Texas Flooding was CAUSED by Weather Manipulation and DAM RELEASES.  North Carolina & Three Gorges Dam in China, ALSO Dam Releases. 1931 Yangtze River Basin in China killed Millions.

Texas Flooding was CAUSED by Weather Manipulation and DAM RELEASES.  North Carolina & Three Gorges Dam in China, ALSO Dam Releases. 1931 Yangtze River Basin in China killed Millions.

I always like Walking in the Rain so no one can see me Crying. - Charlie Chaplin

Hurricane Helene -North Carolina LAND GRAB – to make room for TESLA mining in the EXACT same area? They want your land. FEMA Robbery in action. (psychopathinyourlife.com)

DAMS Create Droughts. WHY all the DAMS in Egypt Ethiopia Sudan Turkey Iraq & Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam? (psychopathinyourlife.com)

DAMS will DESTROY the RAINFOREST * Lula is a Lying TRANNY * Soil & Sediment Robbing of Nutrients and means to Survive = DAMS (psychopathinyourlife.com)

State-of-the-art dams, cascade reservoirs turn floods from beast into resource - Global Times

Hydroelectricity - Wikipedia

How Hydroelectric Power Works (tva.com)

How Is Electricity Generated From Hydroelectric Dams or Ocean Tides? - The Environmental Literacy Council (enviroliteracy.org)

Some things children need to do in an emergency and how their phones can help:
  1. Call emergency services. Children should be taught to dial 911 or the appropriate emergency number on their phones. On many Android phones, pressing the power or side button five times in quick succession will start a countdown, after which the phone will call emergency services. On an iPhone, after pressing the side button five times, the "Emergency Call" option needs to be swiped to place the call.
  2. Provide accurate information. Children need to be able to describe the situation and say where they are when they call 911.
  3. Stay calm. It's important for children to remain calm and speak clearly when answering the 911 operator's questions.
  4. Know their home address. Children should help memorize their home address, which can be written down on an emergency contact sheet.
  5. Use a panic button. A panic button can be set up on a smart home device, such as a Philips Hue dimmer switch, to call specific numbers in the contact list.
  6. Practice. Role-playing a 911 call with the child can help them practice.
  7. Understand the risks. Children must be able to determine whether it is safe to call 911 from where they are. For example, they should be told to leave the house immediately if there is a fire.
  8. Follow directions. Children should follow directions and help with activities like bringing toys and furniture inside to prevent them from blowing away.
  9. Know basic first aid. Older children can be taught basic first aid techniques, but it's important to emphasize the importance of calling an ambulance first.
  10. Have a safety plan. Children should know what to do in the case of fire, including agreed escape routes and meeting points.
1931 Central China Floods: The Deadliest Natural Disaster in Human History Region Affected

Yangtze River Basin (primarily)

  • Also included the Yellow River, Huai River, and other tributaries in central and eastern China
  • Provinces impacted: Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, Anhui, Jiangsu, and parts of Henan
  • Cause: Converging Hydrological Extremes
  • Unusual Spring Snowmelt from mountains
  • Monsoon Rainfall: Over 24 inches (600 mm) of rain fell during July 1931
  • Cyclones: A series of cyclones struck eastern China between July and August, intensifying rainfall
  • Soil Saturation: The land was already saturated from above-average rainfall since late 1930

Scale of Flooding

  • Nearly 70,000 square miles (≈180,000 km²) submerged
  • The Yangtze River expanded to appear more like an inland sea than a river
  • Some towns and cities were underwater for over 3 months
  • Widespread destruction of levees, dikes, and embankments built during the Qing and Republican eras
  • Death Toll
  • Chinese government estimate (1930s): 2 million dead
  • Modern scholarly estimates: 3.7 to 4 million people
  • Includes flood-related drowning, famine, and disease outbreaks (especially cholera and dysentery)

Why Was the Impact So Catastrophic?

  • No major flood control infrastructure existed at the time
  • Poor communications and disaster relief coordination during the Republican era
  • Large-scale deforestation and farming weakened watersheds
  • Densely populated floodplains along the Yangtze worsened exposure
  • Disease and starvation followed the physical flood damage

Response & Aftermath

  • Nationalist government lacked resources to respond effectively
  • Foreign aid (from missionary and Red Cross groups) was mobilized, but not at scale
  • Sparked new thinking in China about:
  • Hydraulic engineering
  • Need for dams, levees, and hydropower infrastructure

Historical Legacy: Led to Future Mega-Dam Projects

  • The devastation of 1931 helped lay the ideological foundation for:
  • Three Gorges Dam (planned since 1950s, built 1994–2012)
  • A national push for hydraulic modernization under Mao Zedong and later Deng Xiaoping
  • Modern Context: How the Yangtze Flood System Has Changed

