The stories we tell ourselves about AI

The stories we tell ourselves about AI

Applications for our second cohort of Media Mastery for New AI Protagonists are now open! Join this 5-week program to level up your media impact alongside a dynamic community of emerging experts in AI politics and power—at no cost to you. In this episode, we chat with Daniel Stone, a participant from our first cohort, about his work. Apply by Sunday, September 29th!


The adoption of new technologies is driven by stories. A story is a shortcut to understanding something complex. Narratives can lock us into a set of options that are…terrible. The kicker is that narratives are hard to detect and even harder to influence.

But how reliable are our narrators? And how can we use story as strategy?

The good news is that experts are working to unravel the narratives around AI. All so that folks with public interest in mind can change the game.

This week Alix sat down with three researchers looking at three AI narrative questions. She spoke to Hanna Barakat about how the New York Times reports on AI; John Tanner, who scraped and analysed huge amounts of YouTube videos to find narrative patterns; and Daniel Stone, who studied and deconstructed metaphors that power collective understanding about AI.

In this ep we ask:

  • What are the stories we tell ourselves about AI? And why do we let industry pick them?
  • How do these narratives change what is politically possible?
  • What can public interest organisations and advocates do to change the narrative game?

Hanna Barakat is a research analyst for Computer Says Maybe, working at the intersection of emerging technologies and complex systems design. She graduated from Brown University in 2022 with honors in International Development Studies and a focus in Digital Media Studies.

Jonathan Tanner founded Rootcause after more than fifteen years working in senior communications roles for high-profile politicians, CEOs, philanthropists and public thinkers across the world. In this time he has worked across more than a dozen countries running diverse teams whilst writing keynote speeches, securing front page headlines, delivering world-first social media moments and helping to secure meaningful changes to public policy.

Daniel Stone is currently undertaking research with Cambridge University’s Centre for Future Intelligence and is the Executive Director of Diffusion.Au. He is a Policy Fellow with the Chifley Research Centre and a Policy Associate at the Centre for Responsible Technology Australia.

Jaksot(116)

Exhibit X: The Courts

Exhibit X: The Courts

Imagine: something horrible has happened and the only evidence you have is a video posted online. Can you submit it into evidence in court? Well, it’s complicated.In part 4 of our Exhibit X series, Al...

16 Elo 202444min

Exhibit X: The Litigators

Exhibit X: The Litigators

Often it feels as though the cases and lawsuits brought against big tech firms are continuously piling up, but there never seems to be any resulting justice or resolution. There are many good reasons ...

9 Elo 202431min

Exhibit X: The Whistleblower

Exhibit X: The Whistleblower

In part 2 of Exhibit X, Alix interviewed Frances Haugen, who In 2021 blew the whistle on Meta; they were sitting on the knowledge that their products were harmful to kids, and yet — shocker — they con...

2 Elo 202431min

Exhibit X: Tech and Tobacco

Exhibit X: Tech and Tobacco

Here is something you’re probably tired of hearing: Big Tech is responsible for a bottomless brunch of societal harms. And they are not being held accountable. Right now it feels as though we hear con...

26 Heinä 202427min

New mini-series: Exhibit X

New mini-series: Exhibit X

In the Exhibit X series Alix and Prathm sink their fingernails into the tangled universe of litigation and Big Tech; how have the courts held Big Tech firms accountable for their various harms over th...

18 Heinä 20243min

What the FAccT? Evidence of bias. Now what?

What the FAccT? Evidence of bias. Now what?

In part four of our FAccT deep dive, Alix joins Marta Ziosi and Dasha Pruss to discuss their paper “Evidence of What, for Whom? The Socially Contested Role of Algorithmic Bias in a Predictive Policing...

12 Heinä 202425min

What the FAccT? First law, bad law

What the FAccT? First law, bad law

In this episode, we speak with Lara Groves and Jacob Metcalf  at the seventh annual FAccT conference in Rio de Janeiro.In part four of our FAccT deep dive, Alix joins Lara Groves and Jacob Metcalf  to...

5 Heinä 202423min

What the FAccT?: Abandoning Algorithms

What the FAccT?: Abandoning Algorithms

In this episode, we speak with Nari Johnson and Sanika Moharana at this year’s FAccT conference in Rio de Janeiro.In part two of our FAccT deep dive, Alix joins Nari Johnson and Sanika Moharana to dis...

28 Kesä 202429min

Suosittua kategoriassa Yhteiskunta

i-dont-like-mondays
sita
olipa-kerran-otsikko
kaksi-aitia
siita-on-vaikea-puhua
hupiklubi
uutiscast
ihme-ja-kumma
poks
antin-palautepalvelu
gogin-ja-janin-maailmanhistoria
kolme-kaannekohtaa
mamma-mia
rss-murhan-anatomia
yopuolen-tarinoita-2
aikalisa
rss-palmujen-varjoissa
meidan-pitais-puhua
loukussa
kummitusjuttuja