Alex Acosta Goes To Congress:   Transcripts From The Alex Acosta Deposition (Part 7) (11/1/25)

Alex Acosta Goes To Congress: Transcripts From The Alex Acosta Deposition (Part 7) (11/1/25)

When Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal trial might have been too risky because victims were “unreliable” and evidence was “thin.” In reality, federal prosecutors had a mountain of corroborating witness statements, corroborative travel logs, and sworn victim testimony—yet Acosta gave Epstein the deal of the century. The so-called non-prosecution agreement wasn’t justice; it was a backroom surrender, executed in secrecy, without even notifying the victims. When pressed on this, Acosta spun excuses about legal precedent and “jurisdictional confusion,” never once admitting the obvious: his office protected a rich, politically connected predator at the expense of dozens of trafficked girls.

Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jaksot(1000)

Bryan Kohberger And The Traffic Stops In The State Of Indiana

Bryan Kohberger And The Traffic Stops In The State Of Indiana

From the archives: 1-5-23There was some confusion as to why the Indiana police pulled Bryan Kohberger over in two separate incidents while he was traveling back to Pennsylvania from Washington. We are now learning more about why the traffic stop went down and who was behind the request to make it happen.Let's dive in!(commercial at 7:07)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:FBI asked police to pull Bryan Kohberger over to get images of hands: report (nypost.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

17 Loka 202510min

The Motion To Strike Death Penalty Against  Kohberger  On Grounds Of Speedy Trial (Part 3)

The Motion To Strike Death Penalty Against Kohberger On Grounds Of Speedy Trial (Part 3)

Bryan Kohberger’s defense team has filed multiple motions to strike the death penalty in his case, which involves the murders of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. Kohberger faces four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. The prosecution, led by Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson, intends to seek the death penalty, citing several aggravating factors, including the "heinous" nature of the crime and Kohberger's "disregard for human life".Kohberger’s attorneys argue that Idaho’s right to a speedy trial conflicts with their ability to effectively defend against the death penalty. They claim that insufficient time has been allocated for preparing a defense in such a complex and high-stakes case​. Additionally, the defense is challenging several of the aggravating factors used to justify the death penalty, arguing that they are unconstitutionally vague and do not offer clear guidelines for jurors to follow. One key argument is that the statute under which these aggravators fall does not meet constitutional standards.(commercial at 7:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:090524-Motion-to-Strike-Death-Penalty-Grounds-State-Speedy-Trial-Preventing.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

17 Loka 202512min

The Motion To Strike Death Penalty Against  Kohberger  On Grounds Of Speedy Trial (Part 2)

The Motion To Strike Death Penalty Against Kohberger On Grounds Of Speedy Trial (Part 2)

Bryan Kohberger’s defense team has filed multiple motions to strike the death penalty in his case, which involves the murders of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. Kohberger faces four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. The prosecution, led by Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson, intends to seek the death penalty, citing several aggravating factors, including the "heinous" nature of the crime and Kohberger's "disregard for human life".Kohberger’s attorneys argue that Idaho’s right to a speedy trial conflicts with their ability to effectively defend against the death penalty. They claim that insufficient time has been allocated for preparing a defense in such a complex and high-stakes case​. Additionally, the defense is challenging several of the aggravating factors used to justify the death penalty, arguing that they are unconstitutionally vague and do not offer clear guidelines for jurors to follow. One key argument is that the statute under which these aggravators fall does not meet constitutional standards.(commercial at 7:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:090524-Motion-to-Strike-Death-Penalty-Grounds-State-Speedy-Trial-Preventing.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

16 Loka 202511min

The Motion To Strike Death Penalty Against  Kohberger  On Grounds Of Speedy Trial (Part 1)

The Motion To Strike Death Penalty Against Kohberger On Grounds Of Speedy Trial (Part 1)

Bryan Kohberger’s defense team has filed multiple motions to strike the death penalty in his case, which involves the murders of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. Kohberger faces four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. The prosecution, led by Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson, intends to seek the death penalty, citing several aggravating factors, including the "heinous" nature of the crime and Kohberger's "disregard for human life".Kohberger’s attorneys argue that Idaho’s right to a speedy trial conflicts with their ability to effectively defend against the death penalty. They claim that insufficient time has been allocated for preparing a defense in such a complex and high-stakes case​. Additionally, the defense is challenging several of the aggravating factors used to justify the death penalty, arguing that they are unconstitutionally vague and do not offer clear guidelines for jurors to follow. One key argument is that the statute under which these aggravators fall does not meet constitutional standards.(commercial at 7:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:090524-Motion-to-Strike-Death-Penalty-Grounds-State-Speedy-Trial-Preventing.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