Factor 1931 Floods Modern Yangtze System Rainfall 24–30 inches in July alone Still susceptible to extreme monsoon rainfall Flood Protection Weak dikes, no large dams Massive dam system: Three Gorges, Gezhouba Death Toll 2–4 million Significantly reduced due to early warning, dams Risk Factors Deforestation, poor communication Urban overdevelopment, seismic risks Flood Area 70,000 mi² (180,000 km²) Modern dams reduce flooding but shift risks
  • Lessons and Risks Today
  • While dams have reduced downstream flood severity, they introduce new risks:
  • Structural failure (due to seismicity, aging)
  • Upstream landslides
  • Reservoir-induced earthquakes
  • Social displacement and environmental destruction
  • Climate change and extreme rainfall still threaten the Yangtze basin, especially during monsoon months (June–August)
  • Notable Modern Events Related to the Yangtze River
  • 1998 Yangtze Floods: Over 3,000 dead; 14 million homeless
  • 2020 Yangtze Flood Crisis: Tested the limits of the Three Gorges Dam
  • Ongoing sedimentation and pollution concerns in the Three Gorges Reservoir

Three Gorges Dam – Major Concerns

  1. Structural Cracks
    Shortly after its 2003 filling, inspectors detected around 80 hairline cracks in the dam. Officials stated they were repaired and within design tolerances, but critics doubt long-term durability.
  2. Seismic Risks
    The dam sits atop the Jiuwanxi and Zigui–Badong faults. Water pressure changes have triggered hundreds of small tremors, and experts warn reservoir-induced seismicity could exacerbate fault instability
  3. Landslides and Bank Erosion
    Rapid reservoir-level fluctuations have destabilized slopes. Over 4,600 landslide events were recorded in 11 months after initial filling; more than 7,400 hazard points have been identified since
  4. Sedimentation and Water Pollution
    Slowed river flow traps silt, gravel, pollution, and industrial runoff. This has caused harbor blockages and water quality degradation. Managing sediment and pollution has required massive investments .
  5. Ecosystem Decline
    The dam has disrupted fish migration, reduced downstream yields by up to 70%, and contributed to extinction of species like the baiji dolphin.
  6. Social and Cultural Costs
    Between 1.1 and 1.4 million people were displaced, and nearly 1,300 archaeological sites were submerged. Resettlements often shifted residents to unstable, landslide-prone terrain.

How It Works with Other Yangtze River Dams

China operates a coordinated cascade of dams on the Yangtze and its tributaries for flood control, power, and navigation. The system includes major dams such as:

  • Three Gorges Dam
  • Gezhouba Dam (downstream, run-of-river, 2,715 MW)
  • Wudongde, Xiluodu, Xiangjiaba, Baihetan (on the Jinsha River upstream)

Joint Operation Strategy:

  • Flood control: Upstream dams retain peak flows during heavy rains, reducing downstream flood risks.
  • Hydropower synergy: Coordinated release of water produces electricity while maintaining reservoir safety.
  • Navigation stability: Controlled flows ensure consistent shipping levels below Gezhouba and Three Gorges.
  • Environmental flow management: Gradual releases support downstream ecosystems, though balancing this with power generation remains complex .

Recent Performance:

  • In summer floods (e.g., 2020), the system—including 47 dams—reduced peak flows by about 30%, securing flood protection equivalent to a 1-in-100-year event globaltimes.cn.

Summary

The Three Gorges Dam faces significant long-term challenges: structural integrity, seismic activity, landslides, sediment buildup, water pollution, ecosystem damage, and social displacement. It operates as the centerpiece of a vast, integrated dam system aimed at flood control, hydropower production, and navigation support. While the cascade has demonstrably reduced flood impacts, it comes with a high environmental, geological, and society issues.

How Power is Generated and Transmitted from Dams:

Water Flow & Turbines:

  • The dam holds back a reservoir of water.
  • When water is released from the reservoir, it flows through intake tunnels or penstocks (large pipes) down to turbines.
  • The force of flowing water spins the turbines.

Turbines Drive Generators:

  • Each turbine is connected to an electrical generator.
  • As the turbine spins, it turns the generator rotor, converting mechanical energy into electrical energy via electromagnetic induction.

Powerhouse / Power Station:

  • The powerhouse is the facility built at the dam where turbines and generators are housed.
  • The electricity generated here is typically at a medium voltage (e.g., 11kV to 33kV).

Step-Up Transformers:

  • Near the powerhouse, transformers step up (increase) the voltage to a higher transmission voltage (e.g., 69kV, 138kV, or higher).
  • Higher voltage reduces energy loss when electricity is sent over long distances.

