The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's  Non Prosecution Agreement (Part 1-2) (10/29/25)

The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Part 1-2) (10/29/25)

The Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement (NPA) of 2007-08, reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), detailed how federal prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida negotiated a deal that effectively ended an active federal investigation into Epstein’s alleged trafficking and abuse of underage girls. The agreement granted broad immunity to Epstein and unnamed “potential co-conspirators,” allowed him to plead guilty to state charges instead of facing major federal sex-trafficking counts, and did so without informing or consulting the victims before the deal was executed. The OPR found that while no evidence of corruption or impermissible influence was uncovered, the decision represented “poor judgment” by the prosecutors.


Further, the report underscored significant procedural deficiencies: victims were not made aware of the NPA, the USAO did not meaningfully engage with them in accordance with the Crime Victims’ Rights Act’s principles, and the immunity granted in the NPA curtailed future federal prosecution of Epstein’s associates—even as investigation into other victims and broader criminal conduct may have persisted. In short, the OPR concluded that the case resolution was legally within the prosecutors’ discretion, but deeply flawed in its execution and fairness to those harmed.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

dl (justice.gov)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jaksot(1000)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 4)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 4)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

13 Loka 202512min

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 3)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 3)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

13 Loka 202512min

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 2)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 2)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Loka 202510min

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's  Motion To  Intervene (Part 1)

Bryan Kohberger And His Response To The AP's Motion To Intervene (Part 1)

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Loka 202510min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 3) (10/12/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 3) (10/12/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Loka 202516min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 2) (10/12/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 2) (10/12/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Loka 202514min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 1) (10/12/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 1) (10/12/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Loka 202514min

The Mega Edition: Sara Rivers And Her Allegations Against Diddy (Parts 3-4) (10/12/25)

The Mega Edition: Sara Rivers And Her Allegations Against Diddy (Parts 3-4) (10/12/25)

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

12 Loka 202522min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
aikalisa
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
tervo-halme
politiikan-puskaradio
rss-kuka-mina-olen
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
otetaan-yhdet
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
aihe
rss-podme-livebox
rikosmyytit
radio-antro
rss-tasta-on-kyse-ivan-puopolo-verkkouutiset
the-ulkopolitist
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka
linda-maria
eevan-politiikkapodi-totuuksia-suomesta