What Happens to Software Developers as AI Can Code?

What Happens to Software Developers as AI Can Code?

Our U.S. Software Analyst Sanjit Singh explains how AI is reshaping software development and why the future for the sector may be brighter – and busier – than ever.

Read more insights from Morgan Stanley.


----- Transcript -----


Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I’m Sanjit Singh, the U.S. Software Analyst at Morgan Stanley.

Today: how AI is transforming software and what that means for developers.

It’s Friday, October 24th, at 10am in New York.

There's been a lot of news stories and anecdotal accounts about AI taking over jobs, especially in the software industry. You may have heard of vibe coding, where people can use natural language prompts, guiding AI to build software applications. So yes, AI is creating a world where software writes itself. But at the same time, the demand for human creativity only grows.

The introduction of AI coding assistants has dramatically expanded what software can do, fueling a surge in both the volume of code and the complexity of projects. But instead of shrinking the developer workforce, AI is actually supporting continued growth in developer headcount, even as productivity soars.

We’re estimating the software development market will grow at a 20 percent compound annual growth rate, reaching $61 billion by 2029. And that’s up from $24 billion in 2024. And in terms of the developer population, [research] firms like IDC expect it to jump from 30 million paid developers in 2024 to 50 million by 2029 – that’s a 10 percent annual growth rate. Even the most conservative estimates, like those from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, see developer jobs growing roughly 2 percent per year through 2033, outpacing overall employment growth.

So, what does this mean for people behind the code?

AI isn’t replacing developers. It’s redefining them. Routine tasks are increasingly handled by AI agents, and this frees up developers to become curators, reviewers, architects, and most important problem-solvers.

The upshot? Companies may need fewer developers for repetitive work, but the overall demand for skilled engineers remains robust. As AI lowers the barrier to entry, the pool of people who can build software applications expands dramatically. But at the same time, the complexity and ambitions of projects rise, keeping experienced developers in high demand.

No doubt, AI coding tools are delivering real productivity gains. Some teams are reporting nearly doubling their code capacity and cutting pull request times in half after adopting AI assistants. Test coverage has increased sharply, resulting in 20 percent fewer production incidents for some organizations. But there is a catch with all this AI-generated code. It’s creating significant new bottlenecks downstream.

An example of this is code review, which is becoming a major pain point. Many organizations are experiencing pull request fatigue, with developers rubber-stamping changes just to keep up. Some teams now require three reviewers for AI-generated change, compared to just one before. And in terms of automated testing, systems are getting overwhelmed because every change made with AI sets off a complete round of test.

Now we estimate productivity gains from AI in software engineering at about 15–20 percent. But in complex projects, the gains are much lower, as the volume of new code often means more bugs and more rework – and hence more human developers.

So where do we go from here?

In our view, the future isn’t about fully autonomous software development. Instead, large enterprises are likely to favor an integrated approach, where AI agents and human developers work side by side. AI will automate more of the software development lifecycle. And that not only includes coding – which, coding typically accounts for 10-20 percent of the software development effort – but other areas like testing, security, and deployment. But humans will remain in the loop for oversight, design, and decision-making. And as software gets cheaper and faster to build, organizations won’t just do the same work with fewer people – they likely will do more.

In short, the need for skilled developers isn’t going away. But it’s definitely evolving. And in the age of AI, it’s not about man versus machine. It’s about man with machine. And so with more software, we see more developers.

Thanks for listening. If you enjoy the show, please leave us a review wherever you listen and share Thoughts on the Market with a friend or colleague today.

Jaksot(1497)

Michael Zezas: U.S.-China Trade and “The Prisoner’s Dilemma” (Replay)

Michael Zezas: U.S.-China Trade and “The Prisoner’s Dilemma” (Replay)

On today’s episode, Head of U.S. Public Policy Michael Zezas explains why a key principle of game theory could help investors navigate markets amid rising trade tensions.

28 Elo 20192min

Mike Wilson: On Recession Risks, Perspective Matters

Mike Wilson: On Recession Risks, Perspective Matters

On today’s podcast, would stock markets be full steam ahead with a healthy dose of Fed rate cuts or a lack of concerns over trade? Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson provides some much needed perspective on the rising risks of recession.

26 Elo 20193min

Andrew Sheets: All Hail the U.S. Consumer?

Andrew Sheets: All Hail the U.S. Consumer?

On today’s podcast, Chief Cross-Asset Strategist Andrew Sheets dives into a key debate on the U.S. economy: How could the risk of recession be rising when consumer activity is so strong?

23 Elo 20193min

Michael Zezas: Time to Rethink Allocations?

Michael Zezas: Time to Rethink Allocations?

On today’s podcast: Amid a bond rally and stock volatility, August has been quite a ride. How should investors think about their allocations? Analysis from Michael Zezas, Head of Public Policy and Municipal Strategy.

21 Elo 20192min

Mike Wilson: Back Next Week

Mike Wilson: Back Next Week

Mike Wilson is off this week. Please check back Wednesday for more Thoughts on the Market.

19 Elo 20196s

Andrew Sheets: The Yield Curve Inverts for a Reason

Andrew Sheets: The Yield Curve Inverts for a Reason

On today’s podcast, Chief Across-Asset Strategist Andrew Sheets shares three takeaways from this week’s inversion of the yield curve, historically the signal of a possible recession.

16 Elo 20193min

Michael Zezas: The Story Behind Falling Bond Yields

Michael Zezas: The Story Behind Falling Bond Yields

On today’s podcast, Head of U.S. Public Policy and Municipal Strategy Michael Zezas explains how the challenges facing U.S. farmers can provide insight on the current bond market.

14 Elo 20192min

Mike Wilson: Navigating the Q3 Dog Days

Mike Wilson: Navigating the Q3 Dog Days

On today’s podcast, Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson identifies several catalysts that could drive increased Q3 volatility. Are markets still facing a correction this quarter?

12 Elo 20193min

Suosittua kategoriassa Liike-elämä ja talous

sijotuskasti
psykopodiaa-podcast
mimmit-sijoittaa
rss-rahapodi
rss-rahamania
rss-lahtijat
herrasmieshakkerit
ostan-asuntoja-podcast
pomojen-suusta
hyva-paha-johtaminen
lakicast
rss-rikasta-elamaa
taloudellinen-mielenrauha
syo-nuku-saasta
rahapuhetta
rss-kaupan-tila
rss-neuvottelija-sami-miettinen
rss-markkinointiradio
rss-seuraava-potilas
rss-paasipodi