Transmission Lines:

  • The high-voltage electricity is carried away from the dam via overhead or underground transmission lines.
  • These lines connect to the regional or national electric grid.

Substations and Step-Down Transformers:

  • Near populated areas or industrial users, substations reduce voltage to safer levels for distribution.
  • Distribution lines then deliver the power to homes, businesses, and industries.
Summary:
  • The dam’s powerhouse is the actual power station where mechanical energy from flowing water becomes electrical energy.
  • The power generated there is stepped up by transformers to high voltages for transmission.
  • High-voltage power lines carry electricity from the dam’s power station to substations and eventually to end users.

The disaster in Texas is severe flash flooding along the Guadalupe River in central Texas, not a dam collapse. Here's the detailed situation:

What is the same? North Carolina had a dam overflow. Texas - also near a dam. China is now in a disaster zone from rain and DAMs in the area. Dams are sitting time bombs; they have a long history. What happens is quite simple, they create a lot of rain, the dams get full, and WHOOPS they have to release the excess water, flooding out people and things in the path.

REPORT: DAMS, FLASH FLOODS & WEATHER MODIFICATION CONNECTIONS

Event: July 2025 Texas Flood Disaster

Dams on the Upper Guadalupe River

Canyon Dam / Canyon Lake

  • Type: Rolled-earth flood-control dam with hydroelectric capacity
  • Construction: 1958–1964; lake filled to conservation level by 1968

Ingram Dam

  • Type: Low-head spillway dam (earth-fill, ~20 ft high)
  • Construction date: Not specified, but in place by the 2000s (has monitoring records from at least 2008) gvlakes.com

Kerrville Lake Dam (Center Point Lake Dam)

  • Type: Earth dam (~20 ft high)
  • Built: 1956

Kerrville Ponding Dam

  • Type: Rock/soil dam (~35 ft high) with outlet gates
  • Built: 1980
Dams on the Lower Guadalupe River (GBRA-managed Hydroelectric Reservoirs)

(All transferred to GBRA management in 1963; dams built 1928–1932)

Lake McQueeney Dam

  • Built: 1927–1928
  • Type: Hydroelectric reservoir dam

Lake Placid Dam

Meadow Lake Dam (Lake Nolte)

  • Constructed: 1931
  • Type: Hydroelectric reservoir dam.

Lake Wood Dam

  • Built: 1931
  • Type: Hydroelectric reservoir dam.

Lake Gonzales Dam

    • Built: 1928–1932 (exact year unspecified)

Lake Dunlap Dam

    • Built: 1928–1932 (same period)

Additional Historic Dam
  • Saffold Dam (Max Starcke Dam) – Seguin

  • Built: originally ~1853 (natural outcropping), expanded in 1938 during park development
  • Purpose: Mill and early hydroelectric power.

Summary Table Dam Name Location Built Type Canyon Dam Above New Braunfels 1958–1964 Flood-control rolled-earth Ingram Dam Near Kerrville Pre-2000s Low-head spillway Kerrville Lake Dam Near Kerrville 1956 Earth dam Kerrville Ponding Dam Near Kerrville 1980 Rock/soil with outlet gates Lake McQueeney Dam West of Seguin 1927–1928 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Placid Dam Near Seguin 1928 Hydroelectric reservoir Meadow Lake Dam (Lake Nolte) Near Seguin 1931 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Wood Dam Gonzales County 1931 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Gonzales Dam Guadalupe County 1928–1932 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Dunlap Dam Guadalupe County 1928–1932 Hydroelectric reservoir Saffold Dam (Seguin) Seguin 1853/1938 Historic mill & hydro dam

Section 1: Overview – Texas Hill Country Flash Flood

Location: Kerr County, Texas (Hunt to Kerrville, along the Guadalupe River)
Date: July 3–4, 2025

Primary Event:

  • A stalled storm system dumped up to 15 inches of rain over the Hill Country in just a few hours.
  • The Guadalupe River surged over 20 feet in under 2 hours, cresting at near-record heights of 29 feet at Hunt.
  • Flash flood emergency issued by the National Weather Service at ~4:00 a.m. on July 4.

Impact:

  • Widespread devastation downstream, especially at summer camps like Camp Mystic.
  • At least 78 people dead, including many children; over 40 missing.

Key Point:
This was not a dam collapse, but rather extreme flash flooding triggered by a high-volume rain event.

