50: Special 50th episode (LIVE)
Everything Hertz14 Syys 2017

50: Special 50th episode (LIVE)

Dan and James celebrate their 50th episode with a live recording! They cover a blog post that argues grad students shouldn’t be publishing, what’s expected of today’s postdocs, and the ‘tone’ debate in psychology. BONUS: You can also watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz podcast channel (link below) Other stuff they cover: James offends a sociologist, as is his wont The argument for why grad students shouldn’t publish Gatekeepers controlling what’s being published Editors that Google authors before sending papers out for review Judging researchers on their institution’s location James on networking How do you challenge reviewers when they say you are "too junior" The standards of Frontiers papers Writing review papers for the wrong reasons Why are there so many meta-analyses? Pre-registering your meta-analysis Registered reports vs. pre-registration What’s expected of today’s postdocs How many papers should you peer review? How James tried to ward off review requests Things that millennials are ruining The role of humour in the tone debate Links Episode video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj3WsTiUuLo&t=3s The “should grad students publish" article: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/08/23/renewed-debate-over-whether-graduate-students-should-publish#.WaGAeN_v8jI.link Prospero meta-analysis registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ Eiko Fried’s tweet on postdoc expectations: https://twitter.com/eikofried/status/902470702892290048 James’ publons profile: https://publons.com/author/1171358/james-aj-heathers#profile JANE: http://jane.biosemantics.org Anonymous PubPeer comments: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E0DAEBEC6183646F18F4FAED03B1A#7

Jaksot(195)

171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)

171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)

We chat with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris about the science of cons and how we can we can avoid being taken in. We also cover the fate of the gorilla suit from the 'invisible gorilla' study, ...

20 Heinä 202355min

170: Holy sheet

170: Holy sheet

We discuss evidence of data tampering in a series of experiments investigating dishonesty revealed via excel spreadsheet metadata and how traditional peer review is not suited for the detection of dat...

23 Kesä 202350min

169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)

169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)

In our first ever live and in-person episode, we chat with Sandra Matz about the opportunities and challenges for using big data to understand human behavior Links Everybody lies book (https://www.ama...

31 Touko 202343min

168: Meta-meta-science

168: Meta-meta-science

Dan and James discuss a new paper that reviews potential issues in metascience practices. They also talk about their upcoming live show in May in Frankfurt. Links Our upcoming show on May 8th, which w...

27 Huhti 202348min

167: Diluted effect sizes

167: Diluted effect sizes

Dan and James chat about a new study that uses homeopathy studies to evaluate bias in biomedical research, a new-ish type of authorship fraud, and the potential for Chat GPT peer-review. Links The Cha...

16 Maalis 202343min

166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?

166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?

Dan and James discuss a recent paper that claims that science is becoming less disruptive over time and the suggested causes for this decline. Links * Our prior episode (https://everythinghertz.com/16...

25 Tammi 202352min

165: Self-promotion

165: Self-promotion

Dan and James chat about self-promotion in academia, how they both wish they had doctoral defences (these aren't a thing in Australia), and replacing error bars with the letter "t". Links and stuff * ...

30 Joulu 202241min

164: The great migration

164: The great migration

James and Dan discuss the recent migration of scientists from Twitter to Mastodon and the pros and cons of sharing the prior submission history of manuscripts The Mastodon thread (https://mas.to/@Ste...

28 Marras 202249min

Suosittua kategoriassa Tiede

tiedekulma-podcast
rss-mita-tulisi-tietaa
rss-poliisin-mieli
rss-metsantuntijat-podcast
filocast-filosofian-perusteet
rss-duodecim-lehti
mielipaivakirja
rss-astetta-parempi-elama-podcast
rss-tiedetta-vai-tarinaa
rss-luontopodi-samuel-glassar-tutkii-luonnon-ihmeita
university-of-eastern-finland
utelias-mieli
docemilia
menologeja-tutkimusmatka-vaihdevuosiin
rss-bios-podcast
rss-ranskaa-raakana
rss-ylistys-elaimille
rss-lapsuuden-rakentajat-podcast
rss-lihavuudesta-podcast
rss-sosiopodi