Gone But Not Forgotten: Ben Padilla

Bill Barr’s closed-door appearance before the House Oversight Committee was less an act of revelation and more of carefully dosed denial and damage control. While he acknowledged Epstein’s death resulted from a “perfect storm of screw-ups,” he denied awareness of missing surveillance footage or any so-called “client list” of associates. And despite widespread media focus on camera blind spots and unmonitored jail lapses, Barr insisted no evidence had emerged contradicting the official suicide determinationCritics argue that Barr’s testimony underscored the DOJ’s reluctance to fully own up to systemic failure. His assertion that he was “personally satisfied” with the outcome—and his resistance to acknowledging deeper institutional faults—fueled the notion that his role was protecting narrative more than uncovering truth. The hearing did little to quell concerns, instead leaving many in Congress and the public convinced there’s more yet to emerge.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Barr tells House he saw no evidence linking Trump to Epstein crimes: Comer | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

20 Elo 12min

The release of the Office of Inspector General’s report on Jeffrey Epstein’s death was marked by a delay so drawn out that it raised more questions than it answered. Epstein died in August 2019, yet the OIG report—supposedly the definitive account of the failures at the Metropolitan Correctional Center—did not surface until mid-2023. That nearly four-year gap created an atmosphere of suspicion, where the public was left to speculate in the absence of transparency. For a case of such magnitude, involving one of the most notorious prisoners in U.S. custody, the government’s inability—or unwillingness—to produce timely findings came across as stonewalling rather than due diligence. Each year that ticked by without answers only deepened the impression that the investigation was less about accountability and more about managing fallout.Critics have argued that the slow pace betrayed the very purpose of oversight. The OIG is meant to reassure the public that even the federal system can police itself, but when it takes nearly half a decade to confirm “errors” that were obvious within days of Epstein’s death—broken cameras, sleeping guards, falsified logs—the credibility of the process collapses. Instead of restoring confidence, the delay reinforced the perception that the system was dragging its feet, hoping the public’s outrage would fade. By the time the report finally arrived, many saw it as an afterthought: a bureaucratic box checked too late to matter, more a shield for officials than a search for truth.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein Death: Justice Department Still Hasn't Released Report (businessinsider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

20 Elo 42min

James Staley’s reply memorandum in support of his motion for summary judgment argues that he should not be held liable in the case brought by the Government of the United States Virgin Islands and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. He asserts that there is no evidence proving his involvement in or knowledge of any alleged misconduct, specifically emphasizing that the claims lack material facts directly linking him to any fraudulent activities or conspiracies. Staley requests the court to dismiss the claims against him based on the lack of substantive evidence, arguing that the legal standards for summary judgment have been.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.332.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

20 Elo 22min

At Sean "Diddy" Combs' infamous parties, celebrities became accustomed to certain signals that marked when it was time to leave before the night's activities spiraled into more debauched territory. Insiders revealed that around 2 to 3 a.m., the atmosphere at the parties began to shift dramatically. One clear indication that things were about to escalate was when young women would start shedding their clothes. For many high-profile attendees, this was the moment to discreetly exit.Those who stayed beyond this point encountered increasingly wild behavior, including drug use, explicit sexual activities, and the presence of sex workers willing to fulfill any request. Parties would continue into the early morning hours, often lasting until 7 a.m. According to sources, the atmosphere after 2 a.m. paled in comparison to the more extreme activities that would take place as the night progressed​.These parties have come under intense scrutiny following Diddy's arrest and the flood of allegations against him. Attorney Tony Buzbee, representing over 120 accusers, described the events as days-long drug-fueled sex parties, with some participants coerced into performing acts for blackmail purposes. The lawsuits, which involve both male and female victims, include accusations from individuals who were minors at the time​.As more victims come forward, the infamous nature of these gatherings—long an open secret in Hollywood—has been laid bare, with many former guests distancing themselves from Diddy amidst the mounting legal actions​.In our Second segment...Comedian Jeff Wittek recently shared his experience at one of Sean "Diddy" Combs' infamous parties during a discussion on his podcast, Jeff FM. Wittek described attending a "freak-off" party at a Miami mansion in 2010, which he originally thought was going to be a normal event. However, he quickly realized it was anything but ordinary when his then-girlfriend and her friend showed up in revealing lingerie.Wittek recounted witnessing "live sex" for the first time in his life, which shocked him. Although he did not participate, he admitted to getting drunk at the party. He described the mansion as sprawling and multi-leveled, with the atmosphere becoming stranger the higher he went. Wittek also mentioned that this party was one of many similar events Diddy hosted, which have since become part of the legal case against the music mogul, who faces numerous allegations of sex trafficking and racketeering.(commercial at 17:37)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' party guests left before things took turn (pagesix.com)Comedian Jeff Wittek saw 'live sex' at 'f--king crazy' Sean 'Diddy' Combs party filled with scantily clad women (pagesix.com)Attorney Tony Buzbee has recently revealed that the ongoing lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs will expose a "long list" of additional accomplices. These individuals are alleged to have been involved in or facilitated the abusive behavior at Diddy’s notorious parties, often referred to as "Freak Off" parties. Buzbee has stated that the names on this list will be shocking, implying that other powerful figures in the entertainment industry could be implicated.While Buzbee has not yet publicly named these accomplices, he has assured that they will be identified as the lawsuits proceed. He emphasized that his legal team is being meticulous in vetting the accusations to ensure accuracy before exposing these individuals. This development comes as part of a broader legal effort, with over 120 alleged victims coming forward, including men, women, and minors, with accusations dating back to the early 1990s​.(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsoure:Diddy 'list' of accomplices includes 'powerful hotel execs, bankers and pharmaceutical bosses, says lawyer | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