Section 2: Dams in the Kerrville/Ingram Region

Major Dams Involved or Nearby:

Canyon Dam (Creates Canyon Lake)

Type: Large rolled-earth flood-control dam

Built: 1958–1964 by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Function: Flood control, water supply, hydroelectricity, recreation

July 2025 Status:

  1. Lake rose ~10 ft to 888 ft (well below spillway threshold of 909 ft)
  1. No uncontrolled overflow
  1. Controlled releases were initiated around July 5–6 to manage lake elevation
  1. Ingram Dam

Type: Small, low-head, 20-foot earth dam near Kerrville

Status:

Overtopped on July 4 — water flowed over the top due to heavy rainfall

No structural breach

No intentional release a passive overflow, not a failure

Did contribute to downstream surge

Kerrville Lake Dam (Center Point Lake Dam)

Earth dam, ~20 feet high, built in 1956

For flood control and recreation

Not implicated in failure

Kerrville Ponding Dam

  1. Small, 35-foot-high rock/soil dam with outlet gates
  1. Built in 1980
  1. For irrigation and water supply

Other Dams Downstream (Managed by GBRA)

These are hydroelectric, recreational, and minor flood-control structures:

  • Lake Dunlap (failed in 2019, rebuilt by 2023)
  • Lake McQueeney
  • Lake Placid
  • Meadow Lake

Section 3: Dam Performance – Key Timeline & Facts

Canyon Dam (Main Flood Control Dam)

  • July 4–5: Lake rose 6–10 ft due to rain; reached 883–888 ft
  • July 5–6: Controlled outflow released (~72.6–106 cfs)
  • Purpose: Prevent spillover by lowering pressure on the dam
  • Result: Helped manage flood risk, did not cause flood
  • Last spillway overflow event: July 2002

Ingram Dam (Low-Head Structure)

  • July 4, 2025 ~4:00 a.m.: Overtopped due to flash flood surge
  • Status: Remained intact
  • No gates opened; no breach
  • Effect: Sudden overflow contributed to surge toward Kerrville and Hunt

Section 4: What Caused the Flood?

Main Cause:

  • A stalled storm dumped 10–15 inches of rain in hours
  • Upstream creeks and tributaries overflowed into the Guadalupe River
  • River levels rose 26–29 ft in a flash flood event, overwhelming all local infrastructure

Not Caused By:

  • No dam breached
  • No dam released water intentionally to cause harm
  • Controlled release from Canyon Dam was minor in comparison to rainfall totals

Misconceptions Addressed:

  • Social media rumors falsely blamed intentional dam releases
  • Authorities confirmed no gates were opened at Ingram
  • Canyon Dam functioned as designed, helping prevent even worse damage

Section 5: Summary Verdict on Dams

  • Canyon Dam: No breach, no overflow. Released small, controlled outflows. Performed well.
  • Ingram Dam: Overtopped due to rain but did not structurally fail.
  • Flood Cause: Extreme rainfall, not dam malfunction or manipulation.

Section 6: Global Context – Dam Risks in China

Three Gorges Dam: Major Structural & Environmental Issues

Risk Category Details Cracks Detected 80+ hairline cracks after initial reservoir filling (2003) Seismic Risk Built near active faults; linked to reservoir-induced earthquakes Landslides & Bank Erosion 4,600+ landslides in first 11 months after filling Sedimentation Massive sediment buildup reduces capacity, degrades water quality Ecosystem Decline Fish migration blocked; several species extinct Social Cost 1.1–1.4 million displaced; 1,300 archaeological sites submerged

How It Works with Other Dams:

  • Part of a 47-dam coordinated cascade along the Yangtze and tributaries
  • Works with: Gezhouba, Xiangjiaba, Baihetan, Wudongde, Xiluodu, etc.
  • Joint Strategy: Flood control, hydropower, sediment management, navigation
  • 2020 Floods: Reduced peak flows by ~30%, avoiding greater disaster

Section 7: Global Pattern – Dam-Driven Flood Complexity

Observations:

  • North Carolina: Recent dam overflow incident
  • China: Major dam zone hit by extreme rain
  • Texas: Flash flooding near multiple dams
  • Pattern:
  • Excessive rainfall (natural or possibly engineered) fills reservoirs
  • When water must be released or overtops spillways, it creates destructive downstream surges
  • Dams are both flood-control assets and potential amplifiers of disaster when overwhelmed

Section 8: Weather Modification Patents (Historical)

A long list of official U.S. weather modification patents exists, dating back to the 19th century:

Year Patent # Title 1891 US462795A Method of producing rainfall 1920 US1338343A Artificial fog/mist production 1946 US2395827A Airplane spray unit (U.S. Dept. of Agriculture) 1951 US2550324A Process for controlling weather 1952 US2582678A Disseminating material from aircraft 1964 US3126155A Silver iodide cloud seeding generator 1969 US3429507A Rainmaker 2001 US20030085296A1 Hurricane and tornado control device …and many more spanning fog dispersal, chemtrails, cloud seeding, and atmospheric manipulation.

