jodi Hildebrandt and Ruby Franke. The revelations, which have stunned many, pertain to Hildebrandt’s questionable approach to counseling and allegations of potential harm caused to patients.    "Numerous people have claimed that they sought help from Jodi Hildebrandt, only to face further destruction of their marriages and relationships," shared Tony, setting the backdrop. Indeed, some of these claims also hint at a possible bias of Hildebrandt against men.    Motta was prompt to weigh in: "When they're given bad advice that they know their patients are going to more likely than not incorporate into their own lives, I think there could be some liability there." He elaborated that there could be multiple avenues of legal action, including claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress or civil fraud. "The question is, can you make the case?" he pondered.    However, the key concern, as both the host and Motta discussed, was the feasibility of such suits. While there seems to be potential for victims to file a case against Hildebrandt, the practicality of recovering damages remains uncertain, given the financial standing of the accused. Motta noted that while anyone can sue, assessing the depth of pockets is often the first step for a plaintiff's counsel. Yet, there's no doubt that the implications are serious, especially considering the emotional vulnerability of patients seeking counseling.    Then came the discussion of Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt’s charges. "Child abuse is a very serious thing," Tony highlighted, noting the frequency with which such cases appear before courts and sometimes the shockingly lenient punishments that follow. Motta, being careful not to preempt the court’s judgment, did indicate the gravity of the situation. "It's serious charges. The things that they have in their favor are the fact that they probably don't have any criminal background," he said. This could possibly influence the final decision, especially considering that every case has its nuances.    Motta further added perspective on how certain parenting choices might or might not fall within the statute's definition of abuse, citing the example of a child being responsible for making her own sandwich. "I don’t know that's child abuse. Like, I would never personally do that with my kid," he said. This draws attention to the thin line between parenting styles and potential harm to a child.    In summary, while the podcast episode did not conclude on a specific note about the potential outcomes for Franke and Hildebrandt, it did bring up important questions surrounding accountability in professional roles, especially in sensitive areas like counseling. As with any high-profile case, the repercussions are multifaceted, and the outcomes can set precedents for similar cases in the future.    Given the complexity and sensitivity of such issues, one can’t help but ponder: How does society strike a balance between trust in professionals and accountability for potential harm? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

3 Loka 20237min

Ruby Franke's fall from grace sent shockwaves through the millions who faithfully followed her family-centric "8 Passengers" YouTube channel. The discovery of one of her six children, emaciated, covered in sores, and bound with duct tape, in Santa Clara, Utah, raised alarm bells and ended her career as a YouTube influencer.   Franke had always portrayed a picture-perfect life. "The Mormon mom appeared as if she led a loving, nurturing family life with a husband and a big brood of children," said a longtime viewer. However, that façade crumbled when alarming details emerged about her association with the controversial therapist, Jodi Hildebrandt, 54.    According to sources close to Franke, her demeanor began to shift after she started her association with Hildebrandt. A friend of Franke for over two decades revealed to Page Six, "Ruby’s values took a drastic turn. Suddenly, she was telling lies and becoming increasingly distant, cutting off her family with seemingly no explanation."    Jodi Hildebrandt was well-known in Santa Clara as a licensed therapist through her organization, ConneXions. This institution pitched itself as an online educational platform designed to help individuals navigate relationship challenges, anxiety, and more. However, beneath this respectable exterior, darker currents flowed. Hildebrandt and Franke’s close relationship led to rampant speculation, with some even drawing parallels to the iconic "Thelma & Louise."    As the duo ventured on numerous trips together, rumors started to swirl about the nature of their relationship. Randy S. Kester, who represented Franke's husband Kevin, stated that while there were murmurs, "I don’t have any concrete evidence of a romantic relationship, other than some video content that showed them holding hands."    Franke's husband Kevin, who was previously a professor at Brigham Young University, echoed these sentiments. He believed that his wife’s association with Hildebrandt significantly impacted their marital relationship. Franke became more distant, frequently leaving Kevin to care for their children while she traveled on business with Hildebrandt. Kester reported that "Kevin was supportive, hoping that these trips were part of Ruby's self-development journey."    Julie Deru, one of Franke’s sisters, expressed her discomfort with Hildebrandt’s teachings. "We were concerned about the messages Ruby started to propagate at family gatherings. They felt alien and contrary to what we knew."    Indeed, as time went on, Franke’s content began shifting. Once filled with wholesome family moments, her channels were gradually dominated by Hildebrandt, with topics such as "tactics of deception," "establishing a truth declaration," and discourses against "lust."    The crux of the concerns revolved around ConneXions' dubious counseling practices. Kevin Franke himself was roped into a men's group supported by Hildebrandt. For over a year, he was subjected to what many describe as emotional manipulation, being labeled "greedy," "narcissistic," and "selfish." These sessions were believed to be the driving force behind Kevin’s decision to move out, a move purportedly influenced by Hildebrandt.    However, perhaps the most shocking revelation came from Jessi Hildebrandt, Jodi's niece. In a heart-wrenching interview, she detailed her traumatic experiences while in Jodi's care as a teenager. Her stories of being tied up, blindfolded, and isolated for hours echoed the harrowing ordeal faced by Franke's child. Jessi declared, "Jodi firmly believes that shame should be punished severely."    Pam Bodtcher, described as "Jodi's surveillance," was another figure deeply involved in ConneXions. Jessi hinted at her complicit role, painting a picture of an intricate web of manipulation and control.    The dark saga culminated in August when the police were called to check on one of Franke's children. The subsequent investigation unveiled disturbing truths about what had transpired behind closed doors.    As the community grapples with this harrowing revelation, many believe that Hildebrandt was the mastermind. Franke's longtime friend summed it up: "While Ruby is not innocent, I believe there's hope for her to be rehabilitated. Jodi, however, is a different story."    This tale serves as a sobering reminder of the dangers lurking behind seemingly perfect facades and the importance of discernment in the world of online influence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

3 Loka 202311min

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

1 Loka 202313min