2026 U.S. Outlook: The Bull Market’s Underappreciated Narrative

2026 U.S. Outlook: The Bull Market’s Underappreciated Narrative

Our CIO and Chief U.S. Equity Strategist Mike Wilson explains why he continues to hold on to an out-of-consensus view of a growth positive 2026, despite near-term risks.


Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Mike Wilson, Morgan Stanley’s CIO and Chief U.S. Equity Strategist.

Today I’ll discuss our outlook for 2026 that we published earlier this week.

It’s Wednesday, Nov 19th at 6:30 am in New York.

So, let’s get after it.

2026 is a continuation of the story we have been telling for the past year.

Looking back to a year ago, our U.S. equity outlook was for a challenging first half, followed by a strong second half. At the time of publication, this was an out of consensus stance. Many expected a strong first half, as President Trump took office for his second term. And then a more challenging second half due to the return of inflation.

We based our differentiated view on the notion that policy sequencing in the new Trump administration would intentionally be growth negative to start. We likened the strategy to a new CEO choosing to ‘kitchen sink’ the results in an effort to clear the decks for a new growth positive strategy. We thought that transition would come around mid-year.

The U.S. economy had much less slack when President Trump took office the second time, compared to the first time he came into office. And this was the main reason we thought it was likely to be sequenced differently. Earnings revisions breadth and other cyclical indicators were also in a phase of deceleration at the end of 2024. In contrast, at the beginning of 2017—when we were out of consensus bullish—earnings revisions breadth and many cyclical gauges were starting to reaccelerate after the manufacturing and commodity downturn of 2015/2016.

Looking back on this year, this cadence of policy sequencing did broadly play out—it just happened faster and more dramatically than we expected. Our views on the policy front still appear to be out of consensus. Many industry watchers are questioning whether policies enacted this year will ultimately lead to better growth going forward, especially for the average stock. From our perspective, the policy choices being made are growth positive for 2026 and are largely in line with our ‘run it hot’ thesis.

There’s another factor embedded in our more constructive take. April marked the end of a rolling recession that began three years prior. The final stages were a recession in government thanks to DOGE, a rate of change trough in expectations around AI CapEx growth and trade policy, and a recession in consumer services that is still ongoing. In short, we believe a new bull market and rolling recovery began in April which means it’s still early days, and not obvious—especially for many lagging parts of the economy and market. That is the opportunity.

The missing ingredient for the typical broadening in stock performance that happens in a new business cycle is rate cuts. Normally, the Fed would have cut rates more in this type of weakening labor market. But due to the imbalances and distortions of the COVID cycle, we think the Fed is later than normal in easing policy, and that has held back the full rotation toward early cycle winners.

Ironically, the government shutdown has weakened the economy further, but has also delayed Fed action due to the lack of labor data releases. This is a near-term risk to our bullish 12-month forecasts should delays in the data continue, or lagging labor releases do not corroborate the recent weakness in non-govt-related jobs data.

In our view, this type of labor market weakness coupled with the administration's desire to ‘run it hot’ means that, ultimately, the Fed is likely to deliver more dovish policy than the market currently expects. It's really just a question of timing. But that is a near-term risk for equity markets and why many stocks have been weaker recently.

In short, we believe a new bull market began in April with the end of a rolling recession and bear market. Remember the S&P [500] was down 20 percent and the average S&P stock was down more than 30 percent into April.

This narrative remains underappreciated, and we think there is significant upside in earnings over the next year as the recovery broadens and operating leverage returns with better volumes and pricing in many parts of the economy. Our forecasts reflect this upside to earnings which is another reason why many stocks are not as expensive as they appear despite our acknowledgement that some areas of the market may appear somewhat frothy.

For the S&P 500, our 12-month target is now 7800 which assumes 17 percent earnings growth next year and a very modest contraction in valuation from today’s levels. Our favorite sectors include Financials, Industrials, and Healthcare. We are also upgrading Consumer Discretionary to overweight and prefer Goods over Services for the first time since 2021.