Conclusion

  • The July 2025 flood in Texas was not caused by dam failure or intentional release, but by record rainfall in a flood-prone region.
  • Canyon Dam and Ingram Dam remained intact; the latter was overtopped passively.
  • A pattern of extreme rain near dams worldwide (Texas, North Carolina, China) has raised serious questions about how these systems interact with both natural and possibly manipulated weather phenomena.
  • The presence of weather modification patents supports further inquiry into whether some rainfall events may be amplified by artificial means.

Weather Modification Patents

YEAR - PATENT NUMBER - PATENT NAME

  • 1891 – US462795A – method of producing rainfall
  • 1914 – US1103490A – rain maker (balloon images)
  • 1917 – US1225521A – protection from poisonous gas in warfare
  • 1920 – US1338343A – process and apparatus for the production of intense artificial clouds, fogs, or mists
  • 1924 – US1512783A – composition for dispelling fogs
  • 1927 – US1619183A – process of producing smoke clouds from moving aircraft
  • 1928 – US1665267A – process of producting artificial fogs
  • 1932 – US1892132A – atomizing attachment for airplane engine exhausts
  • 1933 – US1928963A – electrical system and method (for spraying chemtrails)
  • 1934 – US1957075A – airplane spray equipment
  • 1936 – US2045865A – skywriting apparatus
  • 1936 – US2052626A – method of dispelling fog (mit)
  • 1937 – US2068987A – process of dissipating fog
  • 1939 – US2160900A – method for vapor clearing
  • 1941 – US2232728A – method and composition for dispelling vapors
  • 1941 – US2257360A – desensitized pentaerythritol tetranitrate explosive
  • 1946 – US2395827A – airplane spray unit (us. dept. of agriculture)
  • 1946 – US2409201A – smoke-producing mixture
  • 1949 – US2476171A – smoke screen generator
  • 1949 – US2480967A – aerial discharge device
  • 1950 – US2527230A – method of crystal formation and precipitation
  • 1951 – US2550324A – process for controlling weather
  • 1951 – US2570867A – method of crystal formation and precipitation (general electric)
  • 1952 – US2582678A – material disseminating apparatus for airplanes
  • 1952 – US2591988A – production of tio2 pigments (dupont)
  • 1952 – US2614083A – metal chloride screening smoke mixture
  • 1953 – US2633455A – smoke generator
  • 1954 – US2688069A – steam generator
  • 1955 – US2721495A – method and apparatus for detecting minute crystal forming particles suspended in a gaseous atmosphere (general electric)
  • 1956 – US2730402A – controllable dispersal device
  • 1957 – US2801322A – decomposition chamber for monopropellant fuel
  • 1958 – US2835530A – process for the condensation of atmospheric humidity and dissolution of fog
  • 1959 – US2881335A – generation of electrical fields (haarp – for re-charging clouds!)
  • 1959 – US2903188A – control of tropical cyclone formation
  • 1959 – US2908442A – method for dispersing natural atmospheric fogs and clouds
  • 1960 – US2962450A – fog dispelling composition (see references)
  • 1960 – US2963975A – cloud seeding carbon dioxide bullet
  • 1961 – US2986360A – aerial insecticide dusting device
  • 1962 – US3044911A – propellant system
  • 1962 – US3056556A – method of artificially influencing the weather
  • 1964 – US3120459A – composite incendiary powder containing metal coated oxidizing salts
  • 1964 – US3126155A – silver iodide cloud seeding generator (main commercial ingredient)
  • 1964 – US3127107A – generation of ice-nucleating crystals
  • 1964 – US3131131A – electrostatic mixing in microbial conversions
  • 1965 – US3174150A – self-focusing antenna system (haarp)
  • 1966 – US3257801A – pyrotechnic composition comprising solid oxidizer, boron and aluminum additive and binder
  • 1966 – US3234357A – electrically heated smoke producing device
  • 1966 – US3274035A – metallic composition for production of hydroscopic smoke
  • 1967 – US3300721A – means for communication through a layer of ionized gases (haarp)
  • 1967 – US3313487A – cloud seeding apparatus
  • 1967 – US3338476A – heating device for use with aerosol containers
  • 1968 – US3410489A – automatically adjustable airfoil spray system with pump
  • 1969 – US3429507A – rainmaker
  • 1969 – US3430533A – aircraft dispensor pod having self-sealing ejection tubes
  • 1969 – US3432208A – fluidized particle dispenser (us air force)
  • 1969 – US3437502A – titanium dioxide pigment coated with silica and aluminum (dupont)
  • 1969 – US3441214A – method and apparatus for seeding clouds
  • 2001 -US20030085296A1 - Hurricane and tornado control device

Jaksot(526)

005 - What Is A Psychopath

005 - What Is A Psychopath

18 Touko 201719min

DIANNE SHARES FROM HER PERSONAL INTERVIEWS WITH PSYCHOPATHS THE ATTRIBUTES THEY LOOK FOR IN THEIR FUTURE VICTIMS.

