491: The compelling saga: How to lead an organization toward success (with Don Schmincke)

491: The compelling saga: How to lead an organization toward success (with Don Schmincke)

Welcome to an episode with best-selling author and dynamic keynote speaker, Don Schmincke.

In this episode, Don spoke about the counterintuitive insights of successful companies, why some organizations have a lack of performance, and the challenges that CEOs today need to address. He also shared his journey and discovery of Biological Leadership and how it relates to the leadership that organizations apply today.

Don has been accused by a NY press agency of providing "the most provocative and sensational view of business than any other speaker today."

What else would you expect from an MIT and Johns Hopkins researcher who was nearly arrested as a capitalist spy in the Soviet Bloc, got shot off an aircraft carrier, survived in the Kurdish capital as the Ayatollah held hostages in Tehran, and developed missile inertial guidance systems while his frat brothers took Vegas (later portrayed in the movie "21")?

Don Schmincke's irreverent humor and unconventional methods provide audiences with such a refreshing change compared to other status-quo topics that he's been called the world's "management renegade." His patent-pending offerings transcend typical programs via refreshing alternatives to trendy theories, unproven methods, and phony "experts." The industry agrees.

Don's renowned books are The Code of the Executive and High Altitude Leadership (with NBC Emmy-nominated climber Chris Warner), which has been published in over 10 languages, endorsed by leading authorities, and recommended by top business schools and featured by CNN, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today, MSNBC.com, and more than 60 industry publications annually.

Don has been the host of the Executive Insights TV series and The Leader's Code radio program, and he has been acclaimed as a Top 10 speaker for the world's largest CEO organization.

The high failure rates of pop-management theories drove Don's research using anthropology, evolutionary genetics, and biology to dispel the "program-of-the-month" syndrome that has frustrated CEOs and HR managers for so long. By using Don's science-driven leadership methods, companies experience accelerated results in sales, employee satisfaction, and cultural alignment. He admits, "Our work is politically incorrect but scientifically accurate."

Get Don's Books Here:

High Altitude Leadership: What the World's Most Forbidding Peaks Teach Us About Success: https://amzn.to/3aUCMcF

The Code of the Executive: Forty-seven Ancient Samurai Principles Essential for Twenty-first Century Leadership Success: https://amzn.to/3xs4TYy

Enjoying this episode? Get access to sample advanced training episodes here: www.firmsconsulting.com/promo

Jaksot(816)

105: Case length and details

105: Case length and details

When we ask candidates for more details in their resume, fit responses and cover letter, they always write longer sentences. There is an important difference between "more details" and "greater length". Most candidates are accustomed to spending just a few minutes on a thought and then writing up long and poorly structured sentences. When we ask for more details, we require more facts in the case interview or fit answer and this, crucially, usually means denser and shorter answers.

25 Marras 20126min

104: Do Not Read Your Interviewer

104: Do Not Read Your Interviewer

It is impossible to read the personality of an interview and we discuss the typical errors candidates make in trying to read too much into the behavior of interviewers: quiet, asking questions, rude, etc. One thing we always caution candidates is to be wary of assuming the friendly person likes them or that the unfriendly person does not like them. Friendliness does not equate to "like" and people display their emotions in very different ways. So, if the interviewer is very friendly, it could go either way.

19 Marras 20129min

103: Kim Kardashian on Analytics

103: Kim Kardashian on Analytics

It is impossible to read the personality of an interview and we discuss the typical errors candidates make in trying to read too much into the behavior of interviewers: quiet, asking questions, rude, etc. One thing we always caution candidates is to be wary of assuming the friendly person likes them or that the unfriendly person does not like them. Friendliness does not equate to "like" and people display their emotions in very different ways. So, if the interviewer is very friendly, it could go either way.

13 Marras 20126min

102: Religion, Politics, Culture etc.

102: Religion, Politics, Culture etc.

When interviewing with a partner or associate from a different culture, it is very easy to say something which can offend a person. Our very own clients have said seemly innocent things only to have it blow up in their face much later, and sometimes in the interview. We have a strict rule of never discussing religion, politics, culture and ethnicity with clients. This avoids topics which can offend people if the wrong things are said. The issue is not about who right, since this is an issue of personal faith and rationality does not always work. It is best to avoid these topics.

7 Marras 201215min

101: Example of Poor Case Dialogue

101: Example of Poor Case Dialogue

Interviewers can only respond to what you say, and poor communication, like in this example, not only wastes time, but is a poor reflection on your candidacy. This is a crucial point to remember. No matter how brilliant you may be, if you cannot communicate that brilliance, and do so in a manner laymen would understand, your intellect counts for little in a case interview since it is all about demonstrated competency. You must demonstrate your competency. Period.

1 Marras 201211min

100: Reading Data Exhibits in 4 Simple Steps

100: Reading Data Exhibits in 4 Simple Steps

The right way to read a graph in a case interview and a set of graphics, is not to look for each insight, but to extract the overall message. Most candidates take enormous pride in reading every insight they can find and proudly highlighting them in no particular order - and the waiting for instructions. While there is nothing wrong with this, it is not the way consultants read cases and requires someone, usually the interviewer, to guide the prioritization of the information and generation of the next steps in the case. You can impress the interviewer by weaving together the one most important message, relevant to the case, from all the data.

26 Loka 201210min

99: Three to Five Step Brainstorming Approach

99: Three to Five Step Brainstorming Approach

Brainstorming is the core of a McKinsey case interview. It is tough to pass a case without brainstorming skills. The problem is that it is hard to find a definition and technique to brainstorm effectively and efficiently. This podcast introduces a 3 step, or 5 depending on the way you list the steps, approach to ease the brainstorming approach. This is a very powerful technique which all consultants use daily and is adapted from a BCG technique.

20 Loka 20129min

98: 3 Phrases to Annoy An Interviewer

98: 3 Phrases to Annoy An Interviewer

There are three phrases which create trouble in an interview: "I think that…" and "In my opinion…" and "But, if I look at my friends…" Not only are they defensive, and arrogant, they are also clear indicators where you are struggling in a case interview. When you use them in the wrong context, as explained in this podcast, they will make it difficult to pass the case.

14 Loka 201210min

Suosittua kategoriassa Liike-elämä ja talous

sijotuskasti
mimmit-sijoittaa
rss-rahapodi
psykopodiaa-podcast
ostan-asuntoja-podcast
leadcast
oppimisen-psykologia
rss-lahtijat
hyva-paha-johtaminen
rss-rahamania
inderespodi
rss-neuvottelija-sami-miettinen
kasvun-kipuja
rss-bisnesta-bebeja
rss-seuraava-potilas
yrittaja
lakicast
raharesepti
rss-merja-mahkan-rahat
rss-paasipodi