Another relative trade we like is Software over Semiconductors given the extreme relative underperformance of that pair and positioning at this point. Finally, we like small caps over large for the first time since March 2021, as the early cycle broadening in earnings combined with a more accommodative Fed provides the backdrop we have been patiently waiting for.

We hope you enjoy our detailed report published earlier this week and find it helpful as you navigate a changing marketplace on many levels.

Thanks for tuning in. Let us know what you think by leaving us a review. And if you find Thoughts on the Market worthwhile, tell a friend or colleague to try it out!

Jaksot(1504)

Michael Zezas: Why ‘Slowbalization’ May Be Feeding Trade Tensions

Michael Zezas: Why ‘Slowbalization’ May Be Feeding Trade Tensions

Head of U.S. Public Policy Michael Zezas says that independent of current trade concerns, the trend toward globalized supply chains is fading, as companies respond both to political and market incentives.

12 Kesä 20193min

Mike Wilson: Why Trade Tensions Are Only Part of the Story

Mike Wilson: Why Trade Tensions Are Only Part of the Story

Investors and media have been hyper-focused on trade and Fed policymaking. But according to Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson, some key economic data points are the real story to watch.

10 Kesä 20193min

Andrew Sheets: For Markets, Signs, Signs, Everywhere Signs

Andrew Sheets: For Markets, Signs, Signs, Everywhere Signs

On today’s podcast, Chief Cross-asset Strategist Andrew Sheets says that while discussion of a Fed rate cut may have helped markets rebound, several longer-term signals are troubling.

7 Kesä 20193min

Michael Zezas: U.S.-Mexico Trade Adds to Recession Risks

Michael Zezas: U.S.-Mexico Trade Adds to Recession Risks

On today’s episode, Head of U.S. Public Policy Michael Zezas says further escalation of trade tensions could come with a cost. Are the risks of a global recession increasing?

5 Kesä 20192min

Mike Wilson: U.S. Equities: How Much Correction is Ahead?

Mike Wilson: U.S. Equities: How Much Correction is Ahead?

On today’s TOTM, Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson says trade tensions may be rattling markets, but the fundamentals are the real culprit behind the correction. So where are equities headed next?

3 Kesä 20193min

Andrew Sheets: Fed to the Rescue? Maybe Not.

Andrew Sheets: Fed to the Rescue? Maybe Not.

On today’s podcast, Chief Cross Asset Strategist Andrew Sheets examines the notion that the Fed stands willing and able to reduce interest rates and support markets.

31 Touko 20193min

Michael Zezas: U.S.-China Trade and “The Prisoner’s Dilemma”

Michael Zezas: U.S.-China Trade and “The Prisoner’s Dilemma”

On today’s episode, Head of U.S. Public Policy Michael Zezas explains why a key principle of game theory could help investors navigate markets amid rising trade tensions.

29 Touko 20192min

Mike Wilson: Are U.S. Economic Indicators Flashing Yellow?

Mike Wilson: Are U.S. Economic Indicators Flashing Yellow?

On today’s podcast, Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson says although some investors may assume recent equities volatility is based on trade worries, some key data points may be the real culprit.

27 Touko 20193min

Suosittua kategoriassa Liike-elämä ja talous

sijotuskasti
mimmit-sijoittaa
psykopodiaa-podcast
rss-rahapodi
ostan-asuntoja-podcast
hyva-paha-johtaminen
rss-lahtijat
oppimisen-psykologia
pomojen-suusta
rss-rahamania
lakicast
rss-neuvottelija-sami-miettinen
herrasmieshakkerit
rss-ammattipodcast
rss-yritys-ja-erehdys
rss-rahataito-podcast
inderespodi
rss-myynti-ei-ole-kirosana
rahapuhetta
rss-inderes