DIANNE SHARES FROM HER PERSONAL INTERVIEWS WITH PSYCHOPATHS THE ATTRIBUTES THEY LOOK FOR IN THEIR FUTURE VICTIMS.

In Episode 003, Dianne shares from her personal interviews with psychopaths the attributes they look for in their future victims. Dianne also explains just how manipulative psychopaths can be and how they use the strategy of gaslighting to maintain control over their victims. Tune in to find out why psychopaths play the victim and just how far they’ll push to stay in control. Time Stamped Show Notes: 00:10 – Introduction to Psychopath in Your Life 00:19 – Last episode the kind of personalities psychopaths seek out 00:41 – One guy that Dianne interviewed look at how people’s eyes diverged, how confident they seemed, and even the look of the shoulders when it came to choosing their future victims 01:13 – Investigation Discovery Channel has stories about psychopaths 01:34 – Dateline Show also shares psychopaths’ stories 01:58 – Not all psychopaths are murderers 02:10 – Dealing with a psychopath is all about control 02:34 – Dateline Shows are usually about murder 03:24 – When you watch, read or listen to these stories—“Pay attention to when they describe the victim” 03:47 – The victim is the kind and caring person 04:04 – The victim’s kindness is usually what makes them a target 04:58 – Psychopaths victimize themselves in their own minds 05:13 – They flip and turn things around to make you believe they are the victim 05:51 – Dianne cites an example of how they play the victim 06:32 – Dianne was given a complete checklist of how psychopaths convince people they are the victim 07:08 – “The goal is to get you [the victim] to start to feel like you’re the crazy one and test your sense of normality” 07:21 – A description of the Gaslight Concept 07:51 – Dianne refers to the movie, Gas Light—where the term originated 07:57 – To gaslight is to alter the victim’s reality to fit into with what the psychopath wants it to be 08:59 – A psychopath manipulates to make themselves look like the victim 09:41 – Psychopaths test how far they can push their victims 11:06 – Some psychopaths are actually proud to be one 12:20 – Dianne looks forward for questions and comments 12:41 – Get in touch with Dianne on her website or by email 13:45 – Dianne closes the podcast 3 Key Points: Psychopaths may have very specific qualities in mind when looking for potential targets. Dealing with a psychopath is all about control. Beware of “gaslighting”—psychopaths like playing the victim when, in fact, they victimize you! Resources Mentioned: Investigation Discovery Channel & Dateline Show– TV shows where stories and documentaries are about crimes that lead to psychopaths Gaslighting – the tactic psychopaths use to alter your reality   Credits – Show Notes provided by Mallard Creatives – Podcast Production and Editing Service rendered by Red Walk Boy Prod. Look for Ron (Podcast Producer/Editor)

9 Touko 201713min

003 - Interviewing Psychopaths- They Said WHAT

003 - Interviewing Psychopaths- They Said WHAT

In Episode 003, Dianne shares from her personal interviews with psychopaths the attributes they look for in their future victims. Dianne also explains just how manipulative psychopaths can be and how they use the strategy of gaslighting to maintain control over their victims. Tune in to find out why psychopaths play the victim and just how far they’ll push to stay in control. Time Stamped Show Notes: 00:10 – Introduction to Psychopath in Your Life 00:19 – Last episode the kind of personalities psychopaths seek out 00:41 – One guy that Dianne interviewed look at how people’s eyes diverged, how confident they seemed, and even the look of the shoulders when it came to choosing their future victims 01:13 – Investigation Discovery Channel has stories about psychopaths 01:34 – Dateline Show also shares psychopaths’ stories 01:58 – Not all psychopaths are murderers 02:10 – Dealing with a psychopath is all about control 02:34 – Dateline Shows are usually about murder 03:24 – When you watch, read or listen to these stories—“Pay attention to when they describe the victim” 03:47 – The victim is the kind and caring person 04:04 – The victim’s kindness is usually what makes them a target 04:58 – Psychopaths victimize themselves in their own minds 05:13 – They flip and turn things around to make you believe they are the victim 05:51 – Dianne cites an example of how they play the victim 06:32 – Dianne was given a complete checklist of how psychopaths convince people they are the victim 07:08 – “The goal is to get you [the victim] to start to feel like you’re the crazy one and test your sense of normality” 07:21 – A description of the Gaslight Concept 07:51 – Dianne refers to the movie, Gas Light—where the term originated 07:57 – To gaslight is to alter the victim’s reality to fit into with what the psychopath wants it to be 08:59 – A psychopath manipulates to make themselves look like the victim 09:41 – Psychopaths test how far they can push their victims 11:06 – Some psychopaths are actually proud to be one 12:20 – Dianne looks forward for questions and comments 12:41 – Get in touch with Dianne on her website or by email 13:45 – Dianne closes the podcast 3 Key Points: Psychopaths may have very specific qualities in mind when looking for potential targets. Dealing with a psychopath is all about control. Beware of “gaslighting”—psychopaths like playing the victim when, in fact, they victimize you! Resources Mentioned: Investigation Discovery Channel & Dateline Show– TV shows where stories and documentaries are about crimes that lead to psychopaths Gaslighting – the tactic psychopaths use to alter your reality Visit: psychopathinyourlife.com Dianne’s book Psychopaths In Our Lives: My Interviews By Dianne Emerson Is available on Amazon http://www.amazon.com/dp/1517307880 Credits – Podcast Production and Editing Service by Red Walk Boy Production https://www.facebook.com/redwalkboypr... http://podcasteditor.weebly.com/ – Show Notes provided by Mallard Creatives www.mallardcreatives.com/testimonials

