Is this investigation A Search For Truth Or An Attempt To Bury The Epstein’s Files Forever? (Part 3) (11/17/25)

Ghislaine Maxwell’s legal team sought to keep certain deposition documents sealed, arguing that unsealing them would compromise the integrity of the jury pool by potentially tainting prospective jurors' opinions. In response, prosecutors invoked precedent cases—specifically the trials of Charles Manson and Jimmy Hoffa—asserting these defendants nevertheless received fair trials despite intense public attention and sensational judicial proceedingsThe comparison was used to underline that high-profile, widely publicized defendants do not automatically foreclose the possibility of impartial juries. Maxwell’s team maintained that the graphic and sensational nature of the deposition disclosures could unduly sway public sentiment, whereas prosecutors countered by pointing to similar circumstances in other high-profile cases where justice was upheld.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8718195/Ghislaine-Maxwell-compared-Charles-Manson-court-papers.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

5 Syys 17min

In 2020, an accuser known as “Jane Doe” filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein’s estate and Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging she was recruited and sexually abused as a minor. According to her attorney, estate lawyers engaged in a “concerted and coordinated effort” to pressure her into the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Fund—a voluntary, non-adversarial program—rather than allowing her claim to proceed through the courts. Her attorney further claimed that the estate had “resorted to belittling” her simply for resisting, asserting she was being penalized for exercising her legal right to pursue the claim in court.Estate attorney Mary Grace Metcalfe formally denied these allegations, stating in court that they were “completely untrue” and that the claim of belittlement reflected a lack of good faith from the plaintiff’s side. Meanwhile, the judge handling the case delayed a deposition of Epstein’s co-executor, Darren Indyke, pending considerations over a motion to stay the case. The ongoing dispute highlighted tensions between pursuing judicial redress and channeling claims into the estate’s established compensation structure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

5 Syys 23min

Juliette Bryant, a South African model, asserts that Epstein began targeting her in 2002 when she was just 20 years old, under the guise of launching her modeling career after being introduced to him by an industry contact. She claims that Epstein trafficked her across multiple locations—New York, the U.S. Virgin Islands (including Little Saint James), Paris, and his New Mexico properties—where she was subjected to repeated sexual abuse, at times reportedly up to three times per day. Bryant describes being trapped in confined, fear-inducing environments, isolated on the island, coerced into nude photo sessions, and psychologically manipulated through emotional control and explicit threats—all with the assistance of Ghislaine MaxwellAdditionally, Bryant has publicly stated that her name was omitted from Jeffrey Epstein’s flight logs, despite her presence on his private planes. She contends that this intentional exclusion served to erase her presence from official records and obscure her trafficking, effectively leaving her disappearance unnoticed if she had gone missing.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10672663/Epstein-victim-reveals-island-like-factory-raped-three-times-day.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

5 Syys 27min

The Jeffrey Epstein scandal stands as one of the most glaring failures of the American justice system, a case where victims were silenced, a secret non-prosecution agreement shielded powerful enablers, and federal custody ended in Epstein’s death under suspicious negligence. Despite civil settlements, oversight reports, and the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell, the story remains fragmented, unresolved, and tainted by mistrust. The Department of Justice is compromised by its own history in the case, and every unanswered question deepens public suspicion. A federally appointed special counsel is the only mechanism capable of cutting through that distrust—armed with subpoena power, independence from political pressure, and the mandate to follow the evidence wherever it leads.That need is only magnified by the President’s shocking dismissal of the scandal as a “hoax.” Such rhetoric retraumatizes survivors, emboldens enablers, and corrodes faith in the rule of law. When the highest office mocks the reality of child exploitation, independence becomes not just preferable but mandatory. A special counsel would separate truth from politics, provide finality where there has only been denial, and ensure that victims receive recognition instead of erasure. Without such independence, every decision will remain suspect, every survivor’s voice overshadowed, and the system itself further discredited. The choice is stark: let denial bury justice, or appoint a special counsel to prove that no power, no denial, and no president stands above the truth.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

