Does High REV Signal a Blockchain's Strength or Its User Exploitation? - Ep. 841
Unchained27 Touko 2025

Does High REV Signal a Blockchain's Strength or Its User Exploitation? - Ep. 841

A debate has been heating up on crypto Twitter about Real Economic Value (REV) — a metric meant to measure the value blockchains accrue from user activity. REV includes transaction fees and MEV tips, but excludes issuance — the inflationary rewards paid to validators. Some say it’s the clearest window into genuine usage. Others argue it’s a flawed and misleading proxy. So we brought the argument to Unchained. Tom Dunleavy, Head of Venture at Varys Capital, says fees are headed to zero, and blockchains shouldn’t be valued like companies. Meanwhile, Austin Federa, Co-founder of DoubleZero, believes REV offers a real lens on activity, maturity, and demand. The conversation covers: Whether REV is a meaningful metric (and how to game it) Whether L2 tokens are fundamentally broken What happens to security when fees (and MEV) go to zero If high REV signals product-market fit or just economic noise How to value blockchains, if not with REV Visit our website for breaking news, analysis, op-eds, articles to learn about crypto, and much more: unchainedcrypto.com Thank you to our sponsors! Bitwise Guests: Tom Dunleavy, Head of Venture at Varys Capital Austin Federa, Co-founder of DoubleZero Timestamps: 👋 0:00 Intro 📊 2:50 What REV actually measures and why it’s sparking so much debate 💸 4:33 Why fees that don’t go to the protocol are included in this metric 🪙 14:43 Whether L2 tokens are fundamentally worthless 🧮 15:53 How to factor Ethereum L2s into the REV equation 📉 18:15 Why Tom thinks all fees are going to zero and what that means for value accrual 📈 34:06 Austin defends REV and explains why it reflects real user demand ⚠️ 37:07 MEV debate: is it a feature or a flaw? 🔀 42:59 Why Solana might not follow Ethereum’s REV path 🛡️ 44:18 Who secures the network when MEV goes to zero 🤔 53:46 Whether high REV means success 🚫 59:46 Why Austin calls out Jesse Pollak’s “no sandwiching” claim on Base 🌄 1:02:30 Whether Solana’s Alpenglow proposal could reshape MEV 🔄 1:03:43 How REV might rise even as MEV declines 👑 1:07:11 Why Bitcoin lives in its own reality when it comes to metrics 🎮 1:09:57 How protocols can game the REV metric 📐 1:15:19 What other metrics matter when valuing blockchains Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Tämä jakso on lisätty Podme-palveluun avoimen RSS-syötteen kautta eikä se ole Podmen omaa tuotantoa. Siksi jakso saattaa sisältää mainontaa.

Jaksot(1145)

How Microsoft Won in Its Revised Deal With OpenAI

How Microsoft Won in Its Revised Deal With OpenAI

Microsoft restructured its agreement with OpenAI, and Ram Ahluwalia has a clear verdict: Microsoft won.  In this segment from Bits + Bips, Ram explains the three things Microsoft secured from the new...

29 Huhti 3min

How Morpho Survived a $300M DeFi Hack With Only $1M Exposure

How Morpho Survived a $300M DeFi Hack With Only $1M Exposure

People think of Aave and Morpho as competitors. But Morpho only lost $1 million when North Korea drained $300M from a DeFi protocol. The architecture explains why. ===================================...

29 Huhti 37min

Bits + Bips: How the Kelp rsETH Hack Left Aave With $193M in Bad Debt

Bits + Bips: How the Kelp rsETH Hack Left Aave With $193M in Bad Debt

Luke Leasure and Shaunda Devens of Blockworks Research explain how three compounding failures, Kelp's one-of-one bridge signer, Layer Zero's permissive default settings, and Aave's failure to flag it ...

28 Huhti 9min

Arbitrum Froze $70M From North Korea? Griff Green on the Decision + Miguel Morel on the Hack

Arbitrum Froze $70M From North Korea? Griff Green on the Decision + Miguel Morel on the Hack

KelpDAO’s hackers left telltale signs pointing to one culprit, North Korea. Then, in a surprise move, the Arbitrum Security Council decided to fight back. ============================================...

26 Huhti 1h 7min

Did Arbitrum Violate DRPK's Property Rights? No, Because It Wasn't Their Property

Did Arbitrum Violate DRPK's Property Rights? No, Because It Wasn't Their Property

The $300M KelpDAO exploit became a watershed moment for DeFi, and the Arbitrum Security Council voted froze $70M worth of stolen funds. Is this a slippery slope or learning from history? Thank you...

24 Huhti 1h 20min

DEX in the City: KelpDAO vs. LayerZero: Who Is Liable When a DeFi Protocol Is Hacked?

DEX in the City: KelpDAO vs. LayerZero: Who Is Liable When a DeFi Protocol Is Hacked?

A $300M bridge exploit is forcing the question DeFi has been avoiding: when users lose money, who is actually responsible — the protocol, the infrastructure provider, or both? Thanks to our sponsor...

24 Huhti 47min

The Chopping Block: Kelp DAO Hack Fallout, DeFi Socialized Losses & Arbitrum’s “Reverse Hack”

The Chopping Block: Kelp DAO Hack Fallout, DeFi Socialized Losses & Arbitrum’s “Reverse Hack”

The Chopping Block crew and guest Monet Supply break down the $200M Kelp DAO bridge exploit, finger-pointing between LayerZero, Kelp DAO, and Aave, the wild “reverse hack” Arbitrum bailout, and what i...

23 Huhti 1h 1min

Is Canton Permissionless? CEO Says Yes, but SuperValidators Need Approval

Is Canton Permissionless? CEO Says Yes, but SuperValidators Need Approval

Digital Asset’s CEO faces pointed questions about Canton’s core claims and admits something surprising about the network’s architecture. ======================================================== As B...

22 Huhti 1h 26min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

uutiscast
aikalisa
politiikan-puskaradio
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
tervo-halme
rss-podme-livebox
rss-pinnalla
rss-asiastudio
otetaan-yhdet
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
rss-kaikki-uusiksi
aihe
the-ulkopolitist
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
rss-girls-finish-f1rst
rikosmyytit
rss-uusi-juttu-mediastartupin-tarina
rss-ulkopoditiikkaa
viisupodi