9 Touko 201713min

004 - Characteristics of a Psychopath

004 - Characteristics of a Psychopath

Psychopath in Your Life -Podcast Show Notes- In Episode 004, Dianne continues to share from her personal interviews with psychopaths the attributes they look for in their future victims. Dianne also explains how the definition of how a psychopath is diagnosed. Tune in to find out why psychopaths are who they are. You can contact Dianne on her website or by email   Resources Mentioned:  Psychopaths In Our Lives: My Interviews http://www.amazon.com/dp/1517307880 Also available on iBook’s   Credits Show Notes provided by Mallard Creatives

9 Touko 201715min

002 - Psychopaths: Who ARE They

002 - Psychopaths: Who ARE They

In Episode 002, Dianne delves into the very terms used to define a psychopath and some of the attributes they may exhibit. She shares a story of a psychopath’s co-mingled diagnosis and discusses how a psychopath used the guise of kindness in The Fake Rockefeller. Who do psychopaths choose as victims? Why do some psychopaths pretend to be kind and caring? Tune in as Dianne discusses the complicated nature of defining a psychopath, why they try to blend into the crowd, and how being kind and caring can make you a token victim. Time Stamped Show Notes: 00:10 – Introduction to Psychopath in Your Life 00:19 – This podcast is dedicated to be exclusively a discussion about psychopaths 00:31 – Psychopaths, sociopaths, and antisocial personality disorders – what’s the best way to identify them? 00:56 – Dianne will define all these terms on her website and how these terms have evolved over the years 01:33 – Even Psychopaths, themselves, disagree with the terms they’ve been called 02:44 – Dianne shares an example of a “co-mingled diagnosis” 04:07 – Psychopaths look like, walk like, and talk like normal people 04:30 – There are many psychopaths who are aware of their condition 05:07 – There are socialized and non-socialized psychopaths 05:47 – Less socialized ones end up in the prison system 06:13 – Dianne started this podcast to provide information 06:27 – One interviewee said something Dianne will never forgot 06:55 – “The world is becoming more like us than you” 07:13 – Certain industries attract more psychopaths than others 07:30 – Victims are kind and caring people 08:01 – The end game for a psychopath is to gain control; so if you’re kind, you tend to be an easier victim 08:20 – “Living life by painting the red flags white”—kind people tend to ignore the red flags 08:38 – Dianne has heard from victims all these years, but she never had an idea about how much detail goes into the planning 09:09 – Psychopaths may have animal abuse in their background, but can also use this stereotype to their advantage by befriending and taking care of an animal 09:52 – At the end of the day, “Psychopaths don’t love anybody, but themselves” 10:04 – See the story of The Fake Rockefeller 10:40 – Part of how the psychopath blended in was by pretending to be a kind person who wanted to adopt a handicapped dog 11:39 – Psychopaths know the triggers and attributes that kind and caring people exhibit as it becomes a part of their persona 12:14 – We RESPECT your privacy – send an email to dianne@dianneemerson.com for comments and questions 12:34 – Check out Psychopath In Your Life and send an anonymous email 13:23 – Dianne closes the podcast 3 Key Points: Psychopaths behave very normally—you have to keep a close eye to actually identify them properly. The world is becoming filled with more psychopaths than normal people. Victims tend to be those who are kind and caring as they are the ones that are the most likely to give up control to a psychopath. Resources Mentioned: The Fake Rockefeller – A true crime story about a guy who faked his identity to blend with people