16 Loka 202514min

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 6) (10/16/25)

The Man in Epstein's Cockpit: Larry Visoski’s 2009 Deposition (Part 6) (10/16/25)

In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton & Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

16 Loka 202511min

Epstein Survivors Hit Bank of America And Bank Of NY Mellon With A Lawsuit (10/16/25)

Epstein Survivors Hit Bank of America And Bank Of NY Mellon With A Lawsuit (10/16/25)

A woman, filing under the pseudonym Jane Doe, has sued Bank of America and Bank of New York Mellon in Manhattan federal court, accusing them of playing a financial role in enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation. She alleges that Epstein and his associates used her Bank of America account—opened at the direction of Epstein’s accountant—as a conduit for rent payments, payroll for a “sham company,” and other transfers. The complaint claims the banks ignored obvious red flags, failed to file required Suspicious Activity Reports in a timely fashion, and thereby breached their duty to report illicit financial flows.In the case against BNY Mellon, the lawsuit claims the bank processed as much as $378 million in transactions linked to a modeling agency (MC2) allegedly used by Epstein and his associates in trafficking operations. The complaint contends that BNY Mellon either turned a blind eye to or actively facilitated these flows, benefiting from them financially while violating anti-trafficking and anti–money laundering norms. The plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and class-action status, arguing that the banks “knowingly benefited” from Epstein’s scheme and should be held accountable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bank of America, BNY sued over alleged ties to Jeffrey EpsteinBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

16 Loka 202518min

Diddy Gets Slammed With Suffocating Post Release Conditions (10/16/25)

Diddy Gets Slammed With Suffocating Post Release Conditions (10/16/25)

After his sentencing, Sean “Diddy” Combs will face extremely restrictive conditions during a five-year supervised release period following his roughly 50-month prison term. These conditions include mandatory outpatient treatment for both substance abuse and mental health, adherence to all prescribed medications, and enrollment in a domestic violence intervention program. He is also permanently barred from owning or possessing any firearms or destructive devices. The supervision is designed to tightly control his movements and behavior, ensuring compliance through regular check-ins and monitoring.Beyond the behavioral conditions, Combs will also be subject to deeply invasive oversight measures. He must submit to warrantless searches of his person, residence, vehicles, and electronic devices at any time. He is prohibited from contacting any victims or witnesses involved in his case and must comply with strict financial transparency requirements, allowing authorities to review his records and transactions. These post-release conditions reflect the government’s intent to keep him under a microscope long after his prison term ends, signaling that his punishment and scrutiny will continue for years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs faces strict conditions after his 50-month prison sentenceBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

16 Loka 202510min

Prince William Plans To Send Prince Andrew Into Exile (10/16/25)

Prince William Plans To Send Prince Andrew Into Exile (10/16/25)

Reports circulating across multiple outlets claim that Prince William is preparing to exile Prince Andrew from royal life once he takes the throne. Insiders say William views Andrew as a permanent stain on the family’s reputation and intends to cut him off completely—no public duties, no ceremonial roles, and no return to Windsor’s inner circle. According to those close to royal planning, William has already made it clear to his father that Andrew’s place in the monarchy is finished and that any remaining privileges will be revoked once William wears the crown. The move is being described as both a generational reset and a brutal act of damage control designed to protect the crown from Andrew’s scandals.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prince Andrew's leaked Epstein emails spark major crisis for royal family: expert | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

16 Loka 202512min

Suosittua kategoriassa Politiikka ja uutiset

aikalisa
rss-ootsa-kuullut-tasta
ootsa-kuullut-tasta-2
tervo-halme
rss-vaalirankkurit-podcast
et-sa-noin-voi-sanoo-esittaa
rss-podme-livebox
rss-kuka-mina-olen
politiikan-puskaradio
rikosmyytit
otetaan-yhdet
aihe
rss-merja-mahkan-rahat
rss-raha-talous-ja-politiikka
rss-tasta-on-kyse-ivan-puopolo-verkkouutiset
radio-antro
rss-hyvaa-huomenta-bryssel
rss-50100-podcast
rss-skn-parhaat