20 Elo 25min

Bryan Kohberger has asked for and recieved a second lawyer to help defend him as he faces the death penalty after being accused of a quadruple homicide. The request by Kohberger's team and the approval by the judge, certainly signals that we are headed for a capital case.We also take another look at Bryan Kohberger and his behavior on the night of his arrest and how that might play out in front of the jurors come trial time.(commercial at 6:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New details reveal what Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger was doing on morning he was arrested | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

20 Elo 11min

In the Bryan Kohberger trial, an expert report on survey research was prepared by Veronica Dahir. This report focuses on the methodologies and findings from surveys conducted to assess public opinion and awareness related to the case. The purpose of the report is to provide insights into how pre-trial publicity and public perceptions might impact the jury selection process and the defendant's right to a fair trial.Key Points of the Expert Report:Survey Methodology: Veronica Dahir outlines the survey design, sampling methods, and data collection procedures used to gather public opinion about the Bryan Kohberger case. This includes the selection of a representative sample, the framing of questions, and the statistical techniques employed to ensure reliability and validity.Public Awareness: The report examines the level of public awareness regarding the case. It assesses how widely the case has been reported in the media and the extent to which potential jurors might be exposed to information about the case.Pre-Trial Publicity: The report analyzes the nature and impact of pre-trial publicity on public opinion. It considers whether the media coverage has been neutral, biased, or sensationalized, and how this might influence potential jurors' perceptions of the defendant.Juror Impartiality: One of the key concerns addressed in the report is whether the pre-trial publicity has compromised the ability to select an impartial jury. The survey results are used to evaluate the potential biases and preconceived notions held by the public that could affect juror impartiality.Impact on Fair Trial: The report discusses the implications of the survey findings for ensuring a fair trial. It highlights the challenges of mitigating the effects of widespread media coverage and suggests strategies for addressing these issues during the jury selection process.Recommendations: Based on the survey findings, Veronica Dahir may provide recommendations for the court. These could include measures such as careful vetting of potential jurors, the use of detailed questionnaires during voir dire, and possible changes of venue to ensure a fair and unbiased jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

20 Elo 15min

Bryan Kohberger, accused of the November 2022 stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students, is scheduled for a court appearance today in Boise, Idaho. His defense team has filed motions to suppress key evidence, arguing that the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) violated his constitutional rights. They contend that law enforcement's application of IGG, which involves using DNA from public genealogy databases to identify potential suspects, was conducted without proper warrants, rendering the subsequent evidence inadmissible. Additionally, the defense claims that search warrants for Kohberger's phone, car, and residences were obtained through misleading information presented to the court.In a broader strategy to remove the death penalty as a potential sentence, Kohberger's attorneys have previously argued that capital punishment violates contemporary standards of decency and international treaties against prisoner torture. They also assert that prolonged periods on death row constitute cruel and unusual punishment. However, these arguments were rejected by the court in November 2024, allowing the death penalty to remain on the table if Kohberger is convicted.   The outcome of today's hearing could significantly impact the admissibility of critical evidence and the overall trajectory of the case as it moves toward trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger looks to dodge death penalty with Lori Vallow's playbook | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

20 Elo 12min

On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.eclBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

19 Elo 13min