2 Touko 201713min

001 – Psychopaths: Let’s Chat

001 – Psychopaths: Let’s Chat

In the first episode, Dianne Emerson introduces the podcast, Psychopath in Your Life. The aim of this podcast is to help people understand who psychopaths are and how to identify them amongst the crowd of people that you rub shoulders with on a daily basis. Tune is as Dianne gives listeners insight into how her journey into this research began, why general information and checklists regarding psychopaths can be confusing and misleading, and what it means to be a “successful” psychopath. Time Stamped Show Notes: 00:10 – Introduction to Psychopath in Your Life 00:19 – This podcast is exclusively dedicated to talk about psychopaths 00:42 – In the 1980’s, Ann Rule was one of the more famous crime writers 00:49 – Her first book was about Ted Bundy, The Stranger Beside Me 01:07 – Jack Olsen also came out with a book called Son 01:19 – The character in this book came from a prominent family 01:52 – This podcast will be about identifying psychopaths 02:04 – Not all the information about psychopaths—the checklists— translate into behavior 02:28 – More information has become available because of the internet 02:40 – To store the information, Dianne set up a free forum 02:52 – She started sorting information and people started sharing their stories 03:16 – Along the way, the discussion forum grew and grew 03:50 – Dianne became fascinated by how many people got involved with a psychopath 04:20 – Who are the psychopaths? They are people who are likely to commit crimes (general prison population) 04:28 – 25% of the prison population are tested and classified as psychopaths 04:35 – 1-3% of the general population are classified as psychopaths 05:04 – How do you know if a person is a psychopath? 05:08 – They fall under the personality disorder cluster 05:14 – “It’s in the genes” 06:03 – Checklists are a good source of information, but they can also cause confusion 06:12 – Smart psychopaths vs. those who end up in prison 06:49 – Psychopaths with criminal minds are easier to identify 06:58 – “The more educated they are, the more they are able to cover their behavior” 07:06 – “The one thing that they don’t have that we have is a conscience” 07:52 – Without a conscience, psychopaths are able to make decisions normal people cannot 08:06 – A practiced psychopath can trick people into believing that they have conscience 09:19 – A psychopath can be a person who’s successful 09:37 – A “successful psychopath” studies and learns different behaviors 10:12 – Normal people tend to overlook things 10:45 – A few years ago, Dianne was contacted by psychopaths who wanted to tell their stories 11:03 – She started a book about the plight of victims of psychopaths 11:13 – Dianne thought there had to be some more information to share to the public regarding how psychopaths operate 11:51 – She decided to interview psychopaths under controlled circumstances 12:46 – One question she asked was, “what was their motivation?” 12:51 – All 3 of them said they wanted to learn 13:00 – They wanted to learn how they can hide their behavior better 13:24 – Dianne’s book is called Psychopaths in Our Lives: My Interviews 14:09 – Stranger danger is overrated 14:31 – Next episode will be about the personalities of psychopaths, clues to look for, and how you can know if you’re a person they’re looking to victimize 14:44 – Dianne looks forward to your questions and comments to continue the conversation! 15:07 – Dianne has spoken with a lot of victims and understands your need for privacy and confidentiality and will deal with your comments/emails with the utmost respect 15:34 – Check out Psychopath In Your Life and send your questions and comments (anonymous, if you’d prefer) that Dianne will be more than willing to address on the air 15:57 – Dianne closes the podcast 3 Key Points: One size does NOT fit all—the checklists of information regarding psychopaths does not always translate into behavior. Practiced and successful psychopaths trick people into believing they are “normal.” It is the psychopaths in our lives who are the ones that can hurt us the most. Resources Mentioned: Ann Rule – a crime writer in the 1980’s The Stranger Beside Me – Ann Rule’s book with Ted Bundy Son – Jack Olsen’s book on an affluent psychopath Psychopaths in Our Lives: My Interviews – Dianne Emerson’s book

2 Touko 201715min

Suosittua kategoriassa Koulutus

rss-murhan-anatomia
psykopodiaa-podcast
voi-hyvin-meditaatiot-2
rss-vegaaneista-tykkaan
aamukahvilla
rss-narsisti
rss-valo-minussa-2
adhd-podi
rss-duodecim-lehti
psykologia
aloita-meditaatio
jari-sarasvuo-podcast
rss-tripsteri
rss-vapaudu-voimaasi
queen-talk
rss-laadukasta-ensihoitoa
ilona-rauhala
puhutaan-koiraa
rss-lasnaolon-hetkia-mindfulness-tutuksi
adhd-tyylilla