87: Improving the scientific poster (with Mike Morrison)
Everything Hertz1 Heinä 2019

87: Improving the scientific poster (with Mike Morrison)

We chat with Mike Morrison, a former User Experience (UX) designer who quit his tech career to research how we can bring UX design principles to science. We discuss Mike's recently introduced 'better poster' format and why scientists should think carefully about UX. Here's what we cover: What’s the story behind the “better poster?” The Better Poster video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RwJbhkCA58) The Better Poster template (https://osf.io/ef53g/) The importance of minimising cognitive load Science isn’t badly designed, it’s not even designed at all What is good User Experience (UX)? The most important feature of SciHub Version 2 of the ‘better poster’ Weird poster designs that James has seen over the years The Fish Market study (https://peerj.com/articles/7138/) Common misunderstandings of the better poster Empirically investigating the performance of the Better Poster The meta-meta poster How better posters get better questions Mike’s next target: Better Presentations Andrew York’s Github paper (https://andrewgyork.github.io/remote_refocus/) A special give-away! Other links - Mike on twitter (https://twitter.com/mikemorrison) - Dan on twitter (www.twitter.com/dsquintana) - James on twitter (www.twitter.com/jamesheathers) - Everything Hertz on twitter (www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) - Everything Hertz on Facebook (www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/) Music credits: Lee Rosevere (freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/) Support us on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast) and get bonus stuff! $1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes) Episode citation and permanent link Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, July 1) "Improving the scientific poster (with Mike Morrison)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BNP7E (https://osf.io/bnp7e/) Special Guest: Mike Morrison.

Jaksot(195)

163: eLife's new peer review model

163: eLife's new peer review model

Dan and James discuss eLife's new peer review model, in which they no longer make accept/reject decisions at the end of the peer-review process. Instead, papers invited for peer review will receive an...

7 Marras 202254min

162: Status bias in peer review

162: Status bias in peer review

We chat about a recent preprint describing an experiment on the role of author status in peer-review, dodgy conference proceedings journals, and authorships for sale. Links * James' blogpost (https://...

17 Loka 202250min

161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)

161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)

Dan and James are joined by Brian Nosek (Co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science) to discuss the recent White House Office of Science Technology & Policy memo ensuring free, i...

12 Syys 202247min

160: Whistleblowing

160: Whistleblowing

Dan and James share ten rules for whistleblowing academic misconduct. The Safe Faculty Project (https://www.safefacultyproject.org/) website SLAPP statues https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategiclawsu...

31 Elo 202250min

159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)

159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)

Dan and James are joined by Saloni Dattani for a chat about the history of peer review, a reimagination of what peer review could look like, what happens when you actually pay peer reviewers, peer re...

15 Elo 202251min

158: Word limits

158: Word limits

By popular demand, Dan and James chat about journal word and page limits.They also the debate around a recent meta-analysis on nudge interventions. Links * The PNAS nudge meta-analysis (https://doi.or...

1 Elo 202245min

157: Limitations

157: Limitations

Dan and James discuss a new preprint that examined the types of limitations authors discuss in their published articles and whether these limitation types has changed over the past decade, especially ...

11 Heinä 202246min

156: Looking for seeders

156: Looking for seeders

Dan and James discuss a recent paper that concluded (again) that most researchers aren't compliant with their published data sharing statement and whether torrents (remember them?) are a viable altern...

21 Kesä 202250min

Suosittua kategoriassa Tiede

tiedekulma-podcast
rss-mita-tulisi-tietaa
rss-poliisin-mieli
filocast-filosofian-perusteet
rss-metsantuntijat-podcast
mielipaivakirja
rss-duodecim-lehti
university-of-eastern-finland
docemilia
menologeja-tutkimusmatka-vaihdevuosiin
rss-bios-podcast
rss-ranskaa-raakana
rss-astetta-parempi-elama-podcast
rss-tiedetta-vai-tarinaa
rss-ylistys-elaimille
rss-luontopodi-samuel-glassar-tutkii-luonnon-ihmeita
rss-lihavuudesta-podcast
rss-sosiopodi