97: Slow science
Everything Hertz2 Joulu 2019

97: Slow science

Dan and James discuss the concept of "slow science", which has been proposed in order to improve the quality of scientific research and create a more sustainable work environment. Here's what they cover in this episode Thank you patrons day! Social media algorithms reward outrage, not quality of substance A paper on slow science (https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/fulltext/S1364-6613(19)30242-6) from Uta Frith, which includes a proposal of publication limits Is information overload really a problem? The META platform (https://www.meta.org/) for a weekly research digest Would reducing the volume of publications really improve quality? The working paper (https://osf.io/z47w3/) that simulated the quality vs. quantity question The slow professor book https://utorontopress.com/ca/the-slow-professor-3 Michael Frank’s paper on N-best evaluation (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364661319302347) Some institutions are now screening papers before submission to check for errors Other links - Dan on twitter (www.twitter.com/dsquintana) - James on twitter (www.twitter.com/jamesheathers) - Everything Hertz on twitter (www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) - Everything Hertz on Facebook (www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/) Music credits: Lee Rosevere (freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/) Support us on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast) and get bonus stuff! $1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes) Episode citation and permanent link Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, December 2) "Slow Science", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XEU42, Retrieved from https://osf.io/xeu42/

Jaksot(195)

163: eLife's new peer review model

163: eLife's new peer review model

Dan and James discuss eLife's new peer review model, in which they no longer make accept/reject decisions at the end of the peer-review process. Instead, papers invited for peer review will receive an...

7 Marras 202254min

162: Status bias in peer review

162: Status bias in peer review

We chat about a recent preprint describing an experiment on the role of author status in peer-review, dodgy conference proceedings journals, and authorships for sale. Links * James' blogpost (https://...

17 Loka 202250min

161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)

161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)

Dan and James are joined by Brian Nosek (Co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science) to discuss the recent White House Office of Science Technology & Policy memo ensuring free, i...

12 Syys 202247min

160: Whistleblowing

160: Whistleblowing

Dan and James share ten rules for whistleblowing academic misconduct. The Safe Faculty Project (https://www.safefacultyproject.org/) website SLAPP statues https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategiclawsu...

31 Elo 202250min

159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)

159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)

Dan and James are joined by Saloni Dattani for a chat about the history of peer review, a reimagination of what peer review could look like, what happens when you actually pay peer reviewers, peer re...

15 Elo 202251min

158: Word limits

158: Word limits

By popular demand, Dan and James chat about journal word and page limits.They also the debate around a recent meta-analysis on nudge interventions. Links * The PNAS nudge meta-analysis (https://doi.or...

1 Elo 202245min

157: Limitations

157: Limitations

Dan and James discuss a new preprint that examined the types of limitations authors discuss in their published articles and whether these limitation types has changed over the past decade, especially ...

11 Heinä 202246min

156: Looking for seeders

156: Looking for seeders

Dan and James discuss a recent paper that concluded (again) that most researchers aren't compliant with their published data sharing statement and whether torrents (remember them?) are a viable altern...

21 Kesä 202250min

Suosittua kategoriassa Tiede

tiedekulma-podcast
rss-mita-tulisi-tietaa
rss-poliisin-mieli
filocast-filosofian-perusteet
rss-metsantuntijat-podcast
mielipaivakirja
rss-duodecim-lehti
university-of-eastern-finland
docemilia
menologeja-tutkimusmatka-vaihdevuosiin
rss-bios-podcast
rss-ranskaa-raakana
rss-astetta-parempi-elama-podcast
rss-tiedetta-vai-tarinaa
rss-ylistys-elaimille
rss-luontopodi-samuel-glassar-tutkii-luonnon-ihmeita
rss-lihavuudesta-podcast
rss-sosiopodi