The Audacity of Immunity: Epstein's NPA And How The DOJ Defends the Indefensible (Part 2) (8/26/25)
The Department of Justice’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement is not a story of legal inevitability but one of institutional protection and betrayal. In 2008, prosecutors secretly struck a deal that gave Epstein and his co-conspirators immunity, hiding it from victims in direct violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. When a federal judge confirmed that violation in 2019, the DOJ had the chance to admit the deal was unlawful and void it. Instead, it doubled down, filing a 35-page defense insisting there was “no legal basis” to undo the sweetheart deal. At the same time, it staged a hollow push to release grand jury records it knew the courts would never unseal—then blamed the judiciary for the failure. This was theater, designed to shift blame while burying what the DOJ actually controls: the rotten deal it authored.The truth is that the DOJ could dismantle the non-prosecution agreement tomorrow. Legal tools exist: declare it void for violating victims’ rights, for being unconscionable, or for undermining public policy. But the department refuses because dismantling it would expose its own complicity, the reputations it protected, and the powerful network Epstein served. By clinging to the deal, the DOJ isn’t upholding the law—it’s shielding itself and the elite beneficiaries of Epstein’s world. The result is a department that masquerades as a guardian of justice while acting as caretaker of corruption. The ultimate betrayal is clear: the very institution meant to protect victims instead became a predator’s last line of defense.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
26 Elo 21min
The Audacity of Immunity: Epstein's NPA And How The DOJ Defends the Indefensible (Part 1) (8/26/25)
The Department of Justice’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement is not a story of legal inevitability but one of institutional protection and betrayal. In 2008, prosecutors secretly struck a deal that gave Epstein and his co-conspirators immunity, hiding it from victims in direct violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. When a federal judge confirmed that violation in 2019, the DOJ had the chance to admit the deal was unlawful and void it. Instead, it doubled down, filing a 35-page defense insisting there was “no legal basis” to undo the sweetheart deal. At the same time, it staged a hollow push to release grand jury records it knew the courts would never unseal—then blamed the judiciary for the failure. This was theater, designed to shift blame while burying what the DOJ actually controls: the rotten deal it authored.The truth is that the DOJ could dismantle the non-prosecution agreement tomorrow. Legal tools exist: declare it void for violating victims’ rights, for being unconscionable, or for undermining public policy. But the department refuses because dismantling it would expose its own complicity, the reputations it protected, and the powerful network Epstein served. By clinging to the deal, the DOJ isn’t upholding the law—it’s shielding itself and the elite beneficiaries of Epstein’s world. The result is a department that masquerades as a guardian of justice while acting as caretaker of corruption. The ultimate betrayal is clear: the very institution meant to protect victims instead became a predator’s last line of defense.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
26 Elo 11min
Mega Edition: Virginia Roberts And The Request To Exceed The Presumptive Deposition Limit (8/26/25)
In her further reply, Virginia Roberts Giuffre urged the court to allow additional depositions beyond the standard limit, arguing that such expanded testimony is essential given the seriousness and complexity of the abuse and trafficking allegations. She noted that Ghislaine Maxwell had deliberately withheld crucial information and failed to fully comply with discovery requests, and that the additional deposition time would permit her legal team to explore new evidence, fill gaps in Maxwell's testimony, and address inconsistencies critical to her claims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein list: See all 40 unsealed documents (foxnews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
26 Elo 45min
Mega Edition: Leon Black And The Reply Memo In Further Support Of Sanctions Against Wigdor (8/26/25)
In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, Defendant Leon Black’s reply memorandum emphasizes his argument for imposing sanctions against Wigdor LLP and Jeanne Christensen, alleging that their conduct in pursuing litigation was improper and abusive. Black contends that the lawsuit filed by Wigdor LLP is frivolous and part of a larger campaign to damage his reputation, relying on baseless allegations that lack factual and legal merit. He asserts that the firm and its attorneys acted in bad faith, leveraging the judicial system as a tool for public relations and personal vendettas. Black underscores his position that the actions taken by Wigdor LLP not only violated ethical obligations but also inflicted significant harm on him, warranting the court's intervention through sanctions.The reply memorandum further argues that Wigdor LLP’s tactics amount to malicious litigation designed to intimidate and coerce, undermining the integrity of the legal process. Black urges the court to impose sanctions to deter similar misconduct in the future and to preserve judicial resources. He emphasizes the importance of holding attorneys accountable for their professional conduct to maintain fairness and justice within the legal system. Black’s filing includes requests for monetary sanctions and other appropriate remedies, signaling the seriousness of his claims against Wigdor LLP and Christensen.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.65.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
26 Elo 22min
Mega Edition: Leon Black And The Reply Memo In Further Support Of Dismissing Jane Doe's Claim (8/25/25)
In the case of Doe v. Black (Case No. 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), Defendant Leon Black filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jane Doe's complaint. Black's legal team argues that Doe's allegations are time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations and fail to meet the necessary legal standards for the claims presented. They assert that the complaint lacks specific factual details to substantiate the accusations, rendering the claims insufficient under federal pleading requirements.Additionally, the defense contends that certain claims are legally deficient, as they do not establish essential elements required for such causes of action. Black's attorneys emphasize that the complaint does not provide adequate grounds to proceed and request the court to dismiss the case in its entirety. The reply memorandum serves to reinforce these points, aiming to persuade the court to rule in favor of dismissal.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.70.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
26 Elo 21min
Xana Kernodle's Father And Sister Speak Out In The 48 Hour Special
The father of Xana Kernodle, one of the victims who was murdered in Moscow, Idaho spoke with the media after autopsy results were released and he said that his daughter had bruises on her body that signified to the authorities that medical examiner that she fought back against her attacker. Police still have not named a suspect as they continue to investigate and look for evidence.(commercial at 7:04)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.foxnews.com/us/university-idaho-victims-father-says-xana-kernodle-had-bruises-put-up-fight-against-killerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
26 Elo 12min
The FBI Returns To The House Located At King Road For More Investigations
In a move that pretty much has come out of right field, the FBI has returned to the house where the murders in Moscow took place after turning the house over to the University and stating that their investigation at the home was completed.The home was set to be torn down, but after an outrcy from the parents, the university shelved its plans to raze the home to the ground until further notice.It would seem that that was a good idea as there is obviously still evidence at the home that the FBI has deemed relevant.(commercial at 6:31)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho college killings: FBI returns to house amid Kohberger case delay (newsnationnow.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
26 Elo 10min
Did Bryan Kohberger "Stage" The Crime Scene?
Crime scene staging refers to the intentional alteration or manipulation of a crime scene to mislead or throw off an investigation. This may include moving or rearranging evidence, planting false evidence, or creating a false scenario. Crime scene staging can be done in an attempt to conceal the true circumstances of a crime, such as making a murder appear to be a suicide or an accident. It is a form of criminal deception that can compromise the integrity of an investigation and obstruct justice.In this episode, we explore the possibility that the alleged Murderer Bryan Kohberger left the knife sheath there on purpose and if so, why would he do such a thing?to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders: How does criminology student leave crime scene with blood-dripping knife? | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
25 Elo 11min