5 Syys 16min

The Jeffrey Epstein scandal stands as one of the most glaring failures of the American justice system, a case where victims were silenced, a secret non-prosecution agreement shielded powerful enablers, and federal custody ended in Epstein’s death under suspicious negligence. Despite civil settlements, oversight reports, and the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell, the story remains fragmented, unresolved, and tainted by mistrust. The Department of Justice is compromised by its own history in the case, and every unanswered question deepens public suspicion. A federally appointed special counsel is the only mechanism capable of cutting through that distrust—armed with subpoena power, independence from political pressure, and the mandate to follow the evidence wherever it leads.That need is only magnified by the President’s shocking dismissal of the scandal as a “hoax.” Such rhetoric retraumatizes survivors, emboldens enablers, and corrodes faith in the rule of law. When the highest office mocks the reality of child exploitation, independence becomes not just preferable but mandatory. A special counsel would separate truth from politics, provide finality where there has only been denial, and ensure that victims receive recognition instead of erasure. Without such independence, every decision will remain suspect, every survivor’s voice overshadowed, and the system itself further discredited. The choice is stark: let denial bury justice, or appoint a special counsel to prove that no power, no denial, and no president stands above the truth.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

5 Syys 12min

Thomas Massie has been steadily pressing forward with his discharge petition to force a floor vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act. As of early September, he was just two Republican signatures short of the 218 needed to succeed. While Massie has managed to secure a handful of Republican allies, including figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene, Nancy Mace, and Lauren Boebert, most of the GOP has resisted. Party leadership and the White House have actively discouraged members from supporting Massie’s effort, favoring their own oversight mechanisms to control how and when the Epstein files might be released. This leaves Massie in a precarious spot—close enough to create serious pressure, but still vulnerable to stalling tactics within his own party.At the same time, Democrats have unified around the petition, with every member expected to sign. More importantly, the incoming Democrats from recent special elections have already indicated they will add their signatures as soon as they’re sworn in, potentially putting Massie over the top even without additional Republican support. This looming influx of Democratic votes creates a strategic safety net: even if GOP members hold back, the math still leans in Massie’s favor. In effect, the new Democratic arrivals could be the deciding factor that pushes the discharge petition across the finish line, ensuring a vote happens despite Republican reluctance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Incoming Dems could move Thomas Massie's Epstein discharge petition over finish lineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

5 Syys 13min

Joseph Schnitt, a Department of Justice official, was recently caught in a sting operation by a James O’Keefe operative posing as a date on a dating app. During the secretly recorded meeting, Schnitt claimed the DOJ planned to redact Republican names from the Jeffrey Epstein files while leaving liberal names visible, fueling suspicions of political bias in the release of the documents. He also alleged that Ghislaine Maxwell’s transfer to a minimum-security prison was essentially a favor to keep her quiet, and described internal conflict between Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino over whether to release the files.After the footage surfaced, the DOJ quickly distanced itself from Schnitt’s comments, calling them “personal views based on media reports” with “absolutely zero bearing on reality.” Schnitt himself insisted he didn’t know he was being recorded and that he was speaking offhand, not offering insider information. Still, the incident embarrassed the DOJ, provided fresh fuel for critics of the Epstein cover-up, and underscored just how easily an official could spill sensitive claims in an unguarded moment.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Top DOJ Official Spills Jeffrey Epstein Cover-Up Plans to HoneytrapBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

5 Syys 14min

The Ghislaine Maxwell trial, held in late 2021 in federal court in New York, centered on her alleged role as Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirator in a sex trafficking ring that preyed on underage girls for over a decade. Prosecutors accused Maxwell of grooming minors, gaining their trust, and then facilitating or participating in their abuse at the hands of Epstein between 1994 and 2004. The government’s case included testimony from four women, some of whom described in painful detail how Maxwell recruited them as teenagers under the guise of mentorship or financial assistance, only to manipulate them into sexual encounters with Epstein. Flight logs, photographs, and household staff testimony were used to place Maxwell at various Epstein properties and show her long-standing involvement in his lifestyle and operations.Maxwell’s defense team attempted to cast her as a scapegoat, arguing that she was being punished for Epstein’s crimes following his 2019 death in federal custody. They challenged the credibility of the accusers, questioned their motives, and pointed to the time gaps between the alleged crimes and the trial. Ultimately, the jury found Maxwell guilty on five of six federal charges, including sex trafficking of a minor, and not guilty on one count of enticing a minor to travel for illegal sex acts. The conviction marked a rare moment of accountability in a case that had long been plagued by cover-ups, prosecutorial failures, and elite protection. It also opened the door to further scrutiny of Epstein’s network, although many key figures remain untouched.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

5 